Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Hidden heritability due to heterogeneity across seven populations

Nature Human Behaviour volume 1, pages 757–765 (2017)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies, which dominate genetic discovery, are based on data from diverse historical time periods and populations. Genetic scores derived from genome-wide association studies explain only a fraction of the heritability estimates obtained from whole-genome studies on single populations, known as the ‘hidden heritability’ puzzle. Using seven sampling populations (n = 35,062), we test whether hidden heritability is attributed to heterogeneity across sampling populations and time, showing that estimates are substantially smaller across populations compared with within populations. We show that the hidden heritability varies substantially: from zero for height to 20% for body mass index, 37% for education, 40% for age at first birth and up to 75% for number of children. Simulations demonstrate that our results are more likely to reflect heterogeneity in phenotypic measurement or gene–environment interactions than genetic heterogeneity. These findings have substantial implications for genetic discovery, suggesting that large homogenous datasets are required for behavioural phenotypes and that gene–environment interaction may be a central challenge for genetic discovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Trends in mean AFB of women indicating environmental changes across cohorts (1903–1970) from the United States, United Kingdom, Sweden, the Netherlands, Estonia and Australia.
Fig. 2: Stacked bar charts of average between (\({{\boldsymbol{\sigma }}}_{{\boldsymbol{G}}}^{2}\)) and within (\({{\boldsymbol{\sigma }}}_{{\boldsymbol{gXp}},}^{2}{{\boldsymbol{\sigma }}}_{{\boldsymbol{gXc}}}^{2}{{\boldsymbol{\sigma }}}_{{\boldsymbol{gXpXc}}}^{2}\)) variance explanation by common SNPs estimated for height, BMI, education, AFB and NEB in four model specifications (G, G×P, G×C and G×P×C).
Fig. 3: Hidden heritability due to heterogeneity and universal genetic effects.
Fig. 4: Stacked bar charts showing the average between (\({{\boldsymbol{\sigma }}}_{{\boldsymbol{G}}}^{2}\)) and within (\({{\boldsymbol{\sigma }}}_{{\boldsymbol{G}}{\boldsymbol{\times }}{\boldsymbol{P}}}^{2}\)) variance explanation by common SNPs estimated across 50 simulated phenotypes in two model specifications (the standard GREML model and the gene–environment interaction model by study population (G×P)) and for four simulated phenotypes.
Fig. 5: Bar charts of the average percentage of hidden heritability due to heterogeneity in simulation studies.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Visscher, P. M. et al. 10 years of GWAS discovery: biology, function, and translation. Am. J. Hun. Genet. 101, 5–22 (2017).

  2. Manolio, T. A. et al. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 461, 747–753 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Witte, J. S., Visscher, P. M. & Wray, N. R. The contribution of genetic variants to disease depends on the ruler. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 765–776 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Polderman, T. J. C. et al. Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nat. Genet. 47, 702–709 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Okbay, A. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment. Nature 533, 539–542 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Barban, N. et al. Genome-wide analysis identifies 12 loci influencing human reproductive behavior. Nat. Genet. 48, 1462–1472 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, J. et al. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat. Genet. 42, 565–569 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang, J., Lee, S. H., Goddard, M. E. & Visscher, P. M. GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 88, 76–82 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tropf, F. C. et al. Human fertility, molecular genetics, and natural selection in modern societies. PLoS ONE 10, e0126821 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rietveld, C. A. et al. GWAS of 126,559 individuals identifies genetic variants associated with educational attainment. Science 340, 1467–1471 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhu, Z. et al. Dominance genetic variation contributes little to the missing heritability for human complex traits. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 96, 377–385 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Zuk, O. & Hechter, E. The mystery of missing heritability: genetic interactions create phantom heritability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 1193–1198 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang, J. et al. Genetic variance estimation with imputed variants finds negligible missing heritability for human height and body mass index. Nat. Genet. 47, 1114–1120 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Felson, J. What can we learn from twin studies? A comprehensive evaluation of the equal environments assumption. Soc. Sci. Res. 43, 184–199 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wray, N. R. et al. Pitfalls of predicting complex traits from SNPs. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 507–515 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mills, M. C., Rindfuss, R. R., McDonald, P. & te Velde, E. Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. Hum. Reprod. Update 17, 848–860 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. De Vlaming, R. et al. Meta-GWAS Accuracy and Power (MetaGAP) calculator shows that hiding heritability is partially due to imperfect genetic correlations across studies. PLOS Genet. 13, e1006495 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Robinson, M. R. et al. Genotype-covariate interaction effects and the heritability of adult body mass index. Nat. Genet. 49, 1174–1181 (2017).

  19. Yang, J. et al. Genome-wide genetic homogeneity between sexes and populations for human height and body mass index. Hum. Mol. Genet. 24, 7445–7449 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Conley, D., Laidley, T. M., Boardman, J. D., Domingue, B. W. & Boardman, J. D. Changing polygenic penetrance on phenotypes in the 20th century among adults in the US population. Sci. Rep. 6, 30348 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Walter, S. et al. Association of a genetic risk score with body mass index across different birth cohorts. JAMA 316, 63–69 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mehta, D. et al. Evidence for genetic overlap between schizophrenia and age at first birth in women. JAMA Psychiatry 73, 497–505 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Visscher, P. M. et al. Statistical power to detect genetic (co) variance of complex traits using SNP data in unrelated samples. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004269 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Briley, D. A., Tropf, F. C. & Mills, M. C. What explains the heritability of completed fertility? Evidence from two large twin studies. Behav. Genet. 47, 36–51 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tropf, F. C. & Mandemakers, J. J. Is the association between education and fertility postponement causal? The role of family background factors. Demography 54, 71–91 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mills, M. C. Introducing Survival and Event History Analysis (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2011).

  27. Tropf, F. C., Barban, N., Mills, M. C., Snieder, H. & Mandemakers, J. J. Genetic influence on age at first birth of female twins born in the UK, 1919–68. Popul. Stud. (Camb.) 69, 129–145 (2015).

  28. Stearns, S. C., Byars, S. G., Govindaraju, D. R. & Ewbank, D. Measuring selection in contemporary human populations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 611–622 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Courtiol, A., Tropf, F. C. & Mills, M. C. When genes and environment disagree: making sense of trends in recent human evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 7693–7695 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Purcell, S. M. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559–575 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee, S. H., Yang, J., Goddard, M. E., Visscher, P. M. & Wray, N. R. Estimation of pleiotropy between complex diseases using single-nucleotide polymorphism-derived genomic relationships and restricted maximum likelihood. Bioinformatics 28, 2540–2542 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Visscher, P. M., Yang, J. & Goddard, M. E. A commentary on ‘common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height’ by Yang et al. (2010). Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 13, 517–524 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. International HapMap 3 Consortium. Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations. Nature 467, 52–58 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Balbo, N., Billari, F. C. & Mills, M. C. Fertility in advanced societies: a review of research. Eur. J. Popul. 29, 1–38 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Van de Kaa, D. J. Europe’s second demographic transition. Popul. Bull. 42, 1–59 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sobotka, T. Is lowest‐low fertility in europe explained by the postponement of childbearing? Popul. Dev. Rev. 30, 195–220 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Price, A. L. et al. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 38, 904–909 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Snijders, T. A. B. Multilevel Analysis (Springer, Berlin, 2011).

  39. Domingue, B. W. et al. Genome-wide estimates of heritability for social demographic outcomes. Biodemography Soc. Biol. 62, 1–18 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Verweij, R. M. et al. Sexual dimorphism in the genetic influence on human childlessness. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 25, 1067–1074 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Mills, M. C. & Tropf, F. C. The biodemography of fertility: a review and future research frontiers. Kolner Z. Soz. Sozpsychol. 55, 397–424 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Visscher, P. M., Hill, W. G. & Wray, N. R. Heritability in the genomics era—concepts and misconceptions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 255–266 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wray, N. R. & Maier, R. Genetic basis of complex genetic disease: the contribution of disease heterogeneity to missing heritability. Curr. Epidemiol. Rep. 1, 220–227 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by the European Research Council Consolidator Grant SOCIOGENOME (615603) and the UK Economic and Social Research Council/National Centre for Research Methods SOCGEN grant (ES/N011856/1), as well as the Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund and John Fell Fund (awarded to M.C.M.). The ARIC study is carried out as a collaborative study supported by the United States National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HHSN268201100005C, HHSN268201100006C, HHSN268201100007C, HHSN268201100008C, HHSN268201100009C, HHSN268201100010C, HHSN268201100011C and HHSN268201100012C). The EGCUT study was supported by European Union Horizon 2020 grants 692145, 676550 and 654248, Estonian Research Council Grant IUT20-60, the Nordic Information for Action e-Science Center, the European Institute of Innovation and Technology–Health, National Institutes of Health (NIH) BMI grant 2R01DK075787-06A1 and the European Regional Development Fund (project 2014-2020.4.01.15-0012 GENTRANSMED). The Health and Retirement Study is supported by the United States National Institute on Aging (U01AG009740). The genotyping was funded separately by the United States National Institute on Aging (RC2 AG036495 and RC4 AG039029) and was conducted by the NIH Center for Inherited Disease Research (CIDR) at Johns Hopkins University. Genotyping quality control and final preparation of the HRS data were performed by the Genetics Coordinating Center at the University of Washington. The LifeLines Cohort Study and generation and management of GWAS genotype data for the LifeLines Cohort Study were supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO 175.010.2007.006), Economic Structure Enhancing Fund of the Dutch government, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, Ministry for Health, Welfare and Sports, Northern Netherlands Collaboration of Provinces, Province of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Dutch Kidney Foundation and Dutch Diabetes Research Foundation. The Swedish Twin Registry (TWINGENE) was supported by the Swedish Research Council (M-2005-1112), GenomEUtwin (EU/QLRT-2001-01254 and QLG2-CT-2002-01254), NIH DK U01-066134, Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research and Heart and Lung Foundation (20070481). The TwinsUK study was funded by the Wellcome Trust and European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013). The study also received support from the National Institute for Health Research-funded BioResource, Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust in partnership with King’s College London. SNP genotyping was performed by The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute and National Eye Institute via the NIH CIDR. For the QIMR data, funding was provided by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (241944, 339462, 389927, 389875, 389891, 389892, 389938, 442915, 442981, 496739, 552485 and 552498), Australian Research Council (A7960034, A79906588, A79801419, DP0770096, DP0212016 and DP0343921), FP-5 GenomEUtwin Project (QLG2-CT-2002-01254) and NIH (grants AA07535, AA10248, AA13320, AA13321, AA13326, AA14041, DA12854 and MH66206). A portion of the genotyping on which the QIMR study was based (the Illumina 370 K scans) was carried out at the CIDR through an access award to the authors’ late colleague R. Todd (Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis). Imputation was carried out on the Genetic Cluster Computer, which is financially supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO 480-05-003). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology/Nuffield College, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3UQ, UK

    Felix C. Tropf, Charles Rahal, Robert Hellpap, Nicola Barban & Melinda C. Mills

  2. School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia

    S. Hong Lee

  3. Department of Sociology/Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology, University of Groningen, Groningen, 9712 TG, The Netherlands

    Renske M. Verweij & Gert Stulp

  4. Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, 9700 RB, The Netherlands

    Peter J. van der Most & Harold Snieder

  5. Erasmus University Rotterdam Institute for Behavior and Biology, Erasmus School of Economics, Rotterdam, 3062 PA, The Netherlands

    Ronald de Vlaming

  6. Department of Complex Trait Genetics, University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Ronald de Vlaming

  7. Institute of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia

    Andrew Bakshi & Matthew R. Robinson

  8. Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, 61820-9998, USA

    Daniel A. Briley

  9. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, PO Box 281, Stockholm, SE-171 77, Sweden

    Anastasia N. Iliadou

  10. Estonian Genome Center, University of Tartu, 51010, Tartu, Estonia

    Tõnu Esko & Andres Metspalu

  11. Quantitative Genetics Laboratory, Queensland Institute of Medical Research Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, 4029, Australia

    Sarah E. Medland & Nicholas G. Martin

  12. Department of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, CH-1015, Switzerland

    Matthew R. Robinson

Authors
  1. Felix C. Tropf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Hong Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Renske M. Verweij
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gert Stulp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Peter J. van der Most
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ronald de Vlaming
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Andrew Bakshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Daniel A. Briley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Charles Rahal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Robert Hellpap
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Anastasia N. Iliadou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Tõnu Esko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Andres Metspalu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Sarah E. Medland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Nicholas G. Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Nicola Barban
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Harold Snieder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Matthew R. Robinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Melinda C. Mills
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

F.C.T., S.H.L. and M.C.M. developed the study concept and design. M.R.R. and F.C.T. developed the concept for and performed the simulation studies. F.C.T., R.M.V., G.S. and C.R. performed the data analysis and visualization. T.E., A.M., S.E.M., N.G.M., A.N., S.H.L. and A.B. provided data and input on data analysis and interpretation, and imputed the data. F.C.T., M.C.M., S.H.L., M.R.R., H.S., G.S. and R.d.V. drafted the manuscript. F.C.T., M.C.M., M.R.R., R.M.V., G.S., P.J.v.d.M., R.d.V., N.G.M., N.B., D.A.B., C.R. and R.H. revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix C. Tropf.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1–8, Supplementary Notes 1–4, Supplementary References 1–9

Life Sciences Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tropf, F.C., Lee, S.H., Verweij, R.M. et al. Hidden heritability due to heterogeneity across seven populations. Nat Hum Behav 1, 757–765 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0195-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0195-1

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing