Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

How stakeholders can respond to the rise of predatory journals

Nature Human Behaviour volume 1, pages 852–855 (2017)Cite this article

Subjects

Predatory journals are a global and growing problem contaminating all domains of science. A coordinated response by all stakeholders (researchers, institutions, funders, regulators and patients) will be needed to stop the influence of these illegitimate journals.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Moher, D. et al. Nature 549, 23–25 (2017).

  2. Clark, J. & Smith, R. Br. Med. J. 350, h210 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shamseer, L. et al. BMC Med. 15, 28 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Cobey, K. D., Galipeau, J., Shamseer, L. & Moher, D. CMAJ 188, E279–E280 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Cobey, K. D., Galipeau, J., Shamseer, L. & Moher, D. PeerJ 5, e3294 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Nosek, B. A. et al. Science 348, 1422–1425 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, C. J. & Moher, D. Science 357, 256–257 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kolata, G. A scholarly sting operation shines a light on ‘predatory journals’. The New York Times (22 March 2017); https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/22/science/open-access-journals.html

Download references

Acknowledgements

M.M.L. is supported by The Ottawa Hospital Anesthesia Alternate Funds Association. D.M. is supported by a University Research Chair.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Manoj Mathew Lalu and Larissa Shamseer contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada

    Manoj Mathew Lalu

  2. Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada

    Manoj Mathew Lalu, Larissa Shamseer, Kelly D. Cobey & David Moher

  3. Blueprint Translational Research Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Regenerative Medicine Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada

    Manoj Mathew Lalu

  4. School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

    Larissa Shamseer, Kelly D. Cobey & David Moher

  5. School of Natural Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland

    Kelly D. Cobey

Authors
  1. Manoj Mathew Lalu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Larissa Shamseer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kelly D. Cobey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David Moher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Moher.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

K.D.C. is the publications officer for the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. The other authors have no competing interests to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lalu, M.M., Shamseer, L., Cobey, K.D. et al. How stakeholders can respond to the rise of predatory journals. Nat Hum Behav 1, 852–855 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0257-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0257-4

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing