Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition

Nature Energy volume 5, pages 569–577 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The transition to lower-carbon sources of energy will inevitably produce and, in many cases, perpetuate pre-existing sets of winners and losers. The winners are those that will benefit from cleaner sources of energy, reduced emissions from the removal of fossil fuels, and the employment and innovation opportunities that accompany this transition. The losers are those that will bear the burdens, or lack access to the opportunities. Here we review the current state of understanding—based on a rapidly growing body of academic and policy literature—about the potential adverse consequences of the energy transition for specific communities and socio-economic groups on the frontlines of the transition. We review evidence about just transition policies and programmes, primarily from cases in the Global North, and draw conclusions about what insights are still needed to understand the justice and equity dimensions of the transition, and to ensure that no one is left behind.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (WMO, 2018).

  2. Newell, R. G. & Raimi, D. The New Climate Math: Energy Addition, Subtraction, and Transition. Issue Brief 18–09 (Resources for the Future, 2018).

  3. Fouquet, R. Historical energy transitions: speed, prices and system transformation. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 22, 7–12 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sovacool, B. K. How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 13, 202–215 (2016). Reviews the academic literature on the time scale of the current energy transition.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smil, V. Examining energy transitions: A dozen insights based on performance. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 22, 194–197 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Allen, R. C. Backward into the future: The shift to coal and implications for the next energy transition. Energy Policy 50, 17–23 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mackard, J. The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy. Nat. Energy 3, 628–633 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jenkins, K. Setting energy justice apart from the crowd: Lessons from environmental and climate justice. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 39, 117–21 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fuller, S. & McCauley, D. Framing energy justice: Perspectives from activism and advocacy. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 11, 1–8 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bazilian, M., Nakhooda, S. & Van de Graaf, T. Energy governance and poverty. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 1, 217–25 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Middlemiss, L. & Gillard, R. Fuel poverty from the bottom-up: Characterizing household energy vulnerability through the lived experience of the fuel poor. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 6, 146–54 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jenkins, K., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H. & Rehner, R. Energy Justice: A Conceptual Review. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 11, 174–82 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  13. McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H. & Jenkins, K. Advancing energy justice: The triumvirate of tenets. Int. Energy Law Rev. 32, 107–110 (2013). Provides a conceptual framework for energy justice and defines the three tenets of the concept.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sovacool, B. K. & Dworkin, M. H. Energy justice: Conceptual insights and practical applications. Appl. Energy 142, 435–444 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jones, B. R., Sovacool, B. K. & Sidortsov, R. V. Making the ethical and philosophical case for “energy justice”. Environ. Ethics 37, 145–68 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Heffron, R. J. & McCauley, D. The concept of energy justice across the disciplines. Energy Policy 105, 658–667 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sovacool, B. K., Heffron, R. J., McCauley, D. & Goldthau, A. Energy decisions reframed as justice and ethical concerns. Nat. Energy 1, 1–6 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sovacool, B. K., Burke, M., Baker, L., Kotikalapudi, C. & Wlokas, H. New frontiers and conceptual frameworks for energy justice. Energy Policy 105, 677–691 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Healy, N. & Barry, J. Politicizing energy justice and energy system transitions: Fossil fuel divestment and a “just transition”. Energy Policy 108, 451–459 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oppenheim, J. The United States regulatory compact and energy poverty. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 18, 96–108 (2016). Evaluates the origins and intentions of utility regulation, and then proposes measures that could improve the degree to which such regulations advance social justice.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Banzhaf, S., Ma, L. & Timmins, C. Environmental justice: The economics of race, place, and pollution. J. Econ. Perspect. 33, 185–208 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Welton, S., Eisen, J. Clean energy justice: Charting an emerging agenda. Harvard Environmental Law Review (2019). This law article provides a comprehensive discussion of the energy justice dimensions of clean energy developments.

  23. Mills, S., Bessette, D. & Smith, H. Exploring landowners’ post-construction changes in perceptions of wind energy in Michigan. Land Use Policy 82, 754–762 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Outka, U. Environmental justice issues in sustainable development: Environmental justice in the renewable energy transition. J. Environ. Sustain. Law 19, 60–122 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jolley, G. J., Khalaf, C., Michaud, G. & Sandler, A. M. The economic, fiscal, and workforce impacts of coal-fired power plant closures in Appalachian Ohio. Reg. Sci. Policy Pract. 11, 403–422 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pai, S., Zerriffi, H., Jewell, J. & Pathak, J. Solar has greater techno-economic resource suitability than wind for replacing coal mining jobs. Environ. Res. Lett. 10.1088/1748–9326/ab6c6d (2020).

  27. Carley, S., Evans, T. P. & Konisky, D. M. Adaptation, culture, and the energy transition in American coal country. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 37, 133–139 (2018). This article assesses how the energy transition is affecting American coal country.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cameron, L. & van der Zwaan, B. Employment factors for wind and solar energy technologies: A literature review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 45, 160–172 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Clean Jobs America (E2, 2019); https://www.e2.org/reports/clean-jobs-america-2019/

  30. Outlook handbook: fastest growing occupations. US Bureau of Labor Statistics https://www.bls.gov/ooh/fastest-growing.htm (2019).

  31. Pollin, R. & Callaci, B. The economics of just transition: A framework for supporting fossil fuel-dependent workers and communities in the United States. Labor Stud. J. 44, 93–138 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lobao, M., Zhou, M., Partridge, M. & Betz, M. Poverty, place, and coal employment across Appalachia and the United States in a new economic era. Rural Sociol. 81, 343–386 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tierney, S. The U.S. Coal Industry: Challenging Transitions in the 21st Century (Analysis Group, 2016)

  34. Della Bosca, H. & Gillespie, J. The coal story: Generational coal mining communities and strategies of energy transition in Australia. Energy Policy 120, 734–740 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Burke, P. J., Best, R. & Jotzo, F. Closures of coal-fired power stations in Australia: local unemployment effects. Agric. Resour. Econ. 63, 142–165 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Haggerty, J. H., Haggerty, M. N., Roemer, K. & Rose, J. Planning for the local impacts of coal facility closure: Emerging strategies in the U. S. West. Resour. Policy 57, 69–80 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Morris, A., Kaufman, N. & Doshi, S. The risk of fiscal collapse in coal reliant communities. The Brookings Institution https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-risk-of-fiscal-collapse-in-coal-reliant-communities (2019).

  38. Olson-Hazboun, S. K. “Why are we being punished and they are being rewarded?” views on renewable energy in fossil fuels-based communities of the U. S. west. Extr. Ind. Soc. 5, 366–374 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Drehobl, A. & Ross, L. Lifting the high energy burden in America’s largest cities: How energy efficiency can improve low income and underserved communities (American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, 2016); https://www.aceee.org/sites/default/files/publications/researchreports/u1602.pdfDetailed analysis of energy insecurity in American cities.

  40. Ross, L., Drehobl, A. & Stickles, B. The High Cost of Energy in Rural America: Household Energy Burdens and Opportunities for Energy Efficiency (American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, 2018); https://aceee.org/research-report/u1806. Detailed analysis of energy insecurity in rural America.

  41. One in three U. S. households face challenges in paying energy bills in 2015. Residential Energy Consumption Survey. U.S. Energy Information Administration https://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/reports/2015/energybills (2015).

  42. O’Sullivan, K., Barnard, L. T., Viggers, H. & Howden-Chapman, P. Child and youth fuel poverty: Assessing the known and unknown. People Place Policy 10, 77–87 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Papada, L. & Kaliampakos, D. Measuring energy poverty in Greece. Energy Policy 94, 157–165 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hernández, D. Sacrifice along the energy continuum: a call for energy justice. Environ. Justice 8(4), 151–156 (2015). This article evaluates how vulnerable communities bear disproportionate burdens along the spectrum that includes both energy production and consumption.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hernández, D. & Siegel, E. Energy insecurity and its ill health effects: A community perspective in New York City. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 47, 78–83 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Reames, T. G. Targeting energy justice: Exploring spatial, racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in urban residential heating energy efficiency. Energy Policy 97, 549–558 (2016). Maps rates of fuel poverty along racial/ethnic and socioeconomic block group characteristics, and finds that lower-income and racial- and ethnic-headed households, respectively, have higher rates of fuel poverty.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hernández, D. & Phillips, D. Benefit or burden? Perceptions of energy efficiency efforts among low-income housing residents in New York City. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 8, 52–59 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Graff, M., Carley, S. & Konisky, D. Stakeholder perceptions of the United States energy transition: Local-level dynamics and community responses to national politics and policy. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 43, 144–157 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Carley, S., Evans, T. P., Graff, M. & Konisky, D. M. A framework for evaluating geographic disparities in energy transition vulnerability. Nat. Energy 3, 621–627 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hernández, D. & Bird, S. Energy burden and the need for integrated low-income housing and energy policy. Poverty Public Policy 2, 5–25 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Bickerstaff, K., Walker, G. & Bulkeley, H. (eds.) Energy Justice in a Changing Climate (Zed Books,).

  52. Byrne, J. & Portanger, C. Climate change, energy policy and justice: A systematic review. Anal. Krit. 2, 315–343 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Moore, T., Ridley, I., Strengers, Y., Maller, C. & Horne, R. Dwelling performance and adaptive summer comfort in low-income Australian households. Build. Res. Inf. 45, 443–456 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Passey, R., Watt, M., Bruce, A. & MacGill, I. Who pays, who benefits? The financial impacts of solar photovoltaic systems and air-conditioners on Australian households. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 39, 198–215 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Lehr, U., Lutz, C. & Edler, D. Green jobs? Economic impacts of renewable energy in Germany. Energy Policy 47, 358–364 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wei, M., Patadia, S. & Kammen, D. M. Putting renewables and energy efficiency to work: How many jobs can the clean energy industry generate in the US? Energy Policy 38, 919–931 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Renewable energy and jobs – Annual Review 2018 (International Renewable Energy Agency, 2018).

  58. Occupational Outlook Handbook. Fastest Growing Occupations. US Bureau of Labor Statistics https://www.bls.gov/ooh/fastest-growing.htm (2019).

  59. National Solar Jobs Census 2018 (Solar Foundation, 2018).

  60. PESA Diversity Study Identifies Opportunities to Advance Women in the Workplace. Petroleum Equipment & Services Association https://pesa.org/archives/pesa-diversity-study-identifies-opportunities-to-advance-women-in-the-workplace (2018).

  61. U.S. Energy and Employment Report (US Department of Energy, 2017).

  62. Gender and Energy (European Institute for Gender Equality, 2017); https://eige.europa.eu/publications/gender-and-energy

  63. Pearl-Martinez, R. & Stephens, J. C. Toward a gender diverse workforce in the renewable energy transition. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 12, 8–15 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Walker, C. & Baxter, J. Procedural justice in Canadian wind energy development: A comparison of community-based and technocratic siting processes. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 29, 160–169 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Zarate-Toledo, E., Patino, R. & Fraga, J. Justice, social inclusion and indigenous opposition: A case study of wind energy development on the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, Mexico. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 54, 1–11 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Baker, S. H. Mexican energy reform, climate change, and energy justice in indigenous communities. Nat. Resour. J. 56, 369–390 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Daley, D. M. & Reames, T. G. in Failed Promises: Evaluating the Federal Government's Response to Environmental Justice Ch. 6 (MIT Press, 2015).

  68. Borenstein, S. & Davis, L. W. The distributional effects of U. S. clean energy tax credits. Tax. Policy Econ. 30, 191–234 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Mullen, C. & Marsden, G. Mobility justice in low carbon energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 18, 109–117 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Mitra, S. & Buluswar, S. Universal access to electricity: Closing the affordability gap. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 40, 261–283 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Sunter, D., Castellanos, S. & Kammen, D. M. Disparities in rooftop photovoltaics deployment in the United States by race and ethnicity. Nat. Sustain. 2, 71–76 (2019). Study evaluates the racial and ethnic disparities in rooftop solar development.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Chan, G., Evans, I., Grimley, M., Ihde, B. & Mazumder, P. Design choices and equity implications of community shared solar. Electr. J. 30, 37–41 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Balta-Ozkan, N., Davidson, R., Bicket, M. & Whitmarsh, L. Social barriers to the adoption of smart homes. Energy Policy 63, 363–374 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Wada, K., Akimoto, K., Sano, F., Oda, J. & Homma, T. Energy efficiency opportunities in the residential sector and their feasibility. Energy 48, 5–10 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Reames, T. G., Reiner, M. A. & Stacey, M. B. An incandescent truth: Disparities in energy-efficient lighting availability and prices in an urban U. S. county. Appl. Energy 218, 95–103 (2018). Studies distributional disparities in access to and price of energy efficient light bulbs.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Bednar, D. J. & Reames, T. G. Recognition of and response to energy poverty in the United States. Nat. Energy. 10.1038/s41560-020-0582–0 (2020).

  77. Carley, S., Engle, C., Konisky, D. & Sullivan, S. Supporting vulnerable communities in a Green New Deal. Public Administration Review https://www.publicadministrationreview.com/2019/07/16/gnd17 (2020).

  78. Zinecker, A. et al. Real People, Real Change: Strategies for Just Energy Transitions (IISD, 2017); https://iisd.org/library/real-people-real-change-strategies-just-energy-transitions

  79. Harrahill, K. & Douglas, O. Framework development for ‘just transition’ in coal producing jurisdictions. Energy Policy 134, 1–11 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Franklin, M., Kurtz, C. Lights outs in the cold: Reforming utility shut-off policies as if human rights matter. (NAACP, 2017).

  81. Cook, J. K. & Bird, L. Unlocking Solar For Low- And Moderate-Income Residents: A Matrix of Financing Options By Resident, Provider, And Housing Type Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-70477 (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2018).

  82. Bomberg, E. & McEwen, N. Mobilizing community energy. Energy Policy 51, 435–444 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Jenkins, K., McCauley, D. & Forman, A. Energy justice: A policy approach. Energy Policy 105, 631–34 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Reames, T. G. A community-based approach to low-income residential energy efficiency participation barriers. Local Environ. 21, 1449–1466 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Tonn, B. et al. Weatherization Works – Summary of Findings from The Retrospective Evaluation of The U. S. Department of Energy’s Weatherization Assistance Program Report ORNL/TM-2014/338 (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2014).

  86. Tonn, B., Rose, E. & Hawkins, B. Evaluation of the U. S. department of energy’s weatherization assistance program: Impact results. Energy Policy 118, 279–290 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Graff, M. & Pirog, M. Red tape is not so hot: Asset tests impact participation in the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program. Energy Policy 129, 749–764 (2019). Evaluates how the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program’s asset test is regressive.

  88. Murray, A. G. & Mills, B. F. The impact of low-income home energy assistance program participation on household energy insecurity. Contemp. Econ. Policy 32, 811–825 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Chapman, R., Howden-Chapman, P., Viggers, H., O’Dea, D. & Kennedy, M. Retrofitting houses with insulation: a cost-benefit analysis of a randomized community trial. J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health 63, 271–277 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Howden-Chapman, P. & Chapman, R. Health co-benefits from housing-related policies. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 4, 414–419 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Perl, L. LIHEAP: Program and funding Report PL31865 (Congressional Research Service, 2018); https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL31865.pdf

  92. Lamb, A. K. Energy Efficiency and Health: A Guide for Public Health and Health Care Professionals (Public Health Institute, 2019); http://www.phi.org/resources/?resource=energy-efficiency-and-health-a-guide-for-public-health-and-health-care-professionals

  93. Nowak, S., Kushler, M. & Witte, P. The New Leaders of the Pack: Aceee’s Fourth National Review of Exemplary Energy Efficiency Programs (American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, 2019); https://www.aceee.org/research-report/u1901

  94. Gilleo, A., Nowak, S. & Drehobl, A. Making a Difference: Strategies for Successful Low-Income Energy Efficiency Programs Report U1713 (American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, 2017); http://www.aceee.org/sites/default/files/publications/researchreports/u1713.pdf

  95. Sartor, O. Implementing Coal Transitions: Insights from Case Studies of Major Coal-Consuming Economies (IDDRI, Climate Strategies, 2018).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by the Environmental Resilience Institute, funded by Indiana University’s Prepared for Environmental Change Grand Challenge initiative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Paul H. O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA

    Sanya Carley & David M. Konisky

Authors
  1. Sanya Carley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David M. Konisky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanya Carley.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carley, S., Konisky, D.M. The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition. Nat Energy 5, 569–577 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0641-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0641-6

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene