Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Experimental evidence for sustained carbon sequestration in fire-managed, peat moorlands

Matters Arising to this article was published on 28 October 2019

An Author Correction to this article was published on 10 January 2019

This article has been updated


Peat moorlands are important habitats in the boreal region, where they store approximately 30% of the global soil carbon (C). Prescribed burning on peat is a very contentious management strategy, widely linked with loss of carbon. Here, we quantify the effects of prescribed burning for lightly managed boreal moorlands and show that the impacts on peat and C accumulation rates are not as bad as is widely thought. We used stratigraphical techniques within a unique replicated ecological experiment with known burn frequencies to quantify peat and C accumulation rates (0, 1, 3 and 6 managed burns since around 1923). Accumulation rates were typical of moorlands elsewhere, and were reduced significantly only in the 6-burn treatment. However, impacts intensified gradually with burn frequency; each additional burn reduced the accumulation rates by 4.9 g m−2 yr−1 (peat) and 1.9 g C cm−2 yr−1, but did not prevent accumulation. Species diversity and the abundance of peat-forming species also increased with burn frequency. Our data challenge widely held perceptions that a move to 0 burning is essential for peat growth, and show that appropriate prescribed burning can both mitigate wildfire risk in a warmer world and produce relatively fast peat growth and sustained C sequestration.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Effects of differing prescribed fire frequencies on peat and C accumulation rates.
Fig. 2: Generalized linear models (GLMs) of modelled responses of differing prescribed fire frequencies on community diversity and abundance of major species.
Fig. 3: Summarized impacts of the four fire return intervals on key ecosystem properties.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available in: DataCat: the University of Liverpool Research Data Catalogue with the identifier for peat and C accumulation rates65; and the NERC Environmental Information Data Centre with the identifier for species change66.

Change history

  • 10 January 2019

    In the version of this Article originally published, the authors neglected to include information on Competing Interests; this has now been included in all versions of the Article.


  1. Kaat, A. & Joosten, H. Fact Book for UNFCCC Policies on Peat Carbon Emissions (Wetlands International, Ede, 2008).

  2. Lavoie, M., Paré, D. & Bergeron, Y. Impact of global change and forest management on carbon sequestration in northern forested peatlands. Environ. Rev. 13, 199–240 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yu, Z. Northern peatland carbon stocks and dynamics: a review. Biogeosciences 9, 4071–4085 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rydin H. & Jeglum J. K. The Biology of Peatlands 2nd edn (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2013).

  5. Santana, V. M. & Marrs, R. H. Flammability properties of British heathland and moorland vegetation: models for predicting fire ignition and spread. J. Environ. Manage. 129, 88–96 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kasischke, E. S. & French, N. H. F. Locating and estimating the areal extent of wildfires in Alaskan boreal forests using multiple-season AVHRR NDVI composite data. Rem. Sens. Environ. 51, 263–275 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Calef, M. P., Varvak, A., McGuire, A. D., Chapin, F. S. III. & Reinhold, K. B. Recent changes in annual area burned in interior Alaska: the impact of fire management. Earth Interact. 19, 005 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kasischke, E. S. et al. Influences of boreal fire emissions on Northern Hemisphere atmospheric carbon and carbon monoxide. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 19, GB1012 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goldammer, J. G. Vegetation Fires and Global Change (Kessel Publishing House, Remagen-Oberwinter, 2013).

  10. Faivre, N. et al. Prescribed burning of harvested boreal black spruce forests in eastern Canada: effect on understory vegetation. Can. J. For. Res. 46, 876–884 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kuhry, P. The role of fire in the development of Sphagnum-dominated peatlands in western boreal Canada. J. Ecol. 82, 899–910 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Allen, K. A., Harris, M. P. K. & Marrs, R. H. Matrix modelling of prescribed-burning in Calluna vulgaris-dominated moorland: short burning rotations minimise carbon loss at increased wildfire frequencies. J. Appl. Ecol. 50, 614–624 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alday, J. G., Santana, V. M., Lee, H., Allen, K. & Marrs, R. H. Above-ground biomass accumulation patterns in moorlands after prescribed burning and low-intensity grazing. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 17, 388–396 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaland, P. E. in Anthropogenic Indicators in Pollen Diagrams (ed. Behre, K. E.) 19–36 (Balkema, Rotterdam, 1978).

  15. Vandvik, V. et al. Management-driven evolution in a domesticated ecosystem. Biol. Lett. 10, 20131082 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goldammer, J. G. & Bruce, M. The use of prescribed fire in the land management of western and Baltic Europe. Intnl.Forest Fire News 30, 2–13 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Douglas, D. J. T. et al. Vegetation burning for game management in the UK uplands is increasing and overlaps spatially with soil carbon and protected areas. Biol. Conserv. 191, 243–250 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bain, C. G. et al. IUCN UK Commission of Inquiry on Peatlands (IUCN UK Peatland Programme, Edinburgh, 2011).

  19. Davies, G. M. et al. The role of fire in U.K. peatland and moorland management; the need for informed, unbiased debate. Phil. Trans Roy. Soc. B 371, 20160434 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yallop, A. R. & Clutterbuck, B. Land management as a factor controlling dissolved organic carbon release from upland peat soils. 1: Spatial variation in DOC productivity. Sci. Tot. Environ. 407, 3803–3813 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Clymo, R. S., Turunen, J. & Tolonen, K. Carbon accumulation in peatland. Oikos 81, 368–388 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maltby, E., Legg, C. J. & Proctor, M. C. F. The ecology of severe moorland fire on the North York Moors: effects of the 1976 fires, and subsequent surface and vegetation development. J. Ecol. 78, 490–518 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Davies, G. M., Gray, A., Rein, G. & Legg, C. J. Peat consumption and carbon loss due to smouldering wildfire in a temperate peatland. For. Ecol. Manage. 308, 169–177 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Clear, J. L., Seppa, H., Kuosmanen, N. & Bradshaw, R. H. W. Holocene stand-scale vegetation dynamics and fire history of an old-growth spruce forest in southern Finland. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 24, 731–741 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Clear, J. L., Molinari, C. & Bradshaw, R. H. W. Holocene fire in Fennoscandia and Denmark. Int. J. Wildland Fire 23, 781–789 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Charman, D. J., Blundell, A., Chiverrell, R. C., Hendon, D. & Langdon, P. G. Compilation of non-annually resolved Holocene proxy climate records: stacked Holocene peatland palaeo-water table reconstructions from northern Britain. Quaternary Sci. Rev. 25, 336–350 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Charman, D. J. et al. Climate-related changes in peatland carbon accumulation during the last millennium. Biogeosciences 10, 929–944 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Appleby, P. G. & Oldfield, F. The calculation of 210Pb dates assuming a constant rate of supply of unsupported 210Pb to the sediment. Catena 5, 1–8 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Marrs, R. H., Rawes, M., Robinson, J. S. & Poppitt, S. D. Long-term Studies of Vegetation Change at Moor House NNR: Guide to Recording Methods and Database. Merlewood R & D Paper 109 (Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Grange-over-Sands, 1986).

  30. Renberg, I., Persson, M. W. & Emteryd, O. Preindustrial atmospheric lead contamination detected in Swedish lake-sediments. Nature 368, 323–326 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Clymo, R. S. in Production Ecology of British Moors and Montane Grasslands (eds Heal O. W. & Perkins, D. F.) 185–223 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1978).

  32. Farmer., J. G., MacKenzie, A. B., Sugden, C. L., Edgar, P. J. & Eades, L. J. A comparison of the historical lead pollution recorded in peat and freshwater lake sediments from central Scotland. Water Air Soil Pollut. 100, 253–270 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Turner, J. The anthropogenic factor in vegetational history. I. Tregaron and Whixall mosses. New Phytol. 63, 73–90 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Evans, M. & Lindsay, J. Impact of gulley erosion on carbon sequestration in blanket peatlands. Clim. Res. 45, 31–41 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Billett, M. F. et al. Carbon balance of UK peatlands: current state of knowledge and future research challenges. Clim. Res. 45, 13–29 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Garnett, M. H., Ineson, P. & Stevenson, A. C. Effects of burning and grazing on carbon sequestration in a Pennine blanket bog, UK. Holocene 10, 729–736 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Worrall., F., Burt, T. P., Rowson, J. G., Warburton, J. & Adamson, J. K. The multi-annual carbon budget of a peat-covered catchment. Sci. Tot. Environ. 407, 4084–4094 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lee, H., Alday, J. G., Rose, R. J., O’Reilly, J. & Marrs, R. H. Long-term effects of rotational prescribed-burning and low-intensity sheep-grazing on blanket-bog plant communities. J. Appl. Ecol. 50, 625–635 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Milligan, G., Rose, R. J., O’Reilly, J. & Marrs, R. H. Effects of rotational prescribed burning and sheep-grazing on moorland plant communities: results from a 60-year intervention experiment. Land Deg. Dev. 29, 1397–1412 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Albertson, K., Aylen, J., Cavan, G. & McMorrow, J. Forecasting the outbreak of moorland wildfires in the English Peak District. J. Environ. Manage. 90, 2642–2651 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Albertson, K., Aylen, J., Cavan, G. & McMorrow, J. Climate change and the future occurrence of moorland wildfires in the Peak District of the UK. Clim. Res. 45, 105–118 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gimingham, C. H. Ecology of Heathlands (Chapman & Hall, London, 1972).

  43. Måren, I. E. et al. Prescribed burning of northern heathlands: Calluna vulgaris germination cues and seed-bank dynamics. Plant Ecol. 207, 245–256 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lee, H. et al. Change in propagule banks during prescribed burning: a tale of two contrasting moorlands. Biol. Conserv. 165, 187–197 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bormann, F. H. & Likens, G. E. Pattern and Processes in a Forested Ecosystem (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1979).

  46. Anderson, P. in Blanket Mire Degradation: Causes, Consequences and Challenges (eds Tallis, J. H. et al.) 16–28 (Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Aberdeen, 1997).

  47. Santana, V. M., Alday, J. G., Lee, H., Allen, K. A. & Marrs, R. H. Modelling carbon emissions in Calluna vulgaris-dominated ecosystems when prescribed burning and wildfires interact. PLoS ONE 11, e0167137 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  48. IPCC Climate Change 2014 : Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014)

  49. The Editor. Spreading like wildfire. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 755 (2017).

  50. Rawes, M. & Heal, O. W. in Production ecology of British Moors and Montane Grasslands (eds Heal O. W. & Perkins, D. F.) 224–243 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1978).

  51. Rawes, M. & Welch, D. Upland productivity of vegetation and sheep at Moor House National Nature Reserves, Westmorland, England. Oikos Suppl. 11, 1–69 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  52. The Heather and Grass Burning Code (DEFRA, 2007).

  53. Heal, O. W. & Smith, R. A. H. in Production Ecology of British Moors and Montane Grasslands (eds Heal O. W. & Perkins, D. F.) 3–16 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1978).

  54. Zaccone, C. et al. Smouldering fire signatures in peat and their implications for palaeoenvironmental reconstructions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 137, 134–146 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Harris, M. P. K. et al. Factors affecting moorland plant communities and component species in relation to prescribed burning. J. Appl. Ecol. 48, 1411–1421 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Boyle, J., Chiverrell, R. & Schillereff, D. in Micro-XRF Studies of Sediment Cores: A Non-destructive Tool for the Environmental Sciences. Developments in Paleoenvironmental Research (eds Rothwell, G. & Croudace, I.) 373–390 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2015).

  57. Appleby, P. G. et al. 210Pb dating by low background gamma counting. Hydrobiologia 141, 21–27 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Appleby, P. G., Richardson, N. & Nolan, P. J. Self-absorption corrections for well-type germaniun detectors. Nucl. Inst. Methods B 71, 228–233 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Appleby, P. G., Richardson, N. & Nolan, P. J. 241Am dating of lake sediments. Hydrobiologia 214, 35–42 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Vile, M. A., Wieder, R. K. & Novák, M. Mobility of Pb in Sphagnum-derived peat. Biogeochem. 45, 35–52 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Martin, P. D., Malley, D. F., Manning, G. & Fuller, L. Determination of soil organic carbon and nitrogen at the field level using near-infrared spectroscopy. Can. J. Soil Sci. 82, 413–422 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Pearson, E. J., Juggins, S. & Tyler, J. Ultrahigh resolution total organic carbon analysis using Fourier transform near Infrared reflectance spectroscopy (FT-NIRS). Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 15, 292–301 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Hoogsteen, M. J. J., Lantinga, E. A., Bakker, E. J., Groot, J. C. J. & Tittonell, P. A. Estimating soil organic carbon through loss on ignition: effects of ignition conditions and structural water loss. European J. Soil Sci. 66, 320–328 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  64. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2015);

  65. Marrs, R. & Chiverrell, R. Experimental Evidence for Sustained Carbon Sequestration in Fire-managed Peat Moorlands (DataCat: the University of Liverpool Research Data Catalogue, 2018);

  66. Rose, R. J., Marrs, R. H., O’Reilly, J. & Furness, M. Long-term Vegetation Monitoring Data (1961–2013) from Moorland Burning Plots Established at Hard Hill, Moor House in 1954 (NERC Environmental Information Data Centre, 2018);

Download references


We thank the Nature Conservancy for having the foresight to initiate the Hard Hill Burning Experiment and the UK Environmental Change Network for its continuation. This work was funded by the Heather Trust and NERC/DEFRA (FIREMAN BioDiversa project (NE/G002096/1). S. Yee provided graphical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



R.H.M. and R.C.C. planned and carried out the field sampling with R.J.R, E.-L.M., R.L. and K.H.; R.C.C. led the geochemistry/stratigraphy with E.-L.M. and R.L.; P.G.A. and G.T.P. were responsible for the radiometric dating. The vegetation survey and analyses were planned and performed by J.G.A., K.A.A., H.L., G.M., R.J.R., J.O’R. and V.S. The manuscript was produced by R.H.M. and R.C.C., with all authors contributing to the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. H. Marrs.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Financial competing interests: The work reported in this paper was 95% funded by a Biodiversa grant (ERA-net project within the European Union’s 6th Framework Programme for Research — 2008 Joint call), which in the UK was funded jointly by DEFRA/NERC (NE/G002096/1). DEFRA is a government ministry whose policy is not to burn on peat. R.H.M. was a co-Investigator. The other 5% (about £2,000) was provided by the Heather Trust, which is a charity that’s dedicated to moorland and upland environment management.

Non-financial competing interests: R.H.M. is a member of the Heather Trust and currently their honorary President; in this role he is specifically barred from interfering in any aspect of their work and does not have voting rights. The Trust aims to provide good moorland management and foster peat conservation in a range of different ways, of which burning is one approach. The Heather Trust does not seek to influence the author’s views when work they support is published. R.H.M. was an expert panel member for DEFRA in 2004 and 2005, when the regulations for burning on peatland were re-written. R.H.M. was an expert witness in a public inquiry on Heather Burning in 2012, supporting a private client. R.H.M. was an author of two of the reports by the IUCN UK Peatland Programme’s Commission of Inquiry on Peatlands. R.H.M. is a member of the Game Conservancy & Wildlife Trust’s Uplands Research Committee; this is advisory only and is unpaid. R.H.M. is not a member of the GWCT, is not involved with game shooting in any way, has never shot game of any description and has never attended any game-shooting event.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1–4 and Supplementary Table 1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marrs, R.H., Marsland, EL., Lingard, R. et al. Experimental evidence for sustained carbon sequestration in fire-managed, peat moorlands. Nature Geosci 12, 108–112 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology