Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Bridging cultural sociology and cognitive psychology in three contemporary research programmes

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 29 November 2017

This article has been updated


Three prominent research programmes in cognitive psychology would benefit from a stronger engagement with the cultural context of cognition: studies of poverty focused on scarcity and cognitive bandwidth, studies of dual-process morality and studies of biases using the implicit association test. We address some limitations of these programmes and suggest research strategies for moving beyond an exclusive focus on cognition. Research on poverty using the cognitive bandwidth approach would benefit from considering the cultural schemas that influence how people perceive and prioritize needs. Dual-process morality researchers could explain variation by analysing cultural repertoires that structure moral choices. Research using the implicit association test can better explain implicit attitudes by addressing the variability in cultural schemas that undergird biases. We identify how these research programmes can deepen the causal understanding of human attitudes and behaviours by addressing the interaction between internal cognition and supra-individual cultural repertoires.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Change history

  • 29 November 2017

    Owing to a technical error, Bo Yun Park’s affiliation was incorrect in the originally published HTML version of this Perspective and should have read: Department of Sociology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. This has now been corrected. The PDF version is correct.


  1. 1.

    Perrin, A. J. & Lee, H. The undertheorized environment: sociological theory and the ontology of behavioral genetics. Sociol. Perspect. 50, 303–322 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Abend, G. The Moral Background: An Inquiry into the History of Business Ethics (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2014).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bruch, E. & Feinberg, F. Decision-making processes in social contexts. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 43, 207–227 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lamont, M. & Small, M. L. in The Colors of Poverty: Why Racial and Ethnic Disparities Persist (eds Lin, A. C. & Harris, D. R.) 76–102 (Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY, 2008).

  5. 5.

    Parsons, T. Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1966).

  6. 6.

    Swidler, A. Culture in action: symbols and strategies. Am. Sociol. Rev. 51, 273–286 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lamont, M. & Thévenot, L. Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W. & Lounsbury, M. The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2012).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Willis, P. E. Learning to Labor: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, NY, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hays, S. The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood (Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Buchtel, E. et al. Immorality East and West: are immoral behaviors especially harmful, or especially uncivilized? Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 41, 1382–1394 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cole, M. Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol. Rev. 98, 224–253 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Shweder, R. A., Much, N., Mahapatra, M. & Park, L. in Morality and Health (eds Brandt, A. & Rozin, P.) 119–172 (Routledge, London, 1997).

  15. 15.

    Stephens, N. M., Markus, H. R. & Phillips, L. T. Social class culture cycles: how three gateway contexts shape selves and fuel inequality. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 65, 611–634 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lamont, M. et al. Getting Respect: Responding to Stigma and Discrimination in the United States, Brazil, and Israel (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lewis, O. Five Families: Mexican Case Studies in the Culture of Poverty (Basic Books, New York, NY, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mullainathan, S. & Shafir, E. Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much (Macmillan, New York, NY, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bertrand, M., Mullainathan, S. & Shafir, E. A behavioral-economics view of poverty. Am. Econ. Rev. 94, 419–423 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mani, A., Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E. & Zhao, J. Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science 341, 976–980 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Shah, A. K., Shafir, E. & Mullainathan, S. Scarcity frames value. Psychol. Sci. 26, 402–412 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Desmond, M. Severe deprivation in America: an introduction. RSF 1, 1–11 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Rao, V. Poverty and public celebrations in rural India. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. 573, 85–104 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Desmond, M. Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City (Crown, New York, NY, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Waller, M. R. Viewing low-income fathers’ ties to families through a cultural lens: insights for research and policy. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. 629, 102–124 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Daminger, A., Hayes, J., Barrows, A. & Wright, J. Poverty Interrupted: Applying Behavioral Science to the Context of Chronic Scarcity (ideas42, New York, NY, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Rosen, E. Horizontal immobility: how narratives of neighborhood violence shape housing decisions. Am. Sociol. Rev. 82, 270–296 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Blair-Loy, M. Cultural constructions of family schemas: the case of women finance executives. Gend. Soc. 15, 687–709 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bandelj, N., Wherry, F. F. & Zelizer, V. A. Money Talks: Explaining How Money Really Works (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2017).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Daniel, C. Economic constraints on taste formation and the true cost of healthy eating. Soc. Sci. Med. 148, 34–41 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Damasio, A. R. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Rationality and the Human Brain (Norton, Boston, MA, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Greene, J. & Haidt, J. How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 517–523 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Haidt, J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol. Rev. 108, 814–834 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Cushman, F. Action, outcome, and value: a dual-system framework for morality. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 17, 273–292 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Greene, J. D. Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 322–323 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Greene, J. Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason and the Gap between Us and Them (Penguin Press, New York, NY, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Bartels, D. M. & Pizarro, D. A. The mismeasure of morals: antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas. Cognition 121, 154–161 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Conway, P. & Gawronski, B. Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 104, 216–235 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Cushman, F., Young, L. & Hauser, M. The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: testing three principles of harm. Psychol. Sci. 17, 1082–1089 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E. & Cohen, J. D. Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition 107, 1144–1154 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Greene, J. D. et al. Pushing moral buttons: the interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment. Cognition 111, 364–371 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Hauser, M. D. Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong (HarperCollins Publishers, New York, NY, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Xiang, X. Would the Buddha Push the Man off the Footbridge? Systematic Variations in the Moral Judgment and Punishment Tendencies of Han Chinese, Tibetans and Americans (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Cushman, F., Young, L. & Greene, J. D. in The Moral Psychology Handbook (ed. Doris, J. M.) 47–71 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2010).

  45. 45.

    Henrich, J. et al. (eds) Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence from Fifteen Small-Scale Societies (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2004).

  46. 46.

    Flanagan, O. The Geography of Morals: Varieties of Moral Possibility (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2016).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Lamont, M. Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of the French and American Upper-Middle Class (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1992).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Lamont, M. The Dignity of Working Men: Morality and the Boundaries of Race, Class, and Immigration (Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY & Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Boltanski, L. & Thévenot, L. On Justification: Economies of Worth (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    McAdams, D. P. et al. Family metaphors and moral intuitions: how conservatives and liberals narrate their lives. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 95, 978–990 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Keane, W. Ethical Life: Its Natural and Social Histories (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Haidt, J., Bjorklund, F. & Murphy, S. M oral Dumbfounding: When Intuition Finds No Reason (Univ. Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 2000); intuition finds no reason.pub603.doc.

  53. 53.

    Lowes, S., Nunn, N., Robinson, J. A. & Weigel, J. Understanding ethnic identity in Africa: evidence from the implicit association test (IAT). Am. Econ. Rev. 105, 340–345 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Nosek, B. A., Bar-Anan, Y., Sriram, N., Axt, J. & Greenwald, A. G. Understanding and using the brief implicit association test: recommended scoring procedures. PLoS ONE 9, e110938 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E. & Schwartz, J. L. K. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74, 1464–1480 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Oswald, F. L., Mitchell, G., Blanton, H., Jaccard, J. & Tetlock, P. E. Using the IAT to predict ethnic and racial discrimination: small effect sizes of unknown societal significance. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 108, 562–571 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., Christie, C. & Gonzales, P. M. Plausible assumptions, questionable assumptions and post hoc rationalizations: will the real IAT, please stand up? J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 43, 399–409 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Kaufman, S. B. Does the implicit association test (IAT) really measure racial prejudice? Probably not. Psychology Today (28 January 2011);

  59. 59.

    Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R. & Nosek, B. A. Statistically small effects of the implicit association test can have societally large effects. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 108, 553–561 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    McConnell, A. R. & Leibold, J. M. Relations among the implicit association test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 37, 435–442 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Ziegert, J. C. & Hanges, P. J. Employment discrimination: the role of implicit attitudes, motivation, and a climate for racial bias. J. Appl. Psychol. 90, 553–562 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Bargh, J. A. & Chartrand, T. L. The unbearable automaticity of being. Am. Psychol. 54, 462–479 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Dunham, Y., Chen, E. E. & Banaji, M. R. Two signatures of implicit intergroup attitudes: developmental invariance and early enculturation. Psychol. Sci. 24, 860–868 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Banaji, M. R. & Greenwald, A. G. Blindspot: Hidden Biases of Good People (Delacorte Press, New York, NY, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Matthews, S. A. The salience of neighborhood: some lessons from sociology. Am. J. Prev. Med. 34, 257–259 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Clair, M., Daniel, C. & Lamont, M. Destigmatization and health: cultural constructions and the long-term reduction of stigma. Soc. Sci. Med. 165, 223–232 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Shepherd, H. The cultural context of cognition: what the implicit association test tells us about how culture works. Sociol. Forum 26, 121–143 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Dobbin, F. & Kalev, A. Why diversity programs fail. Harv. Bus. Rev. 94, 52–60 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    DiMaggio, P. Culture and cognition. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 23, 263–287 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Zerubavel, E. Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Vaisey, S. Motivation and justification: a dual-process model of culture in action. Am. J. Sociol. 114, 1675–1715 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Martin, J. L. Social Structures (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2009).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Mohr, J. W. Measuring meaning structures. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 24, 345–370 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Warikoo, N., Sinclair, S., Fei, J. & Jacoby-Senghor, D. Examining racial bias in education: a new approach. Educ. Res. 45, 508–514 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Sanyal, P. Credit to Capabilities: A Sociological Study of Microcredit Groups in India (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2014).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Srivastava, S. B. & Banaji, M. R. Culture, cognition, and collaborative networks in organizations. Am. Sociol. Rev. 76, 207–233 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Babcock, E. D. Using Brain Science to Design New Pathways out of Poverty (Crittenton Women’s Union, Boston, MA, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Lamont, M. Addressing the Recognition Gap: Destigmatization and the Reduction of Inequality (Presidential Address, 112th Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Toronto, ON, 2017);

  79. 79.

    Cushman, F. & Greene, J. D. Finding faults: how moral dilemmas illuminate cognitive structure. Soc. Neurosci. 7, 269–279 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank G. Abend, B. Bonikowski, K. Cerulo, C. Daniel, P. DiMaggio, F. Dobbin, H. Gardner, P. Hall, H. Haste, S. Lukes, J. Mijs, A. Perrin and A. Wilson for their helpful feedback on an earlier version of the paper. M.L. acknowledges support from the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michèle Lamont.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

A correction to this article is available online at

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lamont, M., Adler, L., Park, B. et al. Bridging cultural sociology and cognitive psychology in three contemporary research programmes. Nat Hum Behav 1, 866–872 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing