Letter | Published:

Increasing verbal knowledge mediates development of multidimensional emotion representations

Nature Human Behaviourvolume 1pages881889 (2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

How do people represent their own and others’ emotional experiences? Contemporary emotion theories and growing evidence suggest that the conceptual representation of emotion plays a central role in how people understand the emotions both they and other people feel1,2,3,4,5,6. Although decades of research indicate that adults typically represent emotion concepts as multidimensional, with valence (positive–negative) and arousal (activating–deactivating) as two primary dimensions7,8,9,10, little is known about how this bidimensional (or circumplex) representation arises11. Here we show that emotion representations develop from a monodimensional focus on valence to a bidimensional focus on both valence and arousal from age 6 to age 25. We investigated potential mechanisms underlying this effect and found that increasing verbal knowledge mediated the development of emotion representation over and above three other potential mediators: fluid reasoning, the general ability to represent non-emotional stimuli bidimensionally and task-related behaviours (for example, using extreme ends of rating scales). These results indicate that verbal development aids the expansion of emotion concept representations (and potentially emotional experiences) from a ‘positive or negative’ dichotomy in childhood to a multidimensional organization in adulthood.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Barrett, L. F. Solving the emotion paradox: categorization and the experience of emotion. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 10, 20–46 (2006).

  2. 2.

    Nook, E. C., Lindquist, K. A. & Zaki, J. A new look at emotion perception: concepts speed and shape facial emotion recognition. Emotion 15, 569–578 (2015).

  3. 3.

    Satpute, A. B. et al. Emotions in ‘black or white’ or shades of gray? How we think about emotion shapes our perception and neural representation of emotion. Psychol. Sci. 27, 1428–1442 (2016).

  4. 4.

    Lindquist, K. A. & Barrett, L. F. Constructing emotion: the experience of fear as a conceptual act. Psychol. Sci. 19, 898–903 (2008).

  5. 5.

    Lindquist, K. A., Satpute, A. B. & Gendron, M. Does language do more than communicate emotion? Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 24, 99–108 (2015).

  6. 6.

    Widen, S. C., Pochedly, J. T. & Russell, J. A. The development of emotion concepts: a story superiority effect in older children and adolescents. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 131, 186–192 (2015).

  7. 7.

    Russell, J. A. A circumplex model of affect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39, 1161–1178 (1980).

  8. 8.

    Russell, J. A. Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychol. Rev. 110, 145–172 (2003).

  9. 9.

    Barrett, L. F. Feelings or words? Understanding the content in self-report ratings of experienced emotion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 87, 266–281 (2004).

  10. 10.

    Ong, D. C., Zaki, J. & Goodman, N. D. Affective cognition: exploring lay theories of emotion. Cognition 143, 141–162 (2015).

  11. 11.

    Somerville, L. H. & Mclaughlin, K. A. in The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions 2nd edn (eds Fox, A. S. et al.) (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, NY, in the press).

  12. 12.

    Adolphs, R. How should neuroscience study emotions? By distinguishing emotion states, concepts, and experiences. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 12, 24–31 (2016).

  13. 13.

    Kousta, S.-T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M. & Del Campo, E. The representation of abstract words: why emotion matters. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 140, 14–34 (2011).

  14. 14.

    Widen, S. C. Children’s interpretation of facial expressions: the long path from valence-based to specific discrete categories. Emot. Rev. 5, 72–77 (2013).

  15. 15.

    Wintre, M. G. & Vallance, D. D. A developmental sequence in the comprehension of emotions: intensity, multiple emotions, and valence. Dev. Psychol. 30, 509–514 (1994).

  16. 16.

    Larsen, J. T., To, Y. M. & Fireman, G. Children’s understanding and experience of mixed emotions. Psychol. Sci. 18, 186–191 (2007).

  17. 17.

    Gnepp, J. & Klayman, J. Recognition of uncertainty in emotional inferences: Reasoning about emotionally equivocal situations. Dev. Psychol. 28, 145–158 (1992).

  18. 18.

    Pons, F., Harris, P. L. & de Rosnay, M. Emotion comprehension between 3 and 11 years: developmental periods and hierarchical organization. Eur. J. Dev. Psychol. 1, 127–152 (2004).

  19. 19.

    Harter, S. & Buddin, B. J. Children’s understanding of the simultaneity of two emotions: a five-stage developmental acquisition sequence. Dev. Psychol. 23, 388–399 (1987).

  20. 20.

    Russell, J. A. & Ridgeway, D. Dimensions underlying children’s emotion concepts. Dev. Psychol. 19, 795–804 (1983).

  21. 21.

    Bullock, M. & Russell, J. A. Preschool children’s interpretation of facial expressions of emotion. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 7, 193–214 (1984).

  22. 22.

    Russell, J. A. & Bullock, M. Multidimensional scaling of emotional facial expressions: similarity from preschoolers to adults. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 48, 1290–1298 (1985).

  23. 23.

    Sharp, C., van Goozen, S. & Goodyer, I. Children’s subjective emotional reactivity to affective pictures: gender differences and their antisocial correlates in an unselected sample of 7-11-year-olds. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 47, 143–150 (2006).

  24. 24.

    Kashdan, T. B., Barrett, L. F. & McKnight, P. E. Unpacking emotion differentiation: transforming unpleasant experience by perceiving distinctions in negativity. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 24, 10–16 (2015).

  25. 25.

    Salmon, K., O’Kearney, R., Reese, E. & Fortune, C.-A. The role of language skill in child psychopathology: implications for intervention in the early years. Clin. Child Fam. Psychol. Rev. 19, 352–367 (2016).

  26. 26.

    Farkas, G. & Beron, K. The detailed age trajectory of oral vocabulary knowledge: differences by class and race. Soc. Sci. Res. 33, 464–497 (2004).

  27. 27.

    Baron-Cohen, S., Golan, O., Wheelwright, S., Granader, Y. & Hill, J. Emotion word comprehension from 4 to 16 years old: a developmental survey. Front. Evol. Neurosci. 2, 109 (2010).

  28. 28.

    Lupyan, G. in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation Vol. 57 (ed. Ross, B. H.) 255–297 (Academic Press, London, 2012).

  29. 29.

    Fugate, J. M. B., Gouzoules, H. & Barrett, L. F. Reading chimpanzee faces: evidence for the role of verbal labels in categorical perception of emotion. Emotion 10, 544–554 (2010).

  30. 30.

    Beck, L., Kumschick, I. R., Eid, M. & Klann-Delius, G. Relationship between language competence and emotional competence in middle childhood. Emotion 12, 503–514 (2012).

  31. 31.

    De Stasio, S., Fiorilli, C. & Di Chiacchio, C. Effects of verbal ability and fluid intelligence on children’s emotion understanding. Int. J. Psychol. 49, 409–414 (2014).

  32. 32.

    de Rosnay, M., Pons, F., Harris, P. L. & Morrell, J. M. B. A lag between understanding false belief and emotion attribution in young children: relationships with linguistic ability and mothers’ mental-state language. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 22, 197–218 (2004).

  33. 33.

    Cattell, R. B. Intelligence: Its Structure, Growth and Action (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1987).

  34. 34.

    Piaget, J. The Child’s Conception of Number (Norton, New York, NY, 1952).

  35. 35.

    Howard, D. V. & Howard, J. H. A multidimensional scaling analysis of the development of animal names. Dev. Psychol. 13, 108–113 (1977).

  36. 36.

    Chambers, C. T. & Johnston, C. Developmental differences in children’s use of rating scales. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 27, 27–36 (2002).

  37. 37.

    Suvak, M. K. et al. Emotional granularity and borderline personality disorder. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 120, 414–426 (2011).

  38. 38.

    Carey, S. The Origin of Concepts (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, NY, 2011).

  39. 39.

    Sprung, M., Münch, H. M., Harris, P. L., Ebesutani, C. & Hofmann, S. G. Children’s emotion understanding: a meta-analysis of training studies. Dev. Rev. 37, 41–65 (2015).

  40. 40.

    Van Bergen, P. & Salmon, K. The association between parent–child reminiscing and children’s emotion knowledge. NZ J. Psychol. 39, 51–56 (2010).

  41. 41.

    Wechsler, D. Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence: Second Edition Manual (Pearson, Bloomington, MN, 2011).

  42. 42.

    Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 17, 124–129 (1971).

  43. 43.

    Carroll, J. D. & Chang, J.-J. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of ‘Eckart–Young’ decomposition. Psychometrika 35, 283–319 (1970).

  44. 44.

    De Leeuw, J. & Mair, P. Multidimensional scaling using majorization: SMACOF in R. J. Stat. Softw. 31, 1–30 (2009).

  45. 45.

    Mair, P., Borg, I. & Rusch, T. Goodness-of-fit assessment in multidimensional scaling and unfolding. Multivariate Behav. Res. 51, 772–789 (2016).

  46. 46.

    Erbas, Y., Ceulemans, E., Boonen, J., Noens, I. & Kuppens, P. Emotion differentiation in autism spectrum disorder. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 7, 1221–1227 (2013).

  47. 47.

    Potter, T. C. S., Bryce, N. V. & Hartley, C. A. Cognitive components underpinning the development of model-based learning. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 25, 272–280 (2017).

  48. 48.

    Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. Modern Applied Statistics with R (Springer, New York, NY, 2002).

  49. 49.

    Davison, A. C. & Hinkley, D. V. Bootstrap Methods and Their Applications (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1997).

  50. 50.

    Bennett, D. S., Bendersky, M. & Lewis, M. Antecedents of emotion knowledge: predictors of individual differences in young children. Cogn. Emot. 19, 375–396 (2005).

  51. 51.

    Nook, E. C., Sasse, S. F., Lambert, H. K., McLaughlin, K. A. & Somerville, L. H. Increasing verbal knowledge mediates development of multidimensional emotion representations: online repository. Open Science Framework https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XE4PS (2017).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank C. R. M. Bolden, A. Dews, E. Fearey, M. Garrad, T. Gogue-Garcia, K. Kent, A. Sareen, M. Sirak, T. Stacy, C. Stavish and C. Uhrig for assistance with data collection; J. Snedeker for discussion; and P. Mair and members of Harvard University’s Institute for Quantitative Social Science for guidance on statistical analyses. This work was supported by a Harvard University seed grant to L.H.S., a National Institutes of Mental Health grant to K.A.M. (R01-MH103291), and a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (grant DGE1144152) to E.C.N. Funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

    • Erik C. Nook
    • , Stephanie F. Sasse
    •  & Leah H. Somerville
  2. Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    • Hilary K. Lambert
    •  & Katie A. McLaughlin

Authors

  1. Search for Erik C. Nook in:

  2. Search for Stephanie F. Sasse in:

  3. Search for Hilary K. Lambert in:

  4. Search for Katie A. McLaughlin in:

  5. Search for Leah H. Somerville in:

Contributions

Authors collaboratively developed the study design. E.C.N. programmed computer tasks. E.C.N., S.F.S. and H.K.L. collected data. E.C.N. analysed data. E.C.N. and L.H.S. interpreted results. E.C.N. drafted the manuscript, and all other authors provided critical revisions. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik C. Nook.

Electronic supplementary material

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Notes, Supplementary Figures 1–4, Supplementary References

  2. Life Sciences Reporting Summary

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0238-7

Further reading