Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Oxygen priming induced by elevated CO2 reduces carbon accumulation and methane emissions in coastal wetlands

Nature Geoscience volume 16, pages 63–68 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Warming temperatures and elevated CO2 are inextricably linked global change phenomena, but they are rarely manipulated together in field experiments. As a result, ecosystem-level responses to these interacting facets of global change remain poorly understood. Here we report on a four-year field manipulation of warming and elevated CO2 in a coastal wetland. Contrary to our expectations, elevated CO2 combined with warming reduced the rate of carbon accumulation due to increases in plant-mediated oxygen flux that stimulated aerobic decomposition via oxygen priming. Evidence supporting this interpretation includes an increase in soil redox potential and a decrease in the nominal oxidation state of the dissolved organic carbon pool. While warming alone stimulated methane (CH4) emissions, we found that elevated CO2 combined with warming reduced net CH4 flux due to plant–microbe feedbacks. Together, these results demonstrate that ecosystem responses to interacting facets of global change are mediated by plant traits that regulate the redox state of the soil environment. Thus, plant responses are critical for predicting future ecosystem survival and climate feedbacks.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Fine-root productivity in ambient and warmed plots with and without elevated CO2.
Fig. 2: Automated redox data in warmed plots with and without elevated CO2 from April 2020 to December 2020.
Fig. 3: Root productivity versus mean NOSC for porewater DOC.
Fig. 4: Average rate of change in marsh surface elevation and carbon accumulation from January 2017 to August 2020.
Fig. 5: Summer CH4 emissions in ambient and warmed plots with and without elevated CO2.
Fig. 6: CO2-equivalent greenhouse gas emissions by treatment averaged across the four years of the fully crossed experiment.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request and in the Smithsonian Institution figshare repository (https://smithsonian.figshare.com) under https://doi.org/10.25573/serc.21263328.

References

  1. Heimann, M. & Reichstein, M. Terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics and climate feedbacks. Nature 451, 289–292 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wardle, D. A. et al. Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science 304, 1629–1633 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Girkin, N. T., Turner, B. L., Ostle, N., Craigon, J. & Sjögersten, S. Root exudate analogues accelerate CO2 and CH4 production in tropical peat. Soil Biol. Biochem. 117, 48–55 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Keiluweit, M., Nico, P. S., Kleber, M. & Fendorf, S. Are oxygen limitations under recognized regulators of organic carbon turnover in upland soils? Biogeochemistry 127, 157–171 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Keiluweit, M., Wanzek, T., Kleber, M., Nico, P. & Fendorf, S. Anaerobic microsites have an unaccounted role in soil carbon stabilization. Nat. Commun. 8, 1771 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fritz, C. et al. Zero methane emission bogs: extreme rhizosphere oxygenation by cushion plants in Patagonia. New Phytol. 190, 398–408 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Philippot, L., Hallin, S., Börjesson, G. & Baggs, E. M. Biochemical cycling in the rhizosphere having an impact on global change. Plant Soil 321, 61–81 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Waldo, N. B., Hunt, B. K., Fadely, E. C., Moran, J. J. & Neumann, R. B. Plant root exudates increase methane emissions through direct and indirect pathways. Biogeochemistry 145, 213–234 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Langley, J. A., McKee, K. L., Cahoon, D. R., Cherry, J. A. & Megonigal, J. P. Elevated CO2 stimulates marsh elevation gain, counterbalancing sea-level rise. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 6182–6186 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Megonigal, J. P. & Schlesinger, W. H. Enhanced CH4 emissions from a wetland soil exposed to elevated CO2. Biogeochemistry 37, 77–88 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Langley, J. A., Mozdzer, T. J., Shepard, K. A., Hagerty, S. B., & Megonigal, J. P. Tidal marsh plant responses to elevated CO2, nitrogen fertilization, and sea level rise. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 1495–1503 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bridgman, M. J., Lomax, B. H. & Sjögersten, S. Impacts of elevated atmospheric CO2 and plant species composition on methane emissions from subarctic wetlands. Wetlands 40, 609–618 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin, Y. et al. Divergent responses of wetland methane emissions to elevated atmospheric CO2 dependent on water table. Water Res. 205, 117682 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Carney, K. M., Hungate, B. A., Drake, B. G. & Megonigal, J. P. Altered soil microbial community at elevated CO2 leads to loss of soil carbon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 4990–4995 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. van Groenigen, K. J., Osenberg, C. W. & Hungate, B. A. Increased soil emissions of potent greenhouse gases under increased atmospheric CO2. Nature 475, 214–216 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. van Groenigen, K. J. et al. Faster turnover of new soil carbon inputs under increased atmospheric CO2. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 4420–4429 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wolf, A. A., Drake, B. G., Erickson, J. E. & Megonigal, J. P. An oxygen-mediated positive feedback between elevated carbon dioxide and soil organic matter decomposition in a simulated anaerobic wetland. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 2036–2044 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rietl, A. J., Megonigal, J. P., Herbert, E. R. & Kirwan, M. L. Vegetation type and decomposition priming mediate brackish marsh carbon accumulation under interacting facets of global change. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2020GL092051 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Noyce, G. L., Kirwan, M. L., Rich, R. L. & Megonigal, J. P. Asynchronous nitrogen supply and demand produce non-linear plant allocation responses to warming and elevated CO2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 16, 21623–21628 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Colmer, T. D. Long-distance transport of gases in plants: a perspective on internal aeration and radial oxygen loss from roots. Plant Cell Environ. 26, 17–36 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Armstrong, W. in Advances in Botanical Research Vol. 7(ed. Woolhouse, H. W.) 225–332 (Academic Press, 1980).

  22. Harriss, R. C. & Matson, P. A. Biogenic Trace Gases: Measuring Emissions from Soil and Water (Wiley & Sons, 2009).

  23. Bezbaruah, A. N. & Zhang, T. C. Quantification of oxygen release by bulrush (Scirpus validus) roots in a constructed treatment wetland. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 89, 308–318 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schmidt, M. W. I. et al. Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature 478, 49–56 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lehmann, J. & Kleber, M. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature 528, 60–68 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gunina, A. & Kuzyakov, Y. From energy to (soil organic) matter. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 2169–2182 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Boye, K. et al. Thermodynamically controlled preservation of organic carbon in floodplains. Nat. Geosci. 10, 415–419 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kirwan, M. L. & Megonigal, J. P. Tidal wetland stability in the face of human impacts and sea-level rise. Nature 504, 53–60 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith, A. J., Noyce, G. L., Megonigal, J. P., Guntenspergen, G. R. & Kirwan, M. L. Temperature optimum for marsh resilience and carbon accumulation revealed in a whole ecosystem warming experiment. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 3236–3245 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cherry, J. A., McKee, K. L. & Grace, J. B. Elevated CO2 enhances biological contributions to elevation change in coastal wetlands by offsetting stressors associated with sea-level rise. J. Ecol. 97, 67–77 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pastore, M. A., Megonigal, J. P. & Langley, J. A. Elevated CO2 and nitrogen addition accelerate net carbon gain in a brackish marsh. Biogeochemistry 133, 73–87 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Noyce, G. L. & Megonigal, J. P. Biogeochemical and plant trait mechanisms drive enhanced methane emissions in response to whole-ecosystem warming. Biogeosciences 18, 2449–2463 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. van Bodegom, P. M. & Stams, A. J. M. Effects of alternative electron acceptors and temperature on methanogenesis in rice paddy soils. Chemosphere 39, 167–182 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu, L. et al. Methane emissions from estuarine coastal wetlands: implications for global change effect. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 83, 1368–1377 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yvon-Durocher, G. et al. Methane fluxes show consistent temperature dependence across microbial to ecosystem scales. Nature 507, 488–491 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dijkstra, F. A. et al. Effects of elevated carbon dioxide and increased temperature on methane and nitrous oxide fluxes: evidence from field experiments. Front. Ecol. Environ. 10, 520–527 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hutchin, P. R., Press, M. C., Lee, J. A. & Ashenden, T. W. Elevated concentrations of CO2 may double methane emissions from mires. Glob. Change Biol. 1, 125–128 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Dacey, J. W. H., Drake, B. G. & Klug, M. J. Stimulation of methane emission by carbon dioxide enrichment of marsh vegetation. Nature 370, 47–49 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ziska, L. H. et al. Long-term growth at elevated carbon dioxide stimulates methane emission in tropical paddy rice. Glob. Change Biol. 4, 657–665 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bhattacharyya, P. et al. Impact of elevated CO2 and temperature on soil C and N dynamics in relation to CH4 and N2O emissions from tropical flooded rice (Oryza sativa L.). Sci. Total Environ. 461–462, 601–611 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tokida, T. et al. Methane and soil CO2 production from current-season photosynthates in a rice paddy exposed to elevated CO2 concentration and soil temperature. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 3327–3337 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mueller, P. et al. Plants determine methane response to sea level rise. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18763-4 (2020).

  43. Laanbroek, H. J. Methane emission from natural wetlands: interplay between emergent macrophytes and soil microbial processes. A mini-review. Ann. Bot. 105, 141–153 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. van der Nat, F.-J. W. A. & Middelburg, J. J. Seasonal variation in methane oxidation by the rhizosphere of Phragmites australis and Scirpus lacustris. Aquat. Bot. 61, 95–110 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Jordan, T. E. & Whigham, D. F. The importance of standing dead shoots of the narrow leaved cattail, Typha angustifolia L. Aquat. Bot. 29, 319–328 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Marsh, A. S., Rasse, D. P., Drake, B. G. & Patrick Megonigal, J. Effect of elevated CO2 on carbon pools and fluxes in a brackish marsh. Estuaries 28, 694–704 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Drake, B. G. Rising sea level, temperature, and precipitation impact plant and ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 on a Chesapeake Bay wetland: review of a 28-year study. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 3329–3343 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Erickson, J. E., Megonigal, J. P., Peresta, G. & Drake, B. G. Salinity and sea level mediate elevated CO2 effects on C3–C4 plant interactions and tissue nitrogen in a Chesapeake Bay tidal wetland. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 202–215 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Frolking, S., Roulet, N. & Fuglestvedt, J. How northern peatlands influence the Earth’s radiative budget: sustained methane emission versus sustained carbon sequestration. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 111, G01008 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ratliff, K. M., Braswell, A. E. & Marani, M. Spatial response of coastal marshes to increased atmospheric CO2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15580–15584 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Xu, X. & Trugman, A. T. Trait-based modeling of terrestrial ecosystems: advances and challenges under global change. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 7, 1–13 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Zakharova, L., Meyer, K. M. & Seifan, M. Trait-based modelling in ecology: a review of two decades of research. Ecol. Model. 407, 108703 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Myers-Smith, I. H., Thomas, H. J. D. & Bjorkman, A. D. Plant traits inform predictions of tundra responses to global change. New Phytol. 221, 1742–1748 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ward, N. D. et al. Representing the function and sensitivity of coastal interfaces in Earth system models. Nat. Commun. 11, 2458 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Moor, H. et al. Towards a trait-based ecology of wetland vegetation. J. Ecol. 105, 1623–1635 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Langley, J. A. & Megonigal, J. P. Ecosystem response to elevated CO2 levels limited by nitrogen-induced plant species shift. Nature 466, 96–99 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Rich, R. L. et al. Design and performance of combined infrared canopy and belowground warming in the B4WarmED (Boreal Forest Warming at an Ecotone in Danger) experiment. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 2334–2348 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Lu, M. et al. Allometry data and equations for coastal marsh plants. Ecology 97, 3554–3554 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Rabenhorst, M. C., Hively, W. D. & James, B. R. Measurements of soil redox potential. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 73, 668–674 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Cahoon, D. R. et al. High-precision measurements of wetland sediment elevation: I. Recent improvements to the sedimentation–erosion table. J. Sediment. Res. 72, 730–733 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Cahoon, D. R. et al. High-precision measurements of wetland sediment elevation: II. The rod surface elevation table. J. Sediment. Res. 72, 734–739 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Lynch, J. C., Hensel, P. & Cahoon, D. R. The Surface Elevation Table and Marker Horizon Technique: A Protocol for Monitoring Wetland Elevation Dynamics Natural Resource Report NPS/NCBN/NRR—2015/1078 (USGS, 2015); http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70160049

  63. Neubauer, S. C. & Megonigal, J. P. Moving beyond global warming potentials to quantify the climatic role of ecosystems. Ecosystems 18, 1000–1013 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank G. Peresta for maintaining the field experiment and S. Kent, T. Messerschmidt, E. Herbert and D. Walters for assisting with field measurements. Funding for this project was provided by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, Environmental System Science programme under award numbers DE-SC0014413 to J.P.M., M.L.K. and R.L.R. and DE-SC0019110 and DE-SC0021112 to J.P.M., G.L.N., M.L.K. and R.L.R.; the National Science Foundation Long-Term Research in Environmental Biology Program under award numbers DEB-0950080, DEB-1457100 and DEB-1557009 to J.P.M. and DEB-2051343 to J.P.M. and G.L.N.; and the Smithsonian Institution to J.P.M., G.L.N. and R.L.R. A portion of the research was performed using EMSL, a DOE Office of Science user facility sponsored by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research, under user project 50205 to G.L.N. and J.P.M.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD, USA

    Genevieve L. Noyce, Roy L. Rich & J. Patrick Megonigal

  2. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, VA, USA

    Alexander J. Smith & Matthew L. Kirwan

Authors
  1. Genevieve L. Noyce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexander J. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthew L. Kirwan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Roy L. Rich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. Patrick Megonigal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.P.M., R.L.R., G.L.N. and M.L.K. designed the original experiment, R.L.R. designed the feedback-controlled heating system and G.L.N. and R.L.R. designed the redox measurement system. G.L.N. collected and analysed all vegetation and biogeochemical data and wrote the initial manuscript. A.J.S. provided SET data and analysis. All authors contributed to interpreting results and editing the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Genevieve L. Noyce or J. Patrick Megonigal.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Geoscience thanks Jorge Villa and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Xujia Jiang, in collaboration with the Nature Geoscience team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Annual Schoenoplectus americanus stem density in all treatments from 2017 to 2020.

Points are means of triplicate plots. Error bars are standard error across treatment replicates (n = 3). Temperature treatments are ambient (Amb) or +5.1 °C above ambient (+5.1 °C) either alone or crossed with elevated CO2 (+eCO2).

Extended Data Fig. 2 Mean redox potential measured at 5 cm depth in spring 2022 (Apr through Jun).

Error bars are standard error across treatment replicates (n = 3). Temperature treatments are ambient (Amb) or +5.1 °C above ambient (+5.1 °C) either alone or crossed with elevated CO2 (+eCO2).

Extended Data Fig. 3 Mean porewater CH4 (10–120 cm) from all treatments.

Samples were collected in May, Jun, and Sep. Brackets above the paired bars show the P values for the differences between treatments based on Tukey’s HSD test. Elevated CO2 significantly reduced porewater CH4 in both ambient and warmed treatments. Error bars are standard error across treatment replicates (n = 3). Temperature treatments are ambient (Amb) or +5.1 °C above ambient (+5.1 °C) either alone or crossed with elevated CO2 (+eCO2).

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Table 1 and Figs. 1–3.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noyce, G.L., Smith, A.J., Kirwan, M.L. et al. Oxygen priming induced by elevated CO2 reduces carbon accumulation and methane emissions in coastal wetlands. Nat. Geosci. 16, 63–68 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-01070-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-01070-6

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing