Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Consistency and discrepancy in the atmospheric response to Arctic sea-ice loss across climate models


The decline of Arctic sea ice is an integral part of anthropogenic climate change. Sea-ice loss is already having a significant impact on Arctic communities and ecosystems. Its role as a cause of climate changes outside of the Arctic has also attracted much scientific interest. Evidence is mounting that Arctic sea-ice loss can affect weather and climate throughout the Northern Hemisphere. The remote impacts of Arctic sea-ice loss can only be properly represented using models that simulate interactions among the ocean, sea ice, land and atmosphere. A synthesis of six such experiments with different models shows consistent hemispheric-wide atmospheric warming, strongest in the mid-to-high-latitude lower troposphere; an intensification of the wintertime Aleutian Low and, in most cases, the Siberian High; a weakening of the Icelandic Low; and a reduction in strength and southward shift of the mid-latitude westerly winds in winter. The atmospheric circulation response seems to be sensitive to the magnitude and geographic pattern of sea-ice loss and, in some cases, to the background climate state. However, it is unclear whether current-generation climate models respond too weakly to sea-ice change. We advocate for coordinated experiments that use different models and observational constraints to quantify the climate response to Arctic sea-ice loss.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Effects of Arctic sea-ice loss on winter air temperature.
Fig. 2: Effects of Arctic sea ice loss on winter sea-level pressure.
Fig. 3: Effects of Arctic sea-ice loss on winter atmospheric circulation.


  1. 1.

    Perovich, D. et al. Sea ice cover. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc.98, S131–S133 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Boé, J., Hall, A. & Qu, X. September sea ice cover in the Arctic Ocean projected to vanish by 2100. Nat. Geosci.2, 341–343 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Notz, D. & Stroeve, J. Observed Arctic sea-ice loss directly follow anthropogenic CO2 emission. Science354, 747–750 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Post, E. et al. Ecological consequences of sea-ice decline.Science341, 519–524 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Meier, W. N. et al. Arctic sea ice in transformation: a review of recent observed changes and impacts on biology and human activity. Rev. Geophys.52, 185–217 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cohen, J. et al. Recent Arctic amplification and extreme mid-latitude weather. Nat. Geosci.7, 627–637 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Walsh, J. E. Intensified warming of the Arctic: causes and impacts ion middle latitudes. Glob. Planet. Chang.117, 52–63 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Vihma, T. Effects of Arctic sea ice decline on weather and climate: a review. Surv. Geophys.35, 1175–1214 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Overland, J. E. et al. The melting Arctic and midlatitude weather patterns: are they connected? J. Clim.28, 7917–7932 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Barnes, E. A. & Screen, J. A. The impact of Arctic warming on the midlatitude jet-stream: Can it? Has it? Will it? WIREs Clim. Chang.6, 277–286 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gramling, C. Arctic impact. Science347, 818–821 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Shepherd, T. G. Effects of a warming Arctic. Science353, 989–990 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Screen, J. A. Far-flung effects of Arctic warming. Nat. Geosci.10, 253–254 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sévellec, F., Fedorov, A. V. & Liu, W. Arctic sea-ice decline weakens the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. Nat. Clim. Chang.7, 604–610 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Deser, C., Tomas, R. A. & Sun, L. The role of ocean–atmosphere coupling in the zonal-mean atmospheric response to Arctic sea ice loss.J. Clim.28, 2168–2186 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Smith, D. M. et al. Atmospheric response to Arctic and Antarctic sea ice: the importance of ocean–atmosphere coupling and the background state.J. Clim.30, 4547–4565 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mori, M. et al. Robust arctic sea ice influence on the frequent Eurasian cold winters in past decades. Nat. Geosci.7, 869–873 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sun, L., Perlwitz, J. & Hoerling, M. What caused the recent “warm Arctic, cold continents” trend pattern in winter temperatures? Geophys. Res. Lett.43, 5345–5352 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    McCusker, K. E., Fyfe, J. C. & Sigmond, M. Twenty-five winters of unexpected Eurasian cooling unlikely due to arctic sea ice loss. Nat. Geosci.9, 838–842 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Deser, C., Sun, L., Tomas, R. A. & Screen, J. Does ocean coupling matter for the northern extratropical response to projected Arctic sea ice loss? Geophys. Res. Lett.43, 2149–2157 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Screen, J. A. The missing Northern European cooling response to Arctic sea ice loss. Nat. Commun.8, 14603 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Tomas, R. A., Deser, C. & Sun, L. The role of ocean heat transport in the global climate response to projected Arctic sea ice loss.J. Clim.29, 6841–6859 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Oudar, T. et al. Respective roles of direct GHG radiative forcing and induced Arctic sea ice loss on the Northern Hemisphere atmospheric circulation. Clim. Dyn.49, 3693–3713 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    McCusker, K. E. et al. Remarkable separability of the circulation response to Arctic sea ice loss and greenhouse gas forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett.44, 7955–7964 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Blackport, R. & Kushner, P. The transient and equilibrium climate response to rapid summertime sea ice loss in CCSM4. J. Clim.29, 401–417 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Blackport, R. & Kushner, P. J. Isolating the atmospheric circulation response to Arctic sea ice loss in the coupled climate system.J. Clim.30, 2163–2185 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Inoue, J., Hori, M. E. & Takaya, K. The role of Barents Sea ice in the wintertime cyclone track and emergence of a warm-Arctic cold-Siberian anomaly. J. Clim.25, 2561–2568 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Zhang, X., Sorteberg, A., Zhang, J., Gerdes, R. & Comiso, J. C. Recent radical shifts of the atmospheric circulations and rapid changes in the Arctic climate system. Geophys. Res. Lett.35, L22701 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Francis, J. A. & Vavrus, S. J. Evidence for a wavier jet stream in response to rapid Arctic warming. Environ. Res. Lett.10, 014005 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Magnusdottir, G., Deser, C. & Saravanan, R. The effects of North Atlantic SST and sea ice anomalies on the winter circulation in CCM3. Part I: Main features and storm track characteristics of the response. J. Clim.17, 857–876 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Seierstad, I. & Bader, J. Impact of a projected future Arctic sea ice reduction on extratropical storminess and the NAO. Clim. Dyn.33, 937–943 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Screen, J. A., Deser, C., Simmonds, I. & Tomas, R. Atmospheric impacts of Arctic sea ice loss, 1979–2009: separating forced change from atmospheric internal variability. Clim. Dyn.43, 333–344 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Cassano, E. N., Cassano, J. J., Higgins, M. E. & Serreze, M. C. Atmospheric impacts of an Arctic sea ice minimum as seen in the Community Atmosphere Model. Int. J. Climatol.34, 766–779 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Singarayer, J., Bamber, J. & Valdes, P. Twenty-first-century climate impacts from a declining Arctic sea ice cover. J. Clim.19, 1109–1125 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Strey, S., Chapman, W. & Walsh, J. The 2007 sea ice minimum: impacts on the Northern Hemisphere atmosphere in late autumn and early winter.J. Geophys. Res.115, D23103 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Petoukhov, V. & Semenov, V. A. A link between reduced Barents–Kara sea ice and cold winter extremes over northern continents.J. Geophys. Res.115, D21111 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Peings, Y. & Magnusdottir, G. Response of the wintertime Northern Hemisphere atmospheric circulation to current and projected Arctic sea ice decline: a numerical study with CAM5. J. Clim.27, 244–264 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Semenov, V. A. & Latif, M. Nonlinear winter atmospheric circulation response to Arctic sea ice concentration anomalies for different periods during 1966–2012. Environ. Res. Lett.10, 5 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Chen, H. W., Zhang, F. & Alley, R. B. The robustness of midlatitude weather pattern changes due to Arctic sea ice loss. J. Clim.29, 7831–7849 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Overland, J. E. et al. Nonlinear response of mid-latitude weather to the changing Arctic. Nat. Clim. Chang.6, 992–999 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Robson, J., Hodson, D., Hawkins, E. & Sutton, R. Atlantic overturning in decline? Nat. Geosci.7, 2–3 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Rahmstorf, S. et al. Exceptional twentieth-century slowdown in Atlantic Ocean Overturning Circulation. Nat. Clim. Chang.5, 475–480 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Jackson, L. C., Peterson, K. A., Roberts, C. D. & Wood, R. A. Recent slowing of Atlantic Overturning Circulation as a recovery from earlier strengthening. Nat. Geosci.9, 518–522 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Cheng, W., Chiang, J. C. H. & Zhang, D. Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) in CMIP5 models: RCP and historical simulations.Clim. Dyn.26, 7187–7197 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Sun, L., Deser, C. & Tomas, R. A. Mechanisms of stratospheric and tropospheric circulation response to projected Arctic sea ice loss.J. Clim.28, 7824–7845 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Pedersen, R. A., Cvijanovic, I., Langen, P. L. & Vinther, B. M. The impact of regional Arctic sea ice loss on atmospheric circulation and the NAO. J. Clim.29, 889–902 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Screen, J. A. Simulated atmospheric response to regional and pan-Arctic sea ice loss. J. Clim.30, 3945–3962 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Zhang, P., Wu, Y. & Smith, K. L. Prolonged effect of the stratospheric pathway in linking Barents–Kara Sea sea ice variability to the midlatitude circulation in a simplified model. Clim. Dyn. (2017).

  49. 49.

    Balmaseda, M. A., Ferranti, L., Moteni, F. & Palmer, T. N. Impact of 2007 and 2008 Arctic ice anomalies on the atmospheric circulation: implications for long-range predictions. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc.136, 1655–1664 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Screen, J. A. & Francis, J. A. Contribution of sea ice loss to Arctic amplification is regulated by Pacific Ocean decadal variability.Nat. Clim. Chang.6, 856–860 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Osborne, J. M., Screen, J. A. & Collins, M. Ocean–atmospheric state dependence of the atmospheric response to Arctic sea ice loss. J. Clim.30, 1537–1552 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kim, B.-M. et al. Weakening of the stratospheric polar vortex by Arctic sea ice loss. Nat. Commun.5, 4646 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Wu, Y. & Smith, K. L. Response of Northern Hemisphere midlatitude circulation to Arctic amplification in a simple atmospheric general circulation model. J. Clim.29, 2041–2058 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Nakamura, T. et al. The stratospheric pathway for Arctic impacts on midlatitude climate. Geophys. Res. Lett.43, 3494–3501 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Smith, K. L., Fletcher, C. G. & Kushner, P. J. The role of linear interference in the annular mode response to extratropical surface forcing. J. Clim.23, 6036–6050 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Smith, K. L. & Kushner, P. J. Linear interference and the initiation of extratropical stratosphere–troposphere interactions. J. Geophys. Res.117, D13107 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Suo, L., Gao, Y., Guo, D., Liu, J., Wang, H. & Johannessen, O. M. Atmospheric response to the autumn sea ice free Arctic and its detectability.Clim. Dyn.46, 2051–2066 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Eade, R. et al. Do seasonal-to-decadal climate predictions underestimate the predictability of the real world? Geophys. Res. Lett.41, 5620–5628 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Scaife, A. A. et al. Skilful long range prediction of European and North American winters. Geophys. Res. Lett.41, 2514–2519 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Dunstone, N. et al. Skilful predictions of the winter North Atlantic Oscillation one year ahead. Nat. Geosci.9, 809–814 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Garcia-Serrano, J., Frankignoul, C., Gastineau, G. & de la Camara, A. On the predictability of the winter Euro-Atlantic climate: lagged influence of autumn Arctic sea ice. J. Clim.28, 5195–5216 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Wang, L., Ting, M. & Kushner, P. J. A robust empirical seasonal prediction of the winter NAO and surface climate. Sci. Rep.7, 279 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Cattiaux, J. & Cassou, C. Opposite CMIP3/CMIP5 trends in the wintertime Northern Annular Mode explained by combined local sea ice and remote tropical influences. Geophys. Res. Lett.40, 3682–3687 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Harvey, B. J., Shaffrey, L. C. & Woollings, T. J. Equator-to-pole temperature differences and the extra-tropical storm track responses of the CMIP5 climate models. Clim. Dyn.43, 1171–1182 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Harvey, B. J., Shaffrey, L. C. & Woollings, T. J. Deconstructing the climate change response of the Northern Hemisphere wintertime storm tracks. Clim. Dyn.45, 2847–2860 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Barnes, E. A. & Polvani, L. M. CMIP5 projections of Arctic amplification, of the North American/North Atlantic circulation, and of their relationship. J. Clim.28, 5254–5271 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Yim, B. Y., Min, H. S. & Kug, J. S. Inter-model diversity in jet stream changes and its relation to Arctic climate in CMIP5. Clim. Dyn.47, 235–248 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Hall, A. & Qu, X. Using the current seasonal cycle to constrain the snow albedo feedback in future climate change. Geophys. Res. Lett.33, L03502 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Bracegirdle, T. J. & Stephenson, D. B. On the robustness of emergent constraints used in multimodel climate change projections of Arctic warming. J. Clim.26, 669–678 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Klein, S. A. & Hall, A. Emergent constraints for cloud feedbacks. Curr. Clim. Chang. Rep.4, 276–287 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Borodina, A., Fischer, E. M. & Knutti, R. Emergent constraints in climate projections: a case study of changes in high-latitude temperature variability. J. Clim.30, 3655–3670 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Screen, J. A. & Williamson, D. Ice-free Arctic at 1.5 °C?Nat. Clim. Chang.7, 230–231 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Zou, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y. & Koo, J.-H. Arctic sea ice, Eurasia snow, and extreme winter haze in China. Sci. Adv.3, e1602751 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Kim, J.-S. et al. Reduced North American terrestrial primary productivity linked to anomalous Arctic warming. Nat. Geosci.10, 572–576 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Greene, C. H., Francis, J. A. & Monger, B. C. Superstorm Sandy: a series of unfortunate events? Oceanography26, 8–9 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Kretschmer, M., Coumou, D., Donges, J. F. & Runge, J. Using causal effect networks to analyze different Arctic drivers of midlatitude winter circulation. J. Clim.29, 4069–4081 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Petrie, R. E., Shaffrey, L. C. & Sutton, R. T. Atmospheric impact of Arctic sea ice loss in a coupled ocean–atmosphere simulation.J. Clim.28, 9066–9622 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Semmler, T. et al. Seasonal atmospheric responses to reduced Arctic sea ice in an ensemble of coupled model simulations. J. Clim.29, 5893–5913 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Cvijanovic, I. & Caldeira, K. Atmospheric impacts of sea ice decline in CO2 induced global warming. Clim. Dyn.44, 1173–1186 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Dammann, D. O., Bhatt, U. S., Langen, P. L., Kreiger, J. R. & Zhang, X. Impact of daily Arctic sea ice variability in CAM3.0 during fall and winter. J. Clim.26, 1939–1955 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Gerdes, R. Atmospheric response to changes in Arctic sea ice thickness. Geophys. Res. Lett.33, L18709 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Lang, A., Yang, S. & Kaas, E. Sea ice thickness and recent Arctic warming. Geophys. Res. Lett.44, 409–418 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Steele, M., Ermold, W. & Zhang, J. Arctic Ocean surface warming trends over the past 100 years. Geophys. Res. Lett.35, L02614 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Screen, J. A., Simmonds, I., Deser, C. & Tomas, R. The atmospheric response to three decades of observed Arctic sea ice loss. J. Clim.26, 1230–1248 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Deser, C., Tomas, R., Alexander, M. & Lawrence, D. The seasonal atmospheric response to projected sea ice loss in the late twenty-first century.J. Clim.23, 333–351 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank the Aspen Global Change Institute, with the support of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Heising Simons Foundation, for organizing a workshop in Aspen in June 2017; and the US Climate Variability and Predictability Program for organizing a workshop in Washington DC in February 2017. We also thank the participants at these workshops for engaging in discussion that helped shape this Perspective. J.A.S. and R.B. were funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (NE/P006760/1). C.D. acknowledges the National Science Foundation (NSF), which sponsors the National Center for Atmospheric Research. D.M.S. was supported by the Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme (GA01101) and the APPLICATE project, which is funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 programme. X.Z. was supported by the NSF (ARC#1023592). P.J.K. and K.E.M. were supported by the Canadian Sea Ice and Snow Evolution Network, which is funded by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada. T.O. was funded by Environment and Climate Change Canada (GCXE17S038). L.S. was supported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Climate Program Office.

Author information




J.A.S., C.D, D.M.S. and X.Z jointly conceived the article. D.M.S., R.B., T.O., K.E.M. and L.S. provided data for the figures, which were created by J.A.S. The writing was led by J.A.S. with input from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James A. Screen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Screen, J.A., Deser, C., Smith, D.M. et al. Consistency and discrepancy in the atmospheric response to Arctic sea-ice loss across climate models. Nature Geosci 11, 155–163 (2018).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing