Abstract
Airborne mineral dust particles can act as natural seeds for cirrus clouds in the upper troposphere. However, the atmospheric abundance of dust is unconstrained in cirrus-forming regions, hampering our ability to predict these radiatively important clouds. Here we present global-scale measurements of dust aerosol abundance in the upper troposphere and incorporate these into a detailed cirrus-formation model. We show that dust aerosol initiates cirrus clouds throughout the extra-tropics in all seasons and dominates cirrus formation in the Northern Hemisphere (75–93% of clouds seasonally). Using a global transport model with improved dust treatment, we also explore which of Earth’s deserts are the largest contributors of dust aerosol to cirrus-forming regions. We find that the meteorological environment downstream of each emission region modulates dust atmospheric lifetime and transport efficiency to the upper troposphere so that source contributions are disproportionate to emissions. Our findings establish the critical role of dust in Earth’s climate system through the formation of cirrus clouds.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
In situ data and model output for this study are publically available at https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/2006. ATom aircraft data are publically available at https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1925.
Code availability
Code for the CESM model is publically available at http://www.cesm.ucar.edu/models/cesm1.0/. Code for the GEOS model is publically available at https://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/GEOS_systems/.
References
Boucher, O. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) Ch. 7 and 8 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Cziczo, D. J. et al. Clarifying the dominant sources and mechanisms of cirrus cloud formation. Science 340, 1320–1324 (2013).
Twohy, C. H. Measurements of Saharan dust in convective clouds over the tropical eastern Atlantic Ocean. J. Atmos. Sci. 72, 75–81 (2015).
Kanji, Z. A. et al. Overview of ice nucleating particles. Meteorol. Monogr. 58, 1.1–1.33 (2017).
Lohmann, U. & Gasparini, B. A cirrus cloud climate dial? Science 357, 248–249 (2017).
Knippertz, P. & Stuut, J.-B. W. (eds) Mineral Dust (Springer, 2014).
Huneeus, N. et al. Global dust model intercomparison in AeroCom phase I. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 7781–7816 (2011).
Kok, J. F. et al. Smaller desert dust cooling effect estimated from analysis of dust size and abundance. Nat. Geosci. 10, 274–278 (2017).
Cakmur, R. V. et al. Constraining the magnitude of the global dust cycle by minimizing the difference between a model and observations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 111, D06207 (2006).
Yu, H. et al. Quantification of trans-Atlantic dust transport from seven-year (2007–2013) record of CALIPSO lidar measurements. Remote Sens. Environ. 159, 232–249 (2015).
Koffi, B. et al. Evaluation of the aerosol vertical distribution in global aerosol models through comparison against CALIOP measurements: AeroCom phase II results. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 121, 7254–7283 (2016).
Pruppacher, H. R. & Klett, J. D. Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation (Springer, 2010).
Kipling, Z. et al. Constraints on aerosol processes in climate models from vertically-resolved aircraft observations of black carbon. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 5969–5986 (2013).
Sayer, A. M. et al. Satellite Ocean Aerosol Retrieval (SOAR) algorithm extension to S‐NPP VIIRS as part of the ‘Deep Blue’ aerosol project. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 123, 380–400 (2018).
Shi, Y. et al. A critical examination of spatial biases between MODIS and MISR aerosol products—application for potential AERONET deployment. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 4, 2823–2836 (2011).
Winker, D. M. et al. The global 3-D distribution of tropospheric aerosols as characterized by CALIOP. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 3345–3361 (2013).
Froyd, K. D. et al. A new method to quantify mineral dust and other aerosol species from aircraft platforms using single-particle mass spectrometry. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 12, 6209–6239 (2019).
Bullard, J. E. et al. High-latitude dust in the Earth system. Rev. Geophys. 54, 447–485 (2016).
Yu, P. et al. Evaluations of tropospheric aerosol properties simulated by the Community Earth System Model with a sectional aerosol microphysics scheme. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 7, 865–914 (2015).
Colarco, P., da Silva, A., Chin, M. & Diehl, T. Online simulations of global aerosol distributions in the NASA GEOS-4 model and comparisons to satellite and ground-based aerosol optical depth. J. Geophys. Res. 115, D14207 (2010).
Yu, P. et al. Efficient in-cloud removal of aerosols by deep convection. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 1061–1069 (2019).
Schill, G. P. et al. Widespread biomass burning smoke throughout the remote troposphere. Nat. Geosci. 13, 422–427 (2020).
Formenti, P. et al. Regional variability of the composition of mineral dust from western Africa: results from the AMMA SOP0/DABEX and DODO field campaigns. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 113, D00C13 (2008).
Lieke, K. et al. Particle chemical properties in the vertical column based on aircraft observations in the vicinity of Cape Verde Islands. Tellus B Chem. Phys. Meteorol. 63, 497–511 (2011).
Weinzierl, B. et al. The Saharan aerosol long-range transport and aerosol–cloud-interaction experiment: overview and selected highlights. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 98, 1427–1451 (2017).
Ryder, C. L. et al. Coarse-mode mineral dust size distributions, composition and optical properties from AER-D aircraft measurements over the tropical eastern Atlantic. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 17225–17257 (2018).
Price, H. C. et al. Atmospheric ice-nucleating particles in the dusty tropical Atlantic. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 123, 2175–2193 (2018).
Wiacek, A., Peter, T. & Lohmann, U. The potential influence of Asian and African mineral dust on ice, mixed-phase and liquid water clouds. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 8649–8667 (2010).
Tsai, F., Chen, G. T.-J., Liu, T.-H., Lin, W.-D. & Tu, J.-Y. Characterizing the transport pathways of Asian dust. J. Geophys. Res. 113, D17311 (2008).
Xu, C., Ma, Y., Yang, K. & You, C. Tibetan Plateau impacts on global dust transport in the upper troposphere. J. Clim. 31, 4745–4756 (2018).
Ma, J. et al. Modeling the aerosol chemical composition of the tropopause over the Tibetan Plateau during the Asian summer monsoon. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 11587–11612 (2019).
Mahowald, N. M. Anthropocene changes in desert area: sensitivity to climate model predictions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L18817 (2007).
Kok, J. F., Ward, D. S., Mahowald, N. M. & Evan, A. T. Global and regional importance of the direct dust-climate feedback. Nat. Commun. 9, 241 (2018).
Chin, M. et al. Multi-decadal aerosol variations from 1980 to 2009: a perspective from observations and a global model. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 3657–3690 (2014).
Gettelman, A. et al. Global simulations of ice nucleation and ice supersaturation with an improved cloud scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model. J. Geophys. Res. 115, D18216 (2010).
Kuebbeler, M., Lohmann, U., Hendricks, J. & Kärcher, B. Dust ice nuclei effects on cirrus clouds. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 3027–3046 (2014).
Krämer, M. et al. A microphysics guide to cirrus—part 2: climatologies of clouds and humidity from observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 12569–12608 (2020).
Ullrich, R. et al. A new ice nucleation active site parameterization for desert dust and soot. J. Atmos. Sci. 74, 699–717 (2017).
Mitchell, D. L., Rasch, P., Ivanova, D., McFarquhar, G. & Nousiainen, T. Impact of small ice crystal assumptions on ice sedimentation rates in cirrus clouds and GCM simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L09806 (2008).
Sanderson, B. M., Piani, C., Ingram, W. J., Stone, D. A. & Allen, M. R. Towards constraining climate sensitivity by linear analysis of feedback patterns in thousands of perturbed-physics GCM simulations. Clim. Dyn. 30, 175–190 (2008).
Jensen, E. J. et al. Heterogeneous ice nucleation in the tropical tropopause layer. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 123, 12210–12227 (2018).
Mace, G. G. et al. A description of hydrometeor layer occurrence statistics derived from the first year of merged Cloudsat and CALIPSO data. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 114, D00A26 (2009).
Petzold, A. et al. Upper tropospheric water vapour and its interaction with cirrus clouds as seen from IAGOS long-term routine: in situ observations. Faraday Discuss. 200, 229–249 (2017).
Haag, W. et al. Freezing thresholds and cirrus cloud formation mechanisms inferred from in situ measurements of relative humidity. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 3, 1791–1806 (2003).
Gettelman, A., Fetzer, E. J., Eldering, A. & Irion, F. W. The global distribution of supersaturation in the upper troposphere from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder. J. Clim. 19, 6089–6103 (2006).
Mitchell, D. L., Garnier, A., Pelon, J. & Erfani, E. CALIPSO (IIR–CALIOP) retrievals of cirrus cloud ice-particle concentrations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 17325–17354 (2018).
Sourdeval, O. et al. Ice crystal number concentration estimates from lidar-radar satellite remote sensing—part 1: method and evaluation. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 14327–14350 (2018).
Kahn, B. H., Gettelman, A., Fetzer, E. J., Eldering, A. & Liang, C. K. Cloudy and clear-sky relative humidity in the upper troposphere observed by the A-train. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 114, D00H02 (2009).
Diao, M., Zondlo, M. A., Heymsfield, A. J. & Beaton, S. P. Hemispheric comparison of cirrus cloud evolution using in situ measurements in HIAPER pole-to-pole observations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 4090–4099 (2014).
Wofsy, S. C. et al. ATom: Merged Atmospheric Chemistry, Trace Gases, and Aerosols (ORNL DAAC, 2018); https://doi.org/10.3334/ornldaac/1581
Liu, J. et al. Spatial and temporal representativeness of ATom transects using GEOS-5 and GMI-CTM simulations. In 98th Ann. Meeting Amer. Meteor. Soc. 5B.2 (2018).
Brock, C. A. et al. Aerosol size distributions during the Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom): methods, uncertainties, and data products. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 12, 3081–3099 (2019).
Williamson, C. et al. Fast time response measurements of particle size distributions in the 3–60 nm size range with the nucleation mode aerosol size spectrometer. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 11, 3491–3509 (2018).
Kupc, A., Williamson, C., Wagner, N. L., Richardson, M. & Brock, C. A. Modification, calibration, and performance of the Ultra-High Sensitivity Aerosol Spectrometer for particle size distribution and volatility measurements during the Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom) airborne campaign. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 11, 369–383 (2018).
McNaughton, C. S. et al. Results from the DC-8 inlet characterization experiment (DICE): airborne versus surface sampling of mineral dust and sea salt aerosols. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 41, 136–159 (2007).
Thomson, D. S., Schein, M. E. & Murphy, D. M. Particle Analysis by Laser Mass Spectrometry WB-57F instrument overview. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 33, 153–169 (2000).
Murphy, D. M. et al. Single-particle mass spectrometry of tropospheric aerosol particles. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 111, D23S3 (2006).
Murphy, D. M., Middlebrook, A. M. & Warshawsky, M. Cluster analysis of data from the Particle Analysis by Laser Mass Spectrometry (PALMS) instrument. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 37, 382–391 (2003).
Diskin, G. S., Podolske, J. R., Sachse, G. W. & Slate, T. A. Open-path airborne tunable diode laser hygrometer. Proc. SPIE 4817, 196 (2002).
Podolske, J. R. Calibration and data retrieval algorithms for the NASA Langley/Ames Diode Laser Hygrometer for the NASA Transport and Chemical Evolution Over the Pacific (TRACE-P) mission. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 8792 (2003).
Rollins, A. W. et al. Evaluation of UT/LS hygrometer accuracy by intercomparison during the NASA MACPEX mission. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 119, 1915–1935 (2014).
Chan, K. R., Dean-Day, J., Bowen, S. W. & Bui, T. P. Turbulence measurements by the DC-8 Meteorological Measurement System. Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 1355–1358 (1998).
Bardeen, C. G., Toon, O. B., Jensen, E. J., Marsh, D. R. & Harvey, V. L. Numerical simulations of the three-dimensional distribution of meteoric dust in the mesosphere and upper stratosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 113, D17202 (2008).
Toon, O. B., Turco, R. P., Westphal, D., Malone, R. & Liu, M. A multidimensional model for aerosols: description of computational analogs. J. Atmos. Sci. 45, 2123–2144 (1988).
Ginoux, P. et al. Sources and distributions of dust aerosols simulated with the GOCART model. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 106, 20255–20273 (2001).
Su, L. & Toon, O. B. Numerical simulations of Asian dust storms using a coupled climate–aerosol microphysical model. J. Geophys. Res. 114, D14202 (2009).
Gillette, D. A. & Passi, R. Modeling dust emission caused by wind erosion. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 93, 14233–14242 (1988).
Creamean, J. M. et al. Colorado air quality impacted by long-range-transported aerosol: a set of case studies during the 2015 Pacific Northwest fires. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 12329–12345 (2016).
Tobo, Y. et al. Glacially sourced dust as a potentially significant source of ice nucleating particles. Nat. Geosci. 12, 253–258 (2019).
Zhang, G. J. & McFarlane, N. A. Sensitivity of climate simulations to the parameterization of cumulus convection in the Canadian climate centre general circulation model. Atmos. Ocean 33, 407–446 (1995).
Wang, H. et al. Sensitivity of remote aerosol distributions to representation of cloud–aerosol interactions in a global climate model. Geosci. Model Dev. 6, 765–782 (2013).
Grell, G. A. & Freitas, S. R. A scale and aerosol aware stochastic convective parameterization for weather and air quality modeling. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 5233–5250 (2014).
Chin, M. et al. Tropospheric aerosol optical thickness from the GOCART model and comparisons with satellite and sun photometer measurements. J. Atmos. Sci. 59, 461–483 (2002).
Bian, H. et al. Investigation of global particulate nitrate from the AeroCom phase III experiment. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 12911–12940 (2017).
Rienecker, M. M. et al. The GEOS‐5 Data Assimilation System: Documentation of Versions 5.0.1 and 5.1.0, and 5.2.0 (NASA, 2008).
Bowman, K. P. Large-scale isentropic mixing properties of the Antarctic polar vortex from analyzed winds. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 98, 23013–23027 (1993).
Bowman, K. P. & Carrie, G. D. The mean-meridional transport circulation of the troposphere in an idealized GCM. J. Atmos. Sci. 59, 1502–1514 (2002).
Spichtinger, P. & Gierens, K. M. Modelling of cirrus clouds—part 1b: structuring cirrus clouds by dynamics. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 707–719 (2009).
Jensen, E. J., Pfister, L. & Bui, T. P. Physical processes controlling ice concentrations in cold cirrus near the tropical tropopause. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 117, D111205 (2012).
Murphy, D. M. Rare temperature histories and cirrus ice number density in a parcel and a one-dimensional model. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 13013–13022 (2014).
Jensen, E. J. et al. Physical processes controlling ice concentrations in synoptically forced, midlatitude cirrus. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 5348–5360 (2013).
Jensen, E. & Pfister, L. Transport and freeze-drying in the tropical tropopause layer. J. Geophys. Res. 109, D02207 (2004).
Koop, T., Luo, B., Tsias, A. & Peter, T. Water activity as the determinant for homogeneous ice nucleation in aqueous solutions. Nature 406, 611–614 (2000).
DeMott, P. J. Quantitative descriptions of ice formation mechanisms of silver iodide-type aerosols. Atmos. Res. 38, 63–99 (1995).
Cziczo, D. J. et al. Deactivation of ice nuclei due to atmospherically relevant surface coatings. Environ. Res. Lett. 4, 044013 (2009).
Sullivan, R. C. et al. Irreversible loss of ice nucleation active sites in mineral dust particles caused by sulphuric acid condensation. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 11471–11487 (2010).
DeMott, P. J., Rogers, D. C. & Kreidenweis, S. M. The susceptibility of ice formation in upper tropospheric clouds to insoluble aerosol components. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 102, 19575–19584 (1997).
Kärcher, B., Hendricks, J. & Lohmann, U. Physically based parameterization of cirrus cloud formation for use in global atmospheric models. J. Geophys. Res. 111, D01205 (2006).
Podglajen, A., Hertzog, A., Plougonven, R. & Legras, B. Lagrangian temperature and vertical velocity fluctuations due to gravity waves in the lower stratosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 3543–3553 (2016).
Schoeberl, M. R. et al. Gravity wave spectra in the lower stratosphere diagnosed from project loon balloon trajectories. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 122, 8517–8524 (2017).
Acknowledgements
We thank M. Dollner and B. Weinzierl for cloud particle measurements to exclude cloudy flight segments; M. Richardson, F. Erdesz and D. Thomson for technical support; and D. Cziczo for valuable input. The ATom mission was supported by NASA’s Earth System Science Pathfinder Program EVS-2 funding. Participation in the ATom mission by K.D.F., G.P.S., C.J.W., C.A.B., D.M.M. and E.R. was supported by NOAA climate funding and NASA award NNH15AB12I. P.Y. was supported by the second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP, 2019QZKK0604). The CESM project is supported partly by the National Science Foundation. A.K. was supported by the Austrian Science Fund’s Erwin Schrodinger Fellowship J-3613. GEOS development in the Global Modeling and Assimilation Office is funded by NASA’s Modeling, Analysis and Prediction (MAP) program. Resources supporting GEOS were provided by the NASA High-End Computing (HEC) Program through the NASA Center for Climate Simulation (NCCS) at Goddard Space Flight Center. H.B. was supported by NASA award NNX17AG31G. P.R.C. was supported by the MAP-funded Chemistry-Climate Modeling (CCM) project (600-17-6985).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.D.F. wrote the paper with contributions from all authors. K.D.F., G.P.S., C.A.B., A.K., C.J.W., D.M.M., G.S.D. and T.B. collected airborne data. P.Y. and K.H.R. provided CESM/CARMA model results. H.B., A.S.D. and P.R.C. provided GEOS model results. E.R. provided forward trajectory results. E.J.J. provided cirrus model results.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Geoscience thanks Amato Evan, Trude Storelvmo and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Tom Richardson, in collaboration with the Nature Geoscience team.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Discussion, Figs. 1–13 and Table 1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Froyd, K.D., Yu, P., Schill, G.P. et al. Dominant role of mineral dust in cirrus cloud formation revealed by global-scale measurements. Nat. Geosci. 15, 177–183 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00901-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00901-w
This article is cited by
-
Historical footprints and future projections of global dust burden from bias-corrected CMIP6 models
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science (2024)
-
Long-term relationships between summer clouds and aerosols over mid-high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Mineral dust aerosol impacts on global climate and climate change
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment (2023)
-
Infrared optical signature reveals the source–dependency and along–transport evolution of dust mineralogy as shown by laboratory study
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Wispy clouds are born of dust in the wind
Nature (2022)