Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Amazonian forest degradation must be incorporated into the COP26 agenda

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (that is, forest fires and edge effects) within the Brazilian Amazon.


  1. 1.

    Aragão, L. E. O. C. et al. Nat. Commun. 9, 536 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Silva Junior, C. H. L. et al. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8360 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Assis, T. O. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 104035 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Harris, N. L. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 234–240 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Asner, G. P. Science 310, 480–482 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Caviglia-Harris, J. et al. World Dev. 79, 82–96 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Barlow, J. et al. Nature 535, 144–147 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Matricardi, E. A. T. et al. Science 369, 1378–1382 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Vancutsem, C. et al. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe1603 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Silva, C. V. J. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 114023 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Silva Junior, C. H. L. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 144–145 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lamb, D. Science 310, 1628–1632 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Heinrich, V. H. A. et al. Nat. Commun. 12, 1785 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Smith, C. C. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 085009 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Stabile, M. C. C. et al. Land Use Policy 91, 104362 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001. N.S.C., A.C.M.P., J.B.C.R, P.M.F. and L.E.O.C.A. thank the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for funding (processes 140379/2018-5, 140877/2018-5, 301597/2020-0, 311103/2015-4 and 305054/2016-3, respectively). A.P.-L. thanks the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP; process 2016/21043-8) for funding. V.H. was supported by a NERC GW4+ Doctoral Training Partnership studentship from the Natural Environment Research Council (NE/L002434/1). D.M.L. acknowledges funding from FAPESP (2015/02537-7) and from the AIMES (Analysis, Integration and Modelling of the Earth System) programme. A.A., C.S. and P.B. were funded by Global Wildlife Conservation (grant no. 5282.019-0285) and Climate Land Use Alliance (G-2010-57219). E.B. and J.B. were funded by the UK Research and Innovation (NE/S01084X/1) and the BNP Paribas Foundation (Bioclimate). J.F., E.B. and J.B. thank CNPq for funding (processes 441573/2020-7, 441659/2016-0, 441949/2018-5, and 420254/2018-8). L.O.A. thanks the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI; process SGP-HW 016), the CNPq (processes 441949/2018-5 and 442650/2018-3), and FAPESP (processes 2016/02018-2, 2019/05440-5, and 2018/14423-4) for funding. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. This Correspondence presents the personal views of the authors based on their scientific expertise but is not aimed at representing the official positions of their own organizations. Portuguese and Spanish versions of this Correspondence are provided at

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Celso H. L. Silva Junior.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Geoscience thanks Gregory Asner for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silva Junior, C.H.L., Carvalho, N.S., Pessôa, A.C.M. et al. Amazonian forest degradation must be incorporated into the COP26 agenda. Nat. Geosci. 14, 634–635 (2021).

Download citation


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing