During most of the time between large earthquakes at tectonic plate boundaries, surface displacement time series are generally observed to be linear. This linear trend is interpreted as a result of steady stress accumulation at frictionally locked asperities on the fault interface. However, due to the short geodetic record, it is still unknown whether all interseismic periods show similar rates, and whether frictionally locked asperities remain stationary. Here we show that two consecutive interseismic periods at Simeulue Island, Indonesia experienced significantly different displacement rates, which cannot be explained by a sudden reorganization of locked and unlocked regions. Rather, these observations necessitate the occurrence of a 32-year slow-slip event on a shallow, frictionally stable area of the megathrust. We develop a self-consistent numerical model of such events driven by pore-fluid migration during the earthquake cycle. The resulting slow-slip events appear as abrupt velocity changes in geodetic time series. Due to their long-lived nature, we may be missing or mis-modelling these transient phenomena in a number of settings globally; we highlight one such ongoing example at Enggano Island, Indonesia. We provide a method for detecting these slow-slip events that will enable a substantial revision to the earthquake and tsunami hazard and risk for populations living close to these faults.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Earth, Planets and Space Open Access 26 April 2022
Earth, Planets and Space Open Access 10 January 2022
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to the entire Nature family of 50+ journals
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $9.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The coral data used in this paper are from ref. 20 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.06.003), also available at https://doi.org/10.21979/N9/5QCLZX. The daily RINEX files for the GNSS station MLKN are available for public download at ftp://ftp.earthobservatory.sg/SugarData. The processed time series is provided at https://doi.org/10.21979/N9/LMK36Z. Topography and bathymetry plotted in Figs. 1 and 5 are from the ETOPO1 dataset available at https://doi.org/10.7289/V5C8276M. The figures in this paper were made using MATLAB and Generic Mapping Tools70.
All computations in this study were carried out using MATLAB; code is available at https://researchdata.ntu.edu.sg/dataverse/longlivedsse/.
Michel, S., Gualandi, A. & Avouac, J. P. Similar scaling laws for earthquakes and Cascadia slow-slip events. Nature 574, 522–526 (2019).
Gomberg, J., Wech, A., Creager, K., Obara, K. & Agnew, D. Reconsidering earthquake scaling. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 6243–6251 (2016).
Bürgmann, R. The geophysics, geology and mechanics of slow fault slip. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 495, 112–134 (2018).
Chen, T. & Lapusta, N. Scaling of small repeating earthquakes explained by interaction of seismic and aseismic slip in a rate and state fault model. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 114, B01311 (2009).
Liu, Y. & Rice, J. R. Aseismic slip transients emerge spontaneously in three-dimensional rate and state modeling of subduction earthquake sequences. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 110, B08307 (2005).
Liu, Y. & Rice, J. R. Spontaneous and triggered aseismic deformation transients in a subduction fault model. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 112, B09404 (2007).
Liu, Y. & Rice, J. R. Slow slip predictions based on granite and gabbro friction data compared to GPS measurements in northern Cascadia. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 114, B09407 (2009).
Segall, P., Rubin, A. M., Bradley, A. M. & Rice, J. R. Dilatant strengthening as a mechanism for slow slip events. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 115, B12305 (2010).
Audet, P. & Kim, Y. H. Teleseismic constraints on the geological environment of deep episodic slow earthquakes in subduction zone forearcs: a review. Tectonophysics 670, 1–15 (2016).
Saffer, D. M. & Wallace, L. M. The frictional, hydrologic, metamorphic and thermal habitat of shallow slow earthquakes. Nat. Geosci. 8, 594–600 (2015).
Audet, P. & Schaeffer, A. J. Fluid pressure and shear zone development over the locked to slow slip region in Cascadia. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar2982 (2018).
Hawthorne, J. C. & Rubin, A. M. Laterally propagating slow slip events in a rate and state friction model with a velocity-weakening to velocity-strengthening transition. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 118, 3785–3808 (2013).
Im, K., Saffer, D., Marone, C. & Avouac, J.-P. Slip-rate-dependent friction as a universal mechanism for slow slip events. Nat. Geosci. 13, 705–710 (2020).
Suzuki, T. & Yamashita, T. Dynamic modeling of slow earthquakes based on thermoporoelastic effects and inelastic generation of pores. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 114, B00A04 (2009).
Bernaudin, M. & Gueydan, F. Episodic tremor and slip explained by fluid-enhanced microfracturing and sealing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 3471–3480 (2018).
Lavier, L. L., Bennett, R. A. & Duddu, R. Creep events at the brittle ductile transition. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 14, 3334–3351 (2013).
Yin, A., Xie, Z. & Meng, L. A viscoplastic shear-zone model for deep (15–50 km) slow-slip events at plate convergent margins. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 491, 81–94 (2018).
Marone, C. J., Scholtz, C. H. & Bilham, R. On the mechanics of earthquake afterslip. J. Geophys. Res. 96, 8441–8452 (1991).
Scholz, C. H. Earthquakes and friction laws. Nature 391, 37–42 (1998).
Meltzner, A. J. et al. Time-varying interseismic strain rates and similar seismic ruptures on the Nias–Simeulue patch of the Sunda megathrust. Q. Sci. Rev. 122, 258–281 (2015).
Tsang, L. L. H. H., Meltzner, A. J., Hill, E. M., Freymueller, J. T. & Sieh, K. A paleogeodetic record of variable interseismic rates and megathrust coupling at Simeulue Island, Sumatra. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 10585–10594 (2015).
Meltzner, A. J. et al. Persistent termini of 2004- and 2005-like ruptures of the Sunda megathrust. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 117, B04405 (2012).
Qiu, Q., Feng, L., Hermawan, I. & Hill, E. M. Coseismic and postseismic slip of the 2005 Mw 8.6 Nias–Simeulue earthquake: spatial overlap and localized viscoelastic flow. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 124, 2018JB017263 (2019).
Hsu, Y.-J. et al. Frictional afterslip following the 2005 Nias–Simeulue earthquake, Sumatra. Science (80-.) 312, 1921–1926 (2006).
Melnick, D. et al. The super-interseismic phase of the megathrust earthquake cycle in Chile. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 784–791 (2017).
Loveless, J. P. Super-interseismic periods: redefining earthquake recurrence. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 1329–1332 (2017).
Simoes, M., Avouac, J. P., Cattin, R. & Henry, P. The Sumatra subduction zone: a case for a locked fault zone extending into the mantle. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 109, B10402 (2004).
Klingelhoefer, F. et al. Limits of the seismogenic zone in the epicentral region of the 26 December 2004 great Sumatra–Andaman earthquake: results from seismic refraction and wide-angle reflection surveys and thermal modeling. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 115, B01304 (2010).
Hippchen, S. & Hyndman, R. D. Thermal and structural models of the Sumatra subduction zone: implications for the megathrust seismogenic zone. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 113, B12103 (2008).
Almeida, R. et al. Can the updip limit of frictional locking on megathrusts be detected geodetically? Quantifying the effect of stress shadows on near-trench coupling. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 4754–4763 (2018).
Lindsey, E. O. et al. Slip rate deficit and earthquake potential on shallow megathrusts. Nat. Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00736-x (2021).
Mavrommatis, A. P., Segall, P. & Johnson, K. M. A physical model for interseismic erosion of locked fault asperities. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 122, 8326–8346 (2017).
Mavrommatis, A. P., Segall, P. & Johnson, K. M. A decadal-scale deformation transient prior to the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku-oki earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 4486–4494 (2014).
Mavrommatis, A. P., Segall, P., Uchida, N. & Johnson, K. M. Long-term acceleration of aseismic slip preceding the Mw 9 Tohoku-oki earthquake: constraints from repeating earthquakes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 9717–9725 (2015).
Tsang, L. L. H. et al. A 15 year slow-slip event on the Sunda megathrust offshore Sumatra. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 6630–6638 (2015).
Radiguet, M. et al. Slow slip events and strain accumulation in the Guerrero gap, Mexico. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 117, B04305 (2012).
Li, S., Freymueller, J. & McCaffrey, R. Slow slip events and time-dependent variations in locking beneath Lower Cook Inlet of the Alaska–Aleutian subduction zone. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 121, 1060–1079 (2016).
Bruhat, L. & Segall, P. Coupling on the northern Cascadia subduction zone from geodetic measurements and physics-based models. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 121, 8297–8314 (2016).
Sibson, R. H. Implications of fault-valve behaviour for rupture nucleation and recurrence. Tectonophysics 211, 283–293 (1992).
Perfettini, H. & Ampuero, J.-P. P. Dynamics of a velocity strengthening fault region: implications for slow earthquakes and postseismic slip. J. Geophys. Res. 113, B09411 (2008).
Sibson, R. H. Stress switching in subduction forearcs: implications for overpressure containment and strength cycling on megathrusts. Tectonophysics 600, 142–152 (2013).
Husen, S. & Kissling, E. Postseismic fluid flow after the large subduction earthquake of Antofagasta, Chile. Geology 29, 847–850 (2002).
Hughes, K. L. H., Masterlark, T. & Mooney, W. D. Poroelastic stress-triggering of the 2005 M8.7 Nias earthquake by the 2004 M9.2 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 293, 289–299 (2010).
Materna, K., Bartlow, N., Wech, A., Williams, C. & Bürgmann, R. Dynamically triggered changes of plate interface coupling in southern Cascadia. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 12890–12899 (2019).
Sibson, R. H. Conditions for fault-valve behaviour. Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ. 54, 15–28 (1990).
Sleep, N. H. & Blanpied, M. L. Creep, compaction and the weak rheology of major faults. Nature 359, 687–692 (1992).
Moore, D. E. et al. in The Seismogenic Zone of Subduction Thrust Faults 317–345 (Columbia Univ. Press, 2007); https://doi.org/10.7312/dixo13866-011
Bradley, K. et al. Stratigraphic control of frontal décollement level and structural vergence and implications for tsunamigenic earthquake hazard in Sumatra, Indonesia. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 20, 1646–1664 (2019).
Saffer, D. M. & Marone, C. Comparison of smectite- and illite-rich gouge frictional properties: application to the updip limit of the seismogenic zone along subduction megathrusts. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 215, 219–235 (2003).
Heimisson, E. R., Dunham, E. M. & Almquist, M. Poroelastic effects destabilize mildly rate-strengthening friction to generate stable slow slip pulses. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 130, 262–279 (2019).
Hyndman, R. D. & Peacock, S. M. Serpentinization of the forearc mantle. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 212, 417–432 (2003).
Audet, P., Bostock, M. G., Christensen, N. I. & Peacock, S. M. Seismic evidence for overpressured subducted oceanic crust and megathrust fault sealing. Nature 457, 76–78 (2009).
Johnson, K. M. & Tebo, D. Capturing 50 years of postseismic mantle flow at Nankai Subduction Zone. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 123, 10091–10106 (2018).
Yarai, H. & Ozawa, S. Quasi-periodic slow slip events in the afterslip area of the 1996 Hyuga-nada earthquakes, Japan. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 118, 2512–2527 (2013).
Rolandone, F. et al. Areas prone to slow slip events impede earthquake rupture propagation and promote afterslip. Sci. Adv. 4, 2–10 (2018).
Tsang, L. L. H. et al. Imaging rapid early afterslip of the 2016 Pedernales earthquake, Ecuador. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 524, 115724 (2019).
Paul, J. & Rajendran, C. P. Short-term pre-2004 seismic subsidence near South Andaman: is this a precursor slow slip prior to a megathrust earthquake? Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 248, 30–34 (2015).
Harris, R. A. Large earthquakes and creeping faults. Rev. Geophys. 55, 169–198 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000539
Prawirodirdjo, L., McCaffrey, R., Chadwell, C. D., Bock, Y. & Subarya, C. Geodetic observations of an earthquake cycle at the Sumatra subduction zone: role of interseismic strain segmentation. J. Geophys. Res. 115, B03414 (2010).
Dieterich, J. H. Modeling of rock friction experimental 1. Results and constitutive equations. J. Geophys. Res. 84, 2161–2168 (1979).
Ruina, A. Slip instability and state variable friction laws. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 88, 10359–10370 (1983).
Kanda, R. V. S. & Simons, M. An elastic plate model for interseismic deformation in subduction zones. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 115, B03405 (2010).
Bradley, K. E., Feng, L., Hill, E. M., Natawidjaja, D. H. & Sieh, K. Implications of the diffuse deformation of the Indian Ocean lithosphere for slip partitioning of oblique plate convergence in Sumatra. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 122, 572–591 (2017).
Rice, J. R. Spatio-temporal complexity of slip on a fault. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 9885 (1993).
Segall, P. Earthquake and Volcano Deformation. Van Nostrand’s Scientific Encyclopedia (Princeton Univ. Press, 2010); https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400833856
Okada, Y. Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half space. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 82, 1018–1040 (1992).
Hayes, G. P. et al. Slab2, a comprehensive subduction zone geometry model. Science (80-.) 362, 58–61 (2018).
Neal, R. M. Slice sampling. Ann. Stat. 31, 705–767 (2003).
Lindsey, E. O. & Fialko, Y. Geodetic slip rates in the southern San Andreas Fault system: effects of elastic heterogeneity and fault geometry. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 118, 689–697 (2013).
Wessel, P. & Smith, W. H. F. New, improved version of generic mapping tools released. Eos 79, 579–579 (1998).
This research was supported by the National Research Foundation Singapore under a Singapore NRF Investigatorship to E.M.H. (proposal ID NRF-NRFI05–2019–0009), Singapore NRF Fellowship to A.J.M. (NRF-NRFF11–2019–0008), the Earth Observatory of Singapore (EOS), the National Research Foundation of Singapore, and the Singapore Ministry of Education under the Research Centers of Excellence initiative. Data for the Enggano GPS station MLKN were taken from the SuGAr network maintained by EOS and the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI). This is EOS contribution number 335.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Geoscience thanks Daniel Melnick and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Stefan Lachowycz.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Testing multiple hypotheses to explain the trends in the coral time series. a, Assuming a piecewise linear fit for the time series with a common timing for the velocity change, Tchange, we evaluate the misfit (with Gaussian error statistics - thick blue line). b, We evaluate the reduced χ2 and the significance of error reduction using the F-test for the following hypotheses: piecewise linear fits with an abrupt velocity change at Tchange (blue line - this is the preferred model), continuous acceleration (red line) and piecewise linear fits with an abrupt velocity change whose timing varies for each station (red diamonds).
PDFs for spatial extent of locked and creeping regions on the megathrust. a, Geometric setup and terminology used to describe the 4 segments of the megathrust: shallow creeping, frictionally locked, unlocked/transition zone and freely sliding plate boundary. b, PDFs of the spatial extent of ζup for two time periods (1738–1829 and 1829–1861) assuming steady frictional locking and creep governs the evolution of slip on the megathrust. Maximum aposteriori probability (MAP) of ζup for 1738–1829 is shown as green thick line (95 % confidence interval - thin green lines); MAP of ζup for 1829–1861 is shown as red thick line (95 % confidence interval - thin red lines). To explain the 1829–1861 coral observations with only steady interseismic processes, the upper limit of the locked zone ζup would have to migrate down-dip by 50–100 km while the (c) deeper transition zone ζdown would have to migrate to a depth of 50–60 km. d, The transition from ζdown to ζfree (W) would have to narrow to infinitesimal widths (pdf is maximum at W=0) making this model unphysical.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Observations and modelling results for the 18th-19th century coral record in Simeulue.
Observations and modelling results for the 18th-19th century coral record in Simeulue. a, Subsidence rates for the two time periods, 1738–1829 (grey) and 1829-1861 (red). We assume the velocities from each epoch collectively show the average response of southern Simeulue Island to tectonic changes (filled error bar). The individual site vertical velocities are plotted with error bars, while the model predictions are shown as polygons (67% confidence level, with darker colours showing regions closer to the median). b, Estimated slip rate for 1738-1829 is shown as a grey polygon (67% confidence level). The slip rate for the period 1829-1861 is estimated using two different models: (1) steady interseismic processes with a change in locked/unlocked regions (blue polygon), (2) SSE (orange polygon) superimposed on the existing locking from 1738-1829.
1-d and 2-d marginal PDFs of the spatial parameters (ζup−dip,ζdown−dip,ζfree in Extended Data Fig. 2a) describing (a) frictional domains for a model where we assume the 1738-1829 velocity field is attributed to steady frictional behaviour on the Sunda megathrust followed by (b) the occurrence of a long-lived transient slip event (SSE) from 1829-1861. The SSE is estimated to occur between ζup and ζbot with an average slip rate of Vtrans (mm/yr) (we normalize this by the plate rate Vpl). (See Methods for a more detailed description of all parameters). c, We show the joint distribution of SSE slip rate and the along-dip location where this slip occurred. The darker colours show a higher value of the PDF; the red line in the 1-d marginal PDFs is the maximum aposteriori estimate.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Snapshots through time of a frictional instability on a velocity strengthening fault.
Snapshots through time of a frictional instability on a velocity strengthening fault. A steady-state creeping fault was perturbed early in the simulation (t = 50 yrs) by a pore-fluid expulsion event and allowed to evolve. In this simulation we do not allow additional weakening from pore-pressure recovery on the fault. The colors represent different time periods (t = 190 to 230 yrs) - from the initial acceleration of the SSE (blue) until the instability is arrested and the fault resumes creeping at its steady rate velocity (yellow). The SSE nucleates at the 12–14 km position on the simulated fault, as the fault is trying to recover to its steady state creep rate. However, an overshoot of slip rates occurs leading to a pulse of high slip rate at the center of the simulated fault. The transition from creep at below 10−10 m/s to the accelerated slip pulse of ∼ 10−8 m/s occurs in a short period of time (1-2 yrs). This instability is then damped out and is smeared over the available fault area over 10–15 years.
About this article
Cite this article
Mallick, R., Meltzner, A.J., Tsang, L.L.H. et al. Long-lived shallow slow-slip events on the Sunda megathrust. Nat. Geosci. 14, 327–333 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00727-y
This article is cited by
Earth, Planets and Space (2022)
Earth, Planets and Space (2022)
Nature Geoscience (2021)
Nature Geoscience (2021)