CdTe solar cell technology is one of the lowest-cost methods of generating electricity in the solar industry, benefiting from fast CdTe absorber deposition, CdCl2 treatment and Cu doping. However, Cu doping has low photovoltage and issues with instability. Doping group V elements into CdTe is therefore a promising route to address these challenges. Although high-temperature in situ group V doped CdSeTe devices have demonstrated efficiencies exceeding 20%, they face obstacles including post-deposition doping activation processes, short carrier lifetimes and low activation ratios. Here, we demonstrate low-temperature and effective ex situ group V doping for CdSeTe solar cells using group V chlorides. For AsCl3 doped CdSeTe solar cells, the dopant activation ratio can be 5.88%, hole densities reach >2 × 1015 cm−3 and carrier lifetime is longer than 20 ns. Thus, ex situ As doped CdSeTe solar cells show open-circuit voltages ~863 mV, compared to the highest open-circuit voltage of 852 mV for Cu doped CdSeTe solar cells.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Green, M. A. et al. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 54). Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 27, 565–575 (2019).
Grover, S. et al. Characterization of arsenic doped CdTe layers and solar cells. In Proc. 2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC) 1193–1195 (IEEE, 2017).
Leading the World’s Sustainable Energy Future (First Solar, 2019); http://www.firstsolar.com/-/media/First-Solar/Documents/Corporate-Collaterals/FS_Corporate_Factsheet.ashx
Burst, J. M. et al. CdTe solar cells with open-circuit voltage breaking the 1 V barrier. Nat. Energy 1, 16015 (2016).
Metzger, W. K. et al. Exceeding 20% efficiency with in situ group V doping in polycrystalline CdTe solar cells. Nat. Energy 4, 837–845 (2019).
Fiducia, T. A. M. et al. Understanding the role of selenium in defect passivation for highly efficient selenium-alloyed cadmium telluride solar cells. Nat. Energy 4, 504–511 (2019).
McCandless, B. E. et al. Overcoming carrier concentration limits in polycrystalline CdTe thin films with in situ doping. Sci. Rep. 8, 14519 (2018).
Dzhafarov, T. D., Yesilkaya, S. S., Yilmaz Canli, N. & Caliskan, M. Diffusion and influence of Cu on properties of CdTe thin films and CdTe/CdS cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 85, 371–383 (2005).
Yang, J. H., Yin, W. J., Park, J. S., Ma, J. & Wei, S. H. Review on first-principles study of defect properties of CdTe as a solar cell absorber. Semicond. Sci. Tech. 31, 083002 (2016).
Ma, J. et al. Dependence of the minority-carrier lifetime on the stoichiometry of CdTe using time-resolved photoluminescence and first-principles calculations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 067402 (2013).
Nagaoka, A. et al. Growth and characterization of arsenic doped CdTe single crystals grown by Cd-solvent traveling-heater method. J. Cryst. Growth 467, 6–11 (2017).
Kartopu, G. et al. Study of thin film poly-crystalline CdTe solar cells presenting high acceptor concentrations achieved by in-situ arsenic doping. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 194, 259–267 (2019).
Ghandhi, S. K., Taskar, N. R. & Bhat, I. B. Arsenic-doped P-CdTe layers grown by organometallic vapor-phase epitaxy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 900–902 (1987).
Nagaoka, A., Nishioka, K., Yoshino, K., Kuciauskas, D. & Scarpulla, M. A. Arsenic doped Cd-rich CdTe: equilibrium doping limit and long lifetime for high open-circuit voltage solar cells greater than 900 mV. Appl. Phys. Express 12, 081002 (2019).
Krasikov, D. & Sankin, I. Beyond thermodynamic defect models: a kinetic simulation of arsenic activation in CdTe. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 103803 (2018).
Li, D.-B. et al. Maximize CdTe solar cell performance through copper activation engineering. Nano Energy 73, 104835 (2020).
Artegiani, E. et al. Analysis of a novel CuCl2 back contact process for improved stability in CdTe solar cells. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 27, 706–715 (2019).
Mao, D., Wickersham, C. E. & Gloeckler, M. Measurement of chlorine concentrations at CdTe grain boundaries. IEEE J. Photovolt. 4, 1655–1658 (2014).
Colegrove, E. et al. Phosphorus diffusion mechanisms and deep incorporation in polycrystalline and single-crystalline CdTe. Phys. Rev. Appl. 5, 054014 (2016).
Colegrove, E. et al. Experimental and theoretical comparison of Sb, As, and P diffusion mechanisms and doping in CdTe. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 51, 075102 (2018).
Kraft, C. et al. Phosphorus implanted cadmium telluride solar cells. Thin Solid Films 519, 7153–7155 (2011).
Romeo, N., Bosio, A. & Rosa, G. The back contact of CdTe/CdS thin film solar cells. In Proc. ISES Solar World Congress 2017 (International Solar Energy Society Selection, 2017).
Hu, S. et al. Band diagrams and performance of CdTe solar cells with a Sb2Te3 back contact buffer layer. AIP Adv. 1, 042152 (2011).
Kumar, S. G. & Rao, K. S. R. K. Physics and chemistry of CdTe/CdS thin film heterojunction photovoltaic devices: fundamental and critical aspects. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 45–102 (2014).
Huang, J. et al. Copassivation of polycrystalline CdTe absorber by CuCl thin films for CdTe solar cells. Appl. Surf. Sci. 484, 1214–1222 (2019).
Bastola, E. et al. Doping of CdTe using CuCl2 solution for highly efficient photovoltaic devices. In Proc. 2019 IEEE 46th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) 1846–1850 (IEEE, 2019).
Major, J. D., Treharne, R. E., Phillips, L. J. & Durose, K. A low-cost non-toxic post-growth activation step for CdTe solar cells. Nature 511, 334–337 (2014).
Abbas, A. et al. The effect of a post-activation annealing treatment on thin film CdTe device performance. In Proc. 2015 IEEE 42nd Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC) 1–6 (IEEE, 2015).
Montgomery, A. et al. Solution-processed copper (I) thiocyanate (CuSCN) for highly efficient CdSe/CdTe thin-film solar cells. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 27, 665–672 (2019).
Fiducia, T. et al. 3D distributions of chlorine and sulphur impurities in a thin-film cadmium telluride solar cell. MRS Adv. 3, 3287–3292 (2018).
Akis, R. et al. Extracting Cu diffusion parameters in polycrystalline CdTe. In Proc. 2014 IEEE 40th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC) 3276–3281 (IEEE, 2014).
Colegrove, E. et al. Antimony diffusion in CdTe. IEEE J. Photovolt. 7, 870–873 (2017).
Flores, M. A., Orellana, W. & Menéndez-Proupin, E. Self-compensation in phosphorus-doped CdTe. Phys. Rev. B 96, 134115 (2017).
Barrioz, V. et al. Highly arsenic doped CdTe layers for the back contacts of CdTe solar cells. MRS Proc. 1012, 1208 (2007).
Murria, P. et al. Speciation of CuCl and CuCl2 thiol-amine solutions and characterization of resulting films: implications for semiconductor device fabrication. Inorg. Chem. 56, 14396–14407 (2017).
Molva, E., Saminadayar, K., Pautrat, J. L. & Ligeon, E. Photoluminescence studies in N, P, As implanted cadmium telluride. Solid State Commun. 48, 955–960 (1983).
Yun, J. H., Kim, K. H., Lee, D. Y. & Ahn, B. T. Back contact formation using Cu2Te as a Cu-doping source and as an electrode in CdTe solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 75, 203–210 (2003).
Li, C. et al. Grain-boundary-enhanced carrier collection in CdTe solar cells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 156103 (2014).
Ablekim, T. et al. Self-compensation in arsenic doping of CdTe. Sci. Rep. 7, 4563 (2017).
Guo, J. L. et al. Effect of selenium and chlorine co-passivation in polycrystalline CdSeTe devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 115, 153901 (2019).
Poplawsky, J. D. et al. Structural and compositional dependence of the CdTexSe1−x alloy layer photoactivity in CdTe-based solar cells. Nat. Commun. 7, 12537 (2016).
Grecu, D. & Compaan, A. D. Photoluminescence study of Cu diffusion and electromigration in CdTe. Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 361–363 (1999).
Corwine, C. R., Pudov, A. O., Gloeckler, M., Demtsu, S. H. & Sites, J. R. Copper inclusion and migration from the back contact in CdTe solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 82, 481–489 (2004).
Dobson, K. D., Visoly-Fisher, I., Hodes, G. & Cahen, D. Stability of CdTe/CdS thin-film solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 62, 295–325 (2000).
Awni, R. A. et al. The effects of hydrogen iodide back surface treatment on CdTe solar cells. Sol. RRL 3, 1800304 (2019).
Awni, R. A. et al. Influences of buffer material and fabrication atmosphere on the electrical properties of CdTe solar cells. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 27, 1115–1123 (2019).
Perrenoud, J. et al. A comprehensive picture of Cu doping in CdTe solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 114, 174505 (2013).
Wei, S.-H. & Zhang, S. B. Chemical trends of defect formation and doping limit in II-VI semiconductors: the case of CdTe. Phys. Rev. B 66, 155211 (2002).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
Hutter, J., Iannuzzi, M., Schiffmann, F. & VandeVondele, J. cp2k: atomistic simulations of condensed matter systems. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 4, 15–25 (2014).
VandeVondele, J. & Hutter, J. Gaussian basis sets for accurate calculations on molecular systems in gas and condensed phases. J. Chem. Phys. 127, 114105 (2007).
Li, D.-B. et al. Eliminating S-kink to maximize the performance of MgZnO/CdTe solar cells. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2, 2896–2903 (2019).
S.N.V., L.L. and F.Y. acknowledge funding from the National Science Foundation under contracts no. 1944374 and 2019473, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Alabama EPSCoR International Space Station Flight Opportunity Program (contract no. 80NSSC20M0141) and the US Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) under the Solar Energy Technologies Office (SETO) Agreement DE-EE0009368. D.-B.L., C.Y., R.A.A., K.K.S., R.J.E. and Y.Y. acknowledge funding from the Air Force Research Laboratory, Space Vehicles Directorate (contract no. FA9453-18-2-0037), the National Science Foundation under contract no. 1711534 and the US Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) under Solar Energy Technologies Office (SETO) Agreement DE-EE0008974. We thank D. Strickler from Pilkington North America Inc. for supplying us with the FTO coated substrates.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Energy thanks Gang Xiong and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Figs. 1–16, Tables 1–4 and references.
Supplementary Fig 1. DFT calculation for the diffusion barrier of interstitial Cd and As in CdTe. Supplementary Fig. 3. As linear profile. Supplementary Fig. 7. Statistical Source Data. Supplementary Fig. 10. J–V curves under AM1.5 illumination and in the dark for CdSeTe solar cells without any intentional doping. Supplementary Fig. 12. Light soaking test of the Cu and As doped CdTe solar cells at 85 °C under 1 sun. Supplementary Fig. 14. The C–V determined carrier concentration for the group V chlorides doped CdSeTe solar cells. Supplementary Fig. 15. Temperature-dependent capacitance–frequency measurement for the group V doped CdSeTe measured at temperatures from 150 to 310 K with a step size of 10 K to determine the defect states and back-barrier heights. Supplementary Fig. 16. The Arrhenius plots used to calculate the back-barriers.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, DB., Yao, C., Vijayaraghavan, S.N. et al. Low-temperature and effective ex situ group V doping for efficient polycrystalline CdSeTe solar cells. Nat Energy 6, 715–722 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00848-z
Nature Energy (2021)