Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Rapid increase in ozone-depleting chloroform emissions from China

Nature Geoscience volume 12, pages 89–93 (2019)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Chloroform contributes to the depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer. However, due to its short lifetime and predominantly natural sources, it is not included in the Montreal Protocol that regulates the production and uses of ozone-depleting substances. Atmospheric chloroform mole fractions were relatively stable or slowly decreased during 1990–2010. Here we show that global chloroform mole fractions increased after 2010, based on in situ chloroform measurements at seven stations around the world. We estimate that the global chloroform emissions grew at the rate of 3.5% yr−1 between 2010 and 2015 based on atmospheric model simulations. We used two regional inverse modelling approaches, combined with observations from East Asia, to show that emissions from eastern China grew by 49 (41–59) Gg between 2010 and 2015, a change that could explain the entire increase in global emissions. We suggest that if chloroform emissions continuously grow at the current rate, the recovery of the stratospheric ozone layer above Antarctica could be delayed by several years.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Global atmospheric CHCl3 mole fractions and emissions.
Fig. 2: Measured atmospheric CHCl3 mole fractions at the HAT and GSN AGAGE stations and estimated emissions in eastern China from regional inverse modelling.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. CHCl3 measurement data for East Asia can be accessed by contacting data leads: S.P. (sparky@knu.ac.kr) for GSN and T.S. (saito.takuya@nies.go.jp) for HAT. CHCl3 measurement data for the five non-Asian AGAGE stations (CGO, SMO, RPB, THD and MHD) used in this study are available at http://agage.mit.edu/data/agage-data/.

References

  1. Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2014 Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, Report No. 55 (WMO, 2014).

  2. Navarro, M. A. et al. Airborne measurements of organic bromine compounds in the Pacific tropical tropopause layer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 13789–13793 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sala, S. et al. Deriving an atmospheric budget of total organic bromine using airborne in situ measurements from the western Pacific area during SHIVA. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 6903–6923 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Laube, J. C. et al. Contribution of very short-lived organic substances to stratospheric chlorine and bromine in the tropics—a case study. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 7325–7334 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hossaini, R. et al. Efficiency of short-lived halogens at influencing climate through depletion of stratospheric ozone. Nat. Geosci. 8, 186–190 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sinnhuber, B. M. & Meul, S. Simulating the impact of emissions of brominated very short lived substances on past stratospheric ozone trends. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 2449–2456 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Salawitch, R. J. et al. Sensitivity of ozone to bromine in the lower stratosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, 811–815 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hossaini, R. et al. The increasing threat to stratospheric ozone from dichloromethane. Nat. Commun. 8, 15962–15970 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McCulloch, A. Chloroform in the environment: occurrence, sources, sinks and effects. Chemosphere 50, 1291–1308 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2010 Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, Report No. 52 (WMO, 2011).

  11. Trudinger, C. M. et al. Atmospheric histories of halocarbons from analysis of Antarctic firn air: methyl bromide, methyl chloride, chloroform, and dichloromethane. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 109, 310–324 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Worton, D. R. et al. 20th century trends and budget implications of chloroform and related tri- and dihalomethanes inferred from firn air. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6, 2847–2863 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Prinn, R. G. et al. History of chemically and radiatively important atmospheric gases from the Advanced Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment (AGAGE). Earth Syst. Sci. Data 10, 985–1018 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stohl, A., Hittenberger, M. & Wotawa, G. Validation of the Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART against large-scale tracer experiment data. Atmos. Environ. 32, 4245–4264 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones, A., Thomson, D., Hort, M. & Devenish, B. in Air Pollution Modeling and Its Application XVII (eds Borrego C. & Norman A.-L.) 580–589 (Springer, New York, 2007).

  16. Ganesan, A. L. et al. Characterization of uncertainties in atmospheric trace gas inversions using hierarchical Bayesian methods. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 3855–3864 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Montzka, S. A. et al. An unexpected and persistent increase in global emissions of ozone-depleting CFC-11. Nature 557, 413–417 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lunt, M. F. et al. Continued emissions of the ozone-depleting substance carbon tetrachloride from Eastern Asia. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, 11423–11430 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Park, S. et al. Toward resolving the budget discrepancy of ozone-depleting carbon tetrachloride (CCl4): an analysis of top-down emissions from China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 11729–11738 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vollmer, M. K. et al. Atmospheric histories and emissions of chlorofluorocarbons CFC-13 (CClF3), ΣCFC-114 (C2Cl2F4), and CFC-115 (C2ClF5). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 979–1002 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Assessment for Decision-Makers: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2014 Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, Report No. 56 (WMO, 2014).

  22. Hossaini, R. et al. A multi-model intercomparison of halogenated very short-lived substances (TransCom-VSLS): linking oceanic emissions and tropospheric transport for a reconciled estimate of the stratospheric source gas injection of bromine. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 9163–9187 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu, P. et al. Efficient transport of tropospheric aerosol into the stratosphere via the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6972–6977 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Randel, W. J. et al. Asian monsoon transport of pollution to the stratosphere. Science 328, 611–613 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vogel, B. et al. Fast transport from Southeast Asia boundary layer sources to northern Europe: rapid uplift in typhoons and eastward eddy shedding of the Asian monsoon anticyclone. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 12745–12762 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Oram, D. E. et al. A growing threat to the ozone layer from short-lived anthropogenic chlorocarbons. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 11929–11941 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ashfold, M. J. et al. Rapid transport of East Asian pollution to the deep tropics. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 3565–3573 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Orbe, C., Waugh, D. W. & Newman, P. A. Air-mass origin in the tropical lower stratosphere: the influence of Asian boundary layer air. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 4240–4248 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lu, L. China’s Fuoropolymer Production Capacity Will Be 230,000 Tons By 2020, and PTFE Will Account For 70% (in Chinese) (Qianzhan, 2017); https://www.qianzhan.com/analyst/detail/220/170629-c33a2ca7.html

  30. Rigby, M. et al. Re-evaluation of the lifetimes of the major CFCs and CH3CCl3 using atmospheric trends. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 2691–2702 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cunnold, D. M. et al. The Atmospheric Lifetime Experiment: 3. Lifetime methodology and application to three years of CFCl3 data. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 88, 8379–8400 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rigby, M., Ganesan, A. L. & Prinn, R. G. Deriving emissions time series from sparse atmospheric mole fractions. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 116, 306–310 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xiao, X. Optimal Estimation of the Surface Fluxes of Chloromethanes Using a 3-D Global Atmospheric Chemical Transport Model. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2008.

  34. Rigby, M. et al. Recent and future trends in synthetic greenhouse gas radiative forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 2623–2630 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Enomoto, T., Yokouchi, Y., Izumi, K. & Inagaki, T. Development of an analytical method for atmospheric halocarbons and its application to airborne observation (in Japanese). J. Jpn Soc. Atmos. Environ. 40, 1–8 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yokouchi, Y. et al. High frequency measurements of HFCs at a remote site in east Asia and their implications for Chinese emissions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, 814–817 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Miller, B. R. et al. Medusa: A sample preconcentration and GC/MS detector system for in situ measurements of atmospheric trace halocarbons, hydrocarbons, and sulfur compounds. Anal. Chem. 80, 1536–1545 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P. & Wotawa, G. Technical note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5, 2461–2474 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lunt, M. F., Rigby, M., Ganesan, A. L. & Manning, A. J. Estimation of trace gas fluxes with objectively determined basis functions using reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 3213–3229 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

X.F., R.G.P. and A.G. are supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) grant nos NAG5-12669, NNX07AE89G, NNX11AF17G and NNX16AC98G to MIT. T.S., Y.Y. and the Hateruma station are supported fully by the Ministry of Environment of Japan and NIES. S.P., S.L. and the Gosan AGAGE station are supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (no. NRF-2016R1A2B2010663). R.T. was funded under Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) grant no. NE/M014851/1. A.L.G. was funded under a NERC Independent Research Fellowship (NE/L010992/1). M.R. was funded under a NERC Advanced Fellowship (NE/I021365/1). P.J.F., P.B.K. and the CGO AGAGE station are supported by CSIRO, the Bureau of Meteorology, Refrigerant Reclaim Australia and NASA grants to MIT. The operations of the AGAGE stations were/are supported by the NASA (grant nos NAG5-12669, NNX07AE89G, NNX11AF17G and NNX16AC98G to MIT; grant nos NAG5-4023, NNX07AE87G, NNX07AF09G, NNX11AF15G, NNX11AF16G, NNX16AC96G and NNX16A97G to SIO). In addition to the NASA funding, MHD was/is supported by the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS, UK, formerly the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC)) contract nos GA01081, GA0201, 1028/06/2015 and 1537/06/2018 to the University of Bristol and the UK Meteorological Office. The RPB station was/is also additionally supported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), contract nos RA-133-R09-CN-0062 and RA-133-R15-CN-0008 to the University of Bristol; the NOAA supports the operations of the SMO station.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Global Change Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Xuekun Fang, Alicia Gressent & Ronald G. Prinn

  2. Department of Oceanography, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea

    Sunyoung Park & Shanlan Li

  3. National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan

    Takuya Saito & Yoko Yokouchi

  4. School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

    Rachel Tunnicliffe, Matthew Rigby, Simon O’Doherty, Peter G. Simmonds, Dickon Young & Mark F. Lunt

  5. School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

    Rachel Tunnicliffe & Anita L. Ganesan

  6. Climate Science Centre, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale, VIC, Australia

    Paul J. Fraser, Paul B. Krummel & Peter K. Salameh

  7. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA

    Christina M. Harth, Jens Mühle & Ray F. Weiss

  8. Met Office, Exeter, UK

    Alistair J. Manning

Authors
  1. Xuekun Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sunyoung Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Takuya Saito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rachel Tunnicliffe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anita L. Ganesan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Matthew Rigby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shanlan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yoko Yokouchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Paul J. Fraser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Christina M. Harth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Paul B. Krummel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jens Mühle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Simon O’Doherty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Peter K. Salameh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Peter G. Simmonds
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Ray F. Weiss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Dickon Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Mark F. Lunt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Alistair J. Manning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Alicia Gressent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Ronald G. Prinn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

X.F. and R.G.P. were responsible for the overall project design. M.R. contributed to the global emission estimation. X.F. contributed to the FLEXPART-based inversions. A.L.G., R.T., A.J.M. and M.F.L. contributed to NAME-based inversions. T.S. and Y.Y. provided the CHCl3 measurement data from HAT, Japan. S.P. and S.L. provided the CHCl3 measurement data from GSN, South Korea. Other co-authors provided the CHCl3 measurement data from the five AGAGE stations and the SIO/NIES calibration scales intercomparison data. The manuscript was written by X.F., M.R., A.L.G., J.M., and P.J.F. with contributions from all co-authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xuekun Fang, Anita L. Ganesan or Matthew Rigby.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Description, Supplementary Figures 1–6 and Supplementary Tables 1–5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fang, X., Park, S., Saito, T. et al. Rapid increase in ozone-depleting chloroform emissions from China. Nature Geosci 12, 89–93 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0278-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0278-2

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing