In response to recommendations to redefine statistical significance to P ≤ 0.005, we propose that researchers should transparently report and justify all choices they make when designing a study, including the alpha level.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Quantifying the Extent to Which Successful Juniors and Successful Seniors are Two Disparate Populations: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Findings
Sports Medicine Open Access 06 April 2023
-
Individual consistency in the learning abilities of honey bees: cognitive specialization within sensory and reinforcement modalities
Animal Cognition Open Access 06 January 2023
-
Statistical significance and its critics: practicing damaging science, or damaging scientific practice?
Synthese Open Access 12 May 2022
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References
Benjamin, D. J. et al. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 6–10 (2018).
Wacholder, S., Chanock, S., Garcia-Closas, M., El Ghormli, L. & Rothman, N. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 96, 434–442 (2004).
Open Science Collaboration Science 349, aac4716 (2015).
Senn, S. Statistical Issues in Drug Development 2nd edn (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2007).
Mayo, D. Statistical Inference as Severe Testing: How to Get Beyond the Statistics Wars (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2018).
Johnson, V. E., Payne, R. D., Wang, T., Asher, A. & Mandal, S. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 112, 1–10 (2017).
Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P. & Willmes, K. Cortex 66, A1–A2 (2015).
Lyons, L. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.1284 (2013).
Field, S. A., Tyre, A. J., Jonzen, N., Rhodes, J. R. & Possingham, H. P. Ecol. Lett. 7, 669–675 (2004).
Grieve, A. P. Pharm. Stat. 14, 139–150 (2015).
Mudge, J. F., Baker, L. F., Edge, C. B. & Houlahan, J. E. PLoS ONE 7, e32734 (2012).
Skipper, J. K., Guenther, A. L. & Nass, G. Am. Sociol. 2, 16–18 (1967).
Neyman, J. & Pearson, E. S. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 231, 694–706 (1933).
Fisher R. A. Statistical Methods and Scientific Inferences (Hafner, Oxford, 1956).
Casadevall, A. & Fang, F. C. mBio 7, e01902–16 (2016).
Acknowledgements
We thank D. Barr, F. Cheung, D. Colquhoun, H. IJzerman, H. Motulsky and R. Morey for helpful discussions while drafting this Comment. D.L. was supported by Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 452-17-013. F.G.A. was supported by CONICET. M.A.J.A. was funded by a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council AFL Fellowship (BB/M013596/1). G.S.C. was supported by the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford. Z.C. was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council (grant number C106891X). E.S.C. was supported by the European Research Council (ERC-2015-StG-677270). L.D. is supported by the European Research Council (ERC-2014-CoG-647910 KINSHIP). A.-L.v.H. is funded by a Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Fellowship (DH150176). M.R.H. was supported by the National Science Foundation under grant SBE SPRF-FR 1714446. J.Lao was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation grant 100014_156490/1. C.L.d.O. was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico. A.E.M. was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council of the United Kingdom (grant number ES/K009095/1). J.-J.O.d.X. is supported by an internal grant from the KU Leuven (STG/14/054) and by the Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (1519916N). S.P. was supported by the European Research Council (FP7/2007–2013; ERC grant agreement no. 324176). G.M.A.L. was funded by Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 453-14-016. S.G.S. is supported by a Cancer Research UK Fellowship (C42785/A17965). V.S. was supported by the National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke Intramural Research Program (IRP). M.A.V. was supported by grant 2016-T1/SOC-1395 from Comunidad de Madrid. T.Y. was supported by National Institutes of Health award R01MH109682.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.L., N.W.F., M.G.-M., J.A.G., N.P.H., A.A.K., S.R.M., V.S., S.D.B. and C.N.S. participated in brainstorming, drafting the Comment and data analysis. C.J.A., S.E.A., T.B., E.M.B., B.V.C., Z.C., G.S.C., S.D., D.J.D., B.D.E., J.D.F., J.G.F., A.-L.v.H., M.I., P.M.I., H.K.I., J.Lao, G.M.A.L., D.M., A.E.M., K.M., A.Q.X.N., G.N., C.L.d.O., J.-J.O.d.X., G.P, K.A.Q., I.K.S., Z.S., S.G.S., J.R.S., M.A.L.M.V.A., M.N.W., D.R.W., T.Y. and R.A.Z. participated in brainstorming and drafting the Comment. F.G.A., R.B.B., M.I.F., F.H. and S.P. participated in drafting the Comment and data analysis. M.A.J.A., D.E.B., S.-C.C., B.C., L.J.C., H.D., L.D., M.R.H., E.G.L., R.J.M., J.J.S., S.A.S., T.S., N.S., W.Ś. and M.A.V. participated in brainstorming. F.A., A.R.C., R.C., E.S.C., A.F, C.G., A.P.G., R.G., J.G., K.D.H, C.J., K.J, D.A.K., B.K., J.Lukavský, C.R.M., D.G.M., C.M., M.S., S.E.W. I.Z. did not participate in drafting the Comment because the points that they would have raised had already been incorporated, or they endorse a sufficiently large part of the contents as if participation had occurred. Except for the first author, authorship order is alphabetical.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lakens, D., Adolfi, F.G., Albers, C.J. et al. Justify your alpha. Nat Hum Behav 2, 168–171 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0311-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0311-x
This article is cited by
-
‘Big team’ science challenges us to reconsider authorship
Nature Human Behaviour (2023)
-
The vicious cycle that stalls statistical revolution
Nature Human Behaviour (2023)
-
Points of significance
Nature Human Behaviour (2023)
-
Individual consistency in the learning abilities of honey bees: cognitive specialization within sensory and reinforcement modalities
Animal Cognition (2023)
-
Quantifying the Extent to Which Successful Juniors and Successful Seniors are Two Disparate Populations: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Findings
Sports Medicine (2023)