Why isn’t there a strong relation between income and happiness? Why do people avoid or seek self-confirmatory or even false information? Why do they play the lottery and buy insurance? Taking account of belief-based utility can enable economics to make sense of these and a multitude of other puzzling phenomena.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Psychological inoculation strategies to fight climate disinformation across 12 countries
Nature Human Behaviour Open Access 30 November 2023
-
Does the Dream of Home Ownership Rest Upon Biased Beliefs? A Test Based on Predicted and Realized Life Satisfaction
Journal of Happiness Studies Open Access 14 September 2022
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Bénabou, R. & Tirole, J. J. Econ. Perspect. 30, 141–164 (2016).
Caplin, A. & Leahy, J. Q. J. Econ. 116, 55–79 (2001).
Loewenstein, G. Science 312, 704–706 (2006).
Golman, R., Hagmann, D. & Loewenstein, G. J. Econ. Lit. 55, 96–135 (2017).
Kőszegi, B. & Rabin, M. Am. Econ. Rev.. 99, 909–936 (2009).
Geanakoplos, J., Pearce, D. & Stacchetti, E. Games Econ. Behav. 1, 60–79 (1989).
Chater, N. & Loewenstein, G. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 126, 137–154 (2016).
Kőszegi, B. Econ. Theory 44, 415–444 (2010).
Akerlof, G. A. & Dickens, W. T. Am. Econ. Rev. 72, 307–319 (1982).
Abelson, R. P. J. Theory Soc. Behav. 16, 223–250 (1986).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank R. Bénabou, A. Imas, B. Kőszegi, E. Carbone and C. Taylor for their valuable comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loewenstein, G., Molnar, A. The renaissance of belief-based utility in economics. Nat Hum Behav 2, 166–167 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0301-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0301-z
This article is cited by
-
Psychological inoculation strategies to fight climate disinformation across 12 countries
Nature Human Behaviour (2023)
-
Revolutions of the mind, (threats of) actual revolutions, and institutional change
Public Choice (2023)
-
Does the Dream of Home Ownership Rest Upon Biased Beliefs? A Test Based on Predicted and Realized Life Satisfaction
Journal of Happiness Studies (2022)
-
Diverse motives for human curiosity
Nature Human Behaviour (2019)
-
Towards a neuroscience of active sampling and curiosity
Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2018)