Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Meaning-based guidance of attention in scenes as revealed by meaning maps

Nature Human Behaviour volume 1, pages 743–747 (2017)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Real-world scenes comprise a blooming, buzzing confusion of information. To manage this complexity, visual attention is guided to important scene regions in real time1,2,3,4,5,6,7. What factors guide attention within scenes? A leading theoretical position suggests that visual salience based on semantically uninterpreted image features plays the critical causal role in attentional guidance, with knowledge and meaning playing a secondary or modulatory role8,9,10,11. Here we propose instead that meaning plays the dominant role in guiding human attention through scenes. To test this proposal, we developed ‘meaning maps’ that represent the semantic richness of scene regions in a format that can be directly compared to image salience. We then contrasted the degree to which the spatial distributions of meaning and salience predict viewers’ overt attention within scenes. The results showed that both meaning and salience predicted the distribution of attention, but that when the relationship between meaning and salience was controlled, only meaning accounted for unique variance in attention. This pattern of results was apparent from the very earliest time-point in scene viewing. We conclude that meaning is the driving force guiding attention through real-world scenes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Generation of meaning maps.
Fig. 2: Correlation between saliency and meaning maps.
Fig. 3: Attention, meaning and saliency maps for an example scene.
Fig. 4: Squared linear correlation and semi-partial correlation by scene and by fixation order.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Land, M. F. & Hayhoe, M. M. In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? Vision Res. 41, 3559–3565 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hayhoe, M. M. & Ballard, D. Eye movements in natural behavior. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 188–194 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Henderson, J. M. Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 498–504 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Henderson, J. M. Gaze control as prediction. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21, 15–23 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buswell, G. T. How People Look at Pictures (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1935).

  6. Yarbus, A. L. Eye Movements and Vision (Plenum, 1967).

  7. Henderson, J. M. & Hollingworth, A. High-level scene perception. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 50, 243–271 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Itti, L. & Koch, C. Computational modelling of visual attention. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 194–203 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Parkhurst, D., Law, K. & Niebur, E. Modelling the role of salience in the allocation of visual selective attention. Vision Res. 42, 107–123 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Borji, A., Sihite, D. N. & Itti, L. Quantitative analysis of human-model agreement in visual saliency modeling: a comparative study. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 22, 55–69 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Walther, D. & Koch, C. Modeling attention to salient proto-objects. Neural Networks 19, 1395–1407 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Henderson, J. M. Regarding scenes. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16, 219–222 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Itti, L., Koch, C. & Niebur, E. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell 20, 1254–1259 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Harel, J., Koch, C. & Perona, P. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2006) Vol. 19, 1–8 (2006).

  15. Potter, M. Meaning in visual search. Science 187, 965–966 (1975).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Biederman, I. Perceiving real-world scenes. Science 177, 77–80 (1972).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wolfe, J. M. & Horowitz, T. S. Five factors that guide attention in visual search. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 0058 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tatler, B. W., Hayhoe, M. M., Land, M. F. & Ballard, D. H. Eye guidance in natural vision: reinterpreting salience. J. Vis. 11, 5 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Carmi, R. & Itti, L. The role of memory in guiding attention during natural vision. J. Vis. 6, 898–914 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M. S. & Henderson, J. M. Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. Psychol. Rev. 113, 766–786 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Elazary, L. & Itti, L. Interesting objects are visually salient. J. Vis. 8, 3.1–15 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Henderson, J. M., Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S. & Mack, M. in Eye Movements: A Window on Mind and Brain (eds. Van Gompel, R. P. G. et al.) 537–562 (Elsevier, Oxford, 2007).

  23. Henderson, J. M., Malcolm, G. L. & Schandl, C. Searching in the dark: cognitive relevance drives attention in real-world scenes. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 16, 850–856 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nuthmann, A. & Henderson, J. M. Object-based attentional selection in scene viewing. J. Vis. 10, 20 (2010).

  25. Bylinskii, Z., Judd, T., Oliva, A., Torralba, A. & Durand, F. What do different evaluation metrics tell us about saliency models? Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.03605 (2016).

  26. Anderson, N. C., Donk, M. & Meeter, M. The influence of a scene preview on eye movement behavior in natural scenes. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 23, 1794–1801 (2016).

  27. Anderson, N. C., Ort, E., Kruijne, W., Meeter, M. & Donk, M. It depends on when you look at it: salience influences eye movements in natural scene viewing and search early in time. J. Vis. 15, 9 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. 57, 289–300 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Einhäuser, W., Rutishauser, U. & Koch, C. Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli. J. Vis. 8, 2.1–19 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Oliva, A. & Torralba, A. Building the gist of a scene: the role of global image features in recognition. Prog. Brain Res. 155, 23–36 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Castelhano, M. S. & Henderson, J. M. The influence of color on the perception of scene gist. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform 34, 660–675 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Castelhano, M. S. & Henderson, J. M. Flashing scenes and moving windows: an effect of initial scene gist on eye movements. J. Vis. 3, 67a (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tatler, B. W. The central fixation bias in scene viewing: selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions. J. Vis. 7, 4.1–17 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the members of the UC Davis Visual Cognition Research Group for their feedback and comments. This research was partially funded by BCS-1636586 from the US National Science Foundation. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95618, USA

    John M. Henderson

  2. Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, CA, 95618, USA

    John M. Henderson & Taylor R. Hayes

Authors
  1. John M. Henderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Taylor R. Hayes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.M.H. conceived of and designed the study, and drafted and revised the manuscript. T.R.H. designed the study, collected and analysed the data, and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John M. Henderson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Figures 1–6

Life Sciences Reporting Summary

Life Sciences Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Henderson, J.M., Hayes, T.R. Meaning-based guidance of attention in scenes as revealed by meaning maps. Nat Hum Behav 1, 743–747 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0208-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0208-0

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing