Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Soil carbon storage informed by particulate and mineral-associated organic matter


Effective land-based solutions to climate change mitigation require actions that maximize soil carbon storage without generating surplus nitrogen. Land management for carbon sequestration is most often informed by bulk soil carbon inventories, without considering the form in which carbon is stored, its capacity, persistency and nitrogen demand. Here, we present coupling of European-wide databases with soil organic matter physical fractionation to determine continental-scale forest and grassland topsoil carbon and nitrogen stocks and their distribution between mineral-associated and particulate organic matter pools. Grasslands and arbuscular mycorrhizal forests store more soil carbon in mineral-associated organic carbon, which is more persistent but has a higher nitrogen demand and saturates. Ectomycorrhizal forests store more carbon in particulate organic matter, which is more vulnerable to disturbance but has a lower nitrogen demand and can potentially accumulate indefinitely. The share of carbon between mineral-associated and particulate organic matter and the ratio between carbon and nitrogen affect soil carbon stocks and mediate the effects of other variables on soil carbon stocks. Understanding the physical distribution of organic matter in pools of mineral-associated versus particulate organic matter can inform land management for nitrogen-efficient carbon sequestration, which should be driven by the inherent soil carbon capacity and nitrogen availability in ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Geographical distribution of soil OC and N stocks in the top mineral soil (0–20 cm) of European forests and grasslands.
Fig. 2: Soil C/N ratios in the top 20 cm of mineral soils of European forests and grasslands.
Fig. 3: Box plots of SOM pools and C/N by mycorrhizal association.
Fig. 4: Soil organic C in MAOM and POM.
Fig. 5: A schematic representation of the path analyses used to identify the controls on SOC stocks.

Data availability

Data from the LUCAS database can be accessed at The fractionation data will be made available at the European Soil Data Centre of the EU Joint Research Centre website ( The tree occurrence dataset can be also downloaded from, associated with the paper by Mauri et al.21. The final dataset is available from the European Soil Data Centre of the European Commission: Requests for data can be addressed to E.L. (

Code availability

The R scripts are available from the European Soil Data Centre (ESDAC) of the European Commission:


  1. IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

  2. Chabbi, A. et al. Aligning agriculture and climate policy. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 307–309 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wiesmeier, M. et al. Soil organic carbon storage as a key function of soils—a review of drivers and indicators at various scales. Geoderma 333, 149–162 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gong, P. et al. Finer resolution observation and monitoring of global land cover: first mapping results with Landsat TM and ETM+ data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 34, 2607–2654 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jobbagy, E. G. & Jackson, R. B. The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol. Appl. 10, 423–436 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Janzen, H. The soil carbon dilemma: shall we hoard it or use it? Soil Biol. Biochem. 38, 419–424 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schlesinger, W. H. & Amundson, R. Managing for soil carbon sequestration: let’s get realistic. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 386–389 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Averill, C., Turner, B. L. & Finzi, A. C. Mycorrhiza-mediated competition between plants and decomposers drives soil carbon storage. Nature 505, 543–545 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zak, D. R., Freedman, Z. B., Upchurch, R. A., Steffens, M. & Kögel-Knabner, I. Anthropogenic N deposition increases soil organic matter accumulation without altering its biochemical composition. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 933–944 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mack, M. C., Schuur, E. A. G., Bret-Harte, M. S., Shaver, G. R. & Chapin, F. S. I. I. I. Ecosystem carbon storage in Arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization. Nature 431, 440–443 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cotrufo, M. F. et al. Soil organic matter formation from biochemical and physical pathways of litter mass loss. Nat. Geosci. 8, 776–779 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Castellano, M., Mueller, K., Olk, D., Sawyer, J. & Six, J. Integrating plant litter quality, soil organic matter stabilization and the carbon saturation concept. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 3200–3209 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Averill, C. & Waring, B. Nitrogen limitation of decomposition and decay: how can it occur? Glob. Change Biol. 24, 1417–1427 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Golchin, A., Oades, J., Skjemstad, J. & Clarke, P. Study of free and occluded particulate organic matter in soils by solid state 13C Cp/MAS NMR spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Soil Res 32, 285–309 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kogel-Knabner, I. et al. Organo-mineral associations in temperate soils: integrating biology, mineralogy, and organic matter chemistry. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 171, 61–82 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Poeplau, C. et al. Isolating soil organic carbon fractions with varying turnover rates—a comprehensive comparison of fractionation schemes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 125, 10–26 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cambardella, C. A. & Elliott, E. T. Particulate soil organic-matter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56, 777–783 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Six, J., Conant, R. T., Paul, E. A. & Paustian, K. Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: implications for C-saturation of soils. Plant Soil 241, 155–176 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stewart, C. E., Paustian, K., Conant, R. T., Plante, A. F. & Six, J. Soil carbon saturation: concept, evidence and evaluation. Biogeochemistry 86, 19–31 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Toth, G., Jones, A. & Montanarella, L. LUCAS Topsoil Survey Methodology, Data and Results (European Union, 2013).

  21. Mauri, A., Strona, G. & San-Miguel-Ayanz, J. EU-Forest, a high-resolution tree occurrence dataset for Europe. Sci. Data 4, 160123 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Batjes, N. H. Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 65, 10–21 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sterner, R. W. & Elser, J. J. Ecological Stochiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere (Princeton Univ. Press, 2002).

  24. Paul, E. A. Soil Microbiology, Ecology and Biochemistry (Academic, 2014).

  25. Weedon, J. T. et al. Global meta-analysis of wood decomposition rates: a role for trait variation among tree species? Ecol. Lett. 12, 45–56 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liang, C., Schimel, J. P. & Jastrow, J. D. The importance of anabolism in microbial control over soil carbon storage. Nat. Microbiol 2, 17105 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mueller, C. W. et al. Submicron scale imaging of soil organic matter dynamics using NanoSIMS—from single particles to intact aggregates. Org. Geochem. 42, 1476–1488 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fernandez, C. W., Langley, J. A., Chapman, S., McCormack, M. L. & Koide, R. T. The decomposition of ectomycorrhizal fungal necromass. Soil Biol. Biochem. 93, 38–49 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gadgil, R. L. & Gadgil, P. D. Mycorrhiza and litter decomposition. Nature 233, 133 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Freschet, G. T., Aerts, R. & Cornelissen, J. H. C. A plant economics spectrum of litter decomposability. Funct. Ecol. 26, 56–65 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Van Groenigen, J. W. et al. The soil N cycle: new insights and key challanges. SOIL 1, 235–256 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Phillips, R. P., Brzostek, E. & Midgley, M. G. The mycorrhizal-associated nutrient economy: a new framework for predicting carbon–nutrient couplings in temperate forests. New Phytol. 199, 41–51 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Craig, M. E. et al. Tree mycorrhizal type predicts within-site variability in the storage and distribution of soil organic matter. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 3317–3330 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Denef, K., Del Galdo, I., Venturi, A. & Cotrufo, M. F. Soil carbon and nitrogen stocks and distribution across organic matter fractions in European soils under different land use. Open J. Soil Sci. 3, 297–313 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fierer, N. Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 579–590 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Angers, D., Arrouays, D., Saby, N. & Walter, C. Estimating and mapping the carbon saturation deficit of French agricultural topsoils. Soil Use Manag. 27, 448–452 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang, B. & Qiu, Y. L. Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants. Mycorrhiza 16, 299–363 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Harris, D., Horwáth, W. R. & van Kessel, C. Acid fumigation of soils to remove carbonates prior to total organic carbon or carbon-13 isotopic analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65, 1853–1856 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Simpson, D. et al. The EMEP MSC-W chemical transport model—technical description. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 7825–7865 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Antal, E. & Tillé, Y. A direct bootstrap method for complex sampling designs from a finite population. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 106, 534–543 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rosseel, Y. Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling and more v.0.5–12 (BETA). J. Stat. Softw. 48, 1–36 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank A. Mauri, G. Strona and J. San-Miguel-Ayanz for provision of forests data. We thank C. Tuminello for assisting with soil analysis. This work was supported by the JRC (purchase order no. D.B720517), through an OECD Co-operative Research Programme: Biological Resource Management for Sustainable Agricultural Systems fellowship and the NSF-DEB project no. 1743237.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



M.F.C., E.L. and J.S. developed the research concepts. E.L. and M.G.R. conducted the data and statistical analyses. M.L.H. performed the soil analyses. M.F.C., E.L. and J.S. interpreted the data and wrote the paper with contributions from M.G.R. and M.L.H.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Francesca Cotrufo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Primary Handling Editor(s): Xujia Jiang.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–8 and Tables 1–4.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cotrufo, M.F., Ranalli, M.G., Haddix, M.L. et al. Soil carbon storage informed by particulate and mineral-associated organic matter. Nat. Geosci. 12, 989–994 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing