Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Political science: Partisans' science interests

People who purchase liberal books have distinct tastes for science compared with those who purchase conservative books. This raises questions about the existence of ‘echo chambers’ on matters where science can inform political debates.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H. & Braman, D. J. Risk Res. 14, 147–174 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Druckman, J. N. Polit. Sci. Polit. 48, 58–69 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Shi, F., Shi, Y., Dokshin, F. A., Evans, J. A. & Macy, M. W. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 0079 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Lupia, A. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14048–14054 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    van der Linden, S. L., Leiserowitz, A. A., Feinberg, G. D. & Maibach, E. W. PLoS ONE 10, e0118489 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E. & Vaughan, S. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 399–404 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. & Cook, F. L. Pol. Behav. 36, 235–262 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toby Bolsen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bolsen, T. Political science: Partisans' science interests. Nat Hum Behav 1, 0076 (2017).

Download citation


Quick links