Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

International relations theory on grid communities and international politics in a green world

Nature Energy volume 8, pages 1073–1077 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The energy community’s analyses of international politics often rely on geopolitics, which prioritizes state competition for resources and thus may offer limited explanatory power. Meanwhile, the discipline of international relations (IR), which explicitly examines world politics, seldom focuses on energy. This Perspective brings geopolitics and IR theory together. It provides a brief history of both fields and introduces several IR theories. To demonstrate how IR theory can help illuminate energy issues, it is used to examine an unfounded assumption that has crept into the energy community’s literature. Wide-scale deployment of variable renewable energy will probably require greater cross-border electrification and regional interconnectedness, which energy scholars presume will lead to the formation of cooperative and peaceful multi-state grid communities. The consideration of IR theories presented here helps buttress this assumption and contributes towards addressing the question of whether energy security is better achieved through independence or interdependence.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vakulchuk, R., Overland, I. & Scholten, D. Renewable energy and geopolitics: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 122, 109547 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Månsson, A. A resource curse for renewables? Conflict and cooperation in the renewable energy sector. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 10, 1–9 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Paltsev, S. The complicated geopolitics of renewable energy. Bull. At. Sci. 72, 390–395 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Raman, S. Fossilizing renewable energies. Sci. Cult. 22, 172–180 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Capellán-Pérez, I., de Castro, C. & Iñaki, A. Assessing vulnerabilities and limits in the transition to renewable energies: land requirements under 100% solar energy scenarios. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 77, 760–782 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. World Energy Outlook 184 (International Energy Agency, 2022).

  7. Rothkopf, D. J. Is a green world a safer world? Foreign Policy 174, 134–137 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bordoff, J. & O’Sullivan, M. L. Green upheaval: the new geopolitics of energy. Foreign Aff. 101, 68–84 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Luderer, G. et al. Impact of declining renewable energy costs on electrification in low-emission scenarios. Nat. Energy 7, 32–42 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Scholten, D. & Bosman, R. The geopolitics of renewables; exploring the political implications of renewable energy systems. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 103, 273–283 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Blondeel, M., Bradshaw, M. J., Bridge, G. & Kuzemko, C. The geopolitics of energy system transformation: a review. Geogr. Compass 15, e12580 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mackinder, H. J. The geographical pivot of history. Geogr. J. 23, 421–437 (1904).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pease, K. K. S. International Organizations: Perspectives on Global Governance (Routledge, 2014).

  14. Heinrich, A. & Szulecki, K. in Energy Security in Europe: Divergent Perceptions and Policy Challenges (ed. Szulecki, K.) 33–60 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2017).

  15. Kuzemko, C., Lawrence, A. & Watson, M. New directions in the international political economy of energy. Rev. Int. Polit. Econ. 26, 1–24 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Waltz, K. N. in Neorealism and its Critics (ed. Keohane, R. O.) 98–130 (Columbia Univ. Press, 1986).

  17. Colgan, J. D. Fueling the fire: pathways from oil to war. Int. Secur. 38, 147–180 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kelanic, R. A. Black Gold and Blackmail: Oil and Great Power Politics (Cornell Univ. Press, 2020).

  19. Mearsheimer, J. J. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (W.W. Norton & Company, 2001).

  20. Axelrod, R. & Keohane, R. Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. World Polit. 38, 226–354 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Clark, R. Pool or duel? Cooperation and competition among international organizations. Int. Organ. 75, 1133–1153 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Keohane, R. O. & Nye, J. S. Power and Interdependence (Longman, 2001).

  23. Smith Stegen, K. Deconstructing the ‘energy weapon’: Russia’s threat to Europe as case study. Energy Policy 39, 6505–6513 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kalantzakos, S. The race for critical minerals in an era of geopolitical realignments. Int. Spect. 55, 1–16 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pierri, E., Binder, O., Hemdan, N. & Kurrat, M. C. Challenges and opportunities for a European HDVC grid. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 70, 427–456 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rodriguez, R. A., Becker, S., Andresen, G. B., Heide, D. & Greiner, M. Transmission needs across a fully renewable European power system. Renew. Energy 63, 467–476 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schlachtberger, D. P., Brown, T., Schramm, S. & Greiner, M. The benefits of cooperation in a highly renewable European electricity network. Energy 134, 469–481 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Witthaut, D. et al. Collective nonlinear dynamics and self-organization in decentralized power grids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 015005 (2022).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Fischhendler, I., Herman, L. & Anderman, J. The geopolitics of cross-border electricity grids: the Israeli–Arab case. Energy Policy 98, 533–543 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Böttcher, P. C. et al. Initial analysis of the impact of the Ukrainian power grid synchronization with Continental Europe. Energy Adv. 2, 91–97 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Smith Stegen, K. in The Geopolitics of Renewables (ed. Scholten, D.) 75–96 (Springer, 2018).

  32. Linsi, L., Burgoon, B. & Mügge, D. K. The problem with trade measurement in international relations. Int. Stud. Q. 67, sqad020 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Peterson, T. M. Dyadic trade, exit costs and conflict. J. Conflict Resolut. 58, 564–591 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Crescenzi, M. J. C. Interdependence and conflict: when does symmetry matter? Confl. Manag. Peace Sci. 20, 73–92 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Crescenzi, M. J. C. Economic Interdependence and Conflict in World Politics (Lexington Books, 2005).

  36. Kleinberg, K. B., Robinson, G. & French, S. L. Trade concentration and interstate conflict. J. Polit. 74, 529–540 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Copeland, D. C. Economic interdependence and war: a theory of trade expectations. Int. Secur. 20, 5–41 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Copeland, D. C. Economic Interdependence and War (Princeton Univ. Press, 2014).

  39. Waltz, K. Nuclear myths and political realities. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 84, 731–745 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Westphal, K., Pastukhova, M. & Pepe, J. M. Geopolitics of Electricity: Grids, Space and (Political) Power SWP Research Paper, 1–60 (Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, 2022).

  41. Majkut, J. & Dawes, A. Responding to Russian Attacks on Ukraine’s Power Sector CSIS Analysis, 1–5 (Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2022).

  42. Proskuryakova, L. Updating energy security and environmental policy: energy security theories revisited. J. Environ. Manag. 223, 203–214 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bordoff, J. & O’Sullivan, M. L. The age of energy insecurity: how the fight for resources is upending geopolitics. Foreign Aff. 102, 104–119 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Shepard, J. U. & Pratson, L. F. The myth of US energy independence. Nat. Energy 7, 462–464 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This Perspective could not have been completed without the guidance of several experts on electricity transmission, including L. de Vries from the Delft University of Technology and my colleague at Constructor University, S. Kettemann. I am also grateful for the advice provided by T. Sabonis-Helf of Georgetown University and the assistance of my student, J.-L. Fichtner.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, Social & Decision Sciences, Constructor University, Bremen, Germany

    Karen Smith Stegen

Authors
  1. Karen Smith Stegen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Smith Stegen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Energy thanks Roland Dannreuther and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith Stegen, K. International relations theory on grid communities and international politics in a green world. Nat Energy 8, 1073–1077 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01363-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01363-z

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing