Abstract
From a parent helping to guide their child during their first steps, to a therapist supporting a patient, physical assistance enabled by haptic interaction is a fundamental modus for improving motor abilities. However, what movement information is exchanged between partners during haptic interaction, and how this information is used to coordinate and assist others, remains unclear1. Here, we propose a model in which haptic information, provided by touch and proprioception2, enables interacting individuals to estimate the partner’s movement goal and use it to improve their own motor performance. We use an empirical physical interaction task3 to show that our model can explain human behaviours better than existing models of interaction in literature4–8. Furthermore, we experimentally verify our model by embodying it in a robot partner and checking that it induces the same improvements in motor performance and learning in a human individual as interacting with a human partner. These results promise collaborative robots that provide human-like assistance, and suggest that movement goal exchange is the key to physical assistance.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H. & Knoblich, G. Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 70–76 (2006).
Lederman, S. J. & Klatzky, R. L. Haptic perception: a tutorial. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 71, 1439–1459 (2009).
Ganesh, G. et al. Two is better than one: physical interactions improve motor performance in humans. Sci. Rep. 4, (2014).
Jarrassé, N., Charalambous, T. & Burdet, E. A framework to describe, analyze and generate interactive motor behaviors. PLoS ONE 7, e49945 (2012).
Laughlin, P. R. & Ellis, A. L. Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 22, 177–189 (1986).
Hastie, R. & Kameda, T. The robust beauty of majority rules in group decisions. Psychol. Rev. 112, 494–508 (2005).
Ernst, M. O. & Banks, M. S. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415, 429–433 (2002).
Körding, K. P. & Wolpert, D. M. Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature 427, 244–247 (2004).
Reed, K. et al. Haptically linked dyads: are two motor-control systems better than one? Psychol. Sci. 17, 365–366 (2006).
van der Wel, R. P. R. D., Knoblich, G. & Sebanz, N. Let the force be with us: dyads exploit haptic coupling for coordination. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 37, 1420–1431 (2011).
Melendez-Calderon, A., Komisar, V. & Burdet, E. Interpersonal strategies for disturbance attenuation during a rhythmic joint motor action. Physiol. Behav. 147, 348–358 (2015).
Basdogan, C., Ho, C.-H., Srinivasan, M. A. & Slater, M. An experimental study on the role of touch in shared virtual environments. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 7, 443–460 (2000).
Malysz, P. & Sirouspour, S. Task performance evaluation of asymmetric semiautonomous teleoperation of mobile twin-arm robotic manipulators. IEEE Trans. Haptics 6, 484–495 (2013).
Bosga, J. & Meulenbroek, R. G. Joint-action coordination of redundant force contributions in a virtual lifting task. Motor Control 11, 235–258 (2007).
Newmannorlund, R., Bosga, J., Meulenbroek, R. & Bekkering, H. Anatomical substrates of cooperative joint-action in a continuous motor task: virtual lifting and balancing. NeuroImage 41, 169–177 (2008).
van der Wel, R. P. R. D., Sebanz, N. & Knoblich, G. The sense of agency during skill learning in individuals and dyads. Conscious. Cogn. 21, 1267–1279 (2012).
Bahrami, B. et al. Optimally interacting minds. Science 329, 1081–1085 (2010).
Giese, M. A. & Rizzolatti, G. Neural and computational mechanisms of action processing: interaction between visual and motor representations. Neuron 88, 167–180 (2015).
Gergely, G. & Csibra, G. Teleological reasoning in infancy: the naïve theory of rational action. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 287–292 (2003).
Kilner, J. M., Friston, K. J. & Frith, C. D. Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system. Cogn. Process. 8, 159–166 (2007).
Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K. & Kawato, M. A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 358, 593–602 (2003).
Ikegami, T. & Ganesh, G. Watching novice action degrades expert motor performance: causation between action production and outcome prediction of observed actions by humans. Sci. Rep. 4, 6989 (2014).
Kawato, M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9, 718–727 (1999).
Blakemore, S.-J., Wolpert, D. M. & Frith, C. D. Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nat. Neurosci. 1, 635–640 (1998).
Jarrassé, N., Sanguineti, V. & Burdet, E. Slaves no longer: review on role assignment for human–robot joint motor action. Adapt. Behav. 22, 70–82 (2014).
Diaz et al. Lower-limb robotic rehabilitation: literature review and challenges. J. Robot. 2011, e759764 (2011).
Marchal-Crespo, L. & Reinkensmeyer, D. J. Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury. J. NeuroEng. Rehabil. 6, 20 (2009).
Morimoto, J. & Kawato, M. Creating the brain and interacting with the brain: an integrated approach to understanding the brain. J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20141250 (2015).
Gelb, A. Applied Optimal Estimation (MIT Press, 1974).
Ljung, L. Asymptotic behavior of the extended Kalman filter as a parameter estimator for linear systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 24, 36–50 (1979).
Acknowledgements
We thank C. Clopath, P. Bentley, S. Mussa-Ivaldi, Y. Sasaki and T. Watanabe for their comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. This work was funded in part by the EU-FP7 grants ICT-231554 HUMOUR, ICT-601003 BALANCE, ICT-611626 SYMBITRON, EU-H2020 ICT-644727 COGIMON, UK EPSRC MOTION grant EP/NO29003/1 and by the Great Britain Sasakawa Foundation. This work was also partially supported by a contract with the National Institute of Information and Communications Technology entitled “Development of Network Dynamics Modelling Methods for Human Brain Data Simulation Systems”, and by “Development of BMI Technologies for Clinical Application” of the Strategic Research Program for Brain Sciences supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.T., G.G., M.K. and E.B developed the computational model. G.G. and T.Y. conducted the empirical experiments with human pairs, and A.T. and T.Y. tested human users with the robot assistant. A.T. and G.G. analysed the data and simulated the models. A.T., G.G., M.K. and E.B. wrote and edited the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Methods; Supplementary Figures. (PDF 408 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takagi, A., Ganesh, G., Yoshioka, T. et al. Physically interacting individuals estimate the partner’s goal to enhance their movements. Nat Hum Behav 1, 0054 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0054
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0054
This article is cited by
-
Low-force human–human hand interactions induce gait changes through sensorimotor engagement instead of direct mechanical effects
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Game theory and partner representation in joint action: toward a computational theory of joint agency
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (2024)
-
Force-Based Modeling of Heterogeneous Roles in the Coordinated Behavior of a Triad
New Generation Computing (2024)
-
Learning acquisition of consistent leader–follower relationships depends on implicit haptic interactions
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
How the conception of control influences our understanding of actions
Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2023)