The development of autonomous weapon systems, by removing the human element of warfare, could make war crimes and atrocities a thing of the past. But if these systems are unable to respect the principles of humanitarian law, we might create a super-intelligent predator that is beyond our control.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Bostrom, N. in Cognitive, Emotive and Ethical Aspects of Decision Making in Humans and in Artificial Intelligence Vol. 2 (eds Smit, I. et al.) 12–17 (International Institute for Advanced Studies in Systems Research and Cybernetics, 2003).
Department of Defense Directive 3000.09 (Department of Defense, 2012); http://go.nature.com/2tetei2
Making the Case: The Dangers of Killer Robots and the Need for a Preemptive Ban (Human Rights Watch, 2016); http://go.nature.com/2uHZIFX
Arkin, R. C. Governing Lethal Behavior: Embedding Ethics in a Hybrid Deliberative/Reactive Robot Architecture Technical Report GIT-GVU-07-11 (Georgia Institute of Technology, 2007); http://go.nature.com/2vBbLkD
Kaldor, M. New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in the Global Era 3rd Edn (Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, 2012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dawes, J. The case for and against autonomous weapon systems. Nat Hum Behav 1, 613–614 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0182-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0182-6
