Abstract
Since 2013, China has initiated a rapid energy transition that replaces traditional solid fuels with modern clean energy. Despite the tremendous success of the energy transition, its impacts on household energy costs and associated energy inequality remain largely unexplored. Here we use data from a large nationwide household survey to investigate these trends. We find that about two-fifths (43.0%) of surveyed households switched from traditional solid fuels to clean energy during 2013–2017. However, 56.1% to ~61.0% of them were from extremely poor or poor households, causing deep concern for increasing household energy burden. Accordingly, the share of surveyed households in energy poverty increased from 30.1% to 34.2%. Despite the declining inequality in energy cost, a growing inequality in energy burden was revealed during 2013–2017. Our results demonstrate that the energy burden on rural households increased due to the dramatic rise in the cost of clean energy, while urban households tend to spend a lower and decreased proportion of their income on energy.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout






Data availability
The household-level data supporting the findings of this study are openly available from the Institute of Social Science Survey at Peking University at www.isss.pku.edu.cn/cfps. The dataset contains household identifiers, location, energy costs by fuel types, basic sociodemographic information of all family members and family economic conditions, all of which are derived and generated by the authors. The household identification variable allows us to track the households in follow-up surveys. Sociodemographic data at the province level are collected from the China Census Bureau via API at http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/. The daily average temperature data were obtained from 665 meteorological observation stations in 2013, 648 meteorological observation stations in 2015 and 563 meteorological observation stations in 2017, which can be downloaded from http://data.sheshiyuanyi.com/WeatherData/. Requests for all primary data will be reviewed and made available upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
Requests for the code developed and annotated in Stata (Version 15) and R (Version 4.0.2) to process and analyse the primary data will be reviewed and made available upon reasonable request.
References
Notice of the General Office of the State Council on Issuing the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan (State Council of the People’s Republic of China, 2013); http:// www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-09/12/content_2486773.htm
Lei, Y. et al. Primary anthropogenic aerosol emission trends for China, 1990–2005. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 931–954 (2011).
Zhu, X. et al. Stacked use and transition trends of rural household energy in mainland China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 521–529 (2019).
Lelieveld, J. et al. The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature 525, 367–371 (2015).
Zhang, Q. et al. Drivers of improved PM2.5 air quality in China from 2013 to 2017. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 24463–24469 (2019).
Meng, W. et al. Energy and air pollution benefits of household fuel policies in northern China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 16773–16780 (2019).
Bednar, D. J. & Reames, T. G. Recognition of and response to energy poverty in the United States. Nat. Energy 5, 432–439 (2020).
Graff, M. & Carley, S. COVID-19 assistance needs to target energy insecurity. Nat. Energy 5, 352–354 (2020).
Chapman, A., Fujii, H. & Managi, S. Multinational life satisfaction, perceived inequality and energy affordability. Nat. Sustain. 2, 508–514 (2019).
Tao, S. et al. Quantifying the rural residential energy transition in China from 1992 to 2012 through a representative national survey. Nat. Energy 3, 567–573 (2018).
Wu, S., Zheng, X. & Wei, C. Measurement of inequality using household energy consumption data in rural China. Nat. Energy 2, 795–803 (2017).
Carter, E. et al. Household transitions to clean energy in a multiprovincial cohort study in China. Nat. Sustain. 3, 42–50 (2020).
Clean Winter Heating Plan in Northern China (2017–2021) (National Development and Reform Commission, 2017).
Xie, Y. & Zhou, X. Income inequality in today’s China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6928–6933 (2014).
Drehobl, A., Ross, L. & Ayala, R. How High are Household Energy Burdens? (American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, 2020); https://www.aceee.org/research-report/u2006
Wang, Q., Kwan, M. P., Fan, J. & Lin, J. Racial disparities in energy poverty in the United States. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 137, 110620 (2021).
Hernandez, D. et al. Energy burden and the need for integrated low-income housing and energy policy. Poverty Public Policy 2, 5–25 (2010).
Liddell, C. et al. Measuring and monitoring fuel poverty in the UK: national and regional perspectives. Energy Policy 49, 27–32 (2012).
Lin, B. et al. Does off-farm work reduce energy poverty? Evidence from rural China. Sustain. Prod. Consumption 27, 1822–1829 (2021).
Datta, G. & Meerman, J. Household income or household income per capita in welfare comparisons. Rev. Income Wealth 26, 401–418 (1980).
Blanchflower, D. G. Is happiness U-shaped everywhere? Age and subjective well-being in 145 countries. J. Popul. Econ. 34, 575–624 (2021).
Estiri, H. & Zagheni, E. Age matters: ageing and household energy demand in the United States. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 55, 62–70 (2019).
O’neill, B. C. & Chen, B. S. Demographic determinants of household energy use in the United States. Popul. Dev. Rev. 28, 53–88 (2002).
Lu, Y. et al. Forty years of reform and opening up: China’s progress toward a sustainable path. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau9413 (2019).
Zhao, H. et al. Inequality of household consumption and air pollution-related deaths in china. Nat. Commun. 10, 4337 (2019).
Xie, Y. & Lu, P. The sampling design of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS). Chin. J. Sociol. 1, 471–484 (2015).
Xie, Y. et al. China Family Panel Studies User’s Manual 3rd edn (Social Science Academic Press, 2017).
Sachs, J. D. et al. Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Nat. Sustain. 2, 805–814 (2019).
Fuso Nerini, F. et al. Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the sustainable development goals. Nat. Energy 3, 10–15 (2017).
Davidson, D. J. Exnovating for a renewable energy transition. Nat. Energy 4, 254–256 (2019).
Chen, P. et al. The heterogeneous role of energy policies in the energy transition of Asia-Pacific emerging economies. Nat. Energy 7, 588–596 (2022).
Clean Winter Heating Plan in Northern China (2017–2021) (National Development and Reform Commission, 2017).
Hebei Provincial Clean Winter Heating Plan in 2018 (Work Leading Group Office of City Coal to Electricity and Coal to Gas, 2018); http://www.xiongan.gov.cn/2018-11/02/c_129984560.htm
Hebei Provincial Measures for the Administration of Subsidy Funds to the Comprehensive Air Quality Management (Department of Finance of Hebei Province & Department of Ecology and Environment of Hebei Province, 2017).
Shrestha, P. et al. In-use emissions and usage trend of pellet heating stoves in rural Yangxin, Shandong Province. Environ. Pollut. 280, 116955 (2021).
Carley, S. & Konisky, D. M. The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition. Nat. Energy 5, 569–577 (2020).
Broto, V. C. et al. A research agenda for a people-centred approach to energy access in the urbanizing Global South. Nat. Energy 2, 776–779 (2017).
Malakar, Y. & Day, R. Differences in firewood users’ and LPG users’ perceived relationships between cooking fuels and women’s multidimensional well-being in rural India. Nat. Energy 5, 1022–1031 (2020).
Wolske, K. S., Gillingham, K. T. & Schultz, P. W. Peer influence on household energy behaviours. Nat. Energy 5, 202–212 (2020).
Zhang, H. et al. Solar photovoltaic interventions have reduced rural poverty in China. Nat. Commun. 11, 1969 (2020).
Wang, J. & Du, Y ‘Sunshine Passbook’ warms people’s hearts, energy poverty alleviation creates a bright road to prosperity. People’s Daily Online (19 March, 2020); http://energy.people.com.cn/n1/2020/0319/c71661-31639625.html
Lorenz, M. O. Methods for measuring the concentration of wealth. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 9, 209–219 (1905).
Gini, C. Variabilità e Mutuabilità: Contributo Allo Studio Delle Distribuzioni e Delle Relazioni Statistiche (Cuppini, 1912).
Yang, D. T. Urban-biased policies and rising income inequality in China. Amer. Econ. Rev. 89, 306–310 (1999).
Sovacool, B. K. & Dworkin, M. H. Energy justice: conceptual insights and practical applications. Appl. Energy 142, 435–444 (2015).
Brown, M. A. et al. Low-income energy affordability in an era of U.S. energy abundance. Prog. Energy 2, 042003 (2020).
Fumo, N. & Biswas, M. A. R. Regression analysis for prediction of residential energy consumption. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 47, 332–343 (2015).
Dergiades, T. et al. Energy consumption and economic growth: parametric and non-parametric causality testing for the case of Greece. Energy Econ. 36, 686–697 (2013).
Kong, Y. & Yu, T. A deep neural network model using random forest to extract feature representation for gene expression data classification. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–9 (2018).
Acknowledgements
We thank the study participants and field staff involved in the CFPS.This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41971159, 41922057, 42077328 and 41971164), and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA23020101).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Q.W. and J.F. conceived the initial framework. Q.W., J.F. and J.L. drafted the manuscript. Q.W., K.Z., J.L. and B.W. were involved in data collection and cleaning. Q.W. and N.L. performed the modelling, wrote the codes and carried out the analysis. J.F., J.L., M.-P.K. and Q.W. led the writing of the paper, with all other authors contributing to the writing, revisions and editing.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Energy thanks Yue Dou and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs. 1–6, Tables 1–10 and Notes 1–5.
Supplementary Data 1
Source data for Supplementary Figs. 2–7.
Source data
Source Data Figs. 1–6
Source data for Figs. 1–6.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Q., Fan, J., Kwan, MP. et al. Examining energy inequality under the rapid residential energy transition in China through household surveys. Nat Energy 8, 251–263 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01193-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01193-z