Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Lithium-metal batteries

Lithium quantified, dead or alive

Nature Energy volume 7, pages 1005–1006 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Lithium-metal batteries offer great energy density improvement over lithium-ion, but understanding their cyclability is a daunting task. Now, an analytical method is reported to quantify lithium in its electrochemically inactive and active forms, enabling insights about the anode reversibility throughout cycling.

Increasing the energy density of today’s lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is critical to enable electrification of weight-sensitive industries including aviation and shipping and will likewise advance technologies such as mobile electronics and electric vehicles. Among several promising candidates, lithium-metal batteries (LMBs) with metallic lithium anodes offer a prospect of achieving over 500 Wh kg-1 that nearly doubles the energy density of current LIBs1.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Distinguishing active and inactive lithium metal (Li0) in batteries.

References

  1. Liu, J. et al. Nat. Energy 4, 180–186 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, S., Dai, F. & Cai, M. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 3140–3151 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deng et al. Nat. Energy https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01120-8 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eisch, J. J. & Kaska, W. C. J. Org. Chem. 27, 3745–3752 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim, S. et al. Nat. Commun. 13, 1883 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Zachary M. Konz & Bryan D. McCloskey

  2. Energy Storage & Distributed Resources Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Bryan D. McCloskey

Authors
  1. Zachary M. Konz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bryan D. McCloskey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan D. McCloskey.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Konz, Z.M., McCloskey, B.D. Lithium quantified, dead or alive. Nat Energy 7, 1005–1006 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01142-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01142-2

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing