Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

VISUAL PERCEPTION

Sensory category learning

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 01 August 2018

This article has been updated

Category learning requires finding commonalities between objects in spite of their differences in appearance. While generally thought to rely on abstract representations, far removed from the sensory input, category learning may instead involve early sensory processes more than expected.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Example of rule-based versus information-integration category learning.

Change history

  • 01 August 2018

    In the version of this News & Views originally published, the following sentence was mistakenly omitted from the Fig. 1 caption: ‘Gabor patches generated from https://www.cogsci.nl/gabor-generator under a Creative Commons licence CC BY 4.0.’ This has now been corrected.

References

  1. Davies, I. R. L, Sowden, P. T., Hammond, S. M. & Ansell, J. Expertise in categorizing mammograms: a perceptual or conceptual skill? In Proc. SPIE 2166, Medical Imaging 1994: Image Perception (SPIE, 1994).

  2. Sowden, P. T., Pauli, R., Roling, P., Davies, I. R. L. & Hammond, S. M. Improvement in screening performance: the importance of appropriate feedback in screening mammography. In Proc. SPIE 2712, Medical Imaging 1996: Image Perception (SPIE, 1996).

  3. Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U. & Waldron, E. M. Psychol. Rev. 105, 442–481 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ashby, F. G., Ell, S. W. & Waldron, E. M. Mem. Cogn. 31, 1114–1125 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosedahl, L. A., Eckstein, M. P. & Asby, F. G. Nat. Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0370-z (2018).

  6. Karni, A. & Sagi, D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 4966–4700 (1991).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mollon, J. D. & Danilova, M. V. Spat. Vis. 10, 51–58 (1996).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Xiao, L. Q. et al. Curr. Biol. 18, 1922–1926 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Pollmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pollmann, S. Sensory category learning. Nat Hum Behav 2, 448–449 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0377-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0377-5

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing