Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Decadal variability in twentieth-century ocean acidification in the California Current Ecosystem

Abstract

Oceanic uptake of CO2 can mitigate climate change, but also results in global ocean acidification. Ocean acidification-related changes to the marine carbonate system can disturb ecosystems and hinder calcification by some organisms. Here, we use the calcification response of planktonic foraminifera as a tool to reconstruct the progression of ocean acidification in the California Current Ecosystem through the twentieth century. Measurements of nearly 2,000 fossil foraminifera shell weights and areas preserved in a marine sediment core showed a 20% reduction in calcification by a surface-dwelling foraminifera species. Using modern calibrations, this response translates to an estimated 35% reduction in carbonate ion concentration, a biologically important chemical component of the carbonate system. Assuming other aspects of the carbonate system, this represents a 0.21 decline in pH, exceeding the estimated global average decline by more than a factor of two. Our proxy record also shows considerable variability that is significantly correlated with Pacific Decadal Oscillation and decadal-scale changes in upwelling strength, a relationship that until now has been obscured by the relatively short observational record. This modulation suggests that climatic variations will play an important role in amplifying or alleviating the anthropogenic signal and progression of ocean acidification in this region.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Decadal population mean ANSW.
Fig. 2: Twentieth-century proxy [CO32−] record based on G. bulloides ANSW for the period 1895–2000.
Fig. 3: Stable isotope tracers of influential processes.
Fig. 4: Linking upwelling strength, the PDO and carbonate system state.
Fig. 5: Using individuals to trace habitat depth and upwelling strength.

Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article. New data generated as a part of this study have been made publicly available via PANGAEA (PDI-21505; https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.909101). Additional data related to this study are available from the corresponding author on request. Publicly available data used in this study are described below. Carbonate chemistry measurements made within the SBB were collected seasonally by the California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations time-series (CalCOFI; http://calcofi.org/) and during several NOAA West Coast Ocean Acidification Cruises (WCOA; https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/ocads/oceans/Coastal/WCOA.html). Observational data from the Hawaii Ocean Time-series program (HOT; http://hahana.soest.hawaii.edu/hot/) were also used. Shore Station Data (salinity; https://shorestations.ucsd.edu/shore-stations-data/) were used for carbonate system calculations.

References

  1. 1.

    Lüthi, D. et al. High-resolution carbon dioxide concentration record 650,000–800,000 years before present. Nature 453, 379–382 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Feely, R. A. et al. Impact of anthropogenic CO2 on the CaCO3 system in the oceans. Science 305, 362–366 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Orr, J. C. et al. Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms. Nature 437, 681–686 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gruber, N. et al. The ocean sink for anthropogenic CO2 from 1994 to 2007. Science 363, 1193–1199 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Khatiwala, S. et al. Global ocean storage of anthropogenic carbon. Biogeosciences 10, 2169–2191 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Le Quéré, C. et al. Global carbon budget 2015. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 7, 349–396 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bednaršek, N. et al. New ocean, new needs: application of pteropod shell dissolution as a biological indicator for marine resource management. Ecol. Indic. 76, 240–244 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    de Moel, H. et al. Planktic foraminiferal shell thinning in the Arabian Sea due to anthropogenic ocean acidification? Biogeosciences 6, 1917–1925 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    De’ath, G., Lough, J. M. & Fabricius, K. E. Declining coral calcification on the Great Barrier Reef. Science 342, 116–119 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Fabry, V. J., Seibel, B. A., Feely, R. A. & Orr, J. C. Impacts of ocean acidification on marine fauna and ecosystem processes. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 65, 414–432 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Meier, K. J. S., Beaufort, L., Heussner, S. & Ziveri, P. The role of ocean acidification in Emiliania huxleyi coccolith thinning in the Mediterranean Sea. Biogeosciences 11, 2857–2869 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Moy, A. D., Howard, W. R., Bray, S. G. & Trull, T. W. Reduced calcification in modern Southern Ocean planktonic foraminifera. Nat. Geosci. 2, 276–280 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ries, J. B., Cohen, A. L. & McCorkle, D. C. Marine calcifiers exhibit mixed responses to CO2-induced ocean acidification. Geology 37, 1131–1134 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Rivero-Calle, S., Gnanadesikan, A., Del Castillo, C. E., Balch, W. M. & Guikema, S. D. Multidecadal increase in North Atlantic coccolithophores and the potential role of rising CO2. Science 350, 1533–1537 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Iglesias-Rodriguez, D. et al. Phytoplankton calcification in a high-CO2 world. Science 320, 336–340 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Feely, R. A., Sabine, C. L., Hernandez-Ayon, J. M., Ianson, D. & Hales, B. Evidence for upwelling of corrosive ‘acidified’ water onto the continental shelf. Science 320, 1490–1492 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Feely, R. A. et al. Chemical and biological impacts of ocean acidification along the west coast of North America. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 183, 260–270 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Feely, R. A. et al. The combined effects of acidification and hypoxia on pH and aragonite saturation in the coastal waters of the Californian Current Ecosystem and the northern Gulf of Mexico. Cont. Shelf Res. 152, 50–60 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hauri, C. et al. Ocean acidification in the California Current System. Oceanography 22, 60–71 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Turi, G., Lachkar, Z., Gruber, N. & Munnich, M. Climatic modulation of recent trends in ocean acidification in the California Current System. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 014007 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Gruber, N. et al. Rapid progression of ocean acidification in the California Current System. Science 337, 220–223 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hauri, C., Gruber, N., McDonnell, A. M. P. & Vogt, M. The intensity duration and severity of low aragonite saturation state events on the California continental shelf. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 3424–3429 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bednaršek, N. et al. Limacina helicina shell dissolution as an indicator of declining habitat suitability due to ocean acidification in the California Current Ecosystem. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 281, 20140123 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Takahashi, T., Williams, R. T. & Bos, D. L. in GEOSECS Pacific Expedition Volume 3: Hydrographic Data 1973–1974 (eds Broecker, W. S. et al.) 77–83 (National Science Foundation, 1982).

  25. 25.

    Barker, S. & Elderfield, H. Foraminiferal calcification response to glacial-interglacial changes in atmospheric CO2. Science 297, 833–836 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bijma, J., Spero, H. J. & Lea, D. W. in Use of Proxies in Paleoceanography: Examples from the South Atlantic (eds Fisher, G. & Wefer, G.) 489–512 (Springer, 1999).

  27. 27.

    Spero, H. J., Bijma, J., Lea, D. W. & Bemis, B. E. Effect of seawater carbonate concentration on foraminiferal carbon and oxygen isotopes. Nature 390, 497–500 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Marshall, B. J., Thunell, R., Hennehan, M., Astor, Y. & Wejnert, K. Planktonic foraminiferal area density as a proxy for carbonate ion concentration: a calibration study using the Cariaco Basin ocean time series. Paleoceanography 28, 363–376 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Osborne, E. B. et al. Calcification of the planktonic foraminifera Globigerina bulloides and carbonate ion concentration: results from the Santa Barbara Basin. Paleoceanography 31, 1083–1102 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Aldridge, D., Beer, C. J. & Purdie, D. A. Calcification in the planktonic foraminifera Globigerina bulloides linked to phosphate concentrations in surface waters of the North Atlantic Ocean. Biogeosciences 9, 1725–1739 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Beer, C. J., Schiebel, R. & Wilson, P. A. Testing planktic foraminiferal shell weight as a surface water [CO3 2-] proxy using plankton net samples. Geology 38, 103–106 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    De Villiers, S. Optimum growth conditions as opposed to calcite saturation as a control on the calcification rate and shell-weight of marine foraminifera. Mar. Biol. 144, 45–49 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Dore, J. E., Lukas, R., Sadler, D. W., Church, M. J. & Karl, D. M. Physical and biogeochemical modulation of ocean acidification in the central North Pacific. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 12235–12240 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Fassbender, A. J. et al. Estimating total alkalinity in the Washington State Coastal Zone: complexities and surprising utility for ocean acidification research. Estuar. Coasts 40, 404–418 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Caldeira, K. & Wickett, M. E. Anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH. Nature 425, 365 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Byrne, R. H., Mecking, S., Feely, Ra. & Liu, X. Direct observations of basin-wide acidification of the North Pacific Ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L02601 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Bates, N. et al. A time-series view of changing ocean chemistry due to ocean uptake of anthropogenic CO2 and ocean acidification. Oceanography 27, 126–141 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Gruber, N. et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of carbon-13 in the global surface oceans and the oceanic Suess effect. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 13, 307–335 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Keeling, C. D. The Suess effect: 13carbon-14carbon interrelations. Environ. Int. 2, 229–300 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Black, D., Thunell, R. C., Wejnert, K. & Astor, Y. Carbon isotope composition of Caribbean sea surface waters: response to the uptake of anthropogenic CO2. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048538 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Sydeman, W. J. et al. Climate change and wind intensification in coastal upwelling ecosystems. Science 345, 77–80 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Di Lorenzo, E., Miller, A. J. & SchneiderNand McWilliams, J. C. The warming of the California Current System: dynamics and ecosystem implications. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 35, 336–362 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    McGowan, J., Bograd, S., Lynn, R. J. & Miller, A. J. The biological response to the 1977 regime shift in the California Current. Deep Sea Res. Pt II 50, 2567–2582 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Roemmich, D. & McGowan, J. Climatic warming and the decline of zooplankton in the California Current. Science 267, 1324–1326 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Pak, D. K. & Kennett, J. P. A foraminiferal isotopic proxy for upper water mass stratification. J. Foram. Res. 32, 319–327 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Bringue, M., Pospelova, V. & Field, D. B. High resolution sedimentary record of dinoflagellate cysts reflects decadal variability and 20th century warming in the Santa Barbara Basin. Quat. Sci. Rev. 105, 86–101 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Sonnerup, R. E. & Quay, P. D. 13C constraints on ocean carbon cycle models. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 26, GB2014 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Hare, S. R. Low Frequency Climate Variability and Salmon Production. PhD thesis, Univ. Washington (1996).

  49. 49.

    Mantua, N. J. & Hare, S. R. The Pacific Decadal Oscillation. J. Oceanogr. 58, 35–44 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Nam, S., Kim, H.-J. & Send, U. Amplification of hypoxic and acidic events by La Niña conditions on the continental shelf off California. Geophys. Res. Lett. 120, 5387–5399 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Bemis, B. E., Spero, H. J. & Thunell, R. C. Using species-specific paleotemperature equations with foraminifera: a case study in the Southern California Bight. Mar. Micropaleo. 46, 405–430 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Darling, K. F. et al. Molecular evidence for genetic mixing of Arctic and Antarctic subpolar populations of planktonic foraminifers. Nature 405, 43–47 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Sautter, L. R. & Thunell, R. C. Seasonal variability in the δ18O and δ13C of planktonic foraminifera from an upwelling environment: sediment trap results from the San Pedro Basin, Southern California Bight. Paleoceanography 6, 307–334 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Marshall, B. J. et al. Morphometric and stable isotopic differentiation of Orbulina universa morphotypes from the Cariaco Basin, Venezuela. Mar. Micropaleo 120, 46–64 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Moore, W. S. Radium isotope measurements using germanium detectors. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 223, 407–411 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Bruland, K. W. Pb-210 Geochronology in the Coastal Marine Environment. PhD thesis, Univ. California (1974).

  57. 57.

    Koide, M., Soutar, A. & Goldberg, E. D. Marine geochronology with 210Pb. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 14, 422–446 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Krishnaswami, S., Lai, D., Amin, S. & Soutar, A. Geochronological studies in Santa Barbara Basin: 55Fe as a unique tracer for particulate settling. Limnol. Oceanogr. 18, 763–770 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Carter, M. W. & Moghissi, A. A. Three decades of nuclear testing. Health Phys. 33, 55–71 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Ritchie, J. C. & McHenry, J. R. Application of radioactive fallout Cesium-137 for measuring soil erosion and sediment accumulations rates and patterns: a review. J. Environ. Qual. 19, 215–233 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Shchepetkin, A. F. & McWilliams, J. C. The regional oceanic modeling system (ROMS): a split-explicit, free-surface, topography-following-coordinate oceanic model. Ocean Model. 9, 347–404 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Gruber, N. et al. Eddy-resolving simulation of plankton ecosystem dynamics in the California Current System. Deep Sea Res. Pt I 53, 1483–1516 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Gruber, N. et al. Rapid progression of ocean acidification in the California Current System. Science 337, 220–223 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Hauri, C. et al. Spatiotemporal variability and long-term trends of ocean acidification in the California Current System. Biogeosciences 10, 193–216 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Dee, D. P. et al. The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system.Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 137, 553–597 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Graven, H. D., Gruber, N., Key, R., Khatiwala, S. & Giraud, X. Changing controls on oceanic radiocarbon: new insights on shallow-to-deep ocean exchange and anthropogenic CO2 uptake. J. Geophys. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008074 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Leinweber, A. & Gruber, N. Variability and trends of ocean acidification in the Southern California current system: a timeseries from Santa Monica Bay. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 3622–3633 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Lee, K., Kim, T.-W., Byrne, R. H. & Liu, Y.-M. The universal ratio of boron to chlorinity for the North Pacific and North Atlantic Oceans. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 74, 1801–1811 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Zeebe, R. E. & Wolf-Gladrow, D. A. (eds) in CO 2 in Seawater: Equilibrium, Kinetics, Isotopes Vol. 65, 346 (Elsevier, 2001).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We dedicate this manuscript to co-author Robert C. Thunell, a wonderful colleague, friend and mentor, who lost his battle to cancer on 30 July 2018. This research was supported in part by a National Science Foundation grant to R.C.T. (1631977) and the Johanna M. Resig Fellowship granted to E.B.O. by the Cushman Foundation. R.A.F. was supported by the NOAA Ocean Acidification Program (PMEL contribution number 4546). N.G. acknowledges the support of ETH Zürich and of the Swiss National Foundation through the XEBUS project. We thank D. Burdige from Old Dominion University for collecting the box core used in this study; E. Tappa for his assistance with IRMS analyses and sediment trap recovery and deployments in the SBB; and N. Umling, whose review and scientific discourse greatly improved this manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E.B.O. and R.C.T. conceived the study and wrote the initial draft of the paper. E.B.O. designed and performed the analyses and has led the revision of the paper. N.G. and R.A.F. provided model and in situ data and contributed sustantially to the discussion and interpretation of the results and writing of the paper. C.R.B.-N. conducted radiochemistry analyses, produced an age model for the core and contributed to the interpretation and writing of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily B. Osborne.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Primary Handling Editor: James Super.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Scanning Electron Microscope images of the study species, G. bulloides.

B. G. bulloides shell with its final chamber broken showing a cross-sectional view of the shell wall, the key morphometric used in this study to estimate [CO32−]. Shell wall thickness is indirectly estimated by measuring area normalized shell weight (ANSW: shell weight (μg) / 2-D surface area (μm2).

Extended Data Fig. 2 Bathymetric map of the Santa Barbara Basin.

The location of the box-core (red circle) used for the down-core reconstruction as well as the sediment trap (yellow triangle) and hydrographic sampling location (Plumes and Blooms Project Station 4; orange square) used in the calibration portion of the study29.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Down core trends in G. bulloides weight (not size-normalized) and δ18O.

The increasing shell weight over the down core record coincides with a decline in δ18O (note inverted axis), which represents an increase in temperature. This comparison provides a visualization of the importance of using size-normalized shell weights to estimate changes in calcification and shell thickness. Results from this study show that while overall shell weight and shell size are increasing as a result of warming temperatures, shell thickness is declining as a result of reduced [CO32-].

Extended Data Fig. 4 The long-term shift in G. bulloides shell diameter increases in concert with warming sea surface temperatures.

B. We compare the relative changes that are recorded G. bulloides δ18O to a Northern Hemisphere Temperature anomaly for the 1900–2000 period and see a good agreement between temperature trends recorded in these records (Jones et al., 2013). C. We also compared G. bulloides δ18O to in situ sea surface temperature (SST) measurements made in the Santa Barbara Basin (SBB; 1955-Present; Shore Stations Program) and see an excellent agreements between sea surface temperature and the δ18O recorded in our G. bulloides shells.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Time-series correlations between Pacific Decadal Oscillation Index and the detrended proxy-[CO3=] and ANSW sample standard error.

Corresponding values were compared at 5-year time steps due to difference in time resolution across records. An independent t-test was conducted to compare both detrended proxy-[CO3=] and area-normalized shell weight standard area (a measure of sample variability) to the Pacific Decadal Oscillation Index. Highly significant correlation coefficients exist between PDO and the respective variables p<0.005) and the results of a paired t-tests for both records are highly significant (p<0.005), further confirming significance of the relationships.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Osborne, E.B., Thunell, R.C., Gruber, N. et al. Decadal variability in twentieth-century ocean acidification in the California Current Ecosystem. Nat. Geosci. 13, 43–49 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0499-z

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing