Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Interfacial engineering to achieve an energy density of over 200 Wh kg−1 in sodium batteries

Abstract

Sodium-based batteries have attracted wide interests in the academic and industrial fields. However, their energy density is still lower than that of Li-based batteries. Here we report an initial anode-free Na battery with an energy density of over 200 Wh kg−1, which is even higher than that of the commercial LiFePO4||graphite battery. Through introducing graphitic carbon coating on the Al current collector and boron-containing electrolytes in the battery, we show that uniform nucleation and robust interphases enable reversible and crack-free Na deposition. Benefitting from the synergetic effects derived from the built cooperative interfaces, the cycling lifetime of the Na battery without applying additional pressure reaches 260 cycles, which is the longest life for large-size cells with zero excess Na. The insights gained from the Na plating/stripping behaviour and interfacial chemistry in this work pave the way for further development of Na batteries with even higher performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Sodium batteries with cooperative interfaces using a graphitic carbon coating as the current collector and BPG as the electrolyte.
Fig. 2: Current collectors and morphologies of Na plating and stripping.
Fig. 3: Selection and assessment of electrolytes and SEI/CEI films.
Fig. 4: Performance and mechanism of cooperative interfaces.
Fig. 5: Comparison among different kinds of Na-based batteries.
Fig. 6: Electrochemical performances and safety assessment of proposed Na batteries with cooperative interfaces.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files.

References

  1. Vaalma, C., Buchholz, D., Weil, M. & Passerini, S. A cost and resource analysis of sodium-ion batteries. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 18013 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Usiskin, R. et al. Fundamentals, status and promise of sodium-based batteries. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 1020–1035 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, B., Paek, E., Mitlin, D. & Lee, S. W. Sodium metal anodes: emerging solutions to dendrite growth. Chem. Rev. 119, 5416–5460 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, Y. et al. Developments and perspectives on emerging high-energy-density sodium-metal batteries. Chem 5, 2547–2570 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao, C. et al. Solid-state sodium batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1703012 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Qian, J. et al. Anode-free rechargeable lithium metal batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 7094–7102 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohn, A. P., Muralidharan, N., Carter, R., Share, K. & Pint, C. L. Anode-free sodium battery through in situ plating of sodium metal. Nano Lett. 17, 1296–1301 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao, C. et al. Advanced Na metal anodes. J. Energy Chem. 27, 1584–1596 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, H., Matios, E., Luo, J. & Li, W. Combining theories and experiments to understand the sodium nucleation behavior towards safe sodium metal batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 3783–3805 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mogensen, R., Brandell, D. & Younesi, R. Solubility of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) in sodium ion batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 1, 1173–1178 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Iermakova, D. I., Dugas, R., Palacín, M. R. & Ponrouch, A. On the comparative stability of Li and Na metal anode interfaces in conventional alkyl carbonate electrolytes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, A7060–A7066 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nanda, S., Gupta, A. & Manthiram, A. Anode‐free full cells: a pathway to high‐energy density lithium‐metal batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2000804 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Weber, R. et al. Long cycle life and dendrite-free lithium morphology in anode-free lithium pouch cells enabled by a dual-salt liquid electrolyte. Nat. Energy 4, 683–689 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Louli, A. J. et al. Diagnosing and correcting anode-free cell failure via electrolyte and morphological analysis. Nat. Energy 5, 693–702 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Qiao, Y. et al. A high-energy-density and long-life initial-anode-free lithium battery enabled by a Li2O sacrificial agent. Nat. Energy 6, 653–662 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohn, A. P. et al. Rethinking sodium-ion anodes as nucleation layers for anode-free batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 23875–23884 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rudola, A., Gajjela, S. R. & Balaya, P. High energy density in-situ sodium plated battery with current collector foil as anode. Electrochem. Commun. 86, 157–160 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee, M. E. et al. Anode-free sodium metal batteries based on nanohybrid core–shell templates. Small 15, 1901274 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, H. et al. 3D Ag@C cloth for stable anode free sodium metal batteries. Small Methods 5, e2001050 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Seh, Z. W., Sun, J., Sun, Y. & Cui, Y. A highly reversible room-temperature sodium metal anode. ACS Cent. Sci. 1, 449–455 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, J. et al. Ethers illume sodium-based battery chemistry: uniqueness, surprise, and challenges. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1801361 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin, Z., Xia, Q., Wang, W., Li, W. & Chou, S. Recent research progresses in ether- and ester-based electrolytes for sodium-ion batteries. InfoMat 1, 376–389 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Goktas, M. et al. Stable and unstable diglyme-based electrolytes for batteries with sodium or graphite as electrode. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 32844–32855 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou, L. et al. Engineering sodium-ion solvation structure to stabilize sodium anodes: universal strategy for fast-charging and safer sodium-ion batteries. Nano Lett. 20, 3247–3254 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mazzali, F. et al. Designing a high-power sodium-ion battery by in situ metal plating. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2, 344–353 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li, W.-J. et al. Commercial prospects of existing cathode materials for sodium ion storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1700274 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu, S. et al. Porous Al current collector for dendrite-free Na metal anodes. Nano Lett. 17, 5862–5868 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li, Y., Lu, Y., Adelhelm, P., Titirici, M. –M. & Hu, Y.-S. Intercalation chemistry of graphite: alkali metal ions and beyond. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 4655–4687 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, X. et al. Dendrite-free and long-cycling sodium metal batteries enabled by sodium-ether cointercalated graphite anode. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2009778 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, S. et al. Stable sodium metal batteries via manipulation of electrolyte solvation structure. Small Methods 4, 1900856 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Le, P. M. L. et al. Excellent cycling stability of sodium anode enabled by a stable solid electrolyte interphase formed in ether-based electrolytes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2001151 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, J. et al. Fire-extinguishing organic electrolytes for safe batteries. Nat. Energy 3, 22–29 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang, L. et al. Harnessing the surface structure to enable high-performance cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 4667–4680 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fang, C. et al. Quantifying inactive lithium in lithium metal batteries. Nature 572, 511–515 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fu, L. et al. A lithium metal anode surviving battery cycling above 200 °C. Adv. Mater. 32, 2000952 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mu, L. et al. Electrochemical properties of novel O3–NaCu1/9Ni2/9Fe1/3Mn1/3O2 as cathode material for sodium-ion batteries. Energy Storage Sci. Technol. 5, 324–328 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (NSFC) of China (51725206, 52122214 and 52072403), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA21070500), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2020006) and Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (2212022).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.-S.H. conceived and designed this work; Yuqi L. prepared the materials and carried out the electrochemical measurements and calculations; Yuqi L., Q.Z. and Yu L. assembled the pouch cells and cylindrical cells. Yuqi L., S.W., F.D., J.L. and X.Z. carried out the ex situ or in situ characterizations and analysis; Yuqi L., Yaxiang L. and Y.-S.H. wrote the manuscript; all the authors participated in the discussion to improve the paper and made revisions of the whole manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yaxiang Lu or Yong-Sheng Hu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

X.W. and H.L. are employed at Tianmu Lake Institute of Advanced Energy Storage Technologies. Q.Z., X.Q. and Y.-S.H. are employed at HiNa Battery Technology Co., Ltd.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Energy thanks Naoaki Yabuuchi and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–30.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Zhou, Q., Weng, S. et al. Interfacial engineering to achieve an energy density of over 200 Wh kg−1 in sodium batteries. Nat Energy 7, 511–519 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01033-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01033-6

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing