Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

No 182W evidence for early Moon formation

Matters Arising to this article was published on 13 September 2021

The Original Article was published on 29 July 2019

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Effect of late accretion on the BSE’s µ182W.
Fig. 2: Calculated µ182W difference between the Moon and the BSE before late accretion as a function of the late-accreted mass added to the Moon.


  1. Thiemens, M. M., Sprung, P., Fonseca, R. O. C., Leitzke, F. P. & Münker, C. Early Moon formation inferred from hafnium–tungsten systematics. Nat. Geosci. (2019).

  2. Maurice, M., Tosi, N., Schwinger, S., Breuer, D. & Kleine, T. A long-lived magma ocean on a young Moon. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba8949 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kruijer, T. S. & Kleine, T. Tungsten isotopes and the origin of the Moon. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 475, 15–24 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kruijer, T. S., Kleine, T., Fischer-Gödde, M. & Sprung, P. Lunar tungsten isotopic evidence for the late veneer. Nature 520, 534–537 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Touboul, M., Puchtel, I. S. & Walker, R. J. Tungsten isotopic evidence for disproportional late accretion to the Earth and Moon. Nature 520, 530–533 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacobson, S. A. et al. Highly siderophile elements in Earth’s mantle as a clock for the Moon-forming impact. Nature 508, 84–87 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Palme, H. & O’Neill, H. S. C. in Treatise on Geochemistry Vol. 3, 2nd edn (eds Holland, D. A & Turekian, K. K.) 1–39 (Elsevier, 2014).

  8. Archer, G. J. et al. Lack of late-accreted material as the origin of 182W excesses in the Archean mantle: evidence from the Pilbara Craton, Western Australia. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 528, 115841 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Willbold, M., Elliott, T. & Moorbath, S. The tungsten isotopic composition of the Earth’s mantle before the terminal bombardment. Nature 477, 195–199 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Touboul, M., Puchtel, I. S. & Walker, R. J. 182W evidence for long-term preservation of early mantle differentiation products. Science 335, 1065–1069 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Morbidelli, A. et al. The timeline of the lunar bombardment: revisited. Icarus 305, 262–276 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brenan, J. M., Mungall, J. E. & Bennett, N. R. Abundance of highly siderophile elements in lunar basalts controlled by iron sulfide melt. Nat. Geosci. 12, 701–706 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu, M.-H. et al. Reconstructing the late accretion history of the Moon. Nature 571, 226–229 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fischer, R. A., Zube, N. G. & Nimmo, F. The origin of the Moon’s Earth-like tungsten isotopic composition from dynamical and geochemical modeling. Nat. Commun. 12, 35 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lock, S. J. et al. The origin of the Moon within a terrestrial synestia. J. Geophys. Res. 123, 910–951 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation), Project-ID 263649064–TRR 170. This is TRR 170 publication no. 111.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



T.S.K. and T.K. devised and conducted the study. All authors contributed towards the scientific interpretation and preparation of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas S. Kruijer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Geoscience thanks Alan Brandon and Stephen Mojzsis for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kruijer, T.S., Archer, G.J. & Kleine, T. No 182W evidence for early Moon formation. Nat. Geosci. 14, 714–715 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing