Arctic and Antarctic sea-ice extent are both projected to dramatically decline over the coming century. The effects of Arctic sea-ice loss are not limited to the northern high latitudes, and reach deep into the tropics. Yet little is known about the effects of future Antarctic sea-ice loss outside of the southern high latitudes. Here, using a fully coupled climate model, we investigate the tropical response to Antarctic sea-ice loss and compare it with the response to Arctic sea-ice loss. We show that Antarctic sea-ice loss, similar to Arctic sea-ice loss, causes enhanced warming in the eastern equatorial Pacific and an equatorward intensification of the Intertropical Convergence Zone. We demonstrate that Antarctic sea-ice loss causes a mini global warming signal comparable to the one caused by Arctic sea-ice loss, and reminiscent of the response to greenhouse gases. We also show that ocean dynamics are key to capturing the tropical response to sea-ice loss. In short, we find that future Antarctic sea-ice loss will exert a profound influence on the tropics. Combined Arctic and Antarctic sea-ice losses will account for 20–30% of the projected tropical warming and precipitation changes under the high-emissions scenario Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5.
Your institute does not have access to this article
Open Access articles citing this article.
Nature Climate Change Open Access 27 June 2022
Nature Communications Open Access 18 January 2022
Scientific Reports Open Access 11 November 2021
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to the entire Nature family of 50+ journals
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
All model output analysed in the study is stored on the data servers at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado, and can be made available upon request from the corresponding author.
Where possible, pre-processed variables and the NCL code for reproducing the related figures are publicly available at https://figshare.com/projects/The_Tropical_Responses_to_Projected_Arctic_and_Antarctic_Sea_Ice_Loss/72518. All other code used to produce the figures can be made available upon request from the corresponding author.
All About Sea Ice (National Snow and Ice Data Center, 2019); https://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/
Schweiger, A. et al. Uncertainty in modelled Arctic sea ice volume. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 116, C00D06 (2011).
Comiso, J. et al. Positive trend in the Antarctic sea ice cover and associated changes in surface temperature. J. Clim. 30, 2251–2267 (2017).
Collins, M. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) Ch. 12 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Liu, J., Song, M., Horton, R. & Hu, Y. Reducing spread in climate model projections of a September ice free Arctic. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 12571–12576 (2013).
Overland, J. & Wang, M. When will the summer Arctic be nearly sea ice free? Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 2097–2101 (2013).
Jahn, A., Kay, J., Holland, M. & Hall, D. How predictable is the timing of a summer ice-free Arctic? Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 9113–9120 (2016).
Liu, J., Curry, J., Wang., H., Song, M. & Horton, R. Impact of declining Arctic sea ice on winter snowfall. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 4074–4079 (2012).
Deser, C., Tomas, R., Alexander, M. & Lawrence, D. The seasonal atmospheric response to projected Arctic sea ice loss in the late twenty-first century. J. Clim. 23, 333–351 (2010).
Screen, J. et al. Consistency and discrepancy in the atmospheric response to Arctic sea ice loss across climate models. Nat. Geosci. 11, 155–163 (2018).
Screen, J. & Blackport, R. How robust is the atmospheric response to projected Arctic sea ice loss across Climate models? Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 11406–11415 (2019).
England, M., Polvani, L. & Sun, L. Contrasting the Antarctic and Arctic atmospheric responses to projected sea ice loss in the late twenty-first century. J. Clim. 31, 6353–6370 (2018).
Screen, J., Simmonds, I., Deser, C. & Tomas, R. The atmospheric response to three decades of observed Arctic sea ice loss. J. Clim. 26, 1230–1248 (2013).
Peings, Y. & Magnusdottir, G. Response of the wintertime northern hemisphere atmospheric circulation to current and projected Arctic sea ice decline. J. Clim. 27, 244–264 (2014).
Sun, L., Deser, C. & Tomas, R. Mechanisms of stratospheric and tropospheric circulation response to projected Arctic sea ice loss. J. Clim. 28, 7824–2845 (2015).
Tomas, R., Deser & Sun, L. The role of ocean heat transport in the global climate response to projected Arctic sea ice loss. J. Clim. 29, 6841–6859 (2016).
Sevellec, F., Fedorov, A. & Liu, W. Arctic sea ice decline weakens the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 604–610 (2017).
Sun, L., Alexander, M. & Deser, C. Evolution of the global coupled climate response to Arctic sea ice loss during 1990–2090 and its contribution to climate change. J. Clim. 31, 7823–7843 (2018).
Liu, W. & Fedorov, A. Global impacts of Arctic sea ice loss mediated by the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 944–952 (2019).
Smith, D. et al. Atmospheric response to Arctic and Antarctic sea ice: the importance of ocean-atmosphere coupling and the background state. J. Clim. 30, 4547–4565 (2017).
Deser, C., Tomas, R. & Sun, L. The role of ocean-atmosphere coupling in the zonal-mean atmospheric response to Arctic sea ice loss. J. Clim. 28, 2168–2186 (2015).
Sun, L., Deser, C., Tomas, R. & Alexander, M. Global coupled climate response to polar sea ice loss: evaluating the effectiveness of different ice-constraining approaches. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2019GL085788 (2020).
Wang, K., Deser, C., Sun, L. & Tomas, R. Fast response of the tropics to an abrupt loss of Arctic sea ice via ocean dynamics. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 4264–4272 (2018).
Chemke, R., Polvani, L. & Deser, C. The effect of Arctic sea ice loss on the Hadley circulation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 963–972 (2019).
Kidston, J., Taschetto, A., Thompson, D. & England, M. The influence of Southern Hemisphere sea ice extent on the latitude of the mid-latitude jet stream. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L15804 (2011).
Bader, J., Flugge, M., Kyamsto, N., Mesquita, M. & Voigt, A. Atmospheric winter response to a projected future Antarctic sea ice reduction: a dynamical analysis. Clim. Dynam. 40, 2707–2718 (2013).
Ayres, H. & Screen, J. Multi-model analysis of the atmospheric response to Antarctic sea ice loss at quadrupled CO2. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 9861–9869 (2019).
Chiang, J. & Bitz, C. Influence of high latitude ice cover on the marine Intertropical Convergence Zone. Clim. Dynam. 25, 477–496 (2005).
Marsh, D. et al. Climate change from 1850 to 2005 simulated in CESM1(WACCM). J. Clim. 26, 7372–7391 (2013).
Blackport, R. & Kushner, P. The transient and equilibrium climate response to rapid summertime sea ice loss in CCSM4. J. Clim. 29, 401–417 (2016).
Oudar, T. et al. Respective roles of direct GHG radiative forcing and induced Arctic sea ice loss on the Northern Hemisphere atmospheric circulation. Clim. Dynam. 49, 3693–3717 (2017).
Chiang, J. & Vimont, D. Analagous Pacific and Atlantic meridional modes of tropical atmosphere–ocean variability. J. Clim. 17, 4143–4158 (2004).
Amaya, D. The Pacific Meridional Mode and ENSO: a review. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 5, 296–307 (2019).
Zhang, H., Clement, A. & Di Nezio, P. The South Pacific meridional mode: a mechanism for ENSO-like variability. J. Clim. 27, 769–783 (2014).
Zhang, H., Deser, C., Clement, A. & Tomas, R. Equatorial signatures of the Pacific Meridional Modes: dependence on mean climate state. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 568–574 (2014).
Kang et al. Extratropical-Tropical Model Intercomparison Project: protocol and initial results. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 100, 2589–2605 (2019).
Schott, F., McCreary, J. & Johnson, G. in Earth’s Climate (eds Wang, C. et al.) 261–304 (American Geophysical Union, 2013).
Graffino, G., Farnetti, R., Kucharksi, F. & Molteni, F. The effect of wind stress anomalies and location in driving Pacific subtropical cells and tropical climate. J. Clim. 32, 1641–1660 (2019).
Hwang, Y., Xie, S., Deser, C. & Kang, S. Connecting tropical climate change with Southern Ocean heat uptake. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 9449–9457 (2017).
Lee, S. Testing of the tropically excited Arctic warming mechanism with traditional El Nino and La Nina. J. Clim. 25, 4015–4022 (2012).
Yoo, C., Feldstien, S. & Lee, S. The impact of the Madden-Julian Oscillation trend on the Arctic amplification of surface air temperature during the 1979–2008 boreal winter. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L24804 (2011).
Zhang, P. et al. A stratospheric pathway linking a colder Siberia to Barents-Kara Sea sea ice loss. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat6025 (2018).
De, B. & Wu, Y. Robustness of the stratospheric pathway in linking the Barents-Kara Sea sea ice variability to the mid-latitude circulation in CMIP5 models. Clim. Dynam. 53, 193–207 (2019).
Holland, M., Bailey, D., Briegleb, B., Light, B. & Hunke, E. Improved sea ice shortwave radiation physics in CCSM4: the impact of melt ponds and aerosols on Arctic sea ice. J. Clim. 25, 1413–1430 (2012).
Danabasoglu, G. et al. The CCSM4 ocean component. J. Clim. 25, 1361–1389 (2012).
Rosenblum, E. & Eisenman, I. Sea ice trends in climate models only accurate in runs with biased global warming. J. Clim. 30, 6265–6278 (2017).
Polvani, L., Previdi, M., England, M., Chiodo, G. & Smith, K. Substantial twentieth-century Arctic warming caused by ozone-depleting substances. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 130–133 (2020).
England, M., Polvani, L., Smith, K., Landrum, L. & Holland, M. Robust response of the Amundsen Sea Low to stratospheric ozone depletion. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 8207–8213 (2016).
Kay, J. et al. The influence of local feedbacks and northward heat transport on the equilibrium Arctic climate response to increased greenhouse gas forcing. J. Clim. 25, 5433–5450 (2012).
M.R.E. is funded by a collaborative agreement between NASA GISS and Columbia University and NSF grants OPP-1643445 and OPP-1744835. L.M.P. is funded by NSF award number 1745029. This material is based on work performed at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, a major facility sponsored by the National Science Foundation. We thank S. Gille, I. Eisenman, S. Sun, M. Mazloff and R. Abernathey for productive discussions.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Primary Handling Editor: Heike Langenberg.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The seasonal cycle of (a) Arctic and (b) Antarctic SIE [x106 km2] averaged over the years 1979–2000 from six WACCM historical runs (grey) and observational data from the NSIDC Sea Ice database (NSIDC, 2019) (blue). The shading shows the + /-2σ envelope.
(a) The zonally averaged temperature response [°C] to both Arctic and Antarctic sea ice loss as a function of latitude and height. (b) The linear sum of the response to Arctic sea ice loss and the response to Antarctic sea ice loss. (c) The difference between panels a, b. Contours show the climatological temperature structure with intervals of 15 °C.
(Shading) The annual mean surface temperature response [°C] to (a) Arctic sea ice loss, (b) Antarctic sea ice loss and (c) both Arctic and Antarctic sea ice loss compared to (d) the projected changes under RCP8.5, the 15-year average of 2085-2099 minus the 15-year average of 1955-1969, (scaled by a factor of 1/5). The contours show the climatological surface temperature with contour intervals of 4 °C.
(a) The surface temperature response [°C] after subtracting the mean tropical SST warming (shaded contours) and the surface wind response [m/s] (vectors) to combined Arctic and Antarctic sea ice loss. (b) As in panel (a) except for the linear sum of the response to Arctic sea ice loss and the response to Antarctic sea ice loss. (c) The difference between panels a and b.
The response of annual mean condensational heating rate [x10-2 °C/day] to (a) Arctic sea ice loss, (b) Antarctic sea ice loss and (c) both Arctic and Antarctic sea ice loss. (d) The projected change in annual mean condensational heating rate under RCP8.5, the 15-year average of 2085-2099 minus the 15-year average of 1955-1969. Note that the response in panel (d) is scaled by a factor of 1/5.
(Shading) The response of the zonally averaged precipitation [mm/day] to (a) Arctic sea ice loss, (b) Antarctic sea ice loss and (c) both Arctic and Antarctic sea ice loss. (d) The projected change under RCP8.5, the 15-year average of 2085-2099 minus the 15-year average of 1955-1969. Note that the response in panel (d) is scaled by a factor of 1/5. Stippling shows a statistically significant response at 95% confidence. (Contours, black) The zonally averaged precipitation with contour intervals of 2 mm/day. Regions are highlighted (contours, red) in which the response is over 20% of the RCP8.5 response.
As in Extended Data Fig. 6 but for the Pacific sector (130°E-100°W).
Extended Data Fig. 8 The response of the Pacific subtropical meridional overturning circulation to sea ice loss.
(Shading) The depth-latitude response of the Pacific subtropical meridional overturning circulation [Sv] to (a) Arctic sea ice loss, (b) Antarctic sea ice loss and (c) both Arctic and Antarctic sea ice loss. (Contours) The climatological meridional overturning circulation with contour intervals of 5 Sv. The solid lines indicate positive values (clockwise flow), the dashed lines indicate negative values (anti-clockwise flow) and the thick black contour indicates the 0 Sv contour.
Extended Data Fig. 9 Connecting the slowdown of the subtropical meridional overturning circulation to Antarctic sea ice loss.
(a) Average vertical velocity in the upper-100m of the ocean in the control run. The white contours enclose the subduction zones, which we define to be < -6cm/year. (b) The response of mean sea level pressure [hPa] (shaded) and surface wind [m/s] (vectors) to Antarctic sea ice loss. (c) The response of the vertical Ekman velocity to Antarctic sea ice loss. Positive values indicate anomalous upwelling (Ekman suction) and negative values indicate anomalous downwelling (Ekman pumping). As in panel (a) the black contours enclose the subduction zones. (d) Same as panel (b) but for the atmosphere-only experiments.
Averaged over the three subduction zones (the Indian, Pacific and Atlantic; as shown in Extended Data Fig. 9a), the response of the vertical velocity in the upper-100m to Antarctic sea ice loss (black bars) and the response of the vertical Ekman velocity (white bars) [cm/year].
About this article
Cite this article
England, M.R., Polvani, L.M., Sun, L. et al. Tropical climate responses to projected Arctic and Antarctic sea-ice loss. Nat. Geosci. 13, 275–281 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0546-9
Nature Climate Change (2022)
Nature Climate Change (2022)
Nature Communications (2022)
Climate Dynamics (2022)
Scientific Reports (2021)