Table 1 Full model summary.

From: Global evidence of extreme intuitive moral prejudice against atheists

  Coefficient s.d. coef 95% HPDI
    Low High
Fixed effects
 Belief 0.10 0.06 −0.03 0.23
 Age 0.11 0.05 0.01 0.19
 Female 0.03 0.04 −0.04 0.11
 SSES 0.03 0.04 −0.06 0.11
 Belief × Target 0.11 0.09 −0.07 0.29
Random intercepts
 Total −0.86 0.12 −1.09 −0.63
 Australia −0.90 0.19 −1.27 −0.51
 China −0.28 0.22 −0.70 0.15
 Czech Republic −0.99 0.19 −1.38 −0.62
 Finland −1.01 0.10 −1.22 −0.82
 Hong Kong −0.70 0.21 −1.11 −0.28
 India −0.66 0.15 −0.95 −0.37
 Mauritius −0.93 0.19 −1.31 −0.57
 Netherlands −0.94 0.18 −1.30 −0.57
 New Zealand −0.82 0.20 −1.21 −0.43
 Singapore −0.90 0.21 −1.31 −0.50
 United Arab Emirates −1.17 0.26 −1.66 −0.67
 United Kingdom −0.87 0.20 −1.26 −0.48
 United States −1.08 0.21 −1.50 −0.69
Random slopes (target)
 Total 1.19 0.22 0.74 1.62
 Australia 1.06 0.28 0.51 1.62
 China 1.15 0.30 0.55 1.71
 Czech Republic 1.10 0.27 0.55 1.63
 Finland 0.13 0.15 −0.14 0.43
 Hong Kong 1.16 0.31 0.56 1.75
 India 1.87 0.23 1.44 2.35
 Mauritius 1.13 0.29 0.57 1.72
 Netherlands 0.91 0.26 0.39 1.42
 New Zealand 0.52 0.29 −0.06 1.08
 Singapore 2.02 0.32 1.41 2.65
 United Arab Emirates 2.06 0.36 1.35 2.76
 United Kingdom 0.80 0.29 0.21 1.34
 United States 1.66 0.29 1.13 2.24
  1. Age, gender, subjective socioeconomic status (SSES) and participant belief in God were standardized. Target was coded: atheist = 1, religious = 0. The 95% HPDI illustrates uncertainty around posterior means, and indexes the interval in which the 95% most credible estimates lie.