The vertical structure of CO in the Martian atmosphere from the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter

Abstract

Carbon monoxide (CO) is the main product of CO2 photolysis in the Martian atmosphere. Production of CO is balanced by its loss reaction with OH, which recycles CO into CO2. CO is therefore a sensitive tracer of the OH-catalysed chemistry that contributes to the stability of CO2 in the atmosphere of Mars. To date, CO has been measured only in terms of vertically integrated column abundances, and the upper atmosphere, where CO is produced, is largely unconstrained by observations. Here we report vertical profiles of CO from 10 to 120 km, and from a broad range of latitudes, inferred from the Atmospheric Chemistry Suite on board the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter. At solar longitudes 164–190°, we observe an equatorial CO mixing ratio of ~1,000 ppmv (10–80 km), increasing towards the polar regions to more than 3,000 ppmv under the influence of downward transport of CO from the upper atmosphere, providing a view of the Hadley cell circulation at Mars’s equinox. Observations also cover the 2018 global dust storm, during which we observe a prominent depletion in the CO mixing ratio up to 100 km. This is indicative of increased CO oxidation in a context of unusually large high-altitude water vapour, boosting OH abundance.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Spectral fitting with ACS MIR.
Fig. 2: Solar occultation latitudes distribution over latitude and solar longitude of ACS MIR occultation using position 7 and all other ACS occultation points.
Fig. 3: CO VMR vertical profiles at different latitudes.
Fig. 4: Modelled CO distributions.
Fig. 5: Time evolution of CO VMR vertical profiles.

Data availability

The datasets generated by the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter instruments, including ACS, and analysed during the current study are being made available in the ESA Planetary Science Archive (PSA) repository, https://archives.esac.esa.int/psa, following a six months prior access period, following the ESA Rules on Information, Data, and Intellectual Property. Data used herein can be found by searching for the ‘ExoMars 2016’ mission and then selecting the ACS and MIR instruments. Derived products (CO VMR vertical profiles) have been deposited in the Oxford University Research Archive at https://doi.org/10.5287/bodleian:wxxq2m6jo.

Code availability

The GGG software suite is maintained by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and the California Institute of Technology. GGG is available at https://tccon-wiki.caltech.edu and distributed under a non-commercial software license. The LMD GCM is maintained at LMD. It can be obtained using the Subversion version control system following the instructions made available here: https://www.lmd.jussieu.fr/~lmdz/planets/mars/user_manual.pdf.

References

  1. 1.

    McElroy, M. B. & Donahue, T. M. Stability of the Martian atmosphere. Science 177, 986–988 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Parkinson, T. D. & Hunten, D. M. Spectroscopy and acronomy of O2 on Mars. J. Atmos. Sci. 29, 1380–1390 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Nair, H., Allen, M., Anbar, A. D., Yung, Y. L. & Clancy, R. T. A photochemical model of the Martian atmosphere. Icarus 111, 124–150 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Yung, Y. L. & DeMore, W. B. Photochemistry of Planetary Atmospheres (Oxford Univ. Press, 1999).

  5. 5.

    Lefèvre, F. & Krasnopolsky, V. in The Atmosphere and Climate of Mars (eds Haberle, R. M. et al.) 405–432 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2017).

  6. 6.

    Krasnopolsky, V. A. Long-term spectroscopic observations of Mars using IRTF/CSHELL: mapping of O2 dayglow, CO, and search for CH4. Icarus 190, 93–102 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Encrenaz, T. et al. Seasonal variations of the Martian CO over Hellas as observed by OMEGA/Mars Express. Astron. Astrophys. 459, 265–270 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Smith, M. D., Wolff, M. J., Clancy, R. T. & Murchie, S. L. Compact Reconnaissance Imaging Spectrometer observations of water vapor and carbon monoxide. J. Geophys. Res. 114, E00D03 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sindoni, G., Formisano, V. & Geminale, A. Observations of water vapour and carbon monoxide in the Martian atmosphere with the SWC of PFS/MEX. Planet. Space Sci. 59, 149–162 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Smith, M. D., Daerden, F., Neary, L. & Khayat, A. The climatology of carbon monoxide and water vapor on Mars as observed by CRISM and modeled by the GEM-Mars general circulation model. Icarus 301, 117–131 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Sprague, A. L. et al. Mars’ south polar Ar enhancement: a tracer for south polar seasonal meridional mixing. Science 306, 1364–1367 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sprague, A. L. et al. Interannual similarity and variation in seasonal circulation of Mars’ atmospheric Ar as seen by the Gamma Ray Spectrometer on Mars Odyssey. J. Geophys. Res. 117, E04005 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Smith, M. D. THEMIS observations of Mars aerosol optical depth from 2002–2008. Icarus 202, 444–452 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Mahaffy, P. R. et al. Structure and composition of the neutral upper atmosphere of Mars from the MAVEN NGIMS investigation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 8951–8957 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Stevens, M. H. et al. Detection of the nitric oxide dayglow on Mars by MAVEN/IUVS. J. Geophys. Res. 124, 1226–1237 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Vandaele, A. C. et al. Martian dust storm impact on atmospheric H2O and D/H observed by ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter. Nature 568, 521–525 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Fedorova, A. A. et al. Stormy water on Mars: the distribution and saturation of atmospheric water during the dusty season. Science 367, 297–300 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Forget, F. et al. Improved general circulation models of the Martian atmosphere from the surface to above 80 km. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 24155–24176 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lefèvre, F., Lebonnois, S., Montmessin, F. & Forget, F. Three-dimensional modeling of ozone on Mars. J. Geophys. Res. 109, E07004 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Montabone, L. et al. Martian year 34 column dust climatology from mars climate sounder observations: reconstructed maps and model simulations. J. Geophys. Res. 125, e06111 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Krasnopolsky, V. A. Variations of carbon monoxide in the Martian lower atmosphere. Icarus 253, 149–155 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Holmes, J. A., Lewis, S. R., Patel, M. R. & Smith, M. D. Global analysis and forecasts of carbon monoxide on Mars. Icarus 328, 232–245 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kass, D. M. et al. Mars Climate Sounder observation of Mars’ 2018 global dust storm. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, e2019GL083931 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Smith, M. D. THEMIS observations of the 2018 Mars global dust storm. J. Geophys. Res. 124, 2929–2944 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Aoki, S. et al. Water vapor vertical profiles on Mars in dust storms observed by TGO/NOMAD. J. Geophys. Res. 124, 3482–3497 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Neary, L. et al. Explanation for the increase in high-altitude water on Mars observed by NOMAD during the 2018 global dust storm. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e84354 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The ExoMars mission is a joint mission of the European Space Agency (ESA) and Roscosmos. The ACS experiment is led by the Space Research Institute (IKI) in Moscow, assisted by LATMOS in France. This work was funded by Roscosmos, the National Centre for Space Studies of France (CNES), the Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR)-MCUBE project, the Ministry of Science and Education of Russia, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) (PDF – 516895 – 2018) and the UK Space Agency (ST/T002069/1, ST/R001502/1 and ST/P001572/1). Science operations are funded by Roscosmos and ESA.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Spectral fitting of ACS MIR spectra was performed by K.S.O. using the GGG software suite. Input and aid on spectral fitting was given by J.A., C.F.W., D.A.B., A.A.F. and F.M. Processing of ACS spectra was done at LATMOS by L.B. and at IKI by A.T. A.A.F. supplied ACS NIR retrievals of PT profiles and preliminary CO VMR profiles for comparison. The LMD GCM was run by F.L. with support from F.F. The ACS instrument was operated by A.T., A.P., A.V.G. and A.S. All coauthors have contributed to the preparation of the manuscript, written by K.S.O., F.L., F.M. and O.K.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. S. Olsen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Geoscience thanks Jun Cui and Daniel Viudez-Moreiras for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Tamara Goldin; Stefan Lachowycz.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Methods, Figs. 1–7 and Table 1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Olsen, K.S., Lefèvre, F., Montmessin, F. et al. The vertical structure of CO in the Martian atmosphere from the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter. Nat. Geosci. 14, 67–71 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-00678-w

Download citation

Further reading

  • Transient HCl in the atmosphere of Mars

    • Oleg Korablev
    • , Kevin S. Olsen
    • , Alexander Trokhimovskiy
    • , Franck Lefèvre
    • , Franck Montmessin
    • , Anna A. Fedorova
    • , Michael J. Toplis
    • , Juan Alday
    • , Denis A. Belyaev
    • , Andrey Patrakeev
    • , Nikolay I. Ignatiev
    • , Alexey V. Shakun
    • , Alexey V. Grigoriev
    • , Lucio Baggio
    • , Irbah Abdenour
    • , Gaetan Lacombe
    • , Yury S. Ivanov
    • , Shohei Aoki
    • , Ian R. Thomas
    • , Frank Daerden
    • , Bojan Ristic
    • , Justin T. Erwin
    • , Manish Patel
    • , Giancarlo Bellucci
    • , Jose-Juan Lopez-Moreno
    •  & Ann C. Vandaele

    Science Advances (2021)

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing