Article

Substantial large-scale feedbacks between natural aerosols and climate

Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

The terrestrial biosphere is an important source of natural aerosol. Natural aerosol sources alter climate, but are also strongly controlled by climate, leading to the potential for natural aerosol–climate feedbacks. Here we use a global aerosol model to make an assessment of terrestrial natural aerosol–climate feedbacks, constrained by observations of aerosol number. We find that warmer-than-average temperatures are associated with higher-than-average number concentrations of large (>100 nm diameter) particles, particularly during the summer. This relationship is well reproduced by the model and is driven by both meteorological variability and variability in natural aerosol from biogenic and landscape fire sources. We find that the calculated extratropical annual mean aerosol radiative effect (both direct and indirect) is negatively related to the observed global temperature anomaly, and is driven by a positive relationship between temperature and the emission of natural aerosol. The extratropical aerosol–climate feedback is estimated to be −0.14 W m−2 K−1 for landscape fire aerosol, greater than the −0.03 W m−2 K−1 estimated for biogenic secondary organic aerosol. These feedbacks are comparable in magnitude to other biogeochemical feedbacks, highlighting the need for natural aerosol feedbacks to be included in climate simulations.

  • Subscribe to Nature Geoscience for full access:

    $59

    Subscribe

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

References

  1. 1.

    Arneth, A. et al. Terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in the climate system. Nat. Geosci. 3, 525–532 (2010).

  2. 2.

    Carslaw, K. S. et al. A review of natural aerosol interactions and feedbacks within the Earth system. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 1701–1737 (2010).

  3. 3.

    Hallquist, M. et al. The formation, properties and impact of secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 5155–5236 (2009).

  4. 4.

    Poschl, U. et al. Rainforest aerosols as biogenic nuclei of clouds and precipitation in the Amazon. Science 329, 1513–1516 (2010).

  5. 5.

    Martin, S. T. et al. Sources and properties of Amazonian aerosol particles. Rev. Geophys. 48, RG2002 (2010).

  6. 6.

    Martin, S. T. et al. Introduction: observations and modeling of the Green Ocean Amazon (GoAmazon2014/5). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 4785–4797 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Andreae, M. O. et al. The Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO): overview of pilot measurements on ecosystem ecology, meteorology, trace gases, and aerosols. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 10723–10776 (2015).

  8. 8.

    Goldstein, A. H., Koven, C. D., Heald, C. L. & Fung, I. Y. Biogenic carbon and anthropogenic pollutants combine to form a cooling haze over the southeastern United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 8835–8840 (2009).

  9. 9.

    Spracklen, D. V. et al. Wildfires drive interannual variability of organic carbon aerosol in the western US in summer. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L16816 (2007).

  10. 10.

    Tunved, P. et al. High natural aerosol loading over boreal forests. Science 312, 261–263 (2006).

  11. 11.

    Twomey, S. Aerosols, clouds and radiation. Atmospheric Environment 25, 2435–2442 (1991).

  12. 12.

    Rap, A. et al. Natural aerosol direct and indirect radiative effects. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 3297–3301 (2013).

  13. 13.

    Satheesh, S. K. & Moorthy, K. K. Radiative effects of natural aerosols: a review. Atmospheric Environment 39, 2089–2110 (2005).

  14. 14.

    Scott, C. E. et al. The direct and indirect radiative effects of biogenic secondary organic aerosol. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 447–470 (2014).

  15. 15.

    Unger, N. Human land-use-driven reduction of forest volatiles cools global climate. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 907–910 (2014).

  16. 16.

    Spracklen, D. V. et al. Impacts of climate change from 2000 to 2050 on wildfire activity and carbonaceous aerosol concentrations in the western United States. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 114, D20301 (2009).

  17. 17.

    Ward, D. S. et al. The changing radiative forcing of fires: global model estimates for past, present and future. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 10857–10886 (2012).

  18. 18.

    Jolly, W. M. et al. Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 2013. Nat. Commun. 6, 7537 (2015).

  19. 19.

    Heald, C. L. et al. Predicted change in global secondary organic aerosol concentrations in response to future climate, emissions, and land use change. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 113, D05211 (2008).

  20. 20.

    Mahowald, N. M. et al. Change in atmospheric mineral aerosols in response to climate: Last glacial period, preindustrial, modern, and doubled carbon dioxide climates. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 111, D10202 (2006).

  21. 21.

    Charlson, R. J., Lovelock, J. E., Andreae, M. O. & Warren, S. G. Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulfur, cloud albedo and climate. Nature 326, 655–661 (1987).

  22. 22.

    Kulmala, M. et al. A new feedback mechanism linking forests, aerosols, and climate. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 4, 557–562 (2004).

  23. 23.

    Lihavainen, H., Asmi, E., Aaltonen, V., Makkonen, U. & Kerminen, V. M. Direct radiative feedback due to biogenic secondary organic aerosol estimated from boreal forest site observations. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 104005 (2015).

  24. 24.

    Paasonen, P. et al. Warming-induced increase in aerosol number concentration likely to moderate climate change. Nat. Geosci. 6, 438–442 (2013).

  25. 25.

    Dusek, U. et al. Size matters more than chemistry for cloud-nucleating ability of aerosol particles. Science 312, 1375–1378 (2006).

  26. 26.

    Mann, G. W. et al. Description and evaluation of GLOMAP-mode: a modal global aerosol microphysics model for the UKCA composition-climate model. Geosci. Model Dev. 3, 519–551 (2010).

  27. 27.

    Lohmann, U. & Feichter, J. Global indirect aerosol effects: a review. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5, 715–737 (2005).

  28. 28.

    van der Werf, G. R. et al. Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna, forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997-2009). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 11707–11735 (2010).

  29. 29.

    Guenther, A. B. et al. The Model of emissions of gases and aerosols from nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions. Geosci. Model Dev. 5, 1471–1492 (2012).

  30. 30.

    Voulgarakis, A. et al. Interannual variability of tropospheric trace gases and aerosols: the role of biomass burning emissions. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 120, 7157–7173 (2015).

  31. 31.

    Alves, E. G. et al. Seasonality of isoprenoid emissions from a primary rainforest in central Amazonia. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 3903–3925 (2016).

  32. 32.

    Jardine, K. J. et al. Monoterpene ‘thermometer’ of tropical forest-atmosphere response to climate warming. Plant Cell Environ. 40, 441–452 (2017).

  33. 33.

    Jardine, A. B. et al. Highly reactive light-dependent monoterpenes in the Amazon. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 1576–1583 (2015).

  34. 34.

    van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L. & Gobron, N. & Dolman, A. J. Climate controls on the variability of fires in the tropics and subtropics. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 22, GB3028 (2008).

  35. 35.

    Tsigaridis, K., Lathiere, J., Kanakidou, M. & Hauglustaine, D. A. Naturally driven variability in the global secondary organic aerosol over a decade. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5, 1891–1904 (2005).

  36. 36.

    Myhre, G. et al. Radiative forcing of the direct aerosol effect from AeroCom Phase II simulations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 1853–1877 (2013).

  37. 37.

    Zhu, Z. C. et al. Greening of the Earth and its drivers. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 791–795 (2016).

  38. 38.

    Zaehle, S., Jones, C. D., Houlton, B., Lamarque, J. F. & Robertson, E. Nitrogen availability reduces CMIP5 projections of twenty-first-century land carbon uptake. J. Clim. 28, 2494–2511 (2015).

  39. 39.

    Kloster, S. & Lasslop, G. Historical and future fire occurrence (1850 to 2100) simulated in CMIP5 Earth System Models. Glob. Planet. Change 150, 58–69 (2017).

  40. 40.

    Hantson, S. et al. The status and challenge of global fire modelling. Biogeosciences 13, 3359–3375 (2016).

  41. 41.

    Zhao, D. F. et al. Environmental conditions regulate the impact of plants on cloud formation. Nat. Commun. 8, 14067 (2017).

  42. 42.

    Heald, C. L. & Spracklen, D. V. Land use change impacts on air quality and climate. Chem. Rev. 115, 4476–4496 (2015).

  43. 43.

    Spracklen, D. V. & Rap, A. Natural aerosol–climate feedbacks suppressed by anthropogenic aerosol. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 5316–5319 (2013).

  44. 44.

    Thackeray, C. W. & Fletcher, C. G. Snow albedo feedback: current knowledge, importance, outstanding issues and future directions. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 40, 392–408 (2016).

  45. 45.

    Granier, C. et al. Evolution of anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of air pollutants at global and regional scales during the 1980-2010 period. Climatic Change 109, 163–190 (2011).

  46. 46.

    Nightingale, P. D. et al. In situ evaluation of air–sea gas exchange parameterizations using novel conservative and volatile tracers. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 14, 373–387 (2000).

  47. 47.

    Kettle, A. J. & Andreae, M. O. Flux of dimethylsulfide from the oceans: a comparison of updated data sets and flux models. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 105, 26793–26808 (2000).

  48. 48.

    Gong, S. L. A parameterization of sea-salt aerosol source function for sub- and super-micron particles. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 17, 1097 (2003).

  49. 49.

    Dentener, F. et al. Emissions of primary aerosol and precursor gases in the years 2000 and 1750 prescribed data-sets for AeroCom. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6, 4321–4344 (2006).

  50. 50.

    Mann, G. W. et al. Intercomparison of modal and sectional aerosol microphysics representations within the same 3-D global chemical transport model. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 4449–4476 (2012).

  51. 51.

    Metzger, A. et al. Evidence for the role of organics in aerosol particle formation under atmospheric conditions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 6646–6651 (2010).

  52. 52.

    Edwards, J. M. & Slingo, A. Studies with a flexible new radiation code.1. Choosing a configuration for a large-scale model. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 122, 689–719 (1996).

  53. 53.

    Smith, T. M., Reynolds, R. W., Peterson, T. C. & Lawrimore, J. Improvements to NOAA’s historical merged land–ocean surface temperature analysis (1880–2006). J. Clim. 21, 2283–2296 (2008).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge support from the Natural Environment Research Council (NE/K015966/1), EU Horizon 2020 (SC5-01-2014; grant agreement no 641816) and the Academy of Finland Centre of Excellence (grant nos 1118615 and 272041). We would like to thank the providers of measurement data for ref. 24. This work used the ARCHER UK National Supercomputing Service (http://www.archer.ac.uk).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

    • C. E. Scott
    • , S. R. Arnold
    •  & D. V. Spracklen
  2. Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA

    • S. A. Monks
  3. Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA

    • S. A. Monks
  4. Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

    • A. Asmi
    •  & P. Paasonen
  5. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria

    • P. Paasonen

Authors

  1. Search for C. E. Scott in:

  2. Search for S. R. Arnold in:

  3. Search for S. A. Monks in:

  4. Search for A. Asmi in:

  5. Search for P. Paasonen in:

  6. Search for D. V. Spracklen in:

Contributions

All authors contributed to the research design. C.E.S. and S.A.M. performed model simulations. A.A. and P.P. provided observational data. C.E.S., D.V.S. and S.R.A. analysed the data. All authors contributed to scientific discussions and helped to write the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to C. E. Scott or D. V. Spracklen.

Electronic supplementary material

  1. Supplementary Information.

    Supplementary Figures and Tables