Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Folk theories of nationality and anti-immigrant attitudes

Subjects

Abstract

Nationality governs almost every aspect of our lives, including where we may live and travel, as well as our opportunities for education, healthcare and work. It is a common-sense social category that guides us in making inferences about the social world1,2,3,4. Nationalism has been extensively studied within the social5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16 and cognitive sciences17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25, but there has been little empirical investigation into folk theories regarding what determines someone’s nationality. In experiments carried out in the United States and India (N = 2,745), we used a variant of the switched-at-birth task26,27,28,29,30,31 to investigate the extent to which people believe that nationality is determined by biology or is a malleable social identity that can be acquired32,33,34. We find that folk theories of nationality seem remarkably flexible. Depending on the framing of the question, people report believing that nationality is either fluid or fixed at birth. Our results demonstrate that people from different cultures with different experiences of migration and different explicit stereotypes of their own nation may share similar folk theories about nationality. Moreover, these theories may shape attitudes towards immigrants—an important public-policy issue35,36,37. Belief that nationality is malleable is associated with more positive attitudes towards immigrants even when holding ideology constant.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Nationality ratings and anti-immigrant attitudes.
Fig. 2: Responses to the switched-at-birth task were similar across cultural contexts and experimental variations.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Verdery, K. Whither. ‘nation’ and ‘nationalism’? Daedalus 122, 37–46 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Billig, M. Banal Nationalism (SAGE, London, 1995).

  3. Brubaker, R. Ethnicity, race, and nationalism. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 35, 21–42 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fox, J. E. & Miller-Idriss, C. Everyday nationhood. Ethnicities 8, 536–563 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Seton-Watson, H. Nations and States: An Enquiry into the Origins of Nations and the Politics of Nationalism (Taylor & Francis, London, 1977).

  6. Phillips, P. D. & Wallerstein, I. National and world identities and the interstate system. Millennium 14, 159–171 (1985).

  7. White, R. Inventing Australia: Images and Identity, 1688-1980 (Allen & Unwin, Sydney, 1981).

  8. Balibar, E. The nation form: history and ideology. Rev. Fed. Am. Health Syst. 13, 329–361 (1990).

  9. Malesevic, S. Nation-States and Nationalisms: Organization, Ideology and Solidarity (Polity, Cambridge, 2013).

  10. Gellner, E. Nations and Nationalism (Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY, 2008).

  11. Anderson, B. Imagined Communities, rev. edn (Verso, London, 1991).

  12. Hobsbawm, E. J. Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2012).

  13. Smith, A. D. Ethno-symbolism and Nationalism: A Cultural Approach (Routledge, New York, NY, 2009).

  14. Brubaker, R. in The State of the Nation: Ernest Gellner and the Theory of Nationalism (ed. Hall, J.) 272–305 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1998).

  15. Wimmer, A. & Glick Schiller, N. Methodological nationalism and beyond: nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Glob. Netw. 2, 301–334 (2002).

  16. Connor, W. Ethnonationalism. In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity, and Nationalism (eds Stone, J. et al.) (John Wiley & Sons, Malden, MA and Oxford, 2015); https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663202.wberen301

  17. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J. & Sanford, R. N. The Authoritarian Personality (Springer, New York, NY, 1950).

  18. Kelman, H. C. in International Politics and Foreign Policy rev. edn (ed. Rosenau, J. N.) 276–288 (Free Press, New York, NY, 1969).

  19. Tajfel, H. Social Identity and Intergroup Relations (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2010).

  20. Kosterman, R. & Feshbach, S. Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Polit. Psychol. 10, 257–274 (1989).

  21. Bar-Tal, D. Patriotism as fundamental beliefs of group members. Polit. Individ. 3, 45–62 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schatz, R. T., Staub, E. & Lavine, H. On the varieties of national attachment: blind versus constructive patriotism. Polit. Psychol. 20, 151–174 (1999).

  23. Mummendey, A., Klink, A. & Brown, R. Nationalism and patriotism: national identification and out-group rejection. Br. J. Social. Psychol. 40, 159–172 (2001).

  24. Karasawa, M. Patriotism, nationalism, and internationalism among Japanese citizens: an etic–emic approach. Polit. Psychol. 23, 645–666 (2002).

  25. Ditlmann, R. K., Purdie-Vaughns, V. & Eibach, R. P. Heritage- and ideology-based national identities and their implications for immigrant citizen relations in the United States and in Germany. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 35, 395–405 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gelman, S. A. & Wellman, H. M. Insides and essences: early understandings of the non-obvious. Cognition 38, 213–244 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gil-White, F. Are ethnic groups biological ‘species’ to the human brain? Curr. Anthropol. 42, 515–553 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Astuti, R. Are we all natural dualists? A cognitive developmental approach. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 7, 429–447 (2001).

  29. Ross, N., Medin, D., Coley, J. D. & Atran, S. Cultural and experiential differences in the development of folkbiological induction. Cogn. Dev. 18, 25–47 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sperber, D. & Hirschfeld, L. A. The cognitive foundations of cultural stability and diversity. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 40–46 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kanovsky, M. Essentialism and folksociology: ethnicity again. J. Cogn. Cult. 7, 241–281 (2007).

  32. Brubaker, R., Loveman, M. & Stamatov, P. Ethnicity as cognition. Theory Soc. 33, 31–64 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Reicher, S. & Hopkins, N. Self and Nation (SAGE, London, 2000).

  34. Zerubavel, E. Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, 2009).

  35. Castles, S., de Haas, H. & Miller, M. J. The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World (Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY, 2013).

  36. International Migration and Development: Report of the Secretary-General UN A/71/296 (United Nations, 2016).

  37. Richerson, P. J. & Boyd, R. Being human: Migration: An engine for social change. Nature 456, 456877a (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Allport, G. W. The Nature of Prejudice (Addison, New York, NY, 1954).

  39. Barth, F. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference (Universitetsforlaget, Bergen, 1969).

  40. Foucault, M. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Vintage Books, New York, NY, 1975).

  41. Bauman, Z. Soil, blood and identity. Sociol. Rev. 40, 675–701 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Fox, J. E. & Miller-Idriss, C. The ‘here and now’ of everyday nationhood. Ethnicities 8, 573–576 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rousseau, J. J. Emile (trans. Foxley, B.) (Original work published 1762) (Dent, London, 1974).

  44. Herder, J. G. Spirit of Hebrew Poetry Vol. 1 & 2 (trans. Marsh, J.) (Edward Smith, Burlington, VT, 1833).

  45. Renan, J. E. What is a Nation? (Routledge, London, 1990).

  46. Luxemburg, R. The National Question: Selected Writings by Rosa Luxemburg (NYU Press, New York, NY, 1908).

  47. Nietzsche, F. Beyond Good and Evil (Penguin, London, 2003).

  48. Schildkraut, D. J. Americanism in the Twenty-First Century: Public Opinion in the Age of Immigration (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, NY, 2010).

  49. Kristeva, J. Nations Without Nationalism (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, NY, 1993).

  50. Ignatieff, M. Blood and Belonging: Journeys into the New Nationalism (Random House, New York, NY, 2010).

  51. Wimmer, A. Ethnic Boundary Making: Institutions, Power, Networks. (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2013).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  52. Net migration (World Bank, accessed 14 November 2017); https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SM.POP.NETM

  53. WVS World values survey. Wave 5, 2005–2008 (2005).

  54. Devos, T. & Banaji, M. R. American=white? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 88, 447 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Esses, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., Jackson, L. M. & Armstrong, T. L. The immigration dilemma: the role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. J. Soc. Issues 57, 389–412 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. Voting with your feet: payoff biased migration and the evolution of group beneficial behavior. J. Theor. Biol. 257, 331–339 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Henrich, J. Cultural group selection, coevolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 53, 3–35 (2004).

  58. Alexander, R. The Biology of Moral Systems (Routledge, New York, NY, 2017).

  59. Geertz, C. Old Societies and New States: The Quest for Modernity in Asia and Africa (Free Press of Glencoe: New York, NY, 1963).

  60. Medin, D. L. Concepts and conceptual structure. Am. Psychol. 44, 1469–1481 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Atran, S. Folk biology and the anthropology of science: cognitive universals and cultural particulars. Behav. Brain Sci. 21, 547–609 (1998).

  62. Medin, D. L. & Atran, S. Folkbiology (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999).

  63. Henrich, J. The Secret of our Success: How Culture is Driving Human Evolution, Domesticating our Species, and Making us Smarter (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2015).

  64. Clark Barrett, H. On the functional orgins of essentialism. Mind Soc. 2, 1–30 (2001).

  65. Banton, M. Modelling ethnic and national relations. Ethn. Racial Stud. 17, 1–19 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Nagel, J. Constructing ethnicity: creating and recreating ethnic identity and culture. Soc. Probl. 41, 152–176 (1994).

  67. Okamura, J. Y. Situational ethnicity. Ethn. Racial Stud. 4, 452–465 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Horowitz, A. L. Ethnic identity. In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization (ed. Ritzer, G.) (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 1975); https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470670590.wbeog602

  69. Chatterjee, P. The Nation and its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by a grant to J.G. from the US National Science Foundation (SES 1559387). We thank D. Medin, S. Atran, L. Hirschfeld, W. Hirst and J. Miller for their feedback during the research, and K. A. Lee, C. Shackleford and J. Smith for research assistance. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.S.R. and J.G. conceived the presented idea. Both authors developed the theory, planned and carried out the data collection, performed the computations, verified the analytical methods, discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mostafa Salari Rad.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary References

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Data 1

The complete dataset of all studies in CSV format (2,745 rows and 13 variables)

Supplementary Data 2

The dataset for the supplementary experiment in Supplementary Section 2.3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rad, M.S., Ginges, J. Folk theories of nationality and anti-immigrant attitudes. Nat Hum Behav 2, 343–347 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0334-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0334-3

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing