Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Analysis
  • Published:

Impact of siting ordinances on land availability for wind and solar development

Nature Energy volume 8, pages 1034–1043 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

In the United States, many siting regulations for wind and solar developments are created at the county or township level. Here we survey local zoning ordinances across the contiguous United States to understand the types and frequency of ordinances that might impact wind and solar development. We identify over 1,800 ordinances for wind and more than 800 ordinances for solar in 2022. To understand the impact of ordinances on anticipated land availability, we use spatial modelling on the setbacks specified in the ordinances. Extrapolating the setbacks throughout the country can reduce wind and solar resources by up to 87% and 38%, respectively, depending on the size of the setbacks applied. These results indicate the importance of capturing setback ordinances in resources assessments so as to not overstate resource potential, especially when considering highly decarbonized futures.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Summary of ordinances collected.
Fig. 2: Example of setbacks for two counties.
Fig. 3: Overview of the method used to determine resource availability after applying ordinance setbacks.
Fig. 4: National wind and PV capacity by scenario.
Fig. 5: State level wind and PV capacity by scenario.
Fig. 6: National wind and PV mean capacity factor and land area by scenario.
Fig. 7: National wind and PV capacity and land area by distance to transmission.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The wind siting ordinance data that support findings of this study are openly available in the Open Energy Data Initiative (OEDI) at https://doi.org/10.25984/1873866. Solar ordinances are also available in OEDI at https://doi.org/10.25984/1873867.

Code availability

Model code used for this submission is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7301491 and https://zenodo.org/record/7473407.

References

  1. Renewable Energy Statistics 2022. IRENA https://www.irena.org/publications/2022/Jul/Renewable-Energy-Statistics-2022 (2022).

  2. World Energy Outlook 2021. IEA https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/4ed140c1-c3f3-4fd9-acae-789a4e14a23c/WorldEnergyOutlook2021.pdf (2021).

  3. Renewable Energy Market Update: Outlook for 2022 and 2023. IEA https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/d6a7300d-7919-4136-b73a-3541c33f8bd7/RenewableEnergyMarketUpdate2022.pdf (2022).

  4. Smil, V. Power Density: A Key to Understanding Energy Sources and Uses (MIT Press, 2015).

  5. Larson, E. et al. Net-Zero America: Potential Pathways, Infrastructure, and Impacts, Final Report 345 (Princeton Univ., 2021).

  6. Denholm, P. et al. Examining Supply-Side Options to Achieve 100% Clean Electricity by 2035 (NREL, 2022).

  7. Hoogwijk, M., de Vries, B. & Turkenburg, W. Assessment of the global and regional geographical, technical and economic potential of onshore wind energy. Energy Econ. 26, 889–919 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lopez, A., Roberts, B., Heimiller, D., Blair, N. & Porro, G. US Renewable Energy Technical Potentials: A GIS-Based Analysis (NREL, 2012).

  9. Korfiati, A. et al. Estimation of the global solar energy potential and photovoltaic cost with the use of open data. Int. J. Sustain. Energy Plan. Manag. 9, 17–30 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  10. van der Horst, D. NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies. Energy Policy 35, 2705–2714 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aidun, H. et al. Opposition to renewable energy facilities in the United States: March 2022 edition. Columbia Law School https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/sabin_climate_change/186 (2022).

  12. Susskind, L. et al. Sources of opposition to renewable energy projects in the united states. Energy Policy 165, 112922 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shum, R. Y. A comparison of land-use requirements in solar-based decarbonization scenarios. Energy Policy 109, 460–462 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Luderer, G. et al. Environmental co-benefits and adverse side-effects of alternative power sector decarbonization strategies. Nat. Commun. 10, 5229 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu, G. C. et al. Low-impact land use pathways to deep decarbonization of electricity. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 074044 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gerow, J., Gerrard, M. & Dernbach, J. C. Legal pathways to deep decarbonization in the fields of land use and zoning. SSRN https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3984255 (2021).

  17. Lerner, M. Local power: understanding the adoption and design of county wind energy regulation. Rev. Policy Res. 39, 120–142 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stokes, D. Renewable energy federalism. SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3810940 (2021).

  19. Frankena, F. Facts, values, and technical expertise in a renewable energy siting dispute. J. Econ. Psychol. 4, 131–147 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Upham, P. Applying environmental-behaviour concepts to renewable energy siting controversy: reflections on a longitudinal bioenergy case study. Energy Policy 37, 4273–4283 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Giordono, L. S., Boudet, H. S., Karmazina, A., Taylor, C. L. & Steel, B. S. Opposition ‘overblown’? Community response to wind energy siting in the Western United States. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 43, 119–131 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wiser, R. et al. Land-Based Wind Market Report: 2022 Edition (US Department of Energy, 2022).

  23. Winikoff, J. B. Learning by regulating: the evolution of wind energy zoning laws. J. Law Econ. 65, S223–S262 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bolinger, M., Seel, J., Warner, C. & Robson, D. Utility-scale solar, 2022 edition: empirical trends in deployment, technology, cost, performance, PPA pricing, and value in the United States. Berkeley Lab https://eta-publications.lbl.gov/sites/default/files/utility_scale_solar_2022_edition_slides.pdf 10.2172/1888246. (2022).

  25. Lumbreras, S. & Ramos, A. The new challenges to transmission expansion planning. Survey of recent practice and literature review. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 134, 19–29 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Reed, L. et al. How are we going to build all that clean energy infrastructure? Considering private enterprise, public initiative, and hybrid approaches to the challenge of electricity transmission. Electr. J. 34, 107049 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. You, J. et al. Comparing policy conflict on electricity transmission line sitings. Public Policy Adm. 38, 107–129 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mai, T., Lopez, A., Mowers, M. & Lantz, E. Interactions of wind energy project siting, wind resource potential, and the evolution of the U.S. power system. Energy 223, 1–16 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bloom, A. et al. The value of increased HVDC capacity between eastern and western U.S. grids: the interconnections seam study. NREL https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/76850.pdf (2020).

  30. Brown, P. R. & Botterud, A. The value of inter-regional coordination and transmission in decarbonizing the US electricity system. Joule 5, 115–134 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Clack, C. T. M. 100% clean by 2050: what does it look like? Vibrant Clean Energy https://vibrantcleanenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/VCE-ESIG-03022021.pdf (2021).

  32. Jacobson, M. Z., Delucchi, M. A., Cameron, M. A. & Frew, B. A. Low-cost solution to the grid reliability problem with 100% penetration of intermittent wind, water, and solar for all purposes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15060–15065 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stoms, D. M., Dashiell, S. L. & Davis, F. W. Siting solar energy development to minimize biological impacts. Renew. Energy 57, 289–298 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kiesecker, J. et al. Renewable energy and land use in India: a vision to facilitate sustainable development. Sustainability 12, 281 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lamy, J. V., Jaramillo, P., Azevedo, I. L. & Wiser, R. Should we build wind farms close to load or invest in transmission to access better wind resources in remote areas? A case study in the MISO region. Energy Policy 96, 341–350 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hurley, M. Traditional public utility law and the demise of a merchant transmission developer. Northwest. J. Law Soc. Policy 14, 318 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wu, G. C. et al. Power of place: land conservation and clean energy pathways for California. The Nature Conservancy https://www.scienceforconservation.org/assets/downloads/Technical_Report_Power_of_Place.pdf (2019).

  38. Rinne, E., Holttinen, H., Kiviluoma, J. & Rissanen, S. Effects of turbine technology and land use on wind power resource potential. Nat. Energy 3, 494–500 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Aidun, H., Goyal, R., Marsh, K., McKee, N. & Welch, M. Opposition to renewable energy facilities in the United States. Columbia Law School https://climate.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/content/RELDI%20report%20updated%209.10.21.pdf (2021).

  40. Maclaurin, G. et al. The Renewable Energy Potential (reV) model: a geospatial platform for technical potential and supply curve modeling. NREL https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/73067.pdf (2021).

  41. Buster, G. et al. NREL/reV: PySAM 3 Support. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7301491 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Freeman, J. M. et al. System Advisor Model (SAM) General Description (Version 2017.9.5). NREL https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy18osti/70414.pdf (2018).

  43. Sengupta, M. et al. The National Solar Radiation Data Base (NSRDB). Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 89, 51–60 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 2022 Annual Technology Baseline. NREL https://atb.nrel.gov/ (2022).

  45. Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) 3.0: U.S. Geological Survey data release. USGS https://doi.org/10.5066/P9Q9LQ4B (2022).

  46. National Conservation Easement Database. NCED https://www.conservationeasement.us/ (2022).

  47. Stehly, T. J. & Beiter, P. C. 2018 Cost of Wind Energy Review. NREL https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/74598.pdf (2019).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank P. Gilman, Z. Eldridge and J. Botero of the Department of Energy for their thoughtful review and guidance. The authors also thank B. Roberts for developing the maps and D. Heimiller, M. Ruth and D. Bilello of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory for their review and guidance. This work was authored by researchers from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the US Department of Energy under contract no. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Funding was provided by US Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Solar Energy Technologies Office (award number 38421) and Wind Energy Technology Office. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the US Department of Energy or the United States Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA

    Anthony Lopez, Wesley Cole, Brian Sergi, Aaron Levine, Jesse Carey, Cailee Mangan, Trieu Mai, Travis Williams, Pavlo Pinchuk & Jianyu Gu

Authors
  1. Anthony Lopez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wesley Cole
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brian Sergi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aaron Levine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jesse Carey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Cailee Mangan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Trieu Mai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Travis Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Pavlo Pinchuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jianyu Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A. Lopez, W.C. and T.M. conceptualized the study and wrote the article. A. Lopez, P.P., B.S., T.W. and J.G. developed and applied the methods. A. Levine, J.C. and C.M. collected the data. A. Lopez, W.C. and T.M. acquired funding for the study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony Lopez.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Energy thanks Yekang Ko, Roberta Nilson and Justin B. Winikoff for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1–3, Figs. 1–16, Note 1 and references.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lopez, A., Cole, W., Sergi, B. et al. Impact of siting ordinances on land availability for wind and solar development. Nat Energy 8, 1034–1043 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01319-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01319-3

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing