Combining numerical information on-the-fly is crucial for making advantageous decisions, but precisely how humans are able to track and compare magnitudes is unclear. Experiments now suggest that when it comes to performing such tasks, not all numbers are created equal.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Spitzer, B., Waschke, L. & Summerfield, C. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 0145 (2017).
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D. & Damasio, A. R. Science 275, 1293–1295 (1997).
Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Spelke, E. & Pica, P. Science 320, 1217–1220 (2008).
Dehaene, S. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 145–147 (2003).
Anderson, P. W. Science 177, 393–396 (1972).
Núñez, R. E. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 42, 651–668 (2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kievit, R. Cognitive neuroscience: More is different. Nat Hum Behav 1, 0162 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0162
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0162