Correspondence | Published:

Unfeasible subduction?

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Vlaar, N. J. & Wortel, M. J. R. Tectonophysics 32, 331–351 (1976).

  2. 2.

    Ingalls, M., Rowley, D. B., Currie, B. & Colman, A. S. Nat. Geosci. 9, 848–853 (2016).

  3. 3.

    Capitanio, F. A., Morra, G., Goes, S., Weinberg, R. F. & Moresi, L. Nat. Geosci. 3, 136–139 (2010).

  4. 4.

    Long, S., McQuarrie, N., Tobgay, T. & Grujic, D. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 123, 1427–1447 (2011).

  5. 5.

    Zahirovic, S., Müller, R. D., Seton, M. & Flament, N. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 418, 40–52 (2015).

  6. 6.

    Gibbons, A. D. et al. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 13, Q05W13 (2012).

  7. 7.

    van Hinsbergen, D. J. J. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7659–7664 (2012).

  8. 8.

    Huang, W., van Hinsbergen, D. J. J., Lippert, P. C., Guo, Z. & Dupont-Nivet, G. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 2642–2649 (2015).

  9. 9.

    Huang, W. et al. J. Geophys. Res. 122, 2434–2456 (2017).

  10. 10.

    DeCelles, P. G., Kapp, P., Gehrels, G. E. & Ding, L. Tectonics 33, 824–849 (2014).

  11. 11.

    Gaina, C., van Hinsbergen, D. J. J. & Spakman, W. Tectonics 34, 875–906 (2015).

  12. 12.

    Oncken, O., Hindle, D., Kley, J., Elger, K. & Victor, P. The Andes https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48684-8_1 (2006).

  13. 13.

    Yakovlev, P. & Clark, M. K. Tectonics 33, 1016–1027 (2014).

  14. 14.

    Nabelek, J. et al. Science 325, 1371–1374 (2009).

  15. 15.

    Métivier, F., Gaudemer, Y., Tapponnier, P. & Klein, M. Geophys. J. Int. 137, 280–318 (2002).

  16. 16.

    Gilotti, J. A. Elements 9, 255–260 (2013).

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Douwe J. J. van Hinsbergen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Further reading

Fig. 1: Palaeolatitude versus time curve displaying the predicted palaeolatitudes and 95% confidence envelopes for a reference point at 29° N, 88° E using the same global apparent polar wander path as in ref