Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Understanding cooperation through fitness interdependence

Some acts of human cooperation are not easily explained by traditional models of kinship or reciprocity. Fitness interdependence may provide a unifying conceptual framework, in which cooperation arises from the mutual dependence for survival or reproduction, as occurs among mates, risk-pooling partnerships and brothers-in-arms.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Interdependence is pervasive in human societies and it often includes mutual dependence for survival and/or reproduction.
Fig. 2: Fitness interdependence can be conceptualized as ‘rising and falling together’ in terms of success in replicating genes.

References

  1. 1.

    Brown, S. L. Evolutionary Origins of Investment: Testing a Theory of Close Relationships. PhD dissertation, Arizona State Univ. (1999).

  2. 2.

    Kelley, H. H. & Thibaut, J. W. Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence (John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1978).

  3. 3.

    Roberts, G. Anim. Behav. 70, 901–908 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Whitehouse, H., McQuinn, B., Buhrmester, M., & Swann, W. B. Jr. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17783–17785 (2014).

  5. 5.

    Cronk, L. et al. in Global Perspectives on Long-Term Community Resource Management (eds Lozny, L. & McGovern, T.) (Springer, New York, NY, in the press).

  6. 6.

    Aktipis, C. A. J. Theor. Biol. 231, 249–260 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Noe, R. & Hammerstein, P. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 35, 1–11 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. Proc. Br. Acad. 88, 119–143 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Balliet, D., Tybur, J. M. & Van Lange, P. A. M. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 21, 361–388 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Curry, O. S. in The Evolution of Morality (eds Shackelford, T. K. & Hansen, R. D.) 27–51 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the participants in the Fitness Interdependence Workshop held at Arizona State University in February 2017, including G. Roberts and H. Wasielewski who provided valuable feedback on this manuscript. We also acknowledge the support of the Department of Psychology at Arizona State University and the Human Generosity Project. We also thank S. Brown for valuable comments and feedback on this manuscript. The work of A.A. and L.C. was supported by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation (grant number 46724) and the work of D.B. was supported by European Research Council Starting Grant (number 635356). Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Athena Aktipis.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aktipis, A., Cronk, L., Alcock, J. et al. Understanding cooperation through fitness interdependence. Nat Hum Behav 2, 429–431 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0378-4

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing