Temperature overshoot scenarios that make the 1.5 °C climate target feasible could turn into sources of political flexibility. Climate scientists must provide clear constraints on overshoot magnitude, duration and timing, to ensure accountability.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Possibility for strong northern hemisphere high-latitude cooling under negative emissions
Nature Communications Open Access 01 March 2022
-
Balancing a budget or running a deficit? The offset regime of carbon removal and solar geoengineering under a carbon budget
Climatic Change Open Access 29 July 2021
-
Negative emissions and international climate goals—learning from and about mitigation scenarios
Climatic Change Open Access 17 October 2019
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Schleussner, C.-F. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 827–835 (2016).
Rogelj, J. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 519–527 (2016).
Knutti, R., Rogelj, J., Sedláček, J. & Fischer, E. M. Nat. Geosci. 9, 13–18 (2016).
Sanderson, B. M., O’Neill, B. & Tebaldi, C. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 7133–7142 (2016).
Clarke, L. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) 413–510 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2014).
Geden, O. WIREs Clim. Change 7, 790–797 (2016).
The Emissions Gap Report 2017 (United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, 2017).
Fuss, S. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 850–853 (2014).
Ricke, K. L., Millar, R. J. & MacMartin, D. G. Sci. Rep. 7, 14743 (2017).
Vogler, J. Climate Change in World Politics (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2015).
Geden, O. & Beck, S. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 747–748 (2014).
Bernie, D. & Lowe, J. Overshoot Scenarios and their Climate Response (AVOID, 2015).
Rogelj, J., Schleussner, C.-F. & Hare, W. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075612 (2017).
Peters, G. P. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 646–649 (2016).
Edvardsson Björnberg, K. Energy Policy 56, 285–292 (2013).
Smith, P. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 42–50 (2016).
Zickfeld, K., Arora, V. K. & Gillett, N. P. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L05703 (2012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Geden, O., Löschel, A. Define limits for temperature overshoot targets. Nature Geosci 10, 881–882 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-017-0026-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-017-0026-z
This article is cited by
-
Ratcheting of climate pledges needed to limit peak global warming
Nature Climate Change (2022)
-
Possibility for strong northern hemisphere high-latitude cooling under negative emissions
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Balancing a budget or running a deficit? The offset regime of carbon removal and solar geoengineering under a carbon budget
Climatic Change (2021)
-
Assessing negative carbon dioxide emissions from the perspective of a national “fair share” of the remaining global carbon budget
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change (2020)
-
Asserting the climate benefits of the coal-to-gas shift across temporal and spatial scales
Nature Climate Change (2019)
