Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Fingerprints of internal drivers of Arctic sea ice loss in observations and model simulations


The relative contribution and physical drivers of internal variability in recent Arctic sea ice loss remain open questions, leaving up for debate whether global climate models used for climate projection lack sufficient sensitivity in the Arctic to climate forcing. Here, through analysis of large ensembles of fully coupled climate model simulations with historical radiative forcing, we present an important internal mechanism arising from low-frequency Arctic atmospheric variability in models that can cause substantial summer sea ice melting in addition to that due to anthropogenic forcing. This simulated internal variability shows a strong similarity to the observed Arctic atmospheric change in the past 37 years. Through a fingerprint pattern matching method, we estimate that this internal variability contributes to about 40–50% of observed multi-decadal decline in Arctic sea ice. Our study also suggests that global climate models may not actually underestimate sea ice sensitivities in the Arctic, but have trouble fully replicating an observed linkage between the Arctic and lower latitudes in recent decades. Further improvements in simulating the observed Arctic–global linkage are thus necessary before the Arctic’s sensitivity to global warming in models can be quantified with confidence.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Simulated sea ice trends in 40-Forced.
Fig. 2: Simulated circulation trends in 40-Forced.
Fig. 3: Simulated latitude–height zonal mean JJA trends of atmospheric variables in 40-Forced.
Fig. 4: Trend in JJA Arctic Z200 against trend of September sea ice extent in observations (1979–2015) and in 40-Forced and 27-CMIP5.
Fig. 5: Reconstructed trends of atmospheric and sea ice variables using 40-Forced.

Data availability

All reanalysis data used in this study were obtained from publicly available sources: ERA-Interim reanalysis data can be obtained from the ECMWF public data sets web interface ( Simulated global circulation, temperature and sea ice under anthropogenic forcing were obtained from the CMIP5 and LENS archives accessed through the Earth System Grid Federation data portal (


  1. 1.

    Serreze, M. C. & Barry, R. G. Processes and impacts of Arctic amplification: a research synthesis. Glob. Planet. Change 77, 85–96 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bintanja, R., Graversen, R. & Hazeleger, W. Arctic winter warming amplified by the thermal inversion and consequent low infrared cooling to space. Nat. Geosci. 4, 758–761 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lee, S. Testing of the tropically excited Arctic warming (TEAM) mechanism with traditional El Nino and La Nina. J. Clim. 25, 4015–4022 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Vaughan, D. G. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) Ch. 4 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

  5. 5.

    Fyfe, J. C. et al. One hundred years of Arctic surface temperature variation due to anthropogenic influence. Sci. Rep. 3, 2645 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cohen, J. et al. Recent Arctic amplification and extreme mid-latitude weather. Nat. Geosci. 7, 627–637 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Perlwitz, J., Hoerling, M. & Dole, R. Arctic tropospheric warming: causes and linkages to lower latitudes. J. Clim. 28, 2154–2167 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Screen, J. A. & Francis, J. A. Contribution of sea-ice loss to Arctic amplification is regulated by Pacific Ocean decadal variability. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 856–860 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Overland, J. E. & Wang, M. Future regional Arctic sea ice declines. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L17705 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Barnes, E. A. & Polvani, L. M. CMIP5 projections of Arctic amplification, of the North American/North Atlantic circulation, and of their relationship. J. Clim. 28, 5254–5271 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Holland, M. M. & Landrum, L. Factors affecting projected Arctic surface shortwave heating and albedo change in coupled climate models. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 373, 20140162 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Deser, C., Sun, L., Tomas, R. A. & Screen, J. Does ocean-coupling matter for the northern extra-tropical response to projected Arctic sea ice loss? Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 2149–2157 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Niederdrenk, A. L. & Notz, D. Arctic sea ice in a 1.5 °C warmer world. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 1963–1971 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Stroeve, J., Holland, M. M., Meier, W., Scambos, T. & Serreze, M. Arctic sea ice decline: faster than forecast. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L09501 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Winton, M. Do climate models underestimate the sensitivity of Northern Hemisphere sea ice cover? J. Clim. 24, 3924–3934 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kay, J. E., Holland, M. M. & Jahn, A. Inter-annual to multi-decadal Arctic sea ice extent trends in a warming world. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L15708 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Day, J. J., Hargreaves, J. C., Annan, J. D. & Abe-Ouchi, A. Sources of multi-decadal variability in Arctic sea ice extent. Environ. Res. Lett. 7, 034011 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Stroeve, J. C. et al. Trends in Arctic sea ice extent from CMIP5, CMIP3 and observations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L16502 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mahlstein, I. & Knutti, R. September Arctic sea ice predicted to disappear near 2 °C global warming above present. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D06104 (2012).

  20. 20.

    Swart, N. C., Fyfe, J. C., Hawkins, E., Kay, J. E. & Jahn, A. Influence of internal variability on Arctic sea-ice trends. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 86–89 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ding, Q. H. et al. Influence of the recent high-latitude atmospheric circulation change on summertime Arctic sea ice. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 289–295 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Notz, D. & Stroeve, J. Observed Arctic sea-ice loss directly follows anthropogenic CO2 emission. Science 354, 747–750 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Rosenblum, E. & Eisenman, I. Sea ice trends in climate models only accurate in runs with biased global warming. J. Clim. 30, 6265–6278 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Jahn, A. Reduced probability of ice-free summers for 1.5 °C compared to 2 °C warming. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 409–413 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kay, J. E. et al. The Community Earth System Model (CESM) Large Ensemble Project: a community resource for studying climate change in the presence of internal climate variability. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 96, 1333–1349 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J. & Meehl, G. A. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 485–498 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Tandon, N. F., Kushner, P. J., Docquier, D., Wettstein, J. & Li, C. Reassessing sea ice drift and its relationship to long-term Arctic sea ice loss in coupled climate models. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 2017, JC013697 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ding, Q. H. et al. Tropical forcing of the recent rapid Arctic warming in northeastern Canada and Greenland. Nature 509, 209–212 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Trenberth, K. E., Fasullo, J. T., Branstator, G. & Phillips, A. S. Seasonal aspects of the recent pause in surface warming. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 911–916 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kosaka, Y. & Xie, S.-P. Recent global-warming hiatus tied to equatorial Pacific surface cooling. Nature 501, 403–407 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Meehl, G. A., Teng, H. & Arblaster, J. M. Climate model simulations of the observed early-2000s hiatus of global warming. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 898–902 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Gregory, J. M. et al. Recent and future changes in Arctic sea ice simulated by the HadCM3 AOGCM. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 2175 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Graversen, R. G., Langen, P. L. & Mauritsen, T. Polar amplification in CCSM4: contributions from the lapse rate and surface Albedo feedbacks. J. Clim. 27, 4433–4450 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    McCusker, K. E. et al. Remarkable separability of circulation response to Arctic sea ice loss and greenhouse gas forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 7955–7964 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Screen, J. A. Arctic sea ice at 1.5 and 2 °C. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 362–363 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Rienecker, M. M. et al. MERRA—NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications. J. Clim. 24, 3624–3648 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kanamitsu, M. et al. The NCEP‐DOE AMIP‐II reanalysis (R‐2). Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 83, 1631–1643 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Dee, D. P. et al. The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 137, 553–597 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kobayashi, S. et al. The JRA-55 reanalysis: general specifications and basic characteristics. J. Meteor. Soc. Jpn 93, 5–48 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Saha, S. et al. The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 91, 1015–1057 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Comiso, J. C., Meier, W. N. & Gersten, R. Variability and trends in the Arctic Sea ice cover: results from different techniques. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 122, 6883–6900 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Schweiger, A. J. et al. Uncertainty in modeled Arctic sea ice volume. J. Geophys. Res. 116, C00D06 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Plumb, R. A. On the three-dimensional propagation of stationary waves. J. Atmos. Sci. 42, 217–229 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Bretherton, C. S., Smith, C. & Wallace, J. M. An intercomparison of methods for finding coupled patterns in climate data. J. Clim. 5, 541–560 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Wallace, J. M., Smith, C. & Bretherton, C. S. Singular value decomposition of wintertime sea surface temperature and 500-mb height anomalies. J. Clim. 5, 561–576 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was supported by NOAA’s Climate Program Office, Climate Variability and Predictability Program (NA15OAR4310162) and Ocean Observing and Monitoring Division (NA18OAR4310424), and by NSF’s Polar Programs (OPP1744598 and ARC1203425). The authors acknowledge support from the CESM Large Ensemble Community Project and supercomputing resources provided by NSF/CISL/Yellowstone.

Author information




Q.D. and A.S. led this work with contributions from all authors. Q.D. carried out the calculations and created the figures. Q.D and A.S. led analyses, interpreted results and wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qinghua Ding.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures and Tables

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, Q., Schweiger, A., L’Heureux, M. et al. Fingerprints of internal drivers of Arctic sea ice loss in observations and model simulations. Nature Geosci 12, 28–33 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing