Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Antarctic ice-shelf advance driven by anomalous atmospheric and sea-ice circulation

Nature Geoscience volume 15, pages 356–362 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The disintegration of the eastern Antarctic Peninsula’s Larsen A and B ice shelves has been attributed to atmosphere and ocean warming, and increased mass losses from the glaciers once restrained by these ice shelves have increased Antarctica’s total contribution to sea-level rise. Abrupt recessions in ice-shelf frontal position presaged the break-up of Larsen A and B, yet, in the ~20 years since these events, documented knowledge of frontal change along the entire ~1,400-km-long eastern Antarctic Peninsula is limited. Here, we show that 85% of the seaward ice-shelf perimeter fringing this coastline underwent uninterrupted advance between the early 2000s and 2019, in contrast to the two previous decades. We attribute this advance to enhanced ocean-wave dampening, ice-shelf buttressing and the absence of sea-surface slope-induced gravitational ice-shelf flow. These phenomena were, in turn, enabled by increased near-shore sea ice driven by a Weddell Sea-wide intensification of cyclonic surface winds around 2002. Collectively, our observations demonstrate that sea-ice change can either safeguard from, or set in motion, the final rifting and calving of even large Antarctic ice shelves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Ice-shelf front and grounding-line migration in the eastern Antarctic Peninsula south of Cape Longing.
Fig. 2: Areal evolution of the eastern Antarctic Peninsula’s ice shelves, 1961–2019.
Fig. 3: Sea ice concentration and surface-wind conditions over the Weddell Sea sector.
Fig. 4: Schematic diagrams showing the key atmospheric and sea ice processes controlling the (in)stability of the eastern Antarctic Peninsula’s ice shelves through time.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All satellite and climate reanalysis datasets utilized in this study are publicly available and can be obtained from the data repositories detailed in the Methods. The CATS2008a tidal model is available at: https://www.usap-dc.org/view/dataset/601235, and the ice front and 2019 grounding line location files generated in this study are available at https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.54490 (ref. 81) and https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.54489 (ref. 82), respectively. Supplementary Data 1 contains a list of all satellite images used in the production of our ice front and grounding line datasets, and Supplementary Data 2 contains the ice-shelf areal extent values used in the production of Fig. 2.

Code availability

The MATLAB codes developed for this study are available upon request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Fürst, J. J. et al. The safety band of Antarctic ice shelves. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 479–482 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rott, H., Skvarca, P. & Nagler, T. Rapid collapse of Northern Larsen Ice Shelf, Antarctica. Science 271, 788–792 (1996).

  3. Scambos, T. A., Hulbe, C., Fahnestock, M. & Bohlander, J. The link between climate warming and break-up of ice shelves in the Antarctic Peninsula. J. Glaciol. 46, 516–530 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Scambos, T., Hulbe, C. & Fahnestock, M. in Antarctic Peninsula Climate Variability: Historical and Paleoenvironmental Perspectives Vol. 79 (eds Domack, E. et al.) 79–92 (American Geophysical Union, 2003).

  5. Cook, A. J. & Vaughan, D. G. Overview of areal changes of the ice shelves on the Antarctic Peninsula over the past 50 years. Cryosphere 4, 77–98 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. The IMBIE Team. Mass balance of the Antarctic Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2017. Nature 558, 219–222 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shepherd, A. et al. Trends in Antarctic Ice Sheet elevation and mass. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 8174–8183 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Paolo, F. S., Fricker, H. A. & Padman, L. Volume loss from Antarctic ice shelves is accelerating. Science 348, 327–331 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rack, W. & Rott, H. Pattern of retreat and disintegration of the Larsen B ice shelf, Antarctic Peninsula. Ann. Glaciol. 39, 505–510 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. van den Broeke, M. Strong surface melting preceded collapse of Antarctic Peninsula ice shelf. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L12815 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Banwell, A., MacAyeal, D. R. & Sergienko, O. V. Breakup of the Larsen B ice shelf triggered by chain reaction drainage of supraglacial lakes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 5872–5876 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Etourneau, J. et al. Ocean temperature impact on ice shelf extent in the eastern Antarctic Peninsula. Nat. Commun. 10, 304 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shepherd, A., Wingham, D., Payne, T. & Skvarca, P. Larsen ice shelf has progressively thinned. Science 302, 856–860 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rignot, E. et al. Accelerated ice discharge from the Antarctic Peninsula following the collapse of Larsen B ice shelf. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L18401 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Miles, B. W. J., Stokes, C. R. & Jamieson, S. S. R. Simultaneous disintegration of outlet glaciers in Porpoise Bay (Wilkes Land), East Antarctica, driven by sea ice break-up. Cryosphere 11, 427–442 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. MacGregor, J. A., Catania, G. A., Markowski, M. I. S. & Andrews, A. G. Widespread rifting and retreat of ice-shelf margins in the eastern Amundsen Sea Embayment between 1972 and 2011. J. Glaciol. 58, 458–466 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Haran, T., Bohlander, J., Scambos, T., Painter, T. & Fahnestock, M. MODIS Mosaic of Antarctica 2003–2004 (MOA2004) Image Map, Version 1 (NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center, 2005, updated 2019); https://doi.org/10.7265/N5ZK5DM5

  18. Bell, R. W., Banwell, A. F., Trusel, L. D. & Kingslake, J. Antarctic surface hydrology and impacts on ice-sheet mass balance. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 1044–1052 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hogg, A. E. & Gudmundsson, H. Impacts of the Larsen C ice shelf calving event. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 540–542 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wuite, J. et al. Evolution of surface velocities and ice discharge of Larsen B outlet glaciers from 1995 to 2013. Cryosphere 9, 957–969 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rignot, E. et al. Four decades of Antarctic Ice Sheet mass balance from 1979–2017. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 1095–1103 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Velicogna, I. et al. Continuity of ice sheet mass loss in Greenland and Antarctica from the GRACE and GRACE follow-on missions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL087291 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Adusumilli, S., Fricker, H. A., Siegfried, M. R., Paolo, F. S. & Ligtenberg, S. R. M. Variable basal melt rates of Antarctic Peninsula ice shelves, 1994–2016. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 4086–4095 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Turner, J. et al. Absence of 21st century warming on Antarctic Peninsula consistent with natural variability. Nature 535, 411–415 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bevan, S. L. et al. Decline in surface melt duration on Larsen C ice shelf revealed by the Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT). Earth Space Sci. 5, 578–591 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith, B. et al. Pervasive ice sheet mass loss reflects competing ocean and atmosphere processes. Science 368, 1239–1242 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Massom, R. A. et al. Antarctic ice shelf disintegration triggered by sea ice loss and ocean swell. Nature 558, 383–389 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kacimi, S. & Kwok, R. The Antarctic sea ice cover from ICESat-2 and CryoSat-2: freeboard, snow depth and ice thickness. Cryosphere 14, 4453–4474 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dowdeswell, J. A. et al. Sea-floor and sea-ice conditions in the western Weddell Sea, Antarctica, around the wreck of Sir Ernest Shackleton’s Endurance. Ant. Sci. 32, 301–313 (2020).

  30. Sergienko, O. V. Elastic response of floating glacier ice to impact of long‐period ocean waves. J. Geophys. Res. 115, F04028 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Walker, C. C., Basis, J. N., Fricker, H. A. & Czerwinski, R. J. Structural and environmental controls on Antarctic ice shelf rift propagation inferred from satellite monitoring. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 118, 2354–2364 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Francis, D. et al. Atmospheric extremes caused high oceanward sea surface slope triggering the biggest calving event in more than 50 years at the Amery Ice Shelf. Cryosphere 15, 2147–2165 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. IPCC in The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 203–320 (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022); https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157964.005

  34. Holland, P. R., Bracegridle, T. J., Dutrieux, P., Jenkins, A. & Steig, E. J. West Antarctic ice loss influenced by internal climate variability and anthropogenic forcing. Nat. Geosci. 12, 718–724 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Naughten, K. A. et al. Future projections of Antarctic Ice Shelf melting based on CMIP5 scenarios. J. Clim. 31, 5243–5261 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bintanja, R., van Oldenborgh, G. J., Drijfhout, S. S., Wouters, B. & Katsman, C. A. Important role for ocean warming and increased ice-shelf melt in Antarctic sea-ice expansion. Nat. Geosci. 6, 376–379 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bintanja, R., Oldenborgh, G. J. V. & Katsman, C. A. The effect of increased fresh water from Antarctic ice shelves on future trends in Antarctic sea ice. Ann. Glaciol. 56, 120–126 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cook, A. J., Fox, A. J., Vaughan, D. G. & Ferrigno, J. G. Retreating glacier fronts on the Antarctic Peninsula over the past half-century. Science 308, 541–544 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ferrigno, J. G., Foley, K. M., Swithinbank, C., Williams, R. C. Jr & Dailide, L. M. Coastal-change and glaciological map of the Ronne Ice Shelf area, Antarctica: 1974–2002 (to accompany MAP I–2600–D) (US Department of the Interior, United States Geological Survey, 2005); https://doi.org/10.3133/i2600D

  40. Howat, I. M., Porter, C., Smith, B. E., Noh, M.-J. & Morin, P. The Reference Elevation Model of Antarctica. Cryosphere 13, 665–674 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Depoorter, M. A. et al. Calving fluxes and basal melt rates of Antarctic ice shelves. Nature 502, 89–92 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Budge, J. S. & Long, D. G. A comprehensive database for Antarctic iceberg tracking using scatterometer data. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 11, 434–442 (2018).

  43. Rignot, E., Mouginot, J. & Scheuchl, B. Antarctic grounding line mapping from differential satellite radar interferometry. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L10504 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rignot, E., Mouginot, J. & Scheuchl, B. MEaSUREs Antarctic Grounding Line from Differential Satellite Radar Interferometry, Version 2 (NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center, 2016).

  45. Luckman, A. et al. Surface melt and ponding on Larsen C Ice Shelf and the impact of föhn winds. Antarct. Sci. 26, 625–635 (2014).

  46. Yague-Martinez, N. et al. Interferometric processing of Sentinel-1 TOPS data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 54, 2220–2234 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Christie, F. D. W., Bingham, R. G., Gourmelen, N., Tett, S. F. B. & Muto, A. Four-decade record of pervasive grounding line retreat along the Bellingshausen margin of West Antarctica. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 5741–5749 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Fricker, H. A. et al. Mapping the grounding zone of the Amery Ice Shelf, East Antarctica using InSAR, MODIS and ICESat. Antarct. Sci. 21, 515–532 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Christie, F. D. W. et al. Glacier change along West Antarctica’s Marie Byrd Land Sector and links to inter-decadal atmosphere-ocean variability. Cryosphere 12, 2461–2479 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Rack, W., King, M. A., Marsh, O. J., Wild, C. T. & Floricioiu, D. Analysis of ice shelf flexure and its InSAR representation in the grounding zone of the southern McMurdo Ice Shelf. Cryosphere 11, 2481–2490 (2017).

  51. Morlighem, M. et al. Deep glacial troughs and stabilizing ridges unveiled beneath the margins of the Antarctic ice sheet. Nat. Geosci. 13, 132–137 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Milillo, P. et al. On the short-term grounding zone dynamics of Pine Island Glacier, West Antarctica, observed with COSMO-SkyMed interferometric data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 10436–10444 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Padman, L., Fricker, H. A., Coleman, R., Howard, S. & Erofeeva, S. A new tidal model for the Antarctic ice shelves and seas. Ann. Glaciol. 34, 247–254 (2002). Updated 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Gardner, A. S., Fahnestock, M. A. & Scambos, T. A. ITS_LIVE Regional Glacier and Ice Sheet Surface Velocities (National Snow and Ice Data Center, 2019); https://doi.org/10.5067/6II6VW8LLWJ7

  55. Gardner, A. S. et al. Increased West Antarctic and unchanged East Antarctic ice discharge over the last 7 years. Cryosphere 12, 521–547 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Cavalieri, D. J., Parkinson, C. L., Gloersen, P. & Zwally, H. J. Sea Ice Concentrations from Nimbus-7 SMMR and DMSP SSM/I-SSMIS Passive Microwave Data, Version 1 (NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center, 1996, updated 2020); https://doi.org/10.5067/8GQ8LZQVL0VL

  57. Fetterer, F., Knowles, K., Meier, W. N., Savoie, M. & Windnagel, A. K. Sea Ice Index, Version 3 (National Snow and Ice Data Center, 2017, updated 2020); https://doi.org/10.7265/N5K072F8

  58. Todd, J. & Christoffersen, P. Are seasonal calving dynamics forced by buttressing from ice mélange or undercutting by melting? Outcomes from full-Stokes simulations of Store Glacier, West Greenland. Cryosphere 8, 2353–2365 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Carr, J. R., Stokes, C. & Vieli, A. Recent retreat of major outlet glaciers on Novaya Zemlya, Russian Arctic, influenced by fjord geometry and sea-ice conditions. J. Glaciol. 60, 155–170 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Greene, C. A. et al. Seasonal dynamics of Totten Ice Shelf controlled by sea ice buttressing. Cryosphere 12, 2869–2882 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Liang, Q. et al. Ice flow variations at Polar Record Glacier, East Antarctica. J. Glaciol. 65, 279–287 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Aoki, S. Breakup of land-fast sea ice in Lützow-Holm Bay, East Antarctica, and its teleconnection to tropical Pacific sea surface temperatures. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 3219–3227 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Fraser, A. D. et al. East Antarctic landfast sea ice distribution and variability, 2000–08. J. Clim. 25, 1137–1156 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Robel, A. A. Thinning sea ice weakens buttressing force of iceberg mélange and promotes calving. Nat. Commun. 8, 14596 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Fraser, A. D. et al. High-resolution mapping of circum-Antarctic landfast sea ice distribution 2000–2018. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 2987–2999 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Nihashi, S. & Ohshima, K. I. Circumpolar mapping of Antarctic coastal polynyas and landfast sea ice: relationship and variability. J. Clim. 28, 3650–3670 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Hersbach, H. et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 146, 1999–2049 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Dee, D. P. et al. The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 137, 553–597 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Dong, X. et al. Robustness of the recent global atmospheric reanalyses for Antarctic near-surface wind speed climatology. J. Clim. 33, 4027–4043 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Bidlot, J.-R. Model upgrade improves ocean wave forecasts. ECMWF Newsletter 159 (April 2019); https://www.ecmwf.int/en/newsletter/159/news/model-upgrade-improves-ocean-wave-forecasts

  71. ECMWF. Part VII: ECMWF wave model. In IFS Documentation—Cy43r3 Operational Implementation 11 July 2017 (ECMWF, 2017); https://www.ecmwf.int/sites/default/files/elibrary/2017/17739-part-vii-ecmwf-wave-model.pdf

  72. Chassignet, E. P. et al. The HYCOM (HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model) data assimilative system. J. Mar. Syst. 65, 60–83 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Cummings, J. A. & Smedstad, O. M. in Data Assimilation for Atmospheric, Oceanic and Hydrologic Applications Vol. 2 (eds Park, S. K. & Xu, L.) Ch. 13 (Springer, 2013); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35088-7_13

  74. Brenner, A. C., DiMarzio, J. P. & Zwally, H. J. GFO NASA/GSFC Polar Ice Data Processing and Validation Report (NASA, 2001); https://icesat4.gsfc.nasa.gov/missions/gfo_cal_val.php

  75. Cummings, J. A. Operational multivariate ocean data assimilation. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 131, 3583–3607 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Burrough, P. A. & McDonnell, R. A. Principles of Geographical Information Systems 190 pp. (Oxford Univ. Press, 1998).

  77. Henley, B. J. et al. A tripole index for the interdecadal Pacific oscillation. Clim. Dyn. 45, 3077–3090 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Marshall, G. J. Trends in the southern annular mode from observations and reanalyses. J. Clim. 16, 4134–4143 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Greene, C. A., Gwyther, D. E. & Blankenship, D. D. Antarctic mapping tools for MATLAB. Comput. Geosci. 104, 151–157 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Greene, C. A. et al. The climate data toolbox for MATLAB. Geochem. Geophys. 20, 3774–3781 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Christie, F. D. W. et al. Antarctic ice front positions, 1979–2021, supporting ‘Antarctic ice-shelf advance driven by anomalous atmospheric and sea-ice circulation’ (Cambridge Apollo, 2022); https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.54490

  82. Christie, F. D. W. et al. Antarctic Grounding Line Location from Sentinel-1A/B double-difference interferometry, 2019, supporting ‘Antarctic ice-shelf advance driven by anomalous atmospheric and sea-ice circulation’. Cambridge Apollo (2022); https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.54489

  83. Rignot, E., Mouginot, J. & Scheuchl, B. MEaSUREs InSAR-Based Antarctica Ice Velocity Map, Version 2 (NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center, 2017); https://doi.org/10.5067/D7GK8F5J8M8R

  84. Mouginot, J., Scheuchl, B. & Rignot, E. MEaSUREs Antarctic Boundaries for IPY 2007-2009 from Satellite Radar, Version 2 (NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center, 2017); https://doi.org/10.5067/AXE4121732AD

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Cook, T. Haran, J. Ferrigno and J. Wuite for making their historical ice-shelf frontal positions publicly available, D. Floricioiu for providing access to the DLR/ESA AIS CCI GLL product and NASA, USGS, ESA, the EU Copernicus programme, NSIDC, ECMWF, NOAA, G. Marshall and A. Fraser for making all other satellite and climate data utilized in this study available free of charge. This work was funded by the Flotilla Foundation and Marine Archaeology Consultants Switzerland (F.D.W.C., T.J.B., C.L.B., A.M. and J.A.D.) and with the financial assistance (F.D.W.C. and J.A.D.) of the Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Christine L. Batchelor

    Present address: School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, UK

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Frazer D. W. Christie, Toby J. Benham, Christine L. Batchelor, Aleksandr Montelli & Julian A. Dowdeswell

  2. Gateway Antarctica, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

    Wolfgang Rack

Authors
  1. Frazer D. W. Christie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Toby J. Benham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christine L. Batchelor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wolfgang Rack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Aleksandr Montelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Julian A. Dowdeswell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

F.D.W.C. devised the study and carried out all acquisition, processing and interpretation of the observational and climate reanalysis datasets referred to in the text. T.J.B., W.R., C.L.B. and A.M. assisted F.D.W.C. with the initial acquisition and processing of the Sentinel-1A/B data. F.D.W.C. wrote the manuscript, and each co-author contributed comments on the text and figures.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frazer D. W. Christie.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Geoscience thanks Suzanne Bevan, Ted Scambos and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Tom Richardson, in collaboration with the Nature Geoscience team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Grounding-line migration along Larsen C Ice Shelf.

a, Change in grounding line location (GLL) between 1994-6, 2016-7 and 2019 as determined from satellite radar-based techniques (Methods). Following Fig. 1, symbols denoting recent (2016/7-2019) GLL change are also shown, as well as the position of the 2019 ice front (maroon) and ice surface velocity contours83 (100 m yr−1 increments) over grounded ice. b-j, spatial extent of GLL change across the regions labelled in a, superimposed over recent ice surface velocity magnitudes83. JP1-3 denote unnamed glaciers 1–3 draining from Jason Peninsula; CP1-2, unnamed glaciers 1-2 draining from Churchill Peninsula; At, Atlee; Be, Bevin; An, Anderson; Sl, Sleipnir; Aa, Aagaard; Go, Gould; Ba, Balch; Al, Alberts; Br, Breitfus; Cu, Cumpston; QF, Quartermain-Fricker; Fl, Flint; De, Demorest; Ma, Matthes; Ch, Chamberlain; Re, Renaud; Le, Lewis; Ah, Ahlmann; BG, Bill’s Gulch; Da, Daspit; Me, Mercator; Ap, Aphrodite; Pa, Pan and Cr, Cronus glaciers. HK1-2 denotes the unnamed glaciers flowing from Hollick-Kenyon Peninsula. In e and f, white asterisks denote no change since the mid−1990s in lieu of 2016/7 GLL coverage.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Grounding-line migration along Larsen D, New Bedford, Wright and Keller ice shelves’ fastest-flowing glaciers.

a, Change in grounding line location (GLL) between 1994-6, 2016-7 and 2019 as determined from satellite radar-based techniques (Methods). Following Fig. 1, symbols denoting recent (2016/7-2019) GLL change proximal to Larsen C Ice Shelf (LC) are also shown, as well as the position of the 2019 ice front (maroon) and ice surface velocity contours83 (100 m yr-1 increments) over grounded ice. b-j, spatial extent of GLL change across the regions labelled in a, superimposed over recent ice surface velocity magnitudes83. Ca denotes Casey Glacier; Lu, Lurabee; An, Anthony; Cr, Croom; Cl, Clifford; Ma, Matheson; Ya, Yates; Da, Dana; Mu, Murrish; So, Soto; Ha, Haley; Cli, Cline; Ra, Rankin; Gr, Gruening; Ru, Runcorn; Mr, Maury; Fe, Fenton; Mo, Mosby; MH, Meinardus-Haines and Wa, Waverly glaciers. K denotes the unnamed glacier draining to Keller Inlet. All other abbreviations are the same as in Fig. 1.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Recent changes in EAP ice-surface flow.

a, Landsat 8-derived velocity change between 2016 and 2018 over the Antarctic Peninsula region. Black lines delineate the ice drainage basins detailed in a recent study84. The 2018 ice front position is also shown. To minimise erroneous data coverage over ice divides and other regions of complex topography, data are masked (dark grey) where Verror exceeded 30 m yr-1 in either 2016 or 2018 (or both). Black box indicates the detail shown in c and d. b, Landsat 8-derived Verror. In c and d, HGE denotes Hektoria, Green and Evans; C, Crane; F, Flask and L, Leppard glaciers. Note the continued dynamic acceleration of Flask and Leppard glaciers following the disintegration of Larsen B Ice Shelf in 2002, and the lack of any similar grounded ice-flow acceleration upstream of Larsen C Ice Shelf following the calving of iceberg A-68 (Fig. 1).

Extended Data Fig. 4 Wider climatic conditions over the Weddell Sea Sector.

a and b, Monthly changes in the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation (IPO) and Southern Annular Mode (SAM), respectively (Methods). Data have been smoothed using a 20-year running mean to emphasise multi-decadal variability. Following Fig. 2, blue (pink) shading denotes the approximate timing of relatively cool (warm) climatic conditions over the Antarctic Peninsula as deduced from (a). c and d, annual-averaged 10 m wind anomalies over the Antarctic Peninsula Ice Sheet for the periods (c) January 1982 to December 2002 and (d) January 2003 to December 2019, respectively, relative to all months on record (1979–2019). Note the abrupt reversal in wind direction over most EAP ice shelves (except Ronne) between the two periods, indicative of reduced foehn wind-driven ice-shelf surface melting, calving and coastal sea-ice evacuation through time (see main text and Supplementary Discussion 3 for further information).

Extended Data Fig. 5 Austral summertime sea-ice conditions over the Weddell Sea Sector.

a and b, Mean passive microwave-derived sea-ice concentration anomalies for all complete austral summertime (DJF) cycles between 2003 and 2019 and 1982 and 2002, respectively, relative to all earlier, complete summertime cycles on record (1980–2019). Black asterisk denotes the approximate location of iceberg A-23a (lightly grounded at this location since 2000); light grey shading, no data. In both panels, dashed boxes indicate sea-ice averaging regions used in the production of Fig. 2 and Extended Data Figs. 9 and 10. Figure highlights the importance of summer sea ice variability in dominating the annual-averaged observations presented in Fig. 3.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Landfast sea ice conditions in the eastern Antarctic Peninsula.

a, Mean extended wintertime (April to October) landfast sea ice occurrence offshore of the EAP, 2002–2017. 100% occurrence denotes permanent landfast sea-ice presence over the observational record during these months. G denotes Gipps Ice Rise. b, Linear trend in extended wintertime landfast sea ice occurrence. Red denotes increased sea ice occurrence through time. Cyan stippling indicates statistically significant trends (p < .1) over the 18-year observational window, as determined from a two-tailed Pearson’s Linear Correlation Coefficient test. Inset shows detail around Gipps Ice Rise, including near the rift that formed iceberg A-68 (dark grey line; see main text and Supplementary Discussion for further information).

Extended Data Fig. 7 EAP ‘open ocean years’, 1979–2019.

a,c,e,g, Monthly mean sea-ice minima observed during the ‘open ocean years’ indicated in Fig. 2. Grey shading denotes <15% sea-ice concentration. Note that means overestimate sub-monthly sea ice extent and concentration, especially near the ice edge. b,d,f,h, ERA5-derived timeseries showing corresponding ocean wave conditions (median peak period and significant height of combined wind waves and swell; see Methods) offshore of the Larsen A, B, C (panels b,d,h) and New Bedford, Wright, Keller and Ronne ice shelves (panel f). Median values were calculated from all cells in the red boxes shown in panels a,c,e,g, when ocean waves were incident upon the ice shelves. Times when waves were not incident are masked. Boxplots show the statistical distribution of observed wave conditions, with outliers (>1.5 times the interquartile range) marked as crosses.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Sea-surface slope conditions prior to ice-shelf frontal recession.

a,c,e,g, Mean HYCOM-derived sea-surface slope anomalies offshore of the Larsen B (LBIS), Larsen D (LDIS) and Ronne ice shelves prior to the collapse of Larsen B (a) and the calving of icebergs A-69 (c), A-70/71 (e), and A-76 (g). Temporal averaging window and baseline periods are indicated top right, the latter of which corresponds to mean sea-surface slope during the month of calving (October 2020 for e given the calving of A-70/71 in early November 2020). Black and cyan lines indicate pre- and post-recession location of the ice shelves, respectively. Dark grey denotes no data. b,d,f,h, timeseries showing mean sea-surface slopes in the days and weeks prior to collapse (b) or calving (d,f,h), as averaged over the red dashed boxes shown in a,c,e,g. Vertical red lines denote the onset of collapse/calving; pink shading, periods of intense slopes following either exceptionally strong winds on the already open ocean (b) or observed, pronounced coastal sea-ice evacuation (d,f,h; cf. Supplementary Videos 2–4). Horizontal grey lines indicate mean slope over the baseline periods shown in a,c,e,g. Relative change in ice-shelf frontal strain, Ɛ, corresponding to variations in slope are also shown (right-hand axes).

Extended Data Fig. 9 Larsen A coastal sea-ice variability.

a, Timeseries showing monthly sea ice concentration (SIC) between 1979 and 1986 when a calving event of uncertain timing occurred (cf. Figure 2). Values represent the average of all cells contained in the red dashed box shown in b. Red lines denote times in which highly anomalous (>2σ), wind-driven coastal sea-ice losses would have rapidly de-buttressed Larsen A’s ice front, prompted enhanced gravitational ice-shelf flow due to increased (oceanward-down) sea-surface slopes and likely initiated calving. Pink shading shows ‘open ocean conditions’ as in Fig. 2. b and c, mean wind (vector) and SIC (raster) anomalies during the times indicated by the red lines in a (1981/2 and 1984, respectively). Note the anomalous offshore direction of winds over Larsen A in both panels. d, map showing the extent of the calving event between 1979 and 1986. Grey lines denote all earlier (1947–1978) observed ice frontal positions5.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Larsen D coastal sea-ice variability.

a, Timeseries showing monthly sea ice concentration (SIC) between 1990 and 1993 when a calving event of uncertain timing occurred (cf. Figure 2). Values represent the average of all cells contained in the red dashed box shown in b. Red lines denote times in which highly anomalous (>2σ), wind-driven coastal sea-ice losses would have rapidly de-buttressed Larsen D’s ice front, prompted enhanced gravitational ice-shelf flow due to increased (oceanward-down) sea-surface slopes and likely initiated calving. In c and d, the position of the ice front as observed on 24th January 1995 is also shown, revealing further retreat of the coastline after January 1993 in response to the observed coastal sea-ice loss shown in a and b and/or the related calving event between December 1992 and January 1993 (d). No other satellite imagery exists between these times. HI denotes Hearst Island; EI, Ewing Island; DI, Dolleman Island; SI, Steele Island.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Discussions 1–4, Fig. 1 and references.

Supplementary Data 1

Satellite imagery utilized in this study.

Supplementary Data 2

Ice-shelf areal extent values.

Supplementary Video 1

Time-lapse animation showing the recent calving of iceberg A-68 from Larsen C Ice Shelf, 2017, as observed by Sentinel-1A/B (single (HH) polarization). The black box delimits the region of landfast sea ice (red shading) subject to complete mechanical failure/disintegration ~3 weeks prior to A-68’s calving. Note the synchronous timing between the disintegration of this landfast sea ice and the reactivation of the rift that instigated A-68’s calving.

Supplementary Video 2

Time-lapse animation showing the recent calving of iceberg A-69 from Larsen D Ice Shelf, 2020, as observed by Sentinel-1A/B (dual polarization (HHHV)). The blue box corresponds to the sea-slope averaging region used in the production of Extended Data Fig. 9. Red shading denotes areas of the coastline fringed by landfast sea ice.

Supplementary Video 3

Time-lapse animation showing the recent calving of icebergs A-70 and A-71 from Larsen D Ice Shelf, 2020, as observed by Sentinel-1A/B (single (HH) polarization). The blue box corresponds to the sea-slope averaging region used in the production of Extended Data Fig. 9. The red line tracks the migration of a relatively young, thin band of sea ice from the Ronne Polynya through the averaging box prior to and during the calving of A-70 and A-71.

Supplementary Video 4

Time-lapse animation showing the recent calving of iceberg A-76 from Ronne Ice Shelf, 2021, as observed by Sentinel-1A/B (single (HH) polarization). The blue box corresponds to the sea-slope averaging region used in the production of Extended Data Fig. 9. The red line tracks the limits of the Ronne Polynya in the weeks surrounding A-76’s calving.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Christie, F.D.W., Benham, T.J., Batchelor, C.L. et al. Antarctic ice-shelf advance driven by anomalous atmospheric and sea-ice circulation. Nat. Geosci. 15, 356–362 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00938-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00938-x

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing