Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Metal oxide barrier layers for terrestrial and space perovskite photovoltaics

Nature Energy volume 8, pages 191–202 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Perovskite photovoltaics are attractive for both terrestrial and space applications. Although terrestrial conditions require durability against stressors such as moisture and partial shading, space poses different challenges: radiation, atomic oxygen, vacuum and high-temperature operation. Here we demonstrate a silicon oxide layer that hardens perovskite photovoltaics to critical space stressors. A 1-μm-thick silicon oxide layer evaporated atop the device contacts blocks 0.05 MeV protons at fluences of 1015 cm−2 without a loss in power conversion efficiency, which results in a device lifetime increase in low Earth orbit by ×20 and in highly elliptical orbit by ×30. Silicon-oxide-protected Cs0.05(MA0.17FA0.83)0.95Pb(I0.83Br0.17)3) (MA, methylammonium; FA, formamidinium cation) and CsPbI2Br cells survive submergence in water and N,N-dimethylformamide. Furthermore, moisture tolerance of Sn-Pb and CsPbI2Br devices is boosted. Devices are also found to retain power conversion efficiencies on exposure to alpha irradiation and atomic oxygen. This barrier technology is a step towards lightweight packaging designs for both space and terrestrial applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: SiOx as a radiation barrier.
Fig. 2: SiOx as an atomic oxygen barrier.
Fig. 3: SiOx as water barrier.
Fig. 4: SiOx as a moisture barrier for sensitive chemistries.

Data availability

All of the data generated or analysed during this study are included in the published article and its Supplementary Information files. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Ho‐Baillie, A. W. Y. et al. Deployment opportunities for space photovoltaics and the prospects for perovskite solar cells. Adv. Mater. Technol. 7, 2101059 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akyildiz, I. F. & Kak, A. The Internet of Space Things/CubeSats. IEEE Netw. 33, 212–218 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sasaki, S., Tanaka, K. & Maki, K. Microwave power transmission technologies for solar power satellites. Proc. IEEE 101, 1438–1447 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abiri, B. et al. A lightweight space-based solar power generation and transmission satellite. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.08373 (2022).

  5. Luo, P. et al. Correlation between structural evolution and device performance of CH3NH3PbI3 solar cells under proton irradiation. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 4, 13504–13515 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Durant, B. K. et al. Tolerance of perovskite solar cells to targeted proton irradiation and electronic ionization induced healing. ACS Energy Lett. 6, 2362–2368 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, J., Bao, Q., Shen, L. & Ding, L. Potential applications for perovskite solar cells in space. Nano Energy 76, 105019 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Curtin, D. J. & Statler, R. L. Review of radiation damage to silicon solar cells. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. AES-11, 499–513 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lang, F. et al. Proton‐radiation tolerant all‐perovskite multijunction solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2102246 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tu, Y. et al. Perovskite solar cells for space applications: progress and challenges. Adv. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202006545 (2021).

  11. Huang, J.-S. et al. in 2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC) 1248–1252 (IEEE, 2017).

  12. Miyazawa, Y. et al. Tolerance of perovskite solar cell to high-energy particle irradiations in space environment. iScience 2, 148–155 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Statler, R. L. & Curtin, D. J. Radiation damage in silicon solar cells from low-energy protons. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 18, 412–417 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hosseinian Ahangharnejhad, R. et al. Protecting perovskite solar cells against moisture-induced degradation with sputtered inorganic barrier layers. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 4, 7571–7578 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Choi, E. Y. et al. Enhancing stability for organic–inorganic perovskite solar cells by atomic layer deposited Al2O3 encapsulation. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 188, 37–45 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim, H. et al. Enhanced stability of MAPbI3 perovskite solar cells using poly(p-chloro-xylylene) encapsulation. Sci. Rep. 9, 15461 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao, Y. et al. A bilayer conducting polymer structure for planar perovskite solar cells with over 1,400 hours operational stability at elevated temperatures. Nat. Energy 7, 144–152 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McKenna, B., Troughton, J. R., Watson, T. M. & Evans, R. C. Enhancing the stability of organolead halide perovskite films through polymer encapsulation. RSC Adv. 7, 32942–32951 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Reichmanis, E., Frank, C. W., O’Donnell, J. H. & Hill, D. J. T. in Irradiation of Polymeric Materials (eds Reichmanis, E., Frank, C. W. & O’Donnell, J. H.) Vol. 527 ACS Symposium Series Ch. 1 (American Chemical Society, 1993).

  20. Kirmani, A. R. et al. Countdown to perovskite space launch: guidelines to performing relevant radiation-hardness experiment. Joule https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2022.03.004 (2022).

  21. Durant, B. K. et al. Radiation stability of mixed tin–lead halide perovskites: implications for space applications. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 230, 111232 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tong, J. et al. Carrier lifetimes of >1 μs in Sn–Pb perovskites enable efficient all-perovskite tandem solar cells. Science 364, 475–479 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Beal, R. E. et al. Cesium lead halide perovskites with improved stability for tandem solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 746–751 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. He, J. et al. Surface chelation of cesium halide perovskite by dithiocarbamate for efficient and stable solar cells. Nat. Commun. 11, 4237 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Luo, Y.-X. et al. Uniform stepped interfacial energy level structure boosts efficiency and stability of CsPbI2Br solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2103316 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Messenger, S. R., Summers, G. P., Burke, E. A., Walters, R. J. & Xapsos, M. A. Modeling solar cell degradation in space: a comparison of the NRL displacement damage dose and the JPL equivalent fluence approaches. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 9, 103–121 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ziegler, J. F., Ziegler, M. D. & Biersack, J. P. SRIM—the stopping and range of ions in matter (2010). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 268, 1818–1823 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Saliba, M. et al. Cesium-containing triple cation perovskite solar cells: improved stability, reproducibility and high efficiency. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 1989–1997 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Messenger, S. R. et al. Effect of omnidirectional proton irradiation on shielded solar cells. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 3771–3778 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Walters, R. J., Warner, J. H., Messenger, S. R., Lorentzen, J. R. & Summers, G. P. in 2006 IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conference 1899–1902 (IEEE, 2006).

  31. Anspaugh, B. E. in The Conference Record of the Twenty-Second IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference–1991 1593–1598 (IEEE, 1991).

  32. Insoo, J., Xapsos, M. A. & Burke, E. A. Alpha particle nonionizing energy loss (NIEL). IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 51, 3207–3210 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Brus, V. V. et al. Defect dynamics in proton irradiated CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells. Adv. Electron. Mater. 3, 1600438 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jones, R. Alternative orbits: a new space solar power reference design. Online J. Space Commun. 9, 14 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jiang, Y. et al. Mitigation of vacuum and illumination-induced degradation in perovskite solar cells by structure engineering. Joule 4, 1087–1103 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Li, Y. et al. Li dopant induces moisture sensitive phase degradation of an all-inorganic CsPbI2Br perovskite. Chem. Commun. 54, 9809–9812 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhou, Y. & Zhao, Y. Chemical stability and instability of inorganic halide perovskites. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 1495–1511 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ke, W. et al. Narrow-bandgap mixed lead/tin-based 2D Dion–Jacobson perovskites boost the performance of solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 15049–15057 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Li, C. et al. In situ tin(II) complex antisolvent process featuring simultaneous quasi-core–shell structure and heterojunction for improving efficiency and stability of low-bandgap perovskite solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1903013 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chang, C.-Y., Lee, K.-T., Huang, W.-K., Siao, H.-Y. & Chang, Y.-C. High-performance, air-stable, low-temperature processed semitransparent perovskite solar cells enabled by atomic layer deposition. Chem. Mater. 27, 5122–5130 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lee, Y. I. et al. A low-temperature thin-film encapsulation for enhanced stability of a highly efficient perovskite solar cell. Adv. Energy Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201701928 (2018).

  42. Ramos, F. J. et al. Versatile perovskite solar cell encapsulation by low-temperature ALD-Al2O3 with long-term stability improvement. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2, 2468–2479 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Matteocci, F. et al. Encapsulation for long-term stability enhancement of perovskite solar cells. Nano Energy 30, 162–172 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rout, B. et al. An overview of the facilities, activities, and developments at the University of North Texas Ion Beam Modification and Analysis Laboratory (IBMAL). AIP Conf. Proc. 1544, 11–18 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Young, J. M. et al. Synthesis of magnesiowüstite nanocrystallites embedded in an amorphous silicate matrix via low energy multiple ion implantations. Planet. Space Sci. 206, 105319 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was authored by NREL operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the US Department of Energy (DOE) under contract no. DE-AC36-08GO28308. NREL acknowledges support from the Operational Energy Capability Improvement Fund (OECIF) of the US Department of Defense (DOD). B.R. acknowledges partial support from the National Science Foundation (NSF) grant no. HBCU-EiR-2101181. The work at the University of Oklahoma was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under agreement no. 80NSSC19M0140 issued through NASA Oklahoma EPSCoR. K.T.V. acknowledges the NASA Space Technology Mission Directorate’s Early Career Initiative Program for support of this work. We thank R. Darling of the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, Arlington for guidance and support. The views expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the US Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO, USA

    Ahmad R. Kirmani, David P. Ostrowski, Kaitlyn T. VanSant, Rosemary C. Bramante, Karen N. Heinselman, Jinhui Tong, Bart Stevens, William Nemeth, Kai Zhu & Joseph M. Luther

  2. Photovoltaic and Electrochemical Systems Branch, NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Kaitlyn T. VanSant

  3. Department of Physics, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA

    Todd A. Byers & Bibhudutta Rout

  4. Homer L. Dodge Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA

    Ian R. Sellers

Authors
  1. Ahmad R. Kirmani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David P. Ostrowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kaitlyn T. VanSant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Todd A. Byers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rosemary C. Bramante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Karen N. Heinselman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jinhui Tong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Bart Stevens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. William Nemeth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Kai Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Ian R. Sellers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Bibhudutta Rout
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Joseph M. Luther
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.R.K. and J.M.L. conceived and supervised this work and wrote the manuscript. A.R.K. fabricated the solar cells, designed and carried out the stressing experiments and performed device characterization. D.P.O. supported the SiOx deposition and ambient characterization of Sn–Pb perovskite solar cells. K.T.V. supported the DC 93-500 encapsulation. K.N.H. and B.S. carried out α-irradiation at NREL. W.N. deposited the electrically insulating ITO barrier on the devices. J.T. and K.Z. fabricated the Sn–Pb perovskite solar cells for the study. T.A.B. and B.R. carried out proton and α-irradiation at the University of North Texas with suggestions and insight from I.R.S. B.R. supported the SRIM/TRIM simulations. R.C.B. sputtered ITO electrodes on quartz substrates for the solar cell fabrication. All the authors contributed to the discussion and editing of the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ahmad R. Kirmani or Joseph M. Luther.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.R.K., D.P.O. and J.M.L. are inventors on a pending provisional patent (US patent 63/301,295 by Alliance for Sustainable Energy) related to protective barriers for space-based perovskite PVs as discussed in this manuscript. All the other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Energy thanks Romain Cariou, Felix Lang and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–19, Tables 1–4 and Note 1.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Video 1

Bare CsPbI2Br device in deionized water.

Supplementary Video 2

SiO-capped CsPbI2Br device in deionized water.

Supplementary Video 3

PIN triple-cation devices in DMF_bare and SiO.

Supplementary Video 4

SiO-capped CsPbI2Br device in DMF.

Supplementary Video 5

SiO-capped CsPbI2Br device in DMF and deionized water.

Supplementary Data 1

Device data showing effect of DC 93-500 on PCEs.

Supplementary Data 2

Device data showing effect of 1 um SiO on PCEs.

Supplementary Data 3

Device data showing effect of 1 MeV protons on PCEs.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Remaining factor data of NIP cells for Fig. 1e and remaining factor data of PIN cells for Fig. 1g.

Source Data Fig. 2

Normalized PCE data for atomic oxygen exposed devices.

Source Data Fig. 4

Shelf-life data for CsPbI2Br cells.

Source Data Table 1

Device data for Table 1.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kirmani, A.R., Ostrowski, D.P., VanSant, K.T. et al. Metal oxide barrier layers for terrestrial and space perovskite photovoltaics. Nat Energy 8, 191–202 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01189-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01189-1

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing