Tropical forests are vital for global biodiversity, carbon storage and local livelihoods, yet they are increasingly under threat from human activities. Large-scale land acquisitions have emerged as an important mechanism linking global resource demands to forests in the Global South, yet their influence on tropical deforestation remains unclear. Here we perform a multicountry assessment of the links between large-scale land acquisitions and tropical forest loss by combining a new georeferenced database of 82,403 individual land deals—covering 15 countries in Latin America, sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia—with data on annual forest cover and loss between 2000 and 2018. We find that land acquisitions cover between 6% and 59% of study-country land area and between 2% and 79% of their forests. Compared with non-investment areas, large-scale land acquisitions were granted in areas of higher forest cover in 11 countries and had higher forest loss in 52% of cases. Oil palm, wood fibre and tree plantations were consistently linked with enhanced forest loss while logging and mining concessions showed a mix of outcomes. Our findings demonstrate that large-scale land acquisitions can lead to elevated deforestation of tropical forests, highlighting the role of local policies in the sustainable management of these ecosystems.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $15.58 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are publicly available or are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Verburg, P. H., Erb, K.-H., Mertz, O. & Espindola, G. Land system science: between global challenges and local realities. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 5, 433–437 (2013).
Liu, J. et al. Systems integration for global sustainability. Science 347, 1258832 (2015).
Fuys, A., Mwangi, E. & Dohrn, S. Securing Common Property Regimes in a Globalizing World (International Land Coalition, 2008).
De Schutter, O. Green rush: the global race for farmland and the rights of land users. Harvard Int. Law J. 52, 503–556 (2011).
Wily, L. The Tragedy of Public Lands: The Fate of the Commons under Global Commercial Pressure (International Land Coalition, 2011).
Kugelman, M. The Global Farms Race: Land Grabs, Agricultural Investment, and the Scramble for Food Security (Island Press, 2012).
Dell’Angelo, J., D’Odorico, P., Rulli, M. C. & Marchand, P. The tragedy of the grabbed commons: coercion and dispossession in the global land rush. World Devel. 92, 1–12 (2017).
The Land Matrix (ILC, CIRAD, CDE, GIGA and GIZ, accessed 16 January 2020); https://landmatrix.org/
Dell’Angelo, J., D’Odorico, P. & Rulli, M. C. Threats to sustainable development posed by land and water grabbing. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 26, 120–128 (2017).
Deininger, K. in Food Security and Sociopolitical Stability (ed. Barrett, C. B.) Ch. 4 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2013).
Davis, K. F., Rulli, M. C. & D’Odorico, P. The global land rush and climate change. Earths Future 3, 298–311 (2015).
Chung, Y. B. The grass beneath: conservation, agro-industrialization, and land–water enclosures in postcolonial Tanzania. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 109, 1–17 (2019).
Borras, S. M. Jr., Hall, R., Scoones, I., White, B. & Wolford, W. Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: an editorial introduction. J. Peasant Stud. 38, 209–216 (2011).
Wolford, W., Borras, S. M. Jr., Hall, R., Scoones, I. & White, B. Governing global land deals: the role of the state in the rush for land. Dev. Change 44, 189–210 (2013).
Hall, R. et al. Resistance, acquiescence or incorporation? An introduction to land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’. J. Peasant Stud. 42, 467–488 (2015).
Davis, K. F., D’Odorico, P. & Rulli, M. C. Land grabbing: a preliminary quantification of economic impacts on rural livelihoods. Popul. Environ. 36, 180–192 (2014).
Rulli, M. C. & D’Odorico, P. Food appropriation through large scale land acquisitions. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 064030 (2014).
Nolte, K., Chamberlain, W. & Giger, M. International Land Deals for Agriculture. Fresh Insights from the Land Matrix: Analytical Report II (Bern Open Publishing, 2016).
Liao, C., Jung, S., Brown, D. G. & Agrawal, A. Insufficient research on land grabbing. Science 353, 131 (2016).
D’Odorico, P., Rulli, M. C., Dell’Angelo, J. & Davis, K. F. New frontiers of land and water commodification: socio-environmental controversies of large-scale land acquisitions. Land Degrad. Dev. 28, 2234–2244 (2017).
Messerli, P., Giger, M., Dwyer, M. B., Breu, T. & Eckert, S. The geography of large-scale land acquisitions: analysing socio-ecological patterns of target contexts in the Global South. Appl. Geogr. 53, 449–459 (2014).
Carlson, K. M. et al. Committed carbon emissions, deforestation, and community land conversion from oil palm plantation expansion in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7559–7564 (2011).
Rulli, M. C., Saviori, A. & D’Odorico, P. Global land and water grabbing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 892–897 (2013).
Davis, K. F., Yu, K., Rulli, M. C., Pichdara, L. & D’Odorico, P. Accelerated deforestation driven by large-scale land acquisitions in Cambodia. Nat. Geosci. 8, 772–775 (2015).
Rulli, M. C. et al. Interdependencies and telecoupling of oil palm expansion at the expense of Indonesian rainforest. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 105, 499–512 (2019).
Fox, J., Nghiem, T., Kimkong, H., Hurni, K. & Baird, I. G. Large-scale land concessions, migration, and land use: the paradox of industrial estates in the Red River delta of Vietnam and rubber plantations of Northeast Cambodia. Land (Basel) 7, 77 (2018).
Gibson, L. et al. Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature 478, 378–381 (2011).
Agrawal, A. Forests, governance, and sustainability: common property theory and its contributions. Int. J. Commons 1, 111–136 (2007).
Neef, A. Law and development implications of transnational land acquisitions: introduction. Law Devel. Rev. 7, 187–205 (2014).
le Polain de Waroux, Y. et al. Rents, actors, and the expansion of commodity frontiers in the Gran Chaco. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 108, 204–225 (2018).
Wily, L. A. The law and land grabbing: friend or foe? Law Land Devel. 7, 207–242 (2014).
Searchinger, T. D. et al. High carbon and biodiversity costs from converting Africa’s wet savannahs to cropland. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 481–486 (2015).
Estes, L. D. et al. Reconciling agriculture, carbon and biodiversity in a savannah transformation frontier. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 371, 20150316 (2016).
Seaquist, J., Johansson, E. & Nicholas, K. A. Architecture of the global land acquisition system: applying the tools of network science to identify key vulnerabilities. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 114006 (2014).
Antonelli, M., Siciliano, G., Turvani, M. E. & Rulli, M. C. Global investments in agricultural land and the role of the EU: drivers, scope and potential impacts. Land Use Policy 47, 98–111 (2015).
Mittermeier, R. A. et al. Hotspots Revisited: Earth’s Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions (Conservation International, 2005).
Sanderson, E. W. et al. The human footprint and the last of the wild. BioScience 52, 891–904 (2002).
Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).
Andam, K. S., Ferraro, P. J., Pfaff, A., Sanchez-Azofeifa, G. A. & Robalino, J. A. Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 16089–16094 (2008).
Abood, S. A., Lee, J. S. H., Burivalova, Z., Garcia-Ulloa, J. & Koh, L. P. Relative contributions of the logging, fiber, oil palm, and mining industries to forest loss in Indonesia. Conserv. Lett. 8, 58–67 (2014).
Neef, A., Touch, S. & Chiengthong, J. The politics and ethics of land concessions in rural Cambodia. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 26, 1085–1103 (2013).
Rosa, L., Davis, K. F., Rulli, M. C. & D’Odorico, P. Environmental consequences of oil production from oil sands. Earths Future 5, 158–170 (2017).
Sonter, L. J. et al. Mining drives extensive deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Nat. Commun. 8, 1013 (2017).
Baird, I. G. & Fox, J. How land concessions affect places elsewhere: telecoupling, political ecology, and large-scale plantations in southern Laos and northeastern Cambodia. Land 4, 436–453 (2015).
Magliocca, N. R., Khuc, Q. V., Ellicott, E. A. & de Bremond, A. Archetypical pathways of direct and indirect land-use change caused by Cambodia’s economic land concessions. Ecol. Soc. 24, 25 (2019).
Kehoe, L., Romero-Munoz, A., Estes, L., Kreft, H. & Kuemmerle, T. Biodiversity at risk under future cropland expansion and intensification. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1129–1135 (2017).
Jayne, T. S. et al. Africa’s changing farm size distribution patterns: the rise of medium-scale farms. Agric. Econ. 47, 197–214 (2016).
Grogan, K., Pflugmacher, D., Hostert, P., Mertz, O. & Fensholt, R. Unravelling the link between global rubber price and tropical deforestation in Cambodia. Nat. Plants 5, 47–53 (2018).
Magliocca, N. R. et al. Closing global knowledge gaps: producing generalized knowledge from case studies of social-ecological systems. Glob. Environ. Change 50, 1–14 (2018).
Global Forest Watch Database (WRI, 2016); www.globalforestwatch.org
Maps Catalogue (Open Development, 2014); http://www.opendevelopmentcambodia.net/maps/downloads/
Direito do Uso e Aproveitamento da Terra (MITADER, 2016).
Anseeuw, W., Lay, J., Messerli, P., Giger, M. & Taylor, M. Creating a public tool to assess and promote transparency in global land deals: the experience of the Land Matrix. J. Peasant Stud. 40, 521–530 (2013).
Gridded Population of the World v.4 (GPWv4): Population Count (SEDAC, 2016).
Global Agro‐Ecological Zones (GAEZ) v.3.0 (IIASA/FAO, 2012).
Sekhon, J. S. Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization: the Matching package for R. J. Stat. Softw. 42, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v042.i07 (2011).
Rosenbaum, P. Observational Studies (Springer-Verlag, 2002).
K.F.D. was supported in part by Columbia University’s Data Science Institute. K.F.D, J.D., P.D., M.C.R. and M.T. were partially supported by the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) through NSF grant DBI-1052875. J.D., M.C.R. and P.D. are part of the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action (MSCA) Innovative Training Network (ITN) grant agreement no. 861509 – NEWAVE.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Primary Handling Editors: Clare Davis; Xujia Jiang.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Land area under contract in these 15 countries currently makes up 51% of the world’s LSLA area for all intended uses8.
Forest loss plots are separated by region between Latin America (a), sub-Saharan Africa (b), and Southeast Asia (c).
Extended Data Fig. 3 Annual rates of deforestation for random pixels within oil palm concessions and ‘matched’ non-investment pixels.
Significant enhancements of forest loss within oil palm concessions were observed in (a) Cameroon, (b) Republic of Congo, (c) Indonesia, (d) Liberia, and (e) Malaysia. Data on contract year (blue histograms) came from the Land Matrix19. For Cameroon, Indonesia, and Malaysia, 1, 1, and 21 oil palm deals, respectively, had reported contract years before 2000 (not shown). Insufficient data on contract year were available for oil palm concessions in Republic of Congo. Y-axes scales vary between panels.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Annual rates of deforestation for random pixels within investments and ‘matched’ non-investment pixels.
Significant enhancements of forest loss within investments were observed in: wood fiber concessions in (a) Republic of Congo, (b) Indonesia, and (c) Malaysia; tree plantations in (d) Indonesia, (e) Liberia, and (f) Malaysia; mining concessions in (g) Brazil, (h) Colombia, and (i) Peru; logging concessions in (j) Central African Republic; and economic land concessions (ELCs) in (k) Cambodia. Data on contract year (blue histograms) came from the Land Matrix19. Insufficient data on contract year were available for panels (a), (c), (e), (h), and (j). Y-axes scales vary between panels.
Frequency distribution of contract year reported by Land Matrix19 in all countries for (a) all investment types, (b) logging investments, (c) mining investments, (d) oil palm investments, (e) tree plantation investments, and (f) wood fiber investments.
About this article
Cite this article
Davis, K.F., Koo, H.I., Dell’Angelo, J. et al. Tropical forest loss enhanced by large-scale land acquisitions. Nat. Geosci. 13, 482–488 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0592-3
Nature Geoscience (2020)