Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Solving the difficult problem of hard to decarbonize homes

Hard to decarbonize homes represent a complex problem that has historically been neglected in favour of the lower hanging fruit of easier to treat properties. To enable an equitable net zero transition, we must understand these homes in a holistic manner take into account the impacts of different routes to decarbonization on occupants.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Foster, S. et al. Analysis on Abating Direct Emissions from ‘Hard-to-Decarbonise’ Homes, with a View to Informing the UK’s Long Term Targets (Elementenergy, 2019);

  2. Nemry, F., and Uihlein, A. Environmental Improvement Potential of Residential Buildings: IMPRO building (JRC European Commission and IPTS, 2008);

  3. Rural Energy Matters (FREE, 2016);

  4. Cocen, O.N. and Baniotopoulos, C.C. Heritage buildings’ sustainability assessment framework. In Proc. of CESB13-Central Europe towards sustainable building (CESB13 Prague, 2013).

  5. Xin, D., Daniell, J. E., Tsang, H.-H. & Wenzel, F. Residential building stock modelling for mainland China targeted for seismic risk assessment. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 21, 3031–56 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Every Home Should Be a Warm and Safe Place: Fuel Poverty Monitor 2021 (NEA, 2021);

  7. Taylor, T. Cold hands, warm hearth?: climate, net takeback, and household comfort. The Energy J. 16, 41–54 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pan, L., Biru, A. & Lettu, S. Energy poverty and public health: Global evidence. Energy Econ. 101, 105423 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liddell, C., Morris, C., Thomson, H. & Guiney, C. Excess winter deaths in 30 European countries 1980–2013: a critical review of methods. J. Public Health 38, 806–814 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sandberg, N. H. et al. Dynamic building stock modelling: Application to 11 European countries to support the energy efficiency and retrofit ambitions of the EU. Energy Build. 132, 26–38 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Muldoon-Smith, K. & Greenhalgh, P. Suspect foundations: Developing an understanding of climate-related stranded assets in the global real estate sector. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 54, 60–67 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Baldwin, A. N., Loveday, D. L., Li, B., Murray, M. & Yu, W. A research agenda for the retrofitting of residential buildings in China–A case study. Energy Policy 113, 41–51 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu, L., Milke, J. A. & Merci, B. Special issue on fire safety of high-rise buildings. Fire Technol. 53, 1–3 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ambrose, A. & McCarthy, L. Taming the'masculine pioneers'? Changing attitudes towards energy efficiency amongst private landlords and tenants in New Zealand: A case study of Dunedin. Energy Policy 126, 165–176 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A study of Hard to Treat Homes using the English House Condition Survey (BRE, 2008);

  16. Fabbri, K., Zuppiroli, M. & Ambrogio, K. Heritage buildings and energy performance: Mapping with GIS tools. Energy Build. 48, 137–45 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. The Warm Arm of the Law: Tackling Fuel Poverty in the Private Rented Sector (CAG, 2018);

  18. Fuel poverty methodology handbook (low income low energy efficiency). Gov.UK (February, 2022);

  19. Ashby K. et al. Who are Hard-to-Reach energy users? Segments, barriers and approaches to engage them. In Proc. ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings (ACEEE, 2020);

  20. Aghion, P., Hepburn, C., Teytelboym, A. and Zenghelis, D. in Handbook on Green Growth Ch. 4 (Elgar, 2019).

  21. Rinkinen, J., Shove, E., and Torriti, J. Energy Fables: Challenging Ideas in the Energy Sector (Routledge, 2019).

  22. Grey, C., Jiang, S. and Poortinga, W. Arbed recipient’s views and experiences of living in hard-to-heat, hard-to-treat houses in Wales: results from three focus groups conducted in South Wales. Welsh School of Architecture (2015).

  23. Brøgger, M. & Wittchen, K. Quantifying Uncertainties in an Archetype-Based Building Stock Energy Model by Use of Individual Building Models. Int. J. Energy Environ. Eng. 12, 611–618 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lovell, H. & Watson, P. Scarce data: off‐grid households in Australia. Energy Policy 129, 502–10 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rubinstein, Y. R. et al. The case for open science: rare diseases. JAMIA open 3, 472–486 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rokia Raslan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raslan, R., Ambrose, A. Solving the difficult problem of hard to decarbonize homes. Nat Energy 7, 675–677 (2022).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing