The Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) is pivotal for regional and global climate due to its key role in the uptake and redistribution of heat and carbon. Establishing the causes of historical variability in AMOC strength on different timescales can tell us how the circulation may respond to natural and anthropogenic changes at the ocean surface. However, understanding observed AMOC variability is challenging because the circulation is influenced by multiple factors that co-vary and whose overlapping impacts persist for years. Here we reconstruct and unambiguously attribute intermonthly and interannual AMOC variability at two observational arrays to the recent history of surface wind stress, temperature and salinity. We use a state-of-the-art technique that computes space- and time-varying sensitivity patterns of the AMOC strength with respect to multiple surface properties from a numerical ocean circulation model constrained by observations. While, on interannual timescales, AMOC variability at 26° N is overwhelmingly dominated by a linear response to local wind stress, overturning variability at subpolar latitudes is generated by the combined effects of wind stress and surface buoyancy anomalies. Our analysis provides a quantitative attribution of subpolar AMOC variability to temperature, salinity and wind anomalies at the ocean surface.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
The OSNAP data products are publicly available at www.o-snap.org. The derived data including the OSNAP-EAST overturning are furthermore available in Duke Digital Repository, https://research.repository.duke.edu/collections/1z40kt318. The RAPID–MOCHA overturning time series is available at https://www.rapid.ac.uk/rapidmoc/rapid_data/datadl.php.
The code for the MITgcm and the scripts for post-processing model output are available at https://github.com/MITgcm/. The ECCO state estimate model configuration can be downloaded from https://github.com/gaelforget/ECCOv4, with initial and boundary conditions available at https://web.corral.tacc.utexas.edu/OceanProjects/ECCO/ECCOv4. The TAF algorithmic differentiation software is proprietary and provided by FastOpt. Code used to process data and produce figures is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Lozier, M. S. Overturning in the North Atlantic. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 4, 291–315 (2012).
Stolpe, M. B., Medhaug, I., Sedláček, J. & Knutti, R. Multidecadal variability in global surface temperatures related to the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. J. Clim. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0444.1 (2018).
Cunningham, S. A. et al. Temporal variability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation at 26.5° N. Science 317, 935–938 (2007).
Smeed, D. A. et al. The North Atlantic Ocean is in a state of reduced overturning. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 1527–1533 (2018).
Lozier, M. S. et al. Overturning in the Subpolar North Atlantic Program: a new international ocean observing system. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 98, 737–752 (2017).
Biastoch, A., Böning, C. W., Getzlaff, J., Molines, J.-M. & Madec, G. Causes of interannual–decadal variability in the meridional overturning circulation of the North Atlantic Ocean. J. Clim. 21, 6599–66615 (2008).
Polo, I., Robson, J., Sutton, R. & Balmaseda, M. A. The importance of wind and buoyancy forcing for the boundary density variations and the geostrophic component of the AMOC at 26° N. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 44, 2387–2408 (2014).
Ortega, P. et al. Mechanisms of decadal variability in the Labrador Sea and the wider North Atlantic in a high-resolution climate model. Clim. Dyn. 49, 2625–2647 (2017).
Errico, R. M. What is an adjoint model? Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 78, 2577–2591 (1997).
Forget, G. et al. ECCO version 4: an integrated framework for non-linear inverse modeling and global ocean state estimation. Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 3071–3104 (2015).
Pillar, H., Heimbach, P., Johnson, H. & Marshall, D. Dynamical attribution of recent variability in Atlantic overturning. J. Clim. 29, 3339–3352 (2016).
Smith, T. & Heimbach, P. Atmospheric origins of variability in the South Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. J. Clim. 32, 1483–1500 (2019).
Giering, R. Transformation of Algorithms in Fortran Version 1.15 (TAF Version 1.9.70) (FastOpt, 2010).
Fukumori, I. et al. ECCO Version 4 Release 3 (NASA-JPL, 2017).
Marshall, J., Hill, C., Perelman, L. & Adcroft, A. Hydrostatic, quasi-hydrostatic, and nonhydrostatic ocean modeling. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 5733–5752 (1997).
Forget, G., Ferreira, D. & Liang, X. On the observability of turbulent transport rates by Argo: supporting evidence from an inversion experiment. Ocean Sci. 11, 839–853 (2015).
Fukumori, I., Heimbach, P., Ponte, R. M. & Wunsch, C. A dynamically consistent, multivariable ocean climatology. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 99, 2107–2128 (2018).
Jackson, L. C. et al. The mean state and variability of the North Atlantic circulation: a perspective from ocean reanalyses. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 124, 9141–9170 (2019).
Lozier, M. S. et al. A sea change in our view of overturning in the subpolar North Atlantic. Science 363, 516–521 (2019).
Li, F., Lozier, M. S. & Johns, W. Calculating the meridional volume, heat and freshwater transports from an observing system in the subpolar North Atlantic: observing system simulation experiment. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0247.1 (2017).
Desbruyères, D. G., Mercier, H., Maze, G. & Daniault, N. Surface predictor of overturning circulation and heat content change in the subpolar North Atlantic. Ocean Sci. 15, 809–817 (2019).
Marshall, J. & Plumb, A. Atmosphere, Ocean, and Climate Dynamics: An Introductory Text (Elsevier, 2008).
Menary, M. B., Hermanson, L. & Dunstone, N. J. The impact of Labrador Sea temperature and salinity variability on density and the subpolar AMOC in a decadal prediction system. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 12217–12227 (2016).
Zhao, J. & Johns, W. Wind‐forced interannual variability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation at 26.5° N. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 119, 2403–2419 (2014).
Kanzow, T. et al. Seasonal variability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation at 26.5° N. J. Clim. 23, 5678–5698 (2010).
Jones, D. C. et al. Local and remote influences on the heat content of the Labrador sea: an adjoint sensitivity study. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 123, 2646–2667 (2018).
Loose, N., Heimbach, P., Pillar, H. R. & Nisancioglu, K. H. Quantifying dynamical proxy potential through shared adjustment physics in the North Atlantic. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 125, e2020JC016112 (2020).
Fukumori, I., Wang, O., Llovel, W., Fenty, I. & Forget, G. A near-uniform fluctuation of ocean bottom pressure and sea level across the deep ocean basins of the Arctic Ocean and the Nordic Seas. Progr. Oceanogr. 134, 152–172 (2015).
Eden, C. & Willebrand, J. Mechanism of interannual to decadal variability of the North Atlantic circulation. J. Clim. 14, 2266–2280 (2001).
Getzlaff, J., Böning, C. W., Eden, C. & Biastoch, A. Signal propagation related to the North Atlantic overturning. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L09602 (2005).
MacGilchrist, G. A. et al. Locations and mechanisms of ocean ventilation in the high-latitude North Atlantic in an eddy-permitting ocean model. J. Clim. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0191.1 (2020).
Zantopp, R., Fischer, J., Visbeck, M. & Karstensen, J. From interannual to decadal: 17 years of boundary current transports at the exit of the Labrador Sea. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 122, 1724–1748 (2017).
Zou, S., Lozier, M. S. & Buckley, M. How is meridional coherence maintained in the lower limb of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation? Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 244–252 (2019).
Roemmich, D. et al. On the future of Argo: a global, full-depth, multi-disciplinary array. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 439 (2019).
McCarthy, G. D. et al. Measuring the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation at 26° N. Prog. Oceanogr. 130, 91–111 (2015).
Kostov, Y., Johnson, H. L. & Marshall, D. P. AMOC sensitivity to surface buoyancy fluxes: the role of air–sea feedback mechanisms. Clim. Dyn. 53, 4521–4537 (2019).
Weaver, A. T. & Courtier, P. Correlation modelling on the sphere using a generalized diffusion equation. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 127, 1815–1846 (2001).
Heuzé, C. North Atlantic deep water formation and AMOC in CMIP5 models. Ocean Sci. 13, 609–622 (2017).
Forget, G., Mercier, H. & Ferron, B. Combining Argo profiles with a general circulation model in the North Atlantic. Part 2: realistic transports and improved hydrography, between spring 2002 and spring 2003. Ocean Model. 20, 17–34 (2008).
Locarnini, R. A. et al. in World Ocean Atlas 2009: Temperature. NOAA Atlas NESDIS 68 Vol. 1 (ed. Levitus, S.) 184 (US Government Printing Office 2010).
Dee, D. P. et al. The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 137, 553–597 (2011).
Lund, I. A. A Monte Carlo method for testing the statistical significance of a regression equation. J. Appl. Meteor. 9, 330–332 (1970).
Cornish, S. B., Kostov, Y., Johnson, H. L. & Lique, C. Response of Arctic freshwater to the Arctic oscillation in coupled climate models. J. Clim. 33, 2533–2555 (2020).
This study used the ARCHER UK National Supercomputing Service (http://www.archer.ac.uk). In our analysis, we apply the TAF software provided by FastOpt. The maps used in the figures and supplementary material were produced using the freely available software M_Map: A mapping package for MATLAB, provided by R. Pawlowicz. We thank the groups that maintain the OSNAP and RAPID–MOCHA observational networks and the developers of the ECCO version 4 state estimate. Y.K. was funded by the OSNAP project through NERC grant NE/K010948/1 and the TICTOC project through NERC grant NE/P019064/1. H.L.J. and D.P.M. were also funded by NERC grant NE/K010948/1. G.F. acknowledges support from NASA award no. 6937342 and the Simons Foundation award no. 549931. P.H., H.R.P. and T.S. were supported in part by NOAA grant NOAA/NA130AR4310135, NSF grant NSF-OCE-1924546 and a JPL/Caltech subcontract. T.S. received additional funding from an Oden Institute CSEM fellowship. N.P.H. was funded by the OSNAP NERC grant NE/K010875/1. M.S.L. and F.L. were supported by NSF grants OCE-1948335 and OCE-1924456.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Geoscience thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: James Super.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Comparison between observations (yellow envelope showing ±1 standard deviation of the observational uncertainty) and our two reconstructions (outer gray contours) of OSNAP-EAST overturning [Sv] based on two different sets of sensitivity patterns: one set from objective functions in 2001–2002, and a second set from objective functions in 2006–2007. The reconstructions are interpolated onto the same 30-day windows as the observations. We consider both the mean of our two reconstructions (middle gray contour) and the spread between them (outer gray contours). Note that our reconstruction estimate uses the ECCOv4r3 mean seasonal cycle, since the observational record at OSNAP-EAST is short.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Ekman transport contribution to overturning variability at RAPID-MOCHA in ECCO.
ECCO-based comparison between variability in RAPID-MOCHA overturning (purple) and Ekman transport variability at 26°N (orange) over the time-period of the linear reconstructions in the main text. Anomalies are shown relative to the long-term mean.
Overturning variability (purple, volume transport in Sv) at OSNAP-EAST (a) and RAPID-MOCHA (b) in the ECCO state estimate contrasted against variability in the geostrophic component of overturning (orange). The comparison in a spans the time-period of the linear reconstructions in the main text. Anomalies are shown relative to the long-term mean.
Sensitivity of the OSNAP-EAST overturning in February 2007 to net surface heat fluxes [Sv per (W m-2 sustained over 1 hour)] at a lead time of nine years. Red shading indicates that heat flux into the ocean contributes to a delayed strengthening of the OSNAP-EAST overturning 9 years later. Blue shading indicates that cooling the ocean surface at that lead time causes a lagged strengthening of the OSNAP-EAST overturning. Notice the pattern tracking the Gulf Stream – North Atlantic Current advective pathway from the Caribbean to the subpolar latitudes. This long memory of past sea surface fluxes motivates the use of AMOC sensitivity to SST and SSS instead.
Extended Data Fig. 5 North Atlantic mixed layer depth and spatial origins of buoyancy-driven variability in RAPID-MOCHA overturning.
a, Climatological March mixed layer depth [m] in ECCO; b–e, Spatial sources of variability in the RAPID-MOCHA AMOC overturning: root-mean-square contribution per unit area [Sv m-2] to the convolutions in equation(1) of the main text over the period 1992–2015 using sensitivity patterns based on (b,c) 2006–2007 and (d,e) 2001–2002 AMOC objective functions. Contributions due to SST (b,d), and SSS (c,e) all relative to the seasonal cycle. The scale in all panels is linear.
About this article
Cite this article
Kostov, Y., Johnson, H.L., Marshall, D.P. et al. Distinct sources of interannual subtropical and subpolar Atlantic overturning variability. Nat. Geosci. 14, 491–495 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00759-4
This article is cited by
Projected Atlantic overturning slow-down is to be compensated by a strengthened South Atlantic subtropical gyre
Communications Earth & Environment (2023)
Climate Dynamics (2023)
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment (2022)