Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Ionic screening in perovskite p–n homojunctions

The Original Article was published on 04 February 2019

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Simulated perovskite p–n junction solar cell with and without mobile ions.

Data availability

The data presented in this work can be obtained using our open source device simulation code available at https://github.com/barnesgroupICL/Driftfusion/tree/Homojunction-Nature-Energy. After installation of Driftfusion, a complete dataset and set of plots can be obtained by running the command ‘homojunction_script’.

References

  1. 1.

    Cui, P. et al. Planar p–n homojunction perovskite solar cells with efficiency exceeding 21.3%. Nat. Energy 4, 150–159 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Walsh, A., Scanlon, D. O., Chen, S., Gong, X. G. & Wei, S.-H. Self-regulation mechanism for charged point defects in hybrid halide perovskites. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 1791–1794 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Xiao, Z. et al. Giant switchable photovoltaic effect in organometal trihalide perovskite devices. Nat. Mater. 14, 193–198 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Eames, C. et al. Ionic transport in hybrid lead iodide perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. 6, 7497 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Yang, T.-Y., Gregori, G., Pellet, N., Grätzel, M. & Maier, J. The significance of ion conduction in a hybrid organic–inorganic lead-iodide-based perovskite photosensitizer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 127, 8016–8021 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Leijtens, T. et al. Mapping electric field-induced switchable poling and structural degradation in hybrid lead halide perovskite thin films. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1500962 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Emara, J. et al. Impact of film stoichiometry on the ionization energy and electronic structure of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskites. Adv. Mater. 28, 553–559 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Shi, J. et al. Intrinsic slow charge response in the perovskite solar cells: electron and ion transport. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 163901 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Calado, P. et al. Evidence for ion migration in hybrid perovskite solar cells with minimal hysteresis. Nat. Commun. 7, 13831 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Calado, P., Barnes, P. R. F., Gelmetti, I., Azzouzi, M. & Hilton, B. Driftfusion (2017); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3670155

  11. 11.

    Moia, D. et al. Ionic-to-electronic current amplification in hybrid perovskite solar cells: ionically gated transistor-interface circuit model explains hysteresis and impedance of mixed conducting devices. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 1296–1308 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yang, W. S. et al. Iodide management in formamidinium-lead-halide-based perovskite layers for efficient solar cells. Science 356, 1376–1379 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Jiang, Q. et al. Planar-structure perovskite solar cells with efficiency beyond 21%. Adv. Mater. 29, 1703852 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Son, D. Y. et al. Self-formed grain boundary healing layer for highly efficient CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells. Nat. Energy 1, 1–8 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Calado, P. et al. Driftfusion: an open source code for simulating ordered semiconductor devices with mixed ionic-electronic conducting materials in one dimension. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.04384 (2020).

  16. 16.

    Calado, P. et al. Identifying dominant recombination mechanisms in perovskite solar cells by measuring the transient ideality factor. Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 044005 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Shockley, W. & Queisser, H. J. Detailed balance limit of efficiency of p–n junction solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 510–519 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Leguy, A. M. A. et al. Experimental and theoretical optical properties of methylammonium lead halide perovskites. Nanoscale 8, 6317–6327 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for EPSRC funding from grants EP/M025020/1, EP/R020574/1, EP/R023581/1, EP/T028513/1 and EP/S000763/1.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P.C. and P.R.F.B. contributed equally to the content and analysis of the work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Philip Calado or Piers R. F. Barnes.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–6 and Tables 1 and 2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Calado, P., Barnes, P.R.F. Ionic screening in perovskite p–n homojunctions. Nat Energy 6, 589–591 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00838-1

Download citation

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing