Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Shielding and expanding Mission Innovation

Nature Energy volume 7, pages 779–781 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

In its next phase, Mission Innovation plans to further develop multinational collaborations that include a variety of entities. This may require new governance structures to shield the new collaborations from increasingly protectionist domestic politics while incorporating renewed concerns about climate change and energy security.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Myslikova, Z. & Gallagher, K. S. Mission Innovation is mission critical. Nat. Energy 5, 732–734 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F. & Uzzi, B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316, 1036–1039 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenberg, N. & Nathan, R. Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History (Cambridge University Press, 1994).

  4. Popp, D. Environmental Policy and Innovation: A Decade of Research. NBER Working Paper https://doi.org/10.3386/w25631 (2019).

  5. Popp, D. C. The effect of new technology on energy consumption. Resour. Energy Econ. 23, 215–239 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Noseleit, F. Renewable energy innovations and sustainability transition: How relevant are spatial spillovers? J. Reg. Sci. 58, 259–275 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sayers, E. & Kanapathy, I. America Is Showering China With New Restrictions. Foreign Policy https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/02/15/us-china-economic-financial-decoupling-controls-restrictions-sanctions/ (2022).

  8. Kessler, J., String, M., Mandell, L., Tubman, N. & Gates, D. W. United States Adopts Wide-Ranging China Restrictions. Wilmerhale https://www.wilmerhale.com/en/insights/client-alerts/20211229-united-states-adopts-wide-ranging-china-restrictions (2021).

  9. Schuh, S. & Williams, P. How stricter rules on foreign investment screening impact tech M&A in Europe. Pinsent Masons https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/analysis/stricter-rules-foreign-investment-screening-tech-ma-europe (2021).

  10. Tabeta, S. China tightens rare-earth regulations, policing entire supply chain. Nikkei Asia https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Markets/Commodities/China-tightens-rare-earth-regulations-policing-entire-supply-chain (2021).

  11. Missions. Mission Innovation http://mission-innovation.net/missions/ (2022).

  12. World Energy Transitions Outlook: 1.5°C Pathway (IRENA, 2021); https://www.irena.org/publications/2021/Jun/World-Energy-Transitions-Outlook (2021).

  13. Myslikova, Z., Gallagher, K. S., Zhang, F. & Narassimhan, E. Climate Policy Lab Global RD&D database (Climate Policy Lab, 2022); https://www.climatepolicylab.org/data-landing-page

  14. Energy Technology RD&D Budget Database (IEA, 2022); https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-product/energy-technology-rd-and-d-budget-database-2

  15. Gallagher, K. S. & Anadon, L. D. DOE Budget Authority for Energy Research, Development, and Demonstration Database (Climate Policy Lab, 2022); https://www.climatepolicylab.org/data-usdepartment

  16. Five demonstration projects proposed in energy cooperation between Finland and China. The State Council, The People’s Republic of China http://english.www.gov.cn/news/internationalexchanges/202202/17/content_WS620d9a6bc6d09c94e48a523e.html (2022).

  17. Zhang, F. et al. From fossil to low carbon: The evolution of global public energy innovation. WIREs Clim. Change 12, e734 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. PetroChina Form 20-F. United States Securities and Exchange Commission https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001108329/000119312521140226/d77520d20f.htm (2020).

  19. Dietz, S., Gardiner, D., Jahn, V. & Noels, J. How ambitious are oil and gas companies’ climate goals? Science 374, 405–408 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Climate Policy Lab, The Fletcher School, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA

    Zdenka Myslikova, Amy Jaffe & Kelly Sims Gallagher

Authors
  1. Zdenka Myslikova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amy Jaffe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kelly Sims Gallagher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly Sims Gallagher.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Myslikova, Z., Jaffe, A. & Gallagher, K.S. Shielding and expanding Mission Innovation. Nat Energy 7, 779–781 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01115-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01115-5

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing