From a parent helping to guide their child during their first steps, to a therapist supporting a patient, physical assistance enabled by haptic interaction is a fundamental modus for improving motor abilities. However, what movement information is exchanged between partners during haptic interaction, and how this information is used to coordinate and assist others, remains unclear1. Here, we propose a model in which haptic information, provided by touch and proprioception2, enables interacting individuals to estimate the partner’s movement goal and use it to improve their own motor performance. We use an empirical physical interaction task3 to show that our model can explain human behaviours better than existing models of interaction in literature4–8. Furthermore, we experimentally verify our model by embodying it in a robot partner and checking that it induces the same improvements in motor performance and learning in a human individual as interacting with a human partner. These results promise collaborative robots that provide human-like assistance, and suggest that movement goal exchange is the key to physical assistance.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H. & Knoblich, G. Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 70–76 (2006).
Lederman, S. J. & Klatzky, R. L. Haptic perception: a tutorial. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 71, 1439–1459 (2009).
Ganesh, G. et al. Two is better than one: physical interactions improve motor performance in humans. Sci. Rep. 4, (2014).
Jarrassé, N., Charalambous, T. & Burdet, E. A framework to describe, analyze and generate interactive motor behaviors. PLoS ONE 7, e49945 (2012).
Laughlin, P. R. & Ellis, A. L. Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 22, 177–189 (1986).
Hastie, R. & Kameda, T. The robust beauty of majority rules in group decisions. Psychol. Rev. 112, 494–508 (2005).
Ernst, M. O. & Banks, M. S. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415, 429–433 (2002).
Körding, K. P. & Wolpert, D. M. Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature 427, 244–247 (2004).
Reed, K. et al. Haptically linked dyads: are two motor-control systems better than one? Psychol. Sci. 17, 365–366 (2006).
van der Wel, R. P. R. D., Knoblich, G. & Sebanz, N. Let the force be with us: dyads exploit haptic coupling for coordination. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 37, 1420–1431 (2011).
Melendez-Calderon, A., Komisar, V. & Burdet, E. Interpersonal strategies for disturbance attenuation during a rhythmic joint motor action. Physiol. Behav. 147, 348–358 (2015).
Basdogan, C., Ho, C.-H., Srinivasan, M. A. & Slater, M. An experimental study on the role of touch in shared virtual environments. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 7, 443–460 (2000).
Malysz, P. & Sirouspour, S. Task performance evaluation of asymmetric semiautonomous teleoperation of mobile twin-arm robotic manipulators. IEEE Trans. Haptics 6, 484–495 (2013).
Bosga, J. & Meulenbroek, R. G. Joint-action coordination of redundant force contributions in a virtual lifting task. Motor Control 11, 235–258 (2007).
Newmannorlund, R., Bosga, J., Meulenbroek, R. & Bekkering, H. Anatomical substrates of cooperative joint-action in a continuous motor task: virtual lifting and balancing. NeuroImage 41, 169–177 (2008).
van der Wel, R. P. R. D., Sebanz, N. & Knoblich, G. The sense of agency during skill learning in individuals and dyads. Conscious. Cogn. 21, 1267–1279 (2012).
Bahrami, B. et al. Optimally interacting minds. Science 329, 1081–1085 (2010).
Giese, M. A. & Rizzolatti, G. Neural and computational mechanisms of action processing: interaction between visual and motor representations. Neuron 88, 167–180 (2015).
Gergely, G. & Csibra, G. Teleological reasoning in infancy: the naïve theory of rational action. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 287–292 (2003).
Kilner, J. M., Friston, K. J. & Frith, C. D. Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system. Cogn. Process. 8, 159–166 (2007).
Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K. & Kawato, M. A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 358, 593–602 (2003).
Ikegami, T. & Ganesh, G. Watching novice action degrades expert motor performance: causation between action production and outcome prediction of observed actions by humans. Sci. Rep. 4, 6989 (2014).
Kawato, M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9, 718–727 (1999).
Blakemore, S.-J., Wolpert, D. M. & Frith, C. D. Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nat. Neurosci. 1, 635–640 (1998).
Jarrassé, N., Sanguineti, V. & Burdet, E. Slaves no longer: review on role assignment for human–robot joint motor action. Adapt. Behav. 22, 70–82 (2014).
Diaz et al. Lower-limb robotic rehabilitation: literature review and challenges. J. Robot. 2011, e759764 (2011).
Marchal-Crespo, L. & Reinkensmeyer, D. J. Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury. J. NeuroEng. Rehabil. 6, 20 (2009).
Morimoto, J. & Kawato, M. Creating the brain and interacting with the brain: an integrated approach to understanding the brain. J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20141250 (2015).
Gelb, A. Applied Optimal Estimation (MIT Press, 1974).
Ljung, L. Asymptotic behavior of the extended Kalman filter as a parameter estimator for linear systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 24, 36–50 (1979).
We thank C. Clopath, P. Bentley, S. Mussa-Ivaldi, Y. Sasaki and T. Watanabe for their comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. This work was funded in part by the EU-FP7 grants ICT-231554 HUMOUR, ICT-601003 BALANCE, ICT-611626 SYMBITRON, EU-H2020 ICT-644727 COGIMON, UK EPSRC MOTION grant EP/NO29003/1 and by the Great Britain Sasakawa Foundation. This work was also partially supported by a contract with the National Institute of Information and Communications Technology entitled “Development of Network Dynamics Modelling Methods for Human Brain Data Simulation Systems”, and by “Development of BMI Technologies for Clinical Application” of the Strategic Research Program for Brain Sciences supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
The authors declare no competing interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Takagi, A., Ganesh, G., Yoshioka, T. et al. Physically interacting individuals estimate the partner’s goal to enhance their movements. Nat Hum Behav 1, 0054 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0054
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (2020)
Scientific Reports (2020)
IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology (2020)
Online Identification of Interaction Behaviors From Haptic Data During Collaborative Object Transfer
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (2020)