Letter | Published:

Functional corticostriatal connection topographies predict goal-directed behaviour in humans

Nature Human Behaviour volume 1, Article number: 0146 (2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

Anatomical tracing studies in non-human primates have suggested that corticostriatal connectivity is topographically organized: nearby locations in striatum are connected with nearby locations in cortex. The topographic organization of corticostriatal connectivity is thought to underpin many goal-directed behaviours, but these topographies have not been completely characterized in humans and their relationship to uniquely human behaviours remains to be fully determined. Instead, the dominant approach employs parcellations that cannot model the continuous nature of the topography, nor accommodate overlapping cortical projections in the striatum. Here we employ a different approach to studying human corticostriatal circuitry: we estimate smoothly varying and spatially overlapping ‘connection topographies’ from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. These correspond exceptionally well with and extend the topographies predicted from primate tracing studies. We show that striatal topography is preserved in regions not previously known to have topographic connections with the striatum and that many goal-directed behaviours can be mapped precisely onto individual variations in the spatial layout of striatal connectivity.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , & Striatonigrostriatal pathways in primates form an ascending spiral from the shell to the dorsolateral striatum. J. Neurosci. 20, 2369–2382 (2000).

  2. 2.

    The primate basal ganglia: parallel and integrative networks. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 26, 317–330 (2003).

  3. 3.

    , & Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 357–381 (1986).

  4. 4.

    & Connexions of striatum and globus pallidus: synthesis and speculation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 262, 441–457 (1971).

  5. 5.

    & The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology 35, 4–26 (2010).

  6. 6.

    , , & Representation of action-specific reward values in the striatum. Science 310, 1337–1340 (2005).

  7. 7.

    , & The role of the dorsal striatum in reward and decision-making. J. Neurosci. 27, 8161–8165 (2007).

  8. 8.

    Cerebral evolution and emotional processes: new findings on striatal complex. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 193, 137–149 (1972).

  9. 9.

    , & Reward-dependent spatial selectivity of anticipatory activity in monkey caudate neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 87, 508–515 (2002).

  10. 10.

    , , & Reward-related cortical inputs define a large striatal region in primates that interface with associative cortical connections, providing a substrate for incentive-based learning. J. Neurosci. 26, 8368–8376 (2006).

  11. 11.

    Corticostriatal circuitry. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 18, 7–21 (2016).

  12. 12.

    et al. Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 1, 15020 (2015).

  13. 13.

    et al. Deep brain stimulation for intractable obsessive compulsive disorder: pilot study using a blinded, staggered-onset design. Biol. Psychiatry 67, 535–542 (2010).

  14. 14.

    et al. Pathological gambling in patients with Parkinson’s disease is associated with fronto-striatal disconnection: a path modeling analysis. Mov. Disord. 26, 225–233 (2011).

  15. 15.

    & Longitudinal topography and interdigitation of corticostriatal projections in the rhesus monkey. J. Neurosci. 5, 776–794 (1985).

  16. 16.

    & Converging structural and functional connectivity of orbitofrontal, dorsolateral prefrontal, and posterior parietal cortex in the human striatum. J. Neurosci. 35, 3865–3878 (2015).

  17. 17.

    & Defining the caudal ventral striatum in primates: cellular and histochemical features. J. Neurosci. 22, 10078–10082 (2002).

  18. 18.

    et al. Evidence for segregated and integrative connectivity patterns in the human basal ganglia. J. Neurosci. 28, 7143–7152 (2008).

  19. 19.

    & Cortico-striate projections in rhesus monkey: organization of certain cortico-caudate connections. Brain Res. 139, 43–63 (1978).

  20. 20.

    , , & Estimates of projection overlap and zones of convergence within frontal-striatal circuits. J. Neurosci. 34, 9497–9505 (2014).

  21. 21.

    & The topographic brain: from neural connectivity to cognition. Trends Neurosci. 30, 251–259 (2007).

  22. 22.

    , & The topographic connectome. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 23, 207–215 (2013).

  23. 23.

    , , & Fronto-striatal connections in the human brain: a probabilistic diffusion tractography study. Neurosci. Lett. 419, 113–118 (2007).

  24. 24.

    , , & Connectivity-based segregation of the human striatum predicts personality characteristics. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 32–34 (2009).

  25. 25.

    , , & Microstructural organizational patterns in the human corticostriatal system. J. Neurophysiol. 107, 2984–2995 (2012).

  26. 26.

    et al. Functional connectivity of human striatum: a resting state fMRI study. Cereb. Cortex 18, 2735–2747 (2008).

  27. 27.

    , & The organization of the human striatum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 108, 2242–2263 (2012).

  28. 28.

    , , & Regional specialization within the human striatum for diverse psychological functions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 1907–1912 (2016).

  29. 29.

    , & Connectopic mapping with resting-state fMRI. Neuroimage (2017).

  30. 30.

    , , , & Functional topography of the human entorhinal cortex. eLife 4, e06738 (2015).

  31. 31.

    et al. The WU-Minn human connectome project: an overview. Neuroimage 80, 62–79 (2013).

  32. 32.

    & Laplacian eigenmaps and spectral techniques for embedding and clustering. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 14, 664–668 (2002).

  33. 33.

    ., , & Handbook of Spatial Statistics (CRC, 2010).

  34. 34.

    et al. Function in the human connectome: task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior. Neuroimage 80, 169–189 (2013).

  35. 35.

    , & Localizing the rostrolateral prefrontal cortex at the individual level. Neuroimage 36, 1387–1396 (2007).

  36. 36.

    , , , & A whole brain fMRI atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clustering. Hum. Brain Mapp. 33, 1914–1928 (2012).

  37. 37.

    et al. l-Dopa modulates functional connectivity in striatal cognitive and motor networks: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. J. Neurosci. 29, 7364–7378 (2009).

  38. 38.

    et al. Preference for immediate over delayed rewards is associated with magnitude of ventral striatal activity. J. Neurosci. 26, 13213–13217 (2006).

  39. 39.

    et al. Delayed response tasks in basal ganglia lesions in man: further evidence for a striato-frontal cooperation in behavioural adaptation. Neuropsychologia 34, 709–721 (1996).

  40. 40.

    , & The brain’s default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1124, 1–38 (2008).

  41. 41.

    et al. Dopamine transporters in striatum correlate with deactivation in the default mode network during visuospatial attention. PLoS ONE 4, e6102 (2009).

  42. 42.

    , , & The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 971–978 (2006).

  43. 43.

    , & Widespread corticostriate projections from temporal cortex of the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 199, 205–219 (1981).

  44. 44.

    & Corticostriatal connections of the superior temporal region in rhesus monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 399, 384–402 (1998).

  45. 45.

    Dopamine is released in the striatum during human emotional processing. Neuroreport 21, 1172–1176 (2010).

  46. 46.

    et al. Network modelling methods for fMRI. Neuroimage 54, 875–891 (2011).

  47. 47.

    et al. The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage 80, 105–124 (2013).

  48. 48.

    et al. A positive–negative mode of population covariation links brain connectivity, demographics and behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1565–1567 (2015).

  49. 49.

    et al. Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers. Neuroimage 90, 449–468 (2014).

  50. 50.

    Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Springer, 2006).

  51. 51.

    , , , & Tools to support interpreting multiple regression in the face of multicollinearity. Front. Psychol. 3, 44 (2012).

  52. 52.

    et al. On the interpretation of weight vectors of linear models in multivariate neuroimaging. Neuroimage 87, 96–110 (2014).

  53. 53.

    , , , & Multi-level block permutation. Neuroimage 123, 253–268 (2015).

  54. 54.

    , , & Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 96, 1151–1160 (2001).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge support from The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) by VIDI grants to A.F.M. (grant no. 016.156.415) and C.F.B. (864.12.003), a VENI grant to K.V.H. (016.171.068) and under the Gravitation Programme (024.001.006 supporting A.F.M.). We also acknowledge funding from the Wellcome Trust UK Strategic Award (098369/Z/12/Z). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

    • Andre F. Marquand
    •  & Koen V. Haak

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Kapittelweg 29, 6525 EN Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

    • Andre F. Marquand
    • , Koen V. Haak
    •  & Christian F. Beckmann
  2. Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Kapittelweg 29, 6525 EN Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

    • Andre F. Marquand
    • , Koen V. Haak
    •  & Christian F. Beckmann
  3. Department of Neuroimaging, Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.

    • Andre F. Marquand
  4. Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.

    • Christian F. Beckmann

Authors

  1. Search for Andre F. Marquand in:

  2. Search for Koen V. Haak in:

  3. Search for Christian F. Beckmann in:

Contributions

A.F.M., K.V.H. and C.F.B. devised the experiments, A.F.M. and K.V.H. analysed the data and all authors wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

C.F.B. is director of and shareholder in SBGNeuro Ltd. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andre F. Marquand.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Materials

    Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Figures 1–5, Supplementary References

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0146

Further reading