Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Expanding the social science of happiness

Nature Human Behaviour volume 2, pages 248–252 (2018)Cite this article

Subjects

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 19 March 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Valid and reliable self-report happiness scales have prompted a wellspring of research into the causes and consequences of human happiness, allowing researchers from across the social sciences to empirically address questions that were previously treated more theoretically in the social sciences, religion and philosophy. As this body of knowledge accumulates, we see a need for the study of happiness to be more social in both content and methodology. Specifically, we argue for a social science of happiness that further recognizes the importance of social connection and prosocial action for human well-being, and invests in greater collaboration across all disciplinary boundaries, especially among social scientists and policymakers. As a larger and stronger social science of happiness emerges, it both requires and is supported by a corresponding shift in policy from identifying and fixing problems to finding positive ways to promote well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Estimated and actual likelihood of a lost wallet being returned.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 19 March 2018

    In the version of this Perspective originally published, both authors were incorrectly indicated as being at both affiliations 1 and 2. However, John F. Helliwell is only affiliated with the 1University of British Columbia and Lara B. Aknin is only affiliated with 2Simon Fraser University. This has now been corrected.

References

  1. McMahon, D. M. Happiness: A History (Atlantic Monthly Press, New York, NY, 2006).

  2. Diener, E., Oishi, S. & Tay, L. Advances in subjective well-being research. Nat. Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0307-6 (2018).

  3. Diener, E. Subjective well-being. Psychol. Bull. 95, 542–575 (1984).

  4. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N. & Stone, A. A. A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method. Science 306, 1776–1780 (2004).

  5. Killingsworth, M. A. & Gilbert, D. T. A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science 330, 932–932 (2010).

  6. Diener, E. & Seligman, M. E. Very happy people. Psychol. Sci. 13, 81–84 (2002).

  7. Helliwell, J. F., Huang, H. & Harris, A. in New and Enduring Themes in Development Economics (eds Ray, T., Somanathan, E. & Dutta, B.) 3–40 (World Scientific, Singapore, 2009).

  8. Maslow, A. H. A theory of human motivation. Psychol. Rev. 50, 370–396 (1943).

  9. Helliwell, J. F. & Barrington‐Leigh, C. P. Measuring and understanding subjective well‐being. Can. J. Econ. 43, 729–753 (2010).

  10. Helliwell, J. F. & Wang, S. Weekends and subjective well-being. Soc. Indic. Res. 116, 389–407 (2014).

  11. Helliwell, J. F. & Wang, S. How was your weekend? How the social context underlies weekend effects in happiness and other emotions for US workers. PLoS ONE 10, e0145123 (2015).

  12. Baumeister, R. F. & Leary, M. R. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull. 117, 497–529 (1995).

  13. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55, 68–78 (2000).

  14. Helliwell, J. F., Huang, H. & Wang, S. in The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust (ed. Uslander, E. M.) 409–446 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, NY, 2017).

  15. Coan, J. A., Schaefer, H. S. & Davidson, R. J. Lending a hand: social regulation of the neural response to threat. Psychol. Sci. 17, 1032–1039 (2006).

  16. Medalie, J. H. & Goldbourt, U. Angina pectoris among 10,000 men: II. Psychosocial and other risk factors as evidenced by a multivariate analysis of a five-year incidence study. Am. J. Med. 60, 910–921 (1976).

  17. Cohen, S., Doyle, W. J., Skoner, D. P., Rabin, B. S. & Gwaltney, J. M. Social ties and susceptibility to the common cold. JAMA 277, 1940–1944 (1997).

  18. Cohen, S., Doyle, W. J., Turner, R., Alper, C. M. & Skoner, D. P. Sociability and susceptibility to the common cold. Psychol. Sci. 14, 389–395 (2003).

  19. Aldrich, D. P. Social, not physical, infrastructure: the critical role of civil society after the 1923 Tokyo earthquake. Disasters 36, 398–419 (2012).

  20. Yamamura, E., Tsutsui, Y., Yamane, C., Yamane, S. & Powdthavee, N. Trust and happiness: comparative study before and after the Great East Japan Earthquake. Soc. Indic. Res. 123, 919–935 (2015).

  21. Aldrich, D. P. The externalities of strong social capital: post-tsunami recovery in Southeast India. J. Civ. Soc. 7, 81–99 (2011).

  22. Miller, D. T. The norm of self-interest. Am. Psychol. 54, 1053–1060 (1999).

  23. Fehr, E. & Schmidt, K. M. Fairness, incentives, and contractual choices. Eur. Econ. Rev. 44, 1057–1068 (2000).

  24. Hobbes, T. in Classics of Moral and Political Theory (ed. Morgan, M.) 575 (Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, IN/Cambridge, MA, 2011).

  25. Zaki, J. & Mitchell, J. P. Intuitive prosociality. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 22, 466–470 (2013).

  26. Brownell, C. A. Early development of prosocial behavior: current perspectives. Infancy 18, 1–9 (2013).

  27. Warneken, F. & Tomasello, M. Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science 311, 1301–1303 (2006).

  28. Warneken, F., Hare, B., Melis, A. P., Hanus, D. & Tomasello, M. Spontaneous altruism by chimpanzees and young children. PLoS Biol. 5, e184 (2007).

  29. Hepach, R., Haberl, K., Lambert, S. & Tomasello, M. Toddlers help anonymously. Infancy 22, 130–145 (2017).

  30. Hepach, R. Prosocial arousal in children. Child Dev. Perspect. 11, 50–55 (2017).

  31. Hepach, R., Vaish, A. & Tomasello, M. Young children are intrinsically motivated to see others helped. Psychol. Sci. 23, 967–972 (2012).

  32. Garon, N., Bryson, S. E. & Smith, I. M. Executive function in preschoolers: a review using an integrative frame-work. Psychol. Bull. 134, 31–60 (2008).

  33. Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K. & Bloom, P. Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature 450, 557–559 (2007).

  34. Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K. & Bloom, P. Three‐month‐olds show a negativity bias in their social evaluations. Dev. Sci. 13, 923–929 (2010).

  35. List, J. A. Why economists should conduct field experiments and 14 tips for pulling one off. J. Econ. Perspect. 25, 3–15 (2011).

  36. Brethel-Haurwitz, K. M. & Marsh, A. A. Geographical differences in subjective well-being predict extraordinary altruism. Psychol. Sci. 25, 762–771 (2014).

  37. Koo, M. & Fishbach, A. Giving the self: increasing commitment and generosity through giving something that represents one’s essence. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 7, 339–348 (2016).

  38. Henrich, J. et al. “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behav. Brain Sci. 28, 795–815 (2005).

  39. Bouwmeester, S. et al. Registered replication report: Rand, Greene, and Nowak (2012). Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 12, 527–542 (2017).

  40. Rand, D. G. Reflections on the time-pressure cooperation registered replication report. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 12, 543–547 (2017).

  41. Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D. & Nowak, M. A. Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature 489, 427–430 (2012).

  42. Yamagishi, T. et al. Response time in economic games reflects different types of decision conflict for prosocial and proself individuals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6394–6399 (2017).

  43. Crockett, M. J., Kurth-Nelson, Z., Siegel, J. Z., Dayan, P. & Dolan, R. J. Harm to others outweighs harm to self in moral decision making. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17320–17325 (2014).

  44. Harbaugh, W. T., Mayr, U. & Burghart, D. R. Neural responses to taxation and voluntary giving reveal motives for charitable donations. Science 316, 1622–1625 (2007).

  45. Moll, J. et al. Human fronto-mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15623–15628 (2006).

  46. Park, S. Q. et al. A neural link between generosity and happiness. Nat. Commun. 8, 15964 (2017).

  47. Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B. & Norton, M. I. Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science 319, 1687–1688 (2008).

  48. Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B. & Norton, M. I. Prosocial spending and happiness: Using money to benefit others pays off. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 23, 41–47 (2014).

  49. Aknin, L. B. et al. Prosocial spending and well-being: cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 104, 635–652 (2013).

  50. Aknin, L. B., Broesch, T., Hamlin, K. J. & Van de Vondervoort, J. W. Prosocial behaviour leads to happiness in a small-scale rural society. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 144, 788–795 (2015).

  51. Aknin, L. B., Van de Vondervoort, J. W. & Hamlin, J. K. Positive feelings reward and promote prosocial behavior. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 20, 55–59 (2018).

  52. Aknin, L. B., Hamlin, J. K. & Dunn, E. W. Giving leads to happiness in young children. PLoS ONE 7, e39211 (2012).

  53. Helliwell, J. F., Huang, H. & Wang, S. in WorldHappiness Report 2017 (eds Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R. & Sachs, J.) Ch. 2 (Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 2017).

  54. Warneken, F. & Tomasello, M. Extrinsic rewards undermine altruistic tendencies in 20-month-olds. Dev. Psychol. 44, 1785–1788 (2008).

  55. Lepper, M. R., Greene, D. & Nisbett, R. E. Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: a test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 28, 129–137 (1973).

  56. von Dawans, B., Fischbacher, U., Kirschbaum, C., Fehr, E. & Heinrichs, M. The social dimension of stress reactivity: acute stress increases prosocial behavior in humans. Psychol. Sci. 23, 651–660 (2012).

  57. Pistrang, N., Jay, Z., Gessler, S. & Barker, C. Telephone peer support for women with gynaecological cancer: benefits and challenges for supporters. Psychooncology 22, 886–894 (2013).

  58. Seligman, M. E. & Adler, A. in Global Happiness Policy Report (ed. Global Happiness Council) Ch. 4, 53–74 (Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 2018).

  59. Helliwell, J. F. & Putnam, R. D. The social context of well-being. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 359, 1435–1446 (2004).

  60. Bernstein, A. Link the world’s best investigators. Nature 496, 27 (2013).

  61. Oreopoulos, P. & Petronijevic, U. Student coaching: How far can technology go? J. Hum. Res. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.53.2.1216-8439R (2017).

  62. Balliet, D. Communication and cooperation in social dilemmas: a meta-analytic review. J. Conflict Resolut. 54, 39–57 (2010).

  63. Ostrom, E. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J. Econ. Perspect. 14, 137–158 (2000).

  64. Börner, K. et al. A multi-level systems perspective for the science of team science. Sci. Trans. Med. 2, 49cm24 (2010).

  65. Helliwell, J. F. Institutions as enablers of wellbeing: The Singapore prison case study. Int. J. Well Being 1, 255–265 (2011).

  66. Nilson, C. Canada’s Hub model: calling for perceptions and feedback from those clients at the focus of collaborative risk-driven intervention. J. Community Saf. Well Being 1, 58–60 (2016).

  67. Diener, E., Pressman, S. D., Hunter, J. & Delgadillo‐Chase, D. If, why, and when subjective well‐being influences health, and future needed research. Appl. Psychol. Health Well Being 9, 133–167 (2017).

  68. Fredrickson, B. L. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 359, 1367–1377 (2004).

  69. Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A. & Nowicki, G. P. Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 52, 1122–1131 (1987).

  70. Fredrickson, B. L. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am. Psychol. 56, 218–226 (2001).

  71. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L. & Diener, E. The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychol. Bull. 131, 803–855 (2005).

  72. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C. & Vohs, K. D. Bad is stronger than good. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 5, 323–370 (2001).

  73. Helliwell, J. F. & Wang, S. in World Happiness Report (eds Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R. & Sachs, J.) Ch. 2 (Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 2012).

  74. Nickerson, R. S. Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2, 175–220 (1998).

  75. Bilalić, M., McLeod, P. & Gobet, F. Inflexibility of experts — reality or myth? Quantifying the Einstellung effect in chess masters. Cogn. Psychol. 56, 73–102 (2008).

  76. Wallsten, T. S. Physician and medical student bias in evaluating diagnostic information. Med. Decis. Making 1, 145–164 (1981).

  77. Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F. & Uzzi, B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316, 1036–1039 (2007).

  78. Uzzi, B., Mukherjee, S., Stringer, M. & Jones, B. Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science 342, 468–472 (2013).

  79. OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-being (OECD Publishing, 2013).

  80. Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R. & Sachs, J. (eds) World Happiness Report 2017 (Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 2017).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vancouver School of Economics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

    John F. Helliwell

  2. Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

    Lara B. Aknin

Authors
  1. John F. Helliwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lara B. Aknin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.F.H. and L.B.A. wrote and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John F. Helliwell.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Helliwell, J.F., Aknin, L.B. Expanding the social science of happiness. Nat Hum Behav 2, 248–252 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0308-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0308-5

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing