Introduction of genetic evidence of a predisposition to violent or impulsive behaviour is on the rise in criminal trials. However, a panoply of data suggests that such evidence is ineffective at reducing judgements of culpability and punishment, and therefore its use in the legal process is likely to diminish.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Denno, D. W. Mich. S. L. Rev. 967, 968–1047 (2011).
Baum, M. L. Neuroethics 6, 287–306 (2013).
Byrd, A. L. & Manuck, S. B. Biol. Psych. 75, 9–17 (2014).
Caspi, A. et al. Science 297, 851–854 (2002).
Aspinwall, L. G., Brown, T. R. & Tabery, J. Science 337, 846–849 (2012).
Feresin, E. Italian court reduces murder sentence based on neuroimaging data. Nature News Blog http://go.nature.com/2vAykX0 (2011).
Fuss, J., Dressing, H. & Briken, P. J. Med. Genet. 52, 1–8 (2015).
Scurich, N. & Appelbaum, P. J. L. Biosci. 3, 140–157 (2016).
Morse, S. J. Trends Cognit. Sci. 15, 378–380 (2011).
Buckholtz, J. W. & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. Bioprediction, Biomarkers and Bad Behavior (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2014).
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Scurich, N., Appelbaum, P.S. Behavioural genetics in criminal court. Nat Hum Behav 1, 772–774 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0212-4
This article is cited by
Nature Genetics (2022)
Biocriminal Justice: Exploring Public Attitudes to Criminal Rehabilitation Using Biomedical Treatments
Nature Human Behaviour (2019)
Zeitschrift für Ethik und Moralphilosophie (2019)