Significant methane ebullition from alpine permafrost rivers on the East Qinghai–Tibet Plateau

Abstract

Inland waters are large sources of methane to the atmosphere. However, considerable uncertainty exists in estimating the emissions of this potent greenhouse gas from global streams and rivers due, in part, to a lack of direct measurements in the high-altitude cryosphere and poor accounting for ebullition. Here we present methane concentrations and fluxes over three years in four basins on the East Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. Methane ebullition rates decrease exponentially whereas diffusion declines linearly with increasing stream order. Nonetheless, the average ebullition rate (11.9 mmolCH4 m−2 d−1) from these streams and rivers—which have large organic stocks in surrounding permafrost, abundant cold-tolerant methanogens, shallow water depths, and experience low air pressure—were six times greater than the global average and reached a maximum of 374.4 mmolCH4 m−2 d−1. Upscaled total emissions from sampled third- to seventh-order waterways of the East Qinghai–Tibet Plateau are estimated to be 0.20 TgCH4 yr−1, 79% of which was attributed to ebullition. These methane emissions are approximately 20% of CO2 emissions (2.70 TgCO2 yr−1) in terms of carbon release and two times greater in terms of CO2-equivalent emissions. When upscaled to first- to seventh-order waterways, we estimate emissions of 0.37–1.23 TgCH4 yr−1. Our findings demonstrate that high-elevation rivers on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau are hotspots of methane delivery to the atmosphere. The large ebullitive fluxes, which constitute a substantial fraction of global fluvial methane emissions, reveal a positive feedback between climate warming, permafrost thaw and methane emissions.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Sampling sites in four headwater river basins on the EQTP, China.
Fig. 2: Permafrost wetlands drive the pattern of fluvial CH4 ebullition, DOC concentrations and SOC content across EQTP rivers.
Fig. 3: 16S rRNA gene sequences related to methanogenic and methanotrophic clades in EQTP riverbed sediments.
Fig. 4: Drivers of CH4 ebullition across EQTP rivers.
Fig. 5: CH4 diffusion and ebullition and CO2 diffusion in relation to stream order across EQTP rivers.

Data availability

The data are available at the Environmental Data Initiative (https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/d04ae85f579c60a5b751749a46f9b77b). All sequences reported in this study were deposited in NCBI Short Read Archive (SRA) under the BioProject accession number PRJNA605704.

Code availability

The Monte Carlo model code is available at the Environmental Data Initiative (https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/d04ae85f579c60a5b751749a46f9b77b).

References

  1. 1.

    Bastviken, D., Tranvik, L. J., Downing, J. A., Crill, P. M. & Enrich-Prast, A. Freshwater methane emissions offset the continental carbon sink. Science 331, 50 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Stanley, E. H. et al. The ecology of methane in streams and rivers: patterns, controls, and global significance. Ecol. Monogr. 86, 146–171 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Immerzeel, W. W. & Bierkens, M. F. P. Asia’s water balance. Nat. Geosci. 5, 841–842 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Yang, M., Wang, X., Pang, G., Wan, G. & Liu, Z. The Tibetan Plateau cryosphere: observations and model simulations for current status and recent changes. Earth-Sci. Rev. 190, 353–369 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ran, Y., Li, X. & Cheng, G. Climate warming over the past half century has led to thermal degradation of permafrost on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. Cryosphere 12, 595–608 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Jin, H. J., Chang, X. L. & Wang, S. L. Evolution of permafrost on the Qinghai-Xizang (Tibet) Plateau since the end of the late Pleistocene. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surface 112, F02S09 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Vonk, J. E. & Gustafsson, Ö. Permafrost-carbon complexities. Nat. Geosci. 6, 675–676 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Street, L. E. et al. Redox dynamics in the active layer of an Arctic headwater catchment; examining the potential for transfer of dissolved methane from soils to stream water. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 121, 2776–2792 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lamarche-Gagnon, G. et al. Greenland melt drives continuous export of methane from the ice-sheet bed. Nature 565, 73–77 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wik, M., Crill, P. M., Varner, R. K. & Bastviken, D. Multiyear measurements of ebullitive methane flux from three subarctic lakes. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 118, 1307–1321 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Natchimuthu, S. et al. Spatio-temporal variability of lake CH4 fluxes and its influence on annual whole lake emission estimates. Limnol. Oceanogr. 61, S13–S26 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Mattson, M. D. & Likens, G. E. Air pressure and methane fluxes. Nature 347, 718–719 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wik, M., Varner, R. K., Anthony, K. W., MacIntyre, S. & Bastviken, D. Climate-sensitive northern lakes and ponds are critical components of methane release. Nat. Geosci. 9, 99–105 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wilhelm, E., Battino, R. & Wilcock, R. J. Low-pressure solubility of gases in liquid water. Chem. Rev. 77, 219–262 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wang, Y. et al. Selective leaching of dissolved organic matter from alpine permafrost soils on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 123, 1005–1016 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Wild, B. et al. Rivers across the Siberian Arctic unearth the patterns of carbon release from thawing permafrost. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 10280–10285 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wang, Y. et al. Spatiotemporal transformation of dissolved organic matter along an alpine stream flow path on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: importance of source and permafrost degradation. Biogeosciences 15, 6637–6648 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Yang, Y. et al. Delineating the hydrological processes and hydraulic connectivities under permafrost degradation on Northeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. J. Hydrol. 569, 359–372 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mackelprang, R. et al. Metagenomic analysis of a permafrost microbial community reveals a rapid response to thaw. Nature 480, 368–371 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Boetius, A., Anesio, A. M., Deming, J. W., Mikucki, J. A. & Rapp, J. Z. Microbial ecology of the cryosphere: sea ice and glacial habitats. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 677–690 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zhang, S. et al. Ammonia oxidizers in high-elevation rivers of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau display distinctive distribution patterns. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85, e01701–e01719 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Yergeau, E., Hogues, H., Whyte, L. G. & Greer, C. W. The functional potential of high Arctic permafrost revealed by metagenomic sequencing, qPCR and microarray analyses. ISME J. 4, 1206–1214 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Fasching, C., Ulseth, A. J., Schelker, J., Steniczka, G. & Battin, T. J. Hydrology controls dissolved organic matter export and composition in an Alpine stream and its hyporheic zone. Limnol. Oceanogr. 61, 558–571 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Bastviken, D. et al. Methane emissions from pantanal, South America, during the low water season: toward more comprehensive sampling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 5450–5455 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Liu, S., Lu, X. X., Xia, X., Yang, X. & Ran, L. Hydrological and geomorphological control on CO2 outgassing from low-gradient large rivers: an example of the Yangtze River system. J. Hydrol. 550, 26–41 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Romeijn, P., Comer-Warner, S. A., Ullah, S., Hannah, D. M. & Krause, S. Streambed organic matter controls on carbon dioxide and methane emissions from streams. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 2364–2374 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hotchkiss, E. R. et al. Sources of and processes controlling CO2 emissions change with the size of streams and rivers. Nat. Geosci. 8, 696–699 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Shelley, F., Ings, N., Hildrew, A. G., Trimmer, M. & Grey, J. Bringing methanotrophy in rivers out of the shadows. Limnol. Oceanogr. 62, 2345–2359 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Sawakuchi, H. O. et al. Oxidative mitigation of aquatic methane emissions in large Amazonian rivers. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1075–1085 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Battin, T. J. et al. Biophysical controls on organic carbon fluxes in fluvial networks. Nat. Geosci. 1, 95–100 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Xia, X. et al. The cycle of nitrogen in river systems: sources, transformation, and flux. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 20, 863–891 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Abril, G., Commarieu, M.-V. & Guérin, F. Enhanced methane oxidation in an estuarine turbidity maximum. Limnol. Oceanogr. 52, 470–475 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Campeau, A., Lapierre, J.-F., Vachon, D. & del Giorgio, P. A. Regional contribution of CO2 and CH4 fluxes from the fluvial network in a lowland boreal landscape of Québec. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 28, 57–69 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wallin, M. B. et al. Carbon dioxide and methane emissions of Swedish low-order streams—a national estimate and lessons learnt from more than a decade of observations. Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett. 3, 156–167 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Piao, S. et al. The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China. Nature 458, 1009–1013 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Allen, G. H. & Pavelsky, T. M. Global extent of rivers and streams. Science 361, 585–588 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Marcé, R. et al. Emissions from dry inland waters are a blind spot in the global carbon cycle. Earth-Sci. Rev. 188, 240–248 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Flury, S. & Ulseth, A. J. Exploring the sources of unexpected high methane concentrations and fluxes from Alpine headwater streams. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 6614–6625 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Dean, J. F. et al. Methane feedbacks to the global climate system in a warmer world. Rev. Geophys. 56, 207–250 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Saunois, M. et al. The global methane budget 2000–2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2019-128 (2019).

  41. 41.

    Mountain Research Initiative EDW Working Group. Elevation-dependent warming in mountain regions of the world. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 424–430 (2015).

  42. 42.

    Pekel, J.-F., Cottam, A., Gorelick, N. & Belward, A. S. High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature 540, 418–422 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Zou, D. et al. A new map of permafrost distribution on the Tibetan Plateau. Cryosphere 11, 2527–2542 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Chen, H. et al. The carbon stock of alpine peatlands on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau during the Holocene and their future fate. Quat. Sci. Rev. 95, 151–158 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Johnson, K. M., Hughes, J. E., Donaghay, P. L. & Sieburth, J. M. Bottle-calibration static head space method for the determination of methane dissolved in seawater. Anal. Chem. 62, 2408–2412 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Sawakuchi, H. O. et al. Methane emissions from Amazonian rivers and their contribution to the global methane budget. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 2829–2840 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Lorke, A. et al. Technical note: drifting versus anchored flux chambers for measuring greenhouse gas emissions from running waters. Biogeosciences 12, 7013–7024 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Raymond, P. A. et al. Scaling the gas transfer velocity and hydraulic geometry in streams and small rivers. Limnol. Oceanogr. Fluids Environ. 2, 41–53 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Steinberg, L. M. & Regan, J. M. mcrA-targeted real-time quantitative PCR method to examine methanogen communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 4435–4442 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Walters, W. et al. Improved bacterial 16S rRNA gene (V4 and V4-5) and fungal internal transcribed spacer marker gene primers for microbial community surveys. mSystems 1, e00009–e00015 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Lehner, B., Verdin, K. & Jarvis, A. New global hydrography derived from spaceborne elevation data. Eos 89, 93–94 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kharab, A. & Guenther, R. An Introduction to Numerical Methods: A MATLAB Approach (CRC Press, 2018).

  53. 53.

    Verma, J. P. Data Analysis in Management with SPSS Software (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. E. Butman for insightful discussions. This work was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant no. 2017YFA0605001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 91547207) and the fund for Innovative Research Group of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 51721093).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

X.X. and L.Z. designed the study. L.Z., S.Z., S. Li, J.W., G.W., H.G., Z.Z. and W.W. collected and analysed samples. S. Liu, Q.W. and R.L. conducted GIS and Monte Carlo analyses. X.X., L.Z., S. Liu, Z.Y., E.H.S. and P.A.R. performed data analysis and wrote the manuscript with substantial contributions from all co-authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinghui Xia.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Primary Handling Editors: Tamara Goldin; Xujia Jiang.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Geography of the four studied EQTP headwater basins, China.

a–c, Thermokarst ponds dot along the narrow stream corridors (> 4200 m). d, e, Streams meander through thawing permafrost or peatlands (4200–3400 m). f, Glacial ponds, lakes, and wetlands connect to headwater streams. g, Braided channels suffuse the entire QTP. h, The 5th order river channel (MD reach) of the Yellow River is wide (43.1 ± 29.8 m) but with shallow water depth (0.65 ± 0.13 m). i, Site locations in the four headwater river basins of the EQTP. j, Four headwater river basins underlain with the spatial extents of continuous, discontinuous, sporadic, and isolated permafrost on the EQTP (Data of permafrost distribution were obtained from Obu, J., Westermann, S., Kääb, A. & Bartsch, A. Permafrost Extent and Ground Temperature Map, 2000–2016, Northern Hemisphere Permafrost. https://apgc.awi.de/dataset/pex).

Extended Data Fig. 2 Box plots of seasonal and regional patterns of CH4 concentrations a, and fluxes b, from EQTP rivers.

Box plots present first and third quartiles; whiskers are minimum and maximum and line is median. Markers are outliers. Note the different scales and units.

Extended Data Fig. 3 CH4 ebullition as a function of DOC a, and SOC b, flow velocity c, and SOC d, as a function of Log (Q/w).

The red dashed lines are the fit of linear regressions for a, b and d; or exponential regression for c through observed data.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Methanogens: methanotrophs ratio a, SOC b, SS concentration c, total length d, and average width e, as a function of stream order.

Sixth and seventh order rivers meander through canyons, limiting their width. Thus, second through fifth order streams only were included in the regression used to predict the width of first order streams. The dashed red lines represent the fit of exponential regressions through observed data. All error bars show mean ± 1 s.e.m.

Extended Data Fig. 5

CH4 and CO2 emissions from EQTP alpine waterways.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Methods a and b, Discussion a–c, Fig. 1 and Tables 1–6.

Supplementary Video 1

Visible bubbles erupting from a shallow stream sediment seep at JZ (see Supplementary Table 1), where there are substantial thawing permafrost surrounding, and the ebullition persisted for more than 80 min (duration of sampling time) to sustain high CH4 ebullition rate (734.4 mmol m−2 d−1).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, L., Xia, X., Liu, S. et al. Significant methane ebullition from alpine permafrost rivers on the East Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. Nat. Geosci. 13, 349–354 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0571-8

Download citation

Further reading